Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-08 Thread Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


The Monday 2007-05-07 at 20:42 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:

 I never tried to find out exact reasons for the one side grounding.

Loop currents.

They would form 40 independent loops, and a loop in a variable magnetic 
field, such as induced by the varying currents in the adjacent cables, 
will produce currents. Instead of a shield you would end with an antenna, 
kind of.


- -- 
Cheers,
   Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFGQGeWtTMYHG2NR9URAnBBAJ9lpTjJCs+EDlQKwY1aQNvWpbAhrgCeIxBE
FAJ9GpwTGhzGcopNIbTbSWk=
=um5H
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-07 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 07 May 2007 09:43, Sid Boyce wrote:
 Rajko M. wrote:
...
  The speed test
hdparm -t /dev/hda
  shows speed of 55 MB/s for ATA 100 drive, which seems to be right. For
  details on transfer rates
http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT01170100
 
  The difference between 16 and 32 transfer is non existent on older
  machine, both show 55 MB/s. The reason is probably oldfashioned parallel
  cable that has 16 lines for data transfer and using 32 bit brings no
  improvement, except on very old systems where CPU load is 1/2 if it can
  send 32 bits to controller at once.

 I did mention this to Donn in a private email, then we got into the
 subject of the difference between cables.

 OFF TOPIC:- One thing I read said, in order to minimise crosstalk, that
 all 80 wires are connected at the blue end, but 40 connect to the grey
 connector, the other 40 go to the black connector. However, trying to
 verify it using a DVM, I got shorts registered on the same pins on both
 the grey and the black connectors. One suggestion from Donn is that
 they use 40 pins and 40 earths commoned up at the blue (motherboard)
 end. This seems likely as shorts on a number of pins can be  measured on
 the connectors, though I haven't done enough to verify how they are
 distributed. Then there is the connundrum as to how the whole thing
 looks electrically when connected to devices and a motherboard.
 Regards
 Sid.

Grounds commoned on motherboard side will show shorts on the other end too. 
Wires are to short to see 2 wire lengths resistance with DMV, so it will 
appear as short on both ends. They had to use existing ground pins on 40 pins 
connector and they needed 40 extra wires between existing signal wires to 
prevent crosstalk. More: 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Technology_Attachment

I never tried to find out exact reasons for the one side grounding.
 
-- 
Regards,
Rajko.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-07 Thread Sid Boyce

Rajko M. wrote:

On Monday 07 May 2007 09:43, Sid Boyce wrote:

Rajko M. wrote:

...

The speed test
  hdparm -t /dev/hda
shows speed of 55 MB/s for ATA 100 drive, which seems to be right. For
details on transfer rates
  http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT01170100

The difference between 16 and 32 transfer is non existent on older
machine, both show 55 MB/s. The reason is probably oldfashioned parallel
cable that has 16 lines for data transfer and using 32 bit brings no
improvement, except on very old systems where CPU load is 1/2 if it can
send 32 bits to controller at once.

I did mention this to Donn in a private email, then we got into the
subject of the difference between cables.

OFF TOPIC:- One thing I read said, in order to minimise crosstalk, that
all 80 wires are connected at the blue end, but 40 connect to the grey
connector, the other 40 go to the black connector. However, trying to
verify it using a DVM, I got shorts registered on the same pins on both
the grey and the black connectors. One suggestion from Donn is that
they use 40 pins and 40 earths commoned up at the blue (motherboard)
end. This seems likely as shorts on a number of pins can be  measured on
the connectors, though I haven't done enough to verify how they are
distributed. Then there is the connundrum as to how the whole thing
looks electrically when connected to devices and a motherboard.
Regards
Sid.


Grounds commoned on motherboard side will show shorts on the other end too. 
Wires are to short to see 2 wire lengths resistance with DMV, so it will 
appear as short on both ends. They had to use existing ground pins on 40 pins 
connector and they needed 40 extra wires between existing signal wires to 
prevent crosstalk. More: 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Technology_Attachment


I never tried to find out exact reasons for the one side grounding.
 


Thanks for the URL, excellent description.
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support 
Specialist, Cricket Coach

Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-06 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:15, Donn Washburn wrote:

 Has anyone noticed this problem?  It maybe a problem with hdparm dealing
 with the sda drive and not hda

Can you give output of hdparm that is making trouble to you. 
The transfer rate of 66 interface is lower than the 66 MB/s. 
How much lower depends on many factors.

-- 
Regards,
Rajko.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-06 Thread Sid Boyce

Rajko M. wrote:

On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:15, Donn Washburn wrote:


Has anyone noticed this problem?  It maybe a problem with hdparm dealing
with the sda drive and not hda


Can you give output of hdparm that is making trouble to you. 
The transfer rate of 66 interface is lower than the 66 MB/s. 
How much lower depends on many factors.




hdparm is for the old IDE driver, sdparm is the one.
# rpm -qf /sbin/sdparm
scsi-1.7_2.36_1.22_0.18_0.99_0.91-44

There is also a manpage.
sdparm -al /dev/sda for a good description of the bits.
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support 
Specialist, Cricket Coach

Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-06 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 06 May 2007 17:51, Donn Washburn wrote:
 Rajko M. wrote:
  On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:15, Donn Washburn wrote:
  Has anyone noticed this problem?  It maybe a problem with hdparm dealing
  with the sda drive and not hda
 
  Can you give output of hdparm that is making trouble to you.
  The transfer rate of 66 interface is lower than the 66 MB/s.
  How much lower depends on many factors.

 Just trying to change the to 32 (1) bit from the default 16 (0)
 # hdparm -c1 /dev/sda
 /dev/sda:
   setting 32-bit IO_support flag to 1
   HDIO_SET_32BIT failed: Invalid argument
   IO_support=  0 (default 16-bit)
 #

 It seems to be a sda related issue and not hdparm.
 It happens on three different machine running 10.3Alpha2

 Any more questions let me know

 I did also upgrade hdparm in a effort to see if it was hdparm or the sda
   issue

I guess that you found Sid's mail. The sdparm is not applicable.

You said that they are IDE drives on older 500 MHz system, so hdparm should be 
right application. I'm not familiar with hdparm internals so I ran test on my 
older computer with 10.3 alpha 1 and it shows the same error, although I used  
symlink hda that points to sda ie. solving naming:
  hdparm -c1 /dev/hda
That might be because the device ID major is changed from 3 to 8. Which 
probably confuses hdparm. The 
  hdparm -i /dev/hda
claims that parameter is not applicable for the device. The same works fine in 
10.2. 

The speed test
  hdparm -t /dev/hda
shows speed of 55 MB/s for ATA 100 drive, which seems to be right. For details 
on transfer rates
  http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT01170100 

The difference between 16 and 32 transfer is non existent on older machine, 
both show 55 MB/s. The reason is probably oldfashioned parallel cable that 
has 16 lines for data transfer and using 32 bit brings no improvement, except 
on very old systems where CPU load is 1/2 if it can send 32 bits to 
controller at once. 

-- 
Regards,
Rajko.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]