[opensuse-factory] [Bug 169636] eth devices renamed

2006-06-27 Thread Hans Witvliet
Hi,

Doing some more regression tests, I was looking at some old problems.
What is the purpose of this feature? I mean why should the kernel decide
to start renaming eth-devices in the first place?

I mean, if you have three (pseudo) ethernet devices, all with UNIQUE-mac
address, on what ground is the kernel doing such drastic action...

Hans


Apr 21 16:02:42 ldap1 kernel: eth0 renamed to eth9
Apr 21 16:02:42 ldap1 kernel: eth1 renamed to eth10
Apr 21 16:02:42 ldap1 kernel: eth2 renamed to eth11

-- 
pgp-id: 926EBB12
pgp-fingerprint: BE97 1CBF FAC4 236C 4A73  F76E EDFC D032 926E BB12
Registered linux user: 75761 (http://counter.li.org)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Package Management Design and Experience

2006-06-27 Thread houghi
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:41:50PM +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
  kdebase3-SuSE could be changed to use createrepo
  instead of genIS_PLAINcache and the installation_sources replacement.
  
  Ideally, the installation_sources replacement would be called
  installation_sources and support the same commandline syntax as the old
  installation_sources.
 
 Was the old tool and its options sufficiently useful ? How do they compare
 to e.g. rug or smart ?

It was usefull. `installation_sources -a ftp://example.com/URL`

Perhaps it is that the current chain of command is not clear. There is
zen, there is lybzypp, there is rug, there is yast.

And I can imagine that it is confusing what to use when.
http://en.opensuse.org/Zmd clears a bit things up, but it is not as clear
as it used to be.

Perhaps somebody with knowledge (e.g. not me) could make a re-write of
http://en.opensuse.org/Examples_using_rug and change it into
http://en.opensuse.org/Rug or make a generic Rug page that points towards
the examples. Something that is more beginner friendly then a manpage.

The fact that `rug st` does not say anything about YaST installation
sources does not make things easier.

A proper GUI for rug would be nice. If that could be YaST, that would be
great. And I mean a single point of contact, not seperate programs, like
zen-installer, -updater and -remover.
-- 
houghi  Please to not toppost   http://houghi.org
  My experience with SUSE
You can have my keyboard ...
  if you can pry it from my dead, cold, stiff fingers

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] FSH: mysql tftp

2006-06-27 Thread houghi
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 11:18:28PM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
 OTOH, what's the default directory being set by MySQL builds ?
 At first glance, /srv/mysql would make sense, but if SUSE Linux is the
 only distribution on the planet that uses /srv/mysql and all the others
 use /var/lib/mysql (and so do the mysql.com builds), then I'm not sure
 it would be such a good idea...

Would a symlink from /var/lib/mysql to /srv/mysql work? Or would there be
issues with some things not working, because it is a symlink?

-- 
houghi  Please to not toppost   http://houghi.org
  My experience with SUSE
You can have my keyboard ...
  if you can pry it from my dead, cold, stiff fingers

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] FSH: mysql tftp

2006-06-27 Thread Andreas Hanke
Hi,

houghi schrieb:
 Would a symlink from /var/lib/mysql to /srv/mysql work? Or would there be
 issues with some things not working, because it is a symlink?

IMHO compatibility symlinks are ugly and should be avoided where possible.

Changing the working directory of software packages is a very difficult
thing. It has the potential to upset quite a lot of users. What some of
you might possibly know that there are many rumours out there that SUSE
uses different directory layouts than the rest of the world and moves
config files and working directories around all the time. This is
really one of the typical things that non-SUSE users frequently say
about SUSE.

With that in mind, I propose that nothing is changed unless the current
solution really *violates* the FHS, which I doubt. Moving things around
just because the new solution would comply a little bit better should be
avoided if the current solution is also compliant.

Andreas Hanke

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]