[OpenWrt-Devel] [openwrt] Patch notification: 79 patches updated

2019-04-26 Thread Patchwork
Hello,

The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in Patchwork:

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] download.mk, image.mk: add --mode=a-s option to tar
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1068464/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,1/2] openssl: patch to fix devcrypto sessions leak
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1043245/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel: nf-nathelper depends on ipt-raw
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/967392/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Superseded

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,v2] openssl: backport devcrypto changes from master
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046426/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Superseded

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,v2,1/1] libpcap: patch to add limits.h to 
pcap-usb-linux.c
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/952133/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,v2] kernel: nf-nathelper depends on ipt-raw
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/967393/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Superseded

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] brcm63xx: initial support for Sky SR102 router
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/944013/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] openssl: add Eneas U de Queiroz as maintainer
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1088859/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] cryptodev-linux: move from packages feed
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/995670/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Superseded

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx: add support for UniFi-AC-Mesh-Pro
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/994769/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,1/2] iproute2: RFC update cake support
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/918489/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: RFC

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,2/2] kmod-sched-cake: RFC latest cake
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/918490/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: RFC

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,2/4] libevent2: Make it build using OpenSSL 1.1.0
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/918219/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Not Applicable

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,1/4] openssl: Upgrade to 1.1.0h
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/918220/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Not Applicable

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] Honour NO_COLOR in include/scan.mk
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1033566/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Superseded

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,1/1] openssl, wolfssl: match mbedTLS ciphersuite list
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/950307/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,v3] openssl: backport devcrypto changes from master
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1047918/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Superseded

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,3/4] adb: added patch for openssl 1.1.0 compatibility
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/918221/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Not Applicable

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] openssl: fix devcrypto engine md blocksize
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046380/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Superseded

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,v4] openssl: backport devcrypto changes from master
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1049156/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,4/4] ustream-ssl: openssl-1.1 compatibility
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/918222/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Not Applicable

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] openssl: revert disallowing parallel build
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1054880/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath79: add support for GL.iNet GL-AR750S
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1019411/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Changes Requested

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,v2,ubox] kmodloader: increase module name length
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046591/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel] wireguard: bump to 0.0.20180620
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/932376/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,v2] rtl8812au: Add out-of-tree driver.
 - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1013206/
 - for: OpenWrt development
was: New
now: Accepted

 * openwrt: [OpenWrt-Devel,v2,1/2] lantiq: 

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] procd: add SIGPWR as signal

2019-04-26 Thread Paul Spooren
to use procd in LXC containers they have to support SIGPWR to shutdown.

Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren 
---
 initd/init.c | 1 +
 signal.c | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/initd/init.c b/initd/init.c
index 0349e6e..29eee50 100644
--- a/initd/init.c
+++ b/initd/init.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
sigaction(SIGTERM, _shutdown, NULL);
sigaction(SIGUSR1, _shutdown, NULL);
sigaction(SIGUSR2, _shutdown, NULL);
+   sigaction(SIGPWR, _shutdown, NULL);
 
early();
cmdline();
diff --git a/signal.c b/signal.c
index 07dda9a..9974153 100644
--- a/signal.c
+++ b/signal.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static void signal_shutdown(int signal, siginfo_t *siginfo, 
void *data)
break;
case SIGUSR1:
case SIGUSR2:
+   case SIGPWR:
event = RB_POWER_OFF;
msg = "poweroff";
break;
@@ -90,6 +91,7 @@ void procd_signal(void)
sigaction(SIGINT, _shutdown, NULL);
sigaction(SIGUSR1, _shutdown, NULL);
sigaction(SIGUSR2, _shutdown, NULL);
+   sigaction(SIGPWR, _shutdown, NULL);
sigaction(SIGSEGV, _crash, NULL);
sigaction(SIGBUS, _crash, NULL);
sigaction(SIGHUP, _dummy, NULL);
-- 
2.20.1


___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] RFC: check signatures of sysupgrades via ucert

2019-04-26 Thread Petr Štetiar
Daniel Golle  [2019-04-24 00:33:53]:

Hi,

> I don't think using UCI for this makes sense,

it makes sense to me, as it allows easier opt-in via custom uci-defaults
script for downstream projects during the transition period.

> because people also use sysupgrade in failsafe mode and then may not be able
> to change UCI options. We already got the '-F' option of sysupgrade, imho
> this is enough to ignore an invalid signature.

This is assuming, that the signature verification is enabled by default which
is not going to happen for some time.

-- ynezz

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel