* Claudio Leite (lei...@staticky.com) wrote:
> This sets 'enable_vlan' and thus uses 802.1q
> VLANs, but without tagging on either interface.
Note: this depends on the previous patch, since setting up the switch
when both interfaces have the same MAC address results in a ton of
packet loss. This might be a bug in the switch driver. It may be
related that with the current setup (i.e. without either of these
patches) I see a lot of
[ 65.401622] br-lan: received packet on eth0 with own address as
source address
while running NAT routing tests between two PCs, using both LAN and
WAN interfaces. They seem to go away once I change the MAC (patch 1
only) which then also allows the setup from this patch to work. However,
I might be mixed up as to what the cause is, since I haven't looked
into this too deeply yet. Any insight is appreciated.
It's worth noting the original Linksys firmware seems to use the same
MAC on both interfaces.
-Claudio
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite
> ---
> target/linux/mvebu/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network
> b/target/linux/mvebu/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network
> index 8b1ed6a..9464f36 100644
> --- a/target/linux/mvebu/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network
> +++ b/target/linux/mvebu/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ board=$(mvebu_board_name)
> case "$board" in
> armada-xp-mamba)
> ucidef_set_interfaces_lan_wan "eth0" "eth1"
> + ucidef_add_switch "switch0" "1" "1"
> + ucidef_add_switch_vlan "switch0" "1" "0 1 2 3 5"
> + ucidef_add_switch_vlan "switch0" "2" "4 6"
> ;;
>
> *)
> --
> 2.1.4
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
