Re: [openthinclient-user] NoMachine in OpenThinClient

2013-03-13 Thread Nick Couchman
I just need a NoMachine client package and the necessary schema
extensions to support NoMachine connections to remote servers (both
commercial NX and FreeNX).

-Nick

 On 2013/03/12 at 04:35, Jörn Frenzelj.fren...@openthinclient.com
wrote: 
 There are some Nomachine packages for some customers of
openthinclient 
 (adapted to thier needs). So it works in general.
 
 What exactly do you need?
 
 Regards, Jörn
 
 On 10.03.2013 01:12, Nick Couchman wrote:
 Curious if anyone has used the NoMachine client with OTC?

 --
 Nick Couchman
 Manager, Information Technology
 SEAKR Engineering, Inc.



 
 This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use 
 of the intended recipient.  If this email is not intended for you, or
you are 
 not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended
recipient, 
 please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) 
 Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such a case, you are strictly

 prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise
using 
 this message, its contents or attachments in any way.  If you have
received 
 this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
this e-mail 
 and delete the message from your mailbox.  Information contained in
this 
 message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither
endorsed by 
 nor attributable to SEAKR.


--
 Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The
Forrester
 Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and remains a good choice in
the
 endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner
to
 tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
 ___
 The Open Source Thin Client Solution http://openthinclient.org
 openthinclient-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openthinclient-user





This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use 
of the intended recipient.  If this email is not intended for you, or you are 
not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, 
please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) 
Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such a case, you are strictly 
prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this 
message, its contents or attachments in any way.  If you have received this 
message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail and 
delete the message from your mailbox.  Information contained in this message 
that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor 
attributable to SEAKR.
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
___
The Open Source Thin Client Solution http://openthinclient.org
openthinclient-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openthinclient-user


Re: [openthinclient-user] Firefox 17 and GTK

2013-03-13 Thread Mark D-B
Dear Jörn,

   Would you mind advising whether /etc/skel/.mozilla is part of the 
base package please? I'd come to the conclusion that there are only 
effectively two filesystems created by OTC - /opt in opt and then 
everything else in base but I'm obviously wrong if 
/etc/skel/.mozilla/firefox comes from the firefox-17 package.

All the best,

Mark

On 12/03/13 10:51, Jörn Frenzel wrote:
 Hi Mark,

 as far as i know, every firefox we (otc) have done, have a version in thier
 name. But please double check this. There maybe be other reasons why it
 does not work.

 Just some more word about firefox.

 Why are you trying to have an own firefox package? There is already one
 (the one inside the VM). Please use this repository to install it.

 deb http://devel.openthinclient.org/firefox-17/5f1b84gdfcf3e1d/ ./

 As usual there is also a source package
 http://devel.openthinclient.org/firefox-17/5f1b84gdfcf3e1d/firefox-17_1.0.0-17.0.1-02.tar.gz

 Use this source and have your adaptions. See the README inside for
 instructions.

 Yesterday i've tried to build a package with firefox 19. But it seems we're
 missing some libs to run the new xul/xpcom stuff. We need a new base!

 Regards, Jörn


 On 11.03.2013 22:43, Mark D-B wrote:
 Thanks Jörn, that explains it. I'll stay with my own version of Firefox
 then as I can easily deploy the script that sets the path with it.

 With reference to Please never have two packages with the same name in
 different repositories - are you meaning that this is why my attempt to
 have a package called firefox didn't work? I can understand why it
 would cause problems if two packages have the same name, but I thought
 all the existing Firefox packages had the version on the end (-3, -5,
 -17). Is there another one that isn't visible from the Package
 management tree and is called just firefox?

 All the best,

 Mark

 On 11/03/13 10:42, Jörn Frenzel wrote:
 Hi Mark,

 Firefox needs some newer GTK version than the base packages delivers. So
 the newer one ist installed under /opt/gtk/ and must be used with
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

 In the base version of experimantal the separate GTK was joined into the
 base.

 Please never have two packages with the same name in diffenrent 
 repositories.

 Regards,

 Jörn

 On 09.03.2013 23:25, Mark D-B wrote:
 Dear All,

This problem is due to library paths. I've now got my own Firefox 17
 package with a script to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that the correct version
 of GTK (/opt/gtk/lib) gets loaded but I'd ideally like to use the one
 from the OTC server. Does anyone know why it doesn't set the library
 path itself?

 All the best,

 Mark

 On 16/02/13 18:43, newsgroup account wrote:
 When I try and run Firefox 17 on the client, I get an error saying
 that Firefox needs GTK+ 2.10 but I only have GTK+ 2.8.  This seems
 strange, as the server package manager says the installed package is
 0.4.5-2.16-2, which I infer to mean GTK+ 2.16. Is there something
 wrong with paths?
 --
 Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
 Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and remains a good choice in the
 endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
 tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
 ___
 The Open Source Thin Client Solution http://openthinclient.org
 openthinclient-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openthinclient-user

 --
 Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
 Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and remains a good choice in the
 endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
 tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
 ___
 The Open Source Thin Client Solution http://openthinclient.org
 openthinclient-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openthinclient-user


 --
 Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
 Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and remains a good choice in the
 endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
 tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
 ___
 The Open Source Thin Client Solution http://openthinclient.org
 openthinclient-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openthinclient-user

 --
 Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester