Re: [opensuse-packaging] Standard way to install a font?
Paul Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> さんは書きました:
> Is there a standard way (a macro perhaps), to install a font?
>
>
> I have a spec file written by someone else that puts the following in %post:
> [ -x /usr/sbin/chkfontpath ] && /usr/sbin/chkfontpath -q -a
> %{datadir}/fonts/default/Type1;\
> [ -x /usr/sbin/chkfontpath ] && /usr/sbin/chkfontpath -q -a
> %{datadir}/fonts/default/Type1/adobestd35;\
> [ -x /usr/bin/fc-cache ] && /usr/bin/fc-cache
>
>
> Is this correct? Works with all distros?
We use
%post
%run_suseconfig_fonts -c
%postun
%run_suseconfig_fonts -c
The '-c' needs to be added only if it CJK fonts (Chinese, Japanese, or
Korean fonts) are installed.
--
Mike FABIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-packaging] New rpmlint check in BETA
Dirk Mueller napsal(a): > Hi, > > as a followup of the discussion of yesterday: > > There is a new check in BETA which will check for missing prerequires for > your %pre/%post/%preun%postun scripts. > > An example would be : > > kdemultimedia3-extra.i586: E: no-prereq-on coreutils for mv > > which says, that kdemultimedia3-extra contains a %post script that contains a > call to "/bin/mv", however coreutils or /bin/mv is not in the prereq for that > package. The check is fatal for repeated abuse. > > for (other) details, please refer to http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint > > Please file bugreports if you run accross a false positive/false negative/do > not understand the report/etc. Thanks a lot! That's even more than I expected to happen :) It seems that cooperation works at this mailing-list. Bye Lukas -- Lukas Ocilka, YaST Developer (xn--luk-gla45d) - SUSE LINUX, s. r. o., Lihovarska 1060/12, Praha 9, Czech Republic signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[opensuse-packaging] New rpmlint check in BETA
Hi, as a followup of the discussion of yesterday: There is a new check in BETA which will check for missing prerequires for your %pre/%post/%preun%postun scripts. An example would be : kdemultimedia3-extra.i586: E: no-prereq-on coreutils for mv which says, that kdemultimedia3-extra contains a %post script that contains a call to "/bin/mv", however coreutils or /bin/mv is not in the prereq for that package. The check is fatal for repeated abuse. for (other) details, please refer to http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint Please file bugreports if you run accross a false positive/false negative/do not understand the report/etc. Greetings, Dirk -- RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-packaging] *-examples subpackage
Petr Gajdos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > it's not possible to have source files in *-examples subpackage in beta? > Petr > > -- cut -- > > JFYI: package Source-Navigator failed to build in distribution beta-i386. > Build started Thu 2007-11-01 10:34:56 on alsa2. > > http://w3d.suse.de/abuildstat/failed/beta-i386/Source-Navigator > See /work/built/info/failed/beta-i386/Source-Navigator for details. > > tail -n 30 /work/built/info/failed/beta-i386/Source-Navigator > E: Source-Navigator-examples.i586 devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: > 50) /opt/snavigator/share/demos/c++_demo/glish/Queue.h /opt/snavigator is a bad idea anyway ;-), Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpyH5iloypWK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse-packaging] *-examples subpackage
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Stephan Kulow wrote: > > it's not possible to have source files in *-examples subpackage in beta? it is possible, it was a temporary bug that is meanwhile fixed. you`re looking at a build failure that is over a week old. Please take a look at the current build failures, where Source-Navigator builds again. Also please do not forget that I announced on October 29th on this very list that rpmlint in BETA is being upgraded and that you should NOT react to those reports. > Well, one or two - the badness is 50, so only 20 are a problem :) Wrong, Only in BETA. Scoring is different in STABLE. > You can mark them as %doc and then rpmlint will know Wrong as well. Greetings, Dirk -- RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-packaging] RPM dependencies vs. post-install scripts
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Cristian Rodriguez wrote: > odbcinst from package unixODBC located in /usr/bin/odbcinst may be also > called while installing drivers on %post > > rpmlint may also enforce people using %install_info* macros to PreReq: > %install_info_prereq ;) thanks for all the suggestions in this thread, they`re now implemented and will move to factory soon. Greetings, Dirk -- RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-packaging] *-examples subpackage
Am Dienstag 06 November 2007 schrieb Petr Gajdos: > Hi, > it's not possible to have source files in *-examples subpackage in beta? Well, one or two - the badness is 50, so only 20 are a problem :) You can mark them as %doc and then rpmlint will know Greetings, Stephan > > -- cut -- > > JFYI: package Source-Navigator failed to build in distribution beta-i386. > Build started Thu 2007-11-01 10:34:56 on alsa2. > > http://w3d.suse.de/abuildstat/failed/beta-i386/Source-Navigator > See /work/built/info/failed/beta-i386/Source-Navigator for details. > > tail -n 30 /work/built/info/failed/beta-i386/Source-Navigator > E: Source-Navigator-examples.i586 devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: > 50) /opt/snavigator/share/demos/c++_demo/glish/Queue.h > > --- end cut --- > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-packaging] *-examples subpackage
Hi, it's not possible to have source files in *-examples subpackage in beta? Petr -- cut -- JFYI: package Source-Navigator failed to build in distribution beta-i386. Build started Thu 2007-11-01 10:34:56 on alsa2. http://w3d.suse.de/abuildstat/failed/beta-i386/Source-Navigator See /work/built/info/failed/beta-i386/Source-Navigator for details. tail -n 30 /work/built/info/failed/beta-i386/Source-Navigator E: Source-Navigator-examples.i586 devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /opt/snavigator/share/demos/c++_demo/glish/Queue.h --- end cut --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-packaging] RPM dependencies vs. post-install scripts
Cristian Rodriguez escribió: > Lukas Ocilka escribió: > >> Any other (e.g., better) ideas ;)? >> > odbcinst from package unixODBC located in /usr/bin/odbcinst may be also called while installing drivers on %post rpmlint may also enforce people using %install_info* macros to PreReq: %install_info_prereq ;) I have also seen packages using: chroot gpg HTH. -- "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." --Albert Einstein Cristian Rodríguez R, Core Services SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Research & Development http://www.opensuse.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
