Re: Ethernet switch with linux/openwrt and DSA
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Greg Oliver wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:11 PM Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > > > Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > >> > Finally buy: D-LINK DGS-1210-48 G1. > > >> > > > Also - HP 1920-24G JG924A works correctly. > > > > > But what about future? Is there any new device we can buy and use > > > openwrt there? Or even 2.5Gbps/5Gbps? > > > > > So far just buy used/older devices. > > > > mcr> Is this a device that is still for sale? I have some control plane > > mcr> things that I'd like to test on a variety of switches. I using the > > mcr> Zyxel GS1900 now. > > > > My testing is way behind. > > > > > ZyXEL GS1900-48-EU0102F (new one) will be also fine? > > > > Assuming it boots openwrt, more ports is more interesting to me than faster > > ports. > > I have a handful of GS1900-8HP models I would like to try this out on, > but the images are not where previously mentioned. Get a 404 and only > 4 chipsets are listed under the RealTek nightly directory. Any idea > where I can currently find them? > > TiA! NM - I found it - sorry for the noise! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Ethernet switch with linux/openwrt and DSA
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:11 PM Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > >> > Finally buy: D-LINK DGS-1210-48 G1. > >> > > Also - HP 1920-24G JG924A works correctly. > > > But what about future? Is there any new device we can buy and use > > openwrt there? Or even 2.5Gbps/5Gbps? > > > So far just buy used/older devices. > > mcr> Is this a device that is still for sale? I have some control plane > mcr> things that I'd like to test on a variety of switches. I using the > mcr> Zyxel GS1900 now. > > My testing is way behind. > > > ZyXEL GS1900-48-EU0102F (new one) will be also fine? > > Assuming it boots openwrt, more ports is more interesting to me than faster > ports. I have a handful of GS1900-8HP models I would like to try this out on, but the images are not where previously mentioned. Get a 404 and only 4 chipsets are listed under the RealTek nightly directory. Any idea where I can currently find them? TiA! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Question re DeviceTree addressing
Thank you very much, that clears things up a lot.
Thanks,
Caleb
On 04/04/2023 05:33, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 4/3/2023 7:00 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
Hello folks,
I've been working on trying to port an en7526 and in doing so I'm trying to learn how to at least
partially write a DTS file from an old style header full of #defines.
I ran into a bit of a quandry, I'm comparing the mt7621.dtsi file to an older MT7621 memory map
header:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621.dtsi#L100
https://github.com/keenetic/kernel-49/blob/master/arch/mips/include/asm/rt2880/rt_mmap.h#L48
```
palmbus: palmbus@1e00 {
compatible = "palmbus";
reg = <0x1e00 0x10>;
ranges = <0x0 0x1e00 0x0f>;
[...]
i2c: i2c@900 {
compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-i2c";
reg = <0x900 0x100>;
```
For me, means there should be an I2C controller mapped at address 0x1e000900.
Correct.
But looking at rt_mmap.h I see:
```
#define RALINK_I2C_BASE 0xBE000900
```
And in fact almost everything is based on 0xBE00, except UART and USB addresses which are
"correct". And I see these 0xBE00 addresses being passed through KSEG1ADDR() so it seems they
are physical memory addresses, not virtual.
KSEG1ADDR does a logical or so it would not be altering RALINK_I2C_BASE when OR'd with 0xa000
(KSEG1) you would still get 0xBE000900.
It seems to me like in places where it may be necessary to pass a physical address they used
physical addresses such that ioremap() ends-up returning a proper kernel virtual address in KSEG1,
however everywhere else the driver might have just directly de-referenced the constant which ends-up
working just fine as well.
HTH
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: irt: tools/squashfs4: enable parallel builds
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- > Op 3 apr. 2023, om 23:23 heeft Elliott Mitchell het > volgende geschreven: > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 09:43:28PM +0800, 刘林辉 wrote: >> The reason may be that my computer is under high load all the time. >> >> So I wrote a simple workflow to test squashfs4 using github actions >> https://github.com/lovehackintosh/Actions-OpenWrt/actions/runs/4597175958. > > Okay, I can believe that. Just an issue that it made the commit message > misleading. Parallel building *can* slow things down. `squashfs4` does > look a bit risky for that since most of its source is in 3 files and > everything else is tiny. > > Might want to ensure your background jobs have been run via `nice` or > run `renice` on them later. This makes benchmarks better guides. > > > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 09:12:47PM +0200, Paul Oranje wrote: >> >>> Op 3 apr. 2023, om 00:28 heeft Elliott Mitchell het >>> volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Am I the only person who finds commit 3efd49a588 >> Cannot find that one, but have you seen >> 82e1f041f9a6cf9232c9f73938ef3b11c34cca0f ? >> > > 3efd49a588 is about allowing the build process of `squashfs4` to use > multiple processors. Whereas 82e1f041f9 is about allowing `squashfs4` > to use multiple processors during its runtime. Thus these two do not > conflict and do make sense together. > > (FYI `git rev-parse --short 82e1f041f9a6cf9232c9f73938ef3b11c34cca`) Ah, I should have looked better. Thanks > > > -- > (\___(\___(\__ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- __/)___/)___/) > \BS (| ehem+sig...@m5p.com PGP 87145445 |) / > \_CS\ | _ -O #include O- _ | / _/ > 8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445 > > > > > > > -- > (\___(\___(\__ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- __/)___/)___/) > \BS (| ehem+sig...@m5p.com PGP 87145445 |) / > \_CS\ | _ -O #include O- _ | / _/ > 8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445 > > > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel --- End Message --- ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
