Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Kernel is downloaded although "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel tree" is selected.
Diff file is attached. Erdem. From: Erdem Ergen Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 12:12 AM To: 'openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org' Subject: [PATCH] Kernel is downloaded although "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel tree" is selected. This patch fixes/prevents unnecessary download of Linux kernel if "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel tree" is selected. As you know, there is an option "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel tree", and if we select and type the directory of special kernel it uses this kernel. This configuration does not require downloading kernel, but it does. So that patch prevents unnecessary download of kernel. Signed-off-by: Erdem Ergen diff --git a/include/host-build.mk b/include/host-build.mk index 8eb49c8..09ec42e 100644 --- a/include/host-build.mk +++ b/include/host-build.mk @@ -112,10 +112,20 @@ define Host/Exports/Default endef Host/Exports=$(Host/Exports/Default) +iflinux:= +ifeq ($(strip $(PKG_NAME)),linux) +ifneq ($(strip $(CONFIG_EXTERNAL_KERNEL_TREE)),"") +DownloadPackage = +else +DownloadPackage = $(call Download,default) +endif +endif + ifndef DUMP define HostBuild $(if $(HOST_QUILT),$(Host/Quilt)) - $(if $(if $(PKG_HOST_ONLY),,$(STAMP_PREPARED)),,$(if $(strip $(PKG_SOURCE_URL)),$(call Download,default))) + $(eval $(call iflinux)) + $(if $(if $(PKG_HOST_ONLY),,$(STAMP_PREPARED)),,$(if $(strip $(PKG_SOURCE_URL)),$(DownloadPackage))) $(if $(DUMP),,$(call HostHost/Autoclean)) $(HOST_STAMP_PREPARED): diff_kerneldownload Description: diff_kerneldownload ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Porting WNR3500L into Kamikaze-8.09.1
I am still waiting any response. Any help regarding this is appreciated. Tathagata On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Tathagata Das wrote: > Hi All, > I want to port WNR3500L onto Kamikaze-8.09.1 with kernel-2.6.25 which has > ssb driver. But in WNR3500L, ssb has been changes. So to port WNR3500L I > need to modify the ssb driver in the kernel along with some files under > arch/mips/bcm47xx directory. > Hence before modifying anything I just want to check that is there anybody > who is already working on it ? If no work has been done then could somebody > please tell what should be the approach of porting this ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Tathagata > ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] my patches being ignored?
On 2009-12-11 5:04 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote: >> I took care of that now for the shorewall patches and fixed >> some minor compile errors in there. > Yeah. I guess I don't have a non-GNU system to have weeded those out. > Sorry. No problem. It might have been broken before your changes already, I didn't test. >> Did you post any other patches that we overlooked and that you would >> like us to merge? > > Well it seems you got the "add shorewall6-lite" as well as the "update > shorewall-lite to 4.2.11" but there was a third patch in message with > subject "[PATCH] Default logfile to be non-local" that didn't seem to > get applied. Done. - Felix ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] my patches being ignored?
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 03:10 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > Sorry for the delay, No worries. I understand busy. I was trying to be patient but that only lasted until I saw other commits. :-/ > I took care of that now for the shorewall patches and fixed > some minor compile errors in there. Yeah. I guess I don't have a non-GNU system to have weeded those out. Sorry. > Did you post any other patches that we overlooked and that you would > like us to merge? Well it seems you got the "add shorewall6-lite" as well as the "update shorewall-lite to 4.2.11" but there was a third patch in message with subject "[PATCH] Default logfile to be non-local" that didn't seem to get applied. Thanx much for applying those though! b. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] my patches being ignored?
On 2009-12-11 1:52 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > Is there any reason in particular that my patches to this list are being > ignored? I thought it was everyone's but I saw some commits today, yet > not my patches which were sent here prior the patches that were > committed today. > > This seems to be my (and others from messages I have seen posted here in > the past) history with this list. I take the time to make and send > patches and they get ignored despite others' being committed. It's > really quite discouraging to contribute to a project only to have one's > contribution ignored. > > If there is something wrong with my patches, would somebody please tell > me what it is rather than simply ignoring them? Ignoring mistakes won't > get them corrected. > > Thanx for your time and attention. Sorry for the delay, they probably got overlooked, or nobody had time to apply them. I took care of that now for the shorewall patches and fixed some minor compile errors in there. Did you post any other patches that we overlooked and that you would like us to merge? - Felix ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] my patches being ignored?
Is there any reason in particular that my patches to this list are being ignored? I thought it was everyone's but I saw some commits today, yet not my patches which were sent here prior the patches that were committed today. This seems to be my (and others from messages I have seen posted here in the past) history with this list. I take the time to make and send patches and they get ignored despite others' being committed. It's really quite discouraging to contribute to a project only to have one's contribution ignored. If there is something wrong with my patches, would somebody please tell me what it is rather than simply ignoring them? Ignoring mistakes won't get them corrected. Thanx for your time and attention. b. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Kernel is downloaded although "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel tree" is selected.
On 2009-12-10 11:12 PM, Erdem Ergen wrote: > > This patch fixes/prevents unnecessary download of Linux kernel if > "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel > tree" is selected. > > As you know, there is an option "Advanced configuration options (for > developers) -> Use external kernel tree", and if we select and type the > directory of special kernel it uses this kernel. This configuration does > not require downloading kernel, but it does. So that patch prevents > unnecessary download of kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Erdem Ergen Please resend as pure plain text email or add the patch as an attachment, as your mail client seems to have seriously damaged the formatting of this patch. - Felix ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Kernel is downloaded although "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel tree" is selected.
This patch fixes/prevents unnecessary download of Linux kernel if "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel tree" is selected. As you know, there is an option "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel tree", and if we select and type the directory of special kernel it uses this kernel. This configuration does not require downloading kernel, but it does. So that patch prevents unnecessary download of kernel. Signed-off-by: Erdem Ergen diff --git a/include/host-build.mk b/include/host-build.mk index 8eb49c8..09ec42e 100644 --- a/include/host-build.mk +++ b/include/host-build.mk @@ -112,10 +112,20 @@ define Host/Exports/Default endef Host/Exports=$(Host/Exports/Default) +iflinux:= +ifeq ($(strip $(PKG_NAME)),linux) +ifneq ($(strip $(CONFIG_EXTERNAL_KERNEL_TREE)),"") +DownloadPackage = +else +DownloadPackage = $(call Download,default) +endif +endif + ifndef DUMP define HostBuild $(if $(HOST_QUILT),$(Host/Quilt)) - $(if $(if $(PKG_HOST_ONLY),,$(STAMP_PREPARED)),,$(if $(strip $(PKG_SOURCE_URL)),$(call Download,default))) + $(eval $(call iflinux)) + $(if $(if $(PKG_HOST_ONLY),,$(STAMP_PREPARED)),,$(if $(strip $(PKG_SOURCE_URL)),$(DownloadPackage))) $(if $(DUMP),,$(call HostHost/Autoclean)) $(HOST_STAMP_PREPARED): ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT uml snapshot branch
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Adrian Terranova wrote: > I don't see any reason why it couldn't just be another build target - > I can futz with it when I get time. You can also just use the binaries > from the x86 image like this. (sorry - meant to nip as portion of my writeup.) [snip] 1) d/l the latest openwrt for uml from http://kamikaze.openwrt.org/8.09.1/x86/openwrt-x86-ext2.image I really really wish - they had a CURRENT link here for this. 2) modify that puppy to your hearts content - for instance mkdir /tmp/foo mount -o loop ./openwrt.x86-ext2.image /tmp/foo cd /tmp/foo chroot . /bin/ash echo "nameserver x.x.x.x" > /etc/nameserver opkg update opkg install BLAH mkdir /etc/dropbear echo "VTYSH_PAGER=/usr/bin/less" > /root/.profile exit <--- moved this to the right spot. umount /tmp/foo cp ./openwrt.x86-ext2.image $CLOOMIX_HOME/bulk/openwrt_uml (and then just boot the uml image with the kernel in the snapshot tree.) --Adrian > > Where is the makefile for the binaries / packges? ( I can poke thru.) > > if you need a specific example install clownix - but I installed > quagga / vtysh (and could have installed anything I wanted (I > think).. I tried with xwrt images and openwrt 8.09 ... and it all > seemed to work - but YMMV > > for pointers see. > > http://www.vlcg.net/content/clownix-update > > --Adrian > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Benjamin Henrion wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Bastian Bittorf >> wrote: >>> * Benjamin Henrion [10.12.2009 14:30]: It is a pain to have to setup its own webserver if you want to install packages for openwrt-uml. >>> >>> Just run 'httpd -h /mydir' and place your packages there. >>> It's not openWRT's fault, that your windows does not have a simple httpd. >> >> It seems that the developers does not provide binaries for UML, >> because of the libc6 dependency of different linux distributions. >> >> Why not provide binaries with the libc6 in static? >> >> -- >> Benjamin Henrion >> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 >> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software >> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. >> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of >> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent >> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their >> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or >> democratically elected legislators." >> ___ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> > ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT uml snapshot branch
I don't see any reason why it couldn't just be another build target - I can futz with it when I get time. You can also just use the binaries from the x86 image like this. Where is the makefile for the binaries / packges? ( I can poke thru.) if you need a specific example install clownix - but I installed quagga / vtysh (and could have installed anything I wanted (I think).. I tried with xwrt images and openwrt 8.09 ... and it all seemed to work - but YMMV for pointers see. http://www.vlcg.net/content/clownix-update --Adrian On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Benjamin Henrion wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Bastian Bittorf > wrote: >> * Benjamin Henrion [10.12.2009 14:30]: >>> >>> It is a pain to have to setup its own webserver if you want to install >>> packages for openwrt-uml. >> >> Just run 'httpd -h /mydir' and place your packages there. >> It's not openWRT's fault, that your windows does not have a simple httpd. > > It seems that the developers does not provide binaries for UML, > because of the libc6 dependency of different linux distributions. > > Why not provide binaries with the libc6 in static? > > -- > Benjamin Henrion > FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 > "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software > patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. > Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of > software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent > court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their > favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or > democratically elected legislators." > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Netkit.users] OpenWRT UML integrated into Netkit
> very interesting! > The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site: > http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links. Massimo there is a little wrong detail on the web site. I did not use only the OpenWRT kernel. I used both OpenWRT kernel AND filesystem ! :) Saverio ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Netkit.users] OpenWRT UML integrated into Netkit
> very interesting! > The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site: > http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links. thanks ! :) > About the tap, host-side setup is performed by the > $NETKIT_HOME/bin/manage_tuntap script, and this is almost all that is > required to get it running. The only thing that is left to do inside the > guest is to add a default route, which is performed by the > /etc/init.d/netkit-phase1 script. Yes, that's what I realized reading the scripts :) However there is something I'm missing to make the all thing work. If I run a default netkit UML debian machine everything works perfect. When I run the OpenWRT UML Machine: * I configure by hand the IP address and the default route on the OpenWRT virtual Machine * I flush any default iptables rule on the OpenWRT virtual machine * I try to ping 10.0.0.1 If I tcpdump from OpenWRT I only see ARP requests for 10.0.0.1. So I see only the traffic generated from the UML OpenWRT machine. On the host machine sniffing on the tap I see the ARP requests and I see also the ARP reply being generated, but those answer never actually get back to the OpenWRT guest machine. Iptables rules on the host machine also have been checked and they look fine. Maybe I'm missing some kernel module in the UML OpenWRT guest machine ? So the problem is that the traffic generated from the host machine on the tap interface is not heard by the guest machine... I have no idea how to debug deeper in this problem :( Saverio ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT uml snapshot branch
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * Benjamin Henrion [10.12.2009 14:30]: >> >> It is a pain to have to setup its own webserver if you want to install >> packages for openwrt-uml. > > Just run 'httpd -h /mydir' and place your packages there. > It's not openWRT's fault, that your windows does not have a simple httpd. It seems that the developers does not provide binaries for UML, because of the libc6 dependency of different linux distributions. Why not provide binaries with the libc6 in static? -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or democratically elected legislators." ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT UML integrated into Netkit
>> Are there any other uml openwrt users out there? What are you doing >> with the new uml releases (aside from developing openwrt?) Hello, sorry if you receive this email twice because you are in both mailing lists. I successfully compiled a OpenWRT UML Image and used it in the Netkit [0] I got some notes here: http://wiki.ninux.org/OpenWRT-UML-Netkit For the OpenWRT-devs: I'm using OpenWRT trunk because I can't compile the UML for OpenWRT 8.09.1 :( Looks like there is some problem when compiling uClibc, there are many headers files missing. This happens on my x86_64 host... but trying on a x86 32bit host the 8.09.1 works. With trunk it compiled the all thing on x86_64 (just a little hack because scripts were expecting a lib64 folder) Basically what I did is some changes to inittab and I had to disable the kmod-mac8011-hwsim that was causing some weird problems ... netkit machines not talking to each other. For the Netkit devs: right now I'm working to integrate the netkit-phase1 and netkit-phase2 scripts. there is another thing actually not working, connecting Netkit virtual hosts with tap (with the --eth0=tap,ip1,ip2 syntax). So the question to the Netkit guys is, how to make the tap feature work ? It is necessary to have the netkit-phasex scripts working first ? Saverio [0] - http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Main_Page ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT uml snapshot branch
* Benjamin Henrion [10.12.2009 14:30]: > > It is a pain to have to setup its own webserver if you want to install > packages for openwrt-uml. Just run 'httpd -h /mydir' and place your packages there. It's not openWRT's fault, that your windows does not have a simple httpd. bye, Bastian. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT uml snapshot branch
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hello Adrian, > > Le mardi 8 décembre 2009 01:52:52, Adrian Terranova a écrit : >> Hi, (this is a repost post from openwrt-users which got no reply :( ) >> >> could someone share the tell me the genealogy / plans for the openwrt >> uml port that showed up in the xwrt/openwrt snapshot tree? I'm thrilled >> that it's there - I extended the clownix router simulation platform with >> generic images to build single host - 10-20 UML / quagga setups using >> openwrt as a base image - but I'd like to make sure the thing is going to >> be around for a while. >> >> Are there any other uml openwrt users out there? What are you doing >> with the new uml releases (aside from developing openwrt?) > > Nico and I use UML regularly to test various OpenWrt stuff whenever hardware > is not required or we do not have access to it. We will continue maintaining > it. Too bad there are no binaries available. It is a pain to have to setup its own webserver if you want to install packages for openwrt-uml. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or democratically elected legislators." ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey. > well, it wouldn't hurt and maybe somebody might need it in the > future. Exactly. > But, I have problems to figure out where the scripts gets the network > values from. It's not in the general nvram vars available by 'uci > show'. Most of the variables are in a temporary state overly, you can see them with this command: uci -P /var/state show network HTH, JoW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAksgyvsACgkQdputYINPTPNHSgCgiB/jz/QKO206egunWVqbQN2z am0An14tU8R3URoxWIe1NTF0BQSu8mWe =RJI1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts
well, it wouldn't hurt and maybe somebody might need it in the future. Also maybe some other variables for wireless and the like. But, I have problems to figure out where the scripts gets the network values from. It's not in the general nvram vars available by 'uci show'. ... ede On 09.12.2009 22:28, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I copied it over from 7.09's /etc/init.d/firewall init script ... and it worked for my script.. LAV doesn't seem to be set there. Would you like me to add LANDEV? No, I was just curious. But it seems to make sense :) ~ JoW ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] firewall/iptables
Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2009-12-08 1:36 PM, Ugur DOGRU wrote:
Hi,
After getting busybox 1.15.2, "local" macro is not a problem now. So I
removed all modifications that removes local.
To remind it, these changes are for ubicom32 platform, but for all
no-mmu platforms in general.
As ash cannot run on no-mmu system, we are using hush instead.
There are still not compatible features between ash/hush. I've listed
them below. Please note that these are only
problems that I've encountered in firewall/iptables scripts.
1/ hush needs "eval" to substitute string.
2/ hush doesn't handle line concatenation : "\"
Are you sure that these two kinds of changes are still necessary? I
tried to reproduce your issues by writing small test cases with hush
here, but every test case I come up with seems to work fine.
I also tested parameter expansion such as ${var:+-p $var}, and I also
cannot get it to fail with hush.
If hush still has issues with some of these expansions, could you please
reduce it down to a small test case, so that I can verify it and maybe
fix it in hush directly instead of the scripts?
Yes. I had some troubles about them. I can not get for now a console
prompt on my board
to test it. I think you can get fragments from uci_firewall.sh to test.
For line concatenation. I think below script will show problem by
running with/without line concat sign.
I will try if I will be able to get a shell prompt.
#!/bin/sh
src_port=100-200
src_port_first=${src_port%-*}
src_port_last=${src_port#*-}
[ "$src_port_first" -ne "$src_port_last" ] && { \
src_port="$src_port_first:$src_port_last"; }
3/ hush crashes if two scripts include each other. (uci_firewall.sh and
/etc/hotplug.d/iface/20-firewall includes each other)
I replaced that today without duplicating the hotplug script's code.
As to some of your other changes:
- config_get exists $ZONE_LIST $1
+eval_ZONE_LIST=$(eval "echo $ZONE_LIST")
+config_get exists $eval_ZONE_LIST $1
Why is this necessary?
This is about eval problem.
- Felix
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
