Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

[Roman Yeryomin]

On 2018-04-01 17:48, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:

The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in the next release.

The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* gemini
There are patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list, we will
probably get them in before the release and ship this with 4.14


Hi Hauke, I have a working 4.9, is it too late to submit?
I'll also work on 4.14 submitted by Linus, but it didn't work out of the 
box, so probably will take more time.


Regards,
Roman
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

[Alexandru Ardelean]

On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Hauke Mehrtens  wrote:
> The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
> on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
> will not be included in the next release.
>
> I did some overview of the kernel version some months ago here:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009446.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-February/011308.html
>
> Here is the current situation as of today:
>
>
> The following targets are on kernel 4.14 and are fine:
> * apm821xx
> * archs38
> * armvirt
> * bcm53xx
> * cns3xxx
> * imx6
> * ipq40xx
> * kirkwood
> * malta
> * mediatek
> * mvebu
> * mxs
> * octeon
> * octeontx
> * pistachio
> * sunxi
> * x86
>
>
> The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
> * ar71xx
> * ar7
> * arc770
> * at91
> There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list,
> but it looks like nobody with the hardware wants to take care
> of them.
> * ath25
> * brcm2708
> * brcm47xx
> There is a pull request with kernel 4.14 patches on github, we
> will probably stay with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
> * brcm63xx
> patches for 4.14 are available in master
> * ipq806x
> * ixp4xx
> * lantiq
> patches for 4.14 are available in master, we will probably stay
> with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
> * layerscape
> * mpc85xx
> * omap
> There is a pull request with kernel 4.14 patches on github.
> * orion
> * ramips
> patches for 4.14 are available in master, we will probably stay
> with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
> * rb532
> * uml
>
>
> The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be
> included in the next release:
> * gemini
> There are patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list, we will
> probably get them in before the release and ship this with 4.14
> * oxnas
> * zynq

Will these targets be dropped/removed from the tree ?
I'd be interested in upgrading the zynq target.
And I also have a partial work/effort in a repo, but not enough time
to test + push it.

I don't need this to be part of the 18.xx release, just curios if it
will still be in the tree, and then I can alloc time for it at a later
time.

Thanks
Alex

>
> The following targets are on kernel 3.18 and will probably not be
> included in the next release:
> * adm5120
> * adm8668
> * au1000
> * mcs814x
> * ppc40x
> * ppc44x
> * xburst
>
>
> This target is on kernel 4.1 (WTF):
> * omap24xx
>
>
> All the targets which are not on kernel 4.9 or 4.14 will probably not be
> included in the next release, I also haven't seen any activity for any
> of them expected the gemini target to get support for more recent kernel
> versions, if you need them please take care now.
>
> I am fine with the current status and do not see this as a blocker for
> the next release, all important targets are on either 4.9 or 4.14, if
> someone wants to see his target on a more recent version we are still
> open for patches.
>
> Hauke
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

[Hauke Mehrtens]

The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in the next release.

I did some overview of the kernel version some months ago here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009446.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-February/011308.html

Here is the current situation as of today:


The following targets are on kernel 4.14 and are fine:
* apm821xx
* archs38
* armvirt
* bcm53xx
* cns3xxx
* imx6
* ipq40xx
* kirkwood
* malta
* mediatek
* mvebu
* mxs
* octeon
* octeontx
* pistachio
* sunxi
* x86


The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
* ar71xx
* ar7
* arc770
* at91
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list,
but it looks like nobody with the hardware wants to take care
of them.
* ath25
* brcm2708
* brcm47xx
There is a pull request with kernel 4.14 patches on github, we
will probably stay with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
* brcm63xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* ipq806x
* ixp4xx
* lantiq
patches for 4.14 are available in master, we will probably stay
with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
* layerscape
* mpc85xx
* omap
There is a pull request with kernel 4.14 patches on github.
* orion
* ramips
patches for 4.14 are available in master, we will probably stay
with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
* rb532
* uml


The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* gemini
There are patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list, we will
probably get them in before the release and ship this with 4.14
* oxnas
* zynq

The following targets are on kernel 3.18 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* adm5120
* adm8668
* au1000
* mcs814x
* ppc40x
* ppc44x
* xburst


This target is on kernel 4.1 (WTF):
* omap24xx


All the targets which are not on kernel 4.9 or 4.14 will probably not be
included in the next release, I also haven't seen any activity for any
of them expected the gemini target to get support for more recent kernel
versions, if you need them please take care now.

I am fine with the current status and do not see this as a blocker for
the next release, all important targets are on either 4.9 or 4.14, if
someone wants to see his target on a more recent version we are still
open for patches.

Hauke
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

[Zoltan HERPAI]

Hi,

Michael Heimpold wrote:

Hi,

Am Sonntag, 18. Februar 2018, 22:43:42 CET schrieb Hauke Mehrtens:
  

...

The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
...
* mxs
...



a few weeks ago, I was in contact with Zoltan who started working
on 4.14 support for mxs. I found some patches in his staging repo
and added some patches on top.
I've pushed this in a Github branch:
https://github.com/mhei/source/tree/mxs-4.14

I run tested this on both I2SE Duckbill devices and Olimex OLinuXino
Maxi boards - no obvious problems so far, so I think we can go ahead
for this platform with 4.14.
  

Thanks Michael, this is pushed to master now.

Regards,
Zoltan H
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

[Michael Heimpold]

Hi,

Am Sonntag, 18. Februar 2018, 22:43:42 CET schrieb Hauke Mehrtens:
> ...
> 
> The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
> ...
> * mxs
> ...

a few weeks ago, I was in contact with Zoltan who started working
on 4.14 support for mxs. I found some patches in his staging repo
and added some patches on top.
I've pushed this in a Github branch:
https://github.com/mhei/source/tree/mxs-4.14

I run tested this on both I2SE Duckbill devices and Olimex OLinuXino
Maxi boards - no obvious problems so far, so I think we can go ahead
for this platform with 4.14.

Regards,
Michael
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel