Re: [opensuse] OT: Reply-To or not Reply-To (was Re: Sources, revisited)
Hi, On Monday, August 14, 2006 at 20:26:53, Tilman Vogel wrote: > On the other hand: What's the main advantage of _not_ having Reply-To? I would say that you dont restrict people on using reply-to. There is only one reply-to possible in a mail and if the list sets it, you cant. Henne -- Henne Vogelsang, http://hennevogel.de "To die. In the rain. Alone." Ernest Hemingway - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] OT: Reply-To or not Reply-To (was Re: Sources, revisited)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernhard Walle schrieb: > Get the lastest Thunderbird RPMs from > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/mozilla/experimental/10.1 and install > the extension at > http://open.nit.ca/wiki/index.php?page=ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension&7. > > See also http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.suse.opensuse.devel/3416. Thanks for the hints, I'll look at it. Good to know also for all the other lists who drive on the wrong side of the road ;-) On the other hand: What's the main advantage of _not_ having Reply-To? Never understood it... With it, I guess, every MUA would do, without, now I need to install an extension for Thunderbird and do i-dont-know-what for other MUAs... Tilman -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE4MBt9ZPu6Yae8lkRApsoAJ9ghOxzRw4y1PgTsv9g1nWGW9KdTwCfSerm gx/1o7cyW6mKV8kXqwot5oE= =UFi2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
