[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] protobuf: Bump version, fix build errors.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Siverskog --- libs/protobuf/Makefile | 13 ++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/protobuf/Makefile b/libs/protobuf/Makefile index 789c924..e5593c2 100644 --- a/libs/protobuf/Makefile +++ b/libs/protobuf/Makefile @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk PKG_NAME:=protobuf -PKG_VERSION:=2.4.1 +PKG_VERSION:=2.5.0 PKG_RELEASE:=1 PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.bz2 PKG_SOURCE_URL:=http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files -PKG_MD5SUM:=ed436802019c9e1f40cc750eaf78f318 +PKG_MD5SUM:=a72001a9067a4c2c4e0e836d0f92ece4 PKG_BUILD_DEPENDS:=protobuf/host @@ -37,7 +37,14 @@ define Package/protobuf/description of its internal RPC protocols and file formats. endef -CONFIGURE_ARGS += --with-protoc=$(STAGING_DIR_HOST)/bin/protoc +define Host/Compile + $(MAKE) -C $(HOST_BUILD_DIR) +endef + +define Host/Install +endef + +CONFIGURE_ARGS += --with-protoc=$(HOST_BUILD_DIR)/src/protoc define Build/InstallDev $(INSTALL_DIR) \ -- 1.8.3.2 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] CONFIG_RPS flag activation
Success! I was able to compile it and generate the kernel module. Now, I just need to test it and see if it works. On 13 June 2014 00:46, Carlos Ferreira wrote: > Ok, thanks for the assistance. I will try that! > Just to explain what are my actions here, I'm trying to compile the netmap > kernel mod for openwrt. > > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/ > > I don't know if anyone already tried to do this. I Googled it and found > nothing. > > > On 13 June 2014 00:37, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> 2014-06-12 16:22 GMT-07:00 Carlos Ferreira : >> > Hello all! >> > Can anyone tell me how can activate the CONFIG_RPS flag for the target >> x86 >> > generic? >> > I have tried to add a CONFIG_RPS=y to the config-3.3 file in the >> > target/linux/x86/generic dir and recompile, but i got no luck. In the >> > kernel_menuconfig, RPS is still disabled. >> >> CONFIG_RPS depends on CONFIG_SMP >> >> > I need this active because i'm compiling a kernel module that requires a >> > piece of code in the netdevice.h, that can only be added if RPS is >> active >> > (real_num_rx_queues). >> >> If you are setting your network device queues, you should use the >> helper function netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() which makes sure it >> does the right thing for !CONFIG_RPS and CONFIG_RPS enabled. >> >> > This as changed in the more recent kernel versions, but since openwrt is >> > still using 3.3, I have no choice but to active RPS. >> > >> > Can anyone help me with this? >> > Thank you! >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Carlos Miguel Ferreira >> > Researcher at Telecommunications Institute >> > Aveiro - Portugal >> > Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt >> > Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com >> > LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira >> > >> > ___ >> > openwrt-devel mailing list >> > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> > >> >> -- >> Florian >> > > > > -- > > Carlos Miguel Ferreira > Researcher at Telecommunications Institute > Aveiro - Portugal > Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt > Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com > LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira > -- Carlos Miguel Ferreira Researcher at Telecommunications Institute Aveiro - Portugal Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] /var/state/wireless not being updated any more?
On 06/12/2014 09:13 PM, Shankar Unni wrote: > Ping? > > How can I look up the current state of the various wireless interfaces using > "uci" now? > http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network#determining.linux.interface.names The uci state vars are deprecated and not used anymore for network related information Quoting jow in the forum[0] Use /lib/functions/network.sh: source /lib/functions/network.sh if network_get_ipaddr addr "wan"; then echo "IP is $addr" fi [0]: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=203787#p203787 you might also want to look into ubus http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/ubus cheers! > Thanks in advance, > > On Jun 10, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Shankar Unni wrote: > >> I recently updated my tree to a very recent trunk SVN version (40995), and I >> noticed that my system no longer seems to maintain a /var/state/wireless >> (UCI state of the wireless interfaces - up/down, interface name, etc.). It >> used to do so as recently as 38990 (which was the last version I was using). >> >> I tracked down the place where it gets updated to the functions >> "set_wifi_up()" and "set_wifi_down()" in /sbin/wifi, but no one seems to >> actually invoke these functions. >> >> Is there a more current way of getting this info (the state of the wifi >> interface, and its "real interface name"), via UCI? (Or any other CLI >> method?) >> >> Thanks in advance, >> -- >> Shankar >> >> >> ___ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] /var/state/wireless not being updated any more?
Ping? How can I look up the current state of the various wireless interfaces using "uci" now? Thanks in advance, On Jun 10, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Shankar Unni wrote: > I recently updated my tree to a very recent trunk SVN version (40995), and I > noticed that my system no longer seems to maintain a /var/state/wireless (UCI > state of the wireless interfaces - up/down, interface name, etc.). It used > to do so as recently as 38990 (which was the last version I was using). > > I tracked down the place where it gets updated to the functions > "set_wifi_up()" and "set_wifi_down()" in /sbin/wifi, but no one seems to > actually invoke these functions. > > Is there a more current way of getting this info (the state of the wifi > interface, and its "real interface name"), via UCI? (Or any other CLI method?) > > Thanks in advance, > -- > Shankar > > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] CONFIG_RPS flag activation
Ok, thanks for the assistance. I will try that! Just to explain what are my actions here, I'm trying to compile the netmap kernel mod for openwrt. http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/ I don't know if anyone already tried to do this. I Googled it and found nothing. On 13 June 2014 00:37, Florian Fainelli wrote: > 2014-06-12 16:22 GMT-07:00 Carlos Ferreira : > > Hello all! > > Can anyone tell me how can activate the CONFIG_RPS flag for the target > x86 > > generic? > > I have tried to add a CONFIG_RPS=y to the config-3.3 file in the > > target/linux/x86/generic dir and recompile, but i got no luck. In the > > kernel_menuconfig, RPS is still disabled. > > CONFIG_RPS depends on CONFIG_SMP > > > I need this active because i'm compiling a kernel module that requires a > > piece of code in the netdevice.h, that can only be added if RPS is active > > (real_num_rx_queues). > > If you are setting your network device queues, you should use the > helper function netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() which makes sure it > does the right thing for !CONFIG_RPS and CONFIG_RPS enabled. > > > This as changed in the more recent kernel versions, but since openwrt is > > still using 3.3, I have no choice but to active RPS. > > > > Can anyone help me with this? > > Thank you! > > > > -- > > > > Carlos Miguel Ferreira > > Researcher at Telecommunications Institute > > Aveiro - Portugal > > Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt > > Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com > > LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira > > > > ___ > > openwrt-devel mailing list > > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > > -- > Florian > -- Carlos Miguel Ferreira Researcher at Telecommunications Institute Aveiro - Portugal Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] CONFIG_RPS flag activation
btw, just to be more accurate, its not a flag, its a kconfig symbol :) Sorry for the mistake. On 13 June 2014 00:22, Carlos Ferreira wrote: > Hello all! > Can anyone tell me how can activate the CONFIG_RPS flag for the target x86 > generic? > I have tried to add a CONFIG_RPS=y to the config-3.3 file in the > target/linux/x86/generic dir and recompile, but i got no luck. In the > kernel_menuconfig, RPS is still disabled. > I need this active because i'm compiling a kernel module that requires a > piece of code in the netdevice.h, that can only be added if RPS is active > (real_num_rx_queues). > This as changed in the more recent kernel versions, but since openwrt is > still using 3.3, I have no choice but to active RPS. > > Can anyone help me with this? > Thank you! > > -- > > Carlos Miguel Ferreira > Researcher at Telecommunications Institute > Aveiro - Portugal > Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt > Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com > LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira > -- Carlos Miguel Ferreira Researcher at Telecommunications Institute Aveiro - Portugal Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] CONFIG_RPS flag activation
2014-06-12 16:22 GMT-07:00 Carlos Ferreira : > Hello all! > Can anyone tell me how can activate the CONFIG_RPS flag for the target x86 > generic? > I have tried to add a CONFIG_RPS=y to the config-3.3 file in the > target/linux/x86/generic dir and recompile, but i got no luck. In the > kernel_menuconfig, RPS is still disabled. CONFIG_RPS depends on CONFIG_SMP > I need this active because i'm compiling a kernel module that requires a > piece of code in the netdevice.h, that can only be added if RPS is active > (real_num_rx_queues). If you are setting your network device queues, you should use the helper function netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() which makes sure it does the right thing for !CONFIG_RPS and CONFIG_RPS enabled. > This as changed in the more recent kernel versions, but since openwrt is > still using 3.3, I have no choice but to active RPS. > > Can anyone help me with this? > Thank you! > > -- > > Carlos Miguel Ferreira > Researcher at Telecommunications Institute > Aveiro - Portugal > Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt > Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com > LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > -- Florian ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] CONFIG_RPS flag activation
Hello all! Can anyone tell me how can activate the CONFIG_RPS flag for the target x86 generic? I have tried to add a CONFIG_RPS=y to the config-3.3 file in the target/linux/x86/generic dir and recompile, but i got no luck. In the kernel_menuconfig, RPS is still disabled. I need this active because i'm compiling a kernel module that requires a piece of code in the netdevice.h, that can only be added if RPS is active (real_num_rx_queues). This as changed in the more recent kernel versions, but since openwrt is still using 3.3, I have no choice but to active RPS. Can anyone help me with this? Thank you! -- Carlos Miguel Ferreira Researcher at Telecommunications Institute Aveiro - Portugal Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Add terminfo file in ncurses
Ran into a problem with my Fedora Linux machine, SSHing into an Openwrt router. Fedora sets terminfo to xterm-256color, but ncurses doesn't include that file in the firmware. This causes a few unintended problems, namely nano fails to launch. Attached patch adds xterm-256color to the files installed by ncurses. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bennett diff --git a/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile b/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile index 62ffdfb..26b7bf5 100644 --- a/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile +++ b/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ ifneq ($(HOST_OS),FreeBSD) mv dir (echo -ne "\xdir"); \ done \ ) - for file in a/ansi d/dumb l/linux r/rxvt r/rxvt-unicode s/screen v/vt100 v/vt102 x/xterm x/xterm-color; do \ + for file in a/ansi d/dumb l/linux r/rxvt r/rxvt-unicode s/screen v/vt100 v/vt102 x/xterm x/xterm-color x/xterm-256color; do \ $(INSTALL_DIR) $(1)/usr/share/terminfo/`dirname file`; \ $(CP) $(PKG_INSTALL_DIR)/usr/share/terminfo/file \ $(1)/usr/share/terminfo/file; \ ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] kernel/3.1{0, 2, 3, 4}: mtd: m25p80: add support for EON EN25QH128
This flash is used in newer Ubnt UniFi AP Pro
Signed-off-by: Sergey Ryazanov
---
v2
* Patch v3.12, v3.13, v3.14 kernels as well
---
...-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch | 20
...-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch | 20
...-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch | 20
...-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch | 20
4 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
create mode 100644
target/linux/generic/patches-3.12/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
create mode 100644
target/linux/generic/patches-3.13/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
create mode 100644
target/linux/generic/patches-3.14/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
diff --git
a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..7b5ca98
--- /dev/null
+++
b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+From 0233dcb52eefa0b29250a6d8a58b3143790df57d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sergey Ryazanov
+Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:23:00 +0400
+Subject: [PATCH] mtd: m25p80: add support for EON EN25QH128
+
+Signed-off-by: Sergey Ryazanov
+---
+ drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
+@@ -737,6 +737,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_i
+ { "en25q32b", INFO(0x1c3016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) },
+ { "en25p64", INFO(0x1c2017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
+ { "en25q64", INFO(0x1c3017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
++ { "en25qh128", INFO(0x1c7018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
+ { "en25qh256", INFO(0x1c7019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) },
+
+ /* ESMT */
diff --git
a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.12/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.12/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..543738c
--- /dev/null
+++
b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.12/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+From 0233dcb52eefa0b29250a6d8a58b3143790df57d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sergey Ryazanov
+Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:23:00 +0400
+Subject: [PATCH] mtd: m25p80: add support for EON EN25QH128
+
+Signed-off-by: Sergey Ryazanov
+---
+ drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
+@@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_i
+ { "en25q32b", INFO(0x1c3016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) },
+ { "en25p64", INFO(0x1c2017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
+ { "en25q64", INFO(0x1c3017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
++ { "en25qh128", INFO(0x1c7018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
+ { "en25qh256", INFO(0x1c7019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) },
+
+ /* ESMT */
diff --git
a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.13/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.13/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..35f84ef
--- /dev/null
+++
b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.13/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+From 0233dcb52eefa0b29250a6d8a58b3143790df57d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sergey Ryazanov
+Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:23:00 +0400
+Subject: [PATCH] mtd: m25p80: add support for EON EN25QH128
+
+Signed-off-by: Sergey Ryazanov
+---
+ drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
+@@ -751,6 +751,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_i
+ { "en25q32b", INFO(0x1c3016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) },
+ { "en25p64",INFO(0x1c2017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
+ { "en25q64",INFO(0x1c3017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
++ { "en25qh128", INFO(0x1c7018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
+ { "en25qh256", INFO(0x1c7019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) },
+
+ /* ESMT */
diff --git
a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.14/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.14/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..5465d1c
--- /dev/null
+++
b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.14/473-mtd-m25p80-add-support-for-EON-EN25QH128-flash.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+From 0233dcb52eefa0b29250a6d8a58b3143790df57d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sergey Ryazanov
+Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:23:00 +0400
+Subject: [PATCH] mtd: m25p80: add support for EON EN25QH128
+
+Signed-off-by:
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Nanostation M2 - does it have a new soc chip from 2014?
So this would mean Nanostation M5's have a chipset/motherboard change, and to date no one has had the opportunity to test OpenWRT on them, correct? Thanks for your diligence. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:12 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com < valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote: > I got a batch of 10 Nanostation loco M2 devices and can confim that they > run OpenWrt without problem. > > I have updated OpenWrt Wiki with all information I have found out so far: > http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/nanostationm2 > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Moses F wrote: > >> ## Please do not write below this line ## >> >> Your request (115726) has been updated. You can add a comment by replying >> to this email. >> >> *Moses F.* (Ubiquiti Networks) >> >> Jun 04 15:35 >> >> Hi Valent, >> >> Thanks for you patience. >> >> Here is the information you are looking for: The new firmware "xw" runs >> on the following board (except Rocket ti). >> >> system type : Atheros AR934x >> cpu model : MIPS 74Kc V4.12 >> >> Hope that's helpful. If you have any other questions, please let us know! >> >> I'm setting this ticket to solved for now, but if you have any additional >> questions, feel free to reply to this email at any time and it'll >> automatically reopen the ticket. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Moses F. >> Ubiquiti Networks >> >>*Moses F.* (Ubiquiti Networks) >> >> Jun 03 17:50 >> >> Hi Valent, >> >> The NanoStationM2 still runs on the older board. That's the reason there >> is no XW firmware. >> >> I'm still awaiting the information regarding the newer motherboard. >> >> Thanks for your patience! >> >> Moses F. >> Ubiquiti Networks >> >>*valent.turkovic* >> >> Jun 03 11:41 >> >> Hi Mozes, >> I'm also looking at Nanostation M2 download page: >> http://www.ubnt.com/download#NanoStation:M2 >> >> And here only XM AirOS image is listed, there is no XV image like on >> Nanostation M5 download page: >> http://www.ubnt.com/download#NanoStation:M5 >> >> Why? >> >> *valent.turkovic* >> >> Jun 03 05:47 >> >> Thanks for confirming that Nanostatio Loco M2 devices have changed. >> From what I saw it looks like you have changed SoC (main chip). From >> what I found out so far it looks like old chip was ar724x and new one >> is ar934x >> >> This is a really SIGNIFICANT change! >> >> I have stopped my order of 50 Nanostation M2 Loco devices because of >> this! >> >> I need OpenWrt support because AirOS doesn't support OLSR and BATMAN >> routing protocols, which we use in our community wifi network. >> >> There are hundreds of wifi communities like ours, with many thousands >> Ubiquiti devices, and we need 100% rock-solid support of OpenWrt >> running on your hardware. Ubiquiti has stopped delivering SDK so there >> is no more option to use AirOS + OLSR or BATMAN, now our only option >> is to completely replace AirOS with OpenWrt. >> >> So this change is a really big impact on all of us who can't use your >> hardware unless we have routing protocols our networks use! >> >> So please take OpenWrt support seriously, we are a base custome for >> your devices, which your marketing and develpment departements seam to >> not get or care about. Which is a shame because you are turning away >> your years long and loyal customers away by these kind of action. >> >> Please forward this message to your supperiors and ask them to join in >> the discussion on OpenWrt development mailing list or to provide >> direct emails on which they team leads can be contacted. >> >> Have a nice day. >> >> *Moses F.* (Ubiquiti Networks) >> >> Jun 02 16:58 >> >> Hi Valent, >> >> Thanks for getting in touch with us! >> >> Yes, we have come up with the new board for these devices. Just for easy >> understanding the devices with the xw firmware run on the latest >> motherboard. eg: http://www.ubnt.com/download#NanoStation:M5. You'll see >> two firmware here. The xw is for new board and the xm for the older devices. >> >> I'm not sure about the chip-set. I'll get the information and get back to >> you. >> >> Thanks for your patience! >> >> Moses F. >> Ubiquiti Networks >> >>*valent.turkovic* >> >> Jun 02 16:30 >> >> I have heard from guys at Wlan Slovenia that you have changed chip on new >> models of Nanostation M2 from Atheros ar71xx to Atheros ar934x >> >> >> Could you please confirm or deny this information. Has there been any >> change in SoC that is used in Nanostation M2 and M2 Loco devices? >> >> Cheers, >> Valent. >> This email is a service from Ubiquiti Networks. >> Message-Id:1Q2V5JR6_538f9f164c0e1_1f103f8ead8c9ea417314f_sprut >> > > > > -- > follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com > linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave > ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > -- Be
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] bb luci error
Hi, fixed with http://luci.subsignal.org/trac/changeset/10286 - thanks for your heads-up. ~ Jow signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] bb luci error
Is it ok, if i send some error-messages? /usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:211: /etc/config/luci seems to be corrupt, unable to find section 'main' File /etc/config/luci dosen't exist. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
