Re: [opensuse-factory] Media for openSUSE 10.2

2006-10-22 Thread Alexey Eremenko

I like it very much to see more packages on the CDs/DVD. (7 CDs vs
5CDs for 10.0)
I like this decision.

I would really like to see an optional second DVD that has all the
rest packages from the FTP tree (otherwise I will download the tree
anyways).

In real world, it is much faster to spend a day or two to download
everything and then just spend few seconds installing rare stuff from
the second DVD. (instead of minutes for installing from FTP)

Debians practises Dual DVDs since 3.1, I think as their official thingie.

Another topic:

Linspire have proprietary codecs on their Freespire distro. So, I
assume distributing those is legal... Can we include those codecs on
our closed-source CD ?

Andreas Jaeger: keep up the good work !

-Fenix*NBK*. 22.10.2006.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Repository consistency checklist

2006-10-22 Thread Andreas Jaeger

Hi Andreas,

Andreas Hanke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This is a short specification of requirements for a consistent repository.

 (1) All requirements of binary packages must be provided by a binary
 package.

 (2) All build-requirements of source packages must be provided by a
 binary package.

 (3) The SOURCERPM tag of every binary package must exactly match an
 existing source package.

 (4) All packages which are provided for more than one architecture
 should be provided with the same version and release numbers on all
 architectures.

 (5) No package may obsolete another package that still exists in the
 distribution. Only packages which are no longer part of the distribution
 may be obsoleted.

 (6) No file in the distribution may be provided by more than one package
 unless all its providers are marked as conflicting.

 (7) No package may replace something that existed as a directory in at
 least the direct predecessor of the currently prepared distribution with
 a file or a symlink or vice versa unless the rpm breakage caused by this
 is worked around with %pre scriptlets or similar.

 (8) Packages that provide the same thing can indicate bugs, and fool the
 package manager into installing the wrong package. There are cases where
 providing the same thing in multiple packages makes sense (example:
 alternative backends for multimedia players), but the tree should be
 investigated for cases where this does not make any sense and can be
 dangerous (example: private copies of libraries which also exist as a
 public library).

 (1), (2), (3) and (4) can probably only be verified shortly before the
 release. Or, checking this now would not make much sense as long as the
 tree is still in flux.

 (5), (6), (7) and (8), however, are things that can be tested at any
 time. The Beta period which will start very soon is very well suited to
 squeeze all such issues out.

 Ideally, as much of this as possible would be automated, and done in a
 similar way as a typical testsuite for software packages. I think that
 (5) and (6) can be completely automated, while (7) and (8) can be
 identified automatically, but would still need to be looked at manually
 for evaluation.


 Opinions?

We do a lot of this on a daily basis - and during each release - in
our build system.  Rudi, what do you think?  Is there anything that we
miss?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


pgpTNJAmCLKgW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Media for openSUSE 10.2

2006-10-22 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Alexey Eremenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I like it very much to see more packages on the CDs/DVD. (7 CDs vs
 5CDs for 10.0)
 I like this decision.

 I would really like to see an optional second DVD that has all the
 rest packages from the FTP tree (otherwise I will download the tree
 anyways).

 In real world, it is much faster to spend a day or two to download
 everything and then just spend few seconds installing rare stuff from
 the second DVD. (instead of minutes for installing from FTP)

Ah - different use case than most others do ;-)

 Debians practises Dual DVDs since 3.1, I think as their official thingie.

 Another topic:

 Linspire have proprietary codecs on their Freespire distro. So, I
 assume distributing those is legal... Can we include those codecs on
 our closed-source CD ?

We can only include those that we have contracts for.

 Andreas Jaeger: keep up the good work !

Thanks - but it's not only me ;-)
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


pgpTyLcFIrp6g.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] YAST2 printer module crashing

2006-10-22 Thread Alex
  Trying to re-enable my printer, a HP device usually managed by hplip but
  currently not working, I noticed that the printer module of YAST2 is
  crashing while rebuilding the printer database:
  linux:~ # yast2 printer
  /sbin/yast2: line 267: 30827 Abgebrochen $ybindir/y2base
  $module $@ $SELECTED_GUI $Y2_GEOMETRY $Y2QT_ARGS
  The ncurses interface is crashing at this point, too.
  (yast2-printer-2.14.3-1)
 Please file a bug in bugzilla,

Today's my day for bug reports ;) - #214265

Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Media for openSUSE 10.2 - additional sources

2006-10-22 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 11:01:22AM +0200, Jozef Peterka wrote:
 Hi all,
 maybe I am offtopic, but I think openSuSE could learn something from
 Ubuntu. I think that openSuSE should have had extra install sources
 installed by default ( like Packmann, Guru etc.), and Admin should
 just enable them, read some obligate message about violating law and
 that these sources are community maintained and blah blah ;)

We cannot even offer law violating options. And not even textfiles describing
them.

 I think THIS could attract more users to openSuSE, that the additionall
 codecs are accessible for them, and that it's their decission to use
 them or not.
 Just my opinion. Again I am sorry, If I am off or this idea was
 discussed before...

It has been discussed.

10.2, if you installed the last betas, has the option of adding additional 
installation sources during install. Repackagers can easily modify this choice
I think.

Ciao, Marcus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Media for openSUSE 10.2

2006-10-22 Thread Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


The Saturday 2006-10-21 at 15:23 +0200, Andreas Hanke wrote:

 Carlos E. R. schrieb:
  1) ¿Where will go what on 10.1 when to the non-oss tree 
 (non-oss-inst-source)? ¿For instance, where will go the package for 
 Pine? Maybe this has been discussed previously :-?
 
 Have a look at /suse/install/10.2/inst-source-extra on any ftp.suse.com
 mirror. ;-) 

And in the CDs, which one? Not in the binaries-only one, probably not in 
the OSS one. Then, nowhere except ftp? 

   Perhaps it wouldn't be a bad idea to publish somewhere the full listing 
   of CDs, DVDs, FTP, etc O:-)

 (Yes, pine is there, because it is distributed with source
 code, but not under a real OSS license.)

I know, as in 10.1. No problem with that :-)

But I hope the tree names, contents of each thing, etc, would be more 
stable, I have to re-learn on every release :-P

 
  2) ¿Is it possible, at install time from DVD, to add an FTP source for 
 whatever is not in the DVD? ¿Or a local directory?
 
 This is already possible via the Add-On Product dialog displayed at the
 very beginning of the system installation, before the package
 installation starts (hopefully working without aborting the entire
 installation in 10.2).

Magnific! I hadn't noticed previously that possibility. It will come very 
handy, if it works :-)

- -- 
Cheers,
   Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFFO4cutTMYHG2NR9URAnQXAJ93sXkyb+yDqdmwgbzE2NXjnu9HKACgl2kP
HYRCWT6ZCoHBmzf9+10/lfI=
=YB7V
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


[opensuse-factory] Intel Pro BG 2200 wireless configuration in 10.1.1 alpha1

2006-10-22 Thread Digvijoy Chatterjee
Hi,I am running SUSE Linux 10.1.1 (i586) Alpha2, i compiled my own kernel ,uname -aLinux 3(NXDOMAIN) 2.6.18-default #1 Sun Oct 8 00:19:32 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/LinuxI am trying to get my wireless card to work in Suse, which is an Intel 2200BG
lspci | grep 220001:05.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection (rev 05)I had to download the firmware from 
http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/firmware.php?fid=7 and copied it to /lib/firmware and loaded the module modprobe ipw2200, the module loaded without any errors , and then I ran iwconfig likeiwconfig eth1 essid Network_620 key DB19ABDEFE33
when i ran iwconfig eth1Warning: Driver for device eth1 has been compiled with version 20of Wireless Extension, while this program supports up to version 19.Some things may be broken...
eth1 unassociated ESSID:Network_620 Mode:Managed Channel=0 Access Point: Not-Associated Bit Rate:0 kb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm Sensitivity=8/0 Retry limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
 Encryption key:DB19-225F- Security mode:open Power Management:off Link Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0 Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
 Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0when i run dhclient eth1 , my wireless card is not able to get a DHCP address from my ISP is something wrong ??How do i configure the wireless card for this new kernel with the iwconfig which comes with this suse Version??
ThanksDigz


Re: [opensuse-factory] Media for openSUSE 10.2 - additional sources

2006-10-22 Thread Pascal Bleser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
 Ubuntu. I think that openSuSE should have had extra install sources
 installed by default ( like Packmann, Guru etc.), and Admin should
 just enable them, read some obligate message about violating law and
 that these sources are community maintained and blah blah ;)
 We cannot even offer law violating options. And not even textfiles describing
 them.
 
 Understood. But if Ubuntu is doing it, how do they get away with it?

That's a good question. Maybe they won't.

 Is it because it isn't an American company (if indeed they aren't)? Many
 years ago one of the great advantages of SuSE was that it wasn't
 American, and I felt sorry for the Canadians because they had to eat the
 American poo.

Note that Germany isn't any better in this case, see the Heise trial wrt
linking to patent infringing websites.

- --
  -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
  /\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFO90er3NMWliFcXcRAsvgAJsHnio/2Trj0Em/3mZyZILnqahAKgCgmtRw
QKEfmk7E4sRZ24EAgZc3oLM=
=olk0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Media for openSUSE 10.2

2006-10-22 Thread Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


The Friday 2006-10-20 at 13:53 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

[adding the ftp tree as add-on media during install]

  If so, excellent: this would provide the best of both worlds, in 
  that if the DVD contains the latest version of a package, that 
  local version will be installed (faster and less bandwidth), 
  and if there's an update available on the FTP site, then you 
  get that immediately, without requiring an immediate update 
  cycle.
 
 I agree - but it needs some serious testing,

The feature or use of that I'm most interested in, is during update.

Example: updating from 10.1 to 10.2. There are a bunch of packages that 
are not included in the 10.1 dvd and were installed from the ftp tree 
during normal system usage. If during the system upgrade only the VDs/DVD 
is available, those packages that are not in the new 10.2 DVD will be 
removed from the system, and the user will have to reinstall them later 
when he discovers that they are missing - this is what happened to me 
while going from 9.3 to 10.1

- From what you have already said, I gather it should work.

I'm interested in that, but I'm reluctant to test this with the 10.2 beta 
on my working 10.1 install. In order to test this I'd probably have to 
install 10.1 in a new partition, add some packages from the ftp, then 
upgrade to one of the 10.2 betas. A day or two work, plus the time to 
download and burn all the CDs plus the 10.1 remastered DVD. A week at 
least. Ough.

- -- 
Cheers,
   Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFFPAZytTMYHG2NR9URAnXFAJ0Z0tOQeAFRz7nCZ7deGPQdZQS5XgCfb8bR
HFaXu2mzwJ/iWm6SJP9Zef4=
=PEgJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]