[OpenWrt-Devel] mpcC85xx
Hi, I am about to buy a TP-Link WDR4900 because of its powerful NAT throughput (https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=244167#p244167) Some say that this router with his rather uncommon platform mpcC85xx has been abandoned. I'm not sure about this. Could you clarify the state of the future support this router or SoC will have from your team? I won't buy it if it doesn't participate in further development of OpenWrt. Thank you in advance. Klaus ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] mpcC85xx
* Klaus Maus klaus.ma...@aol.com [22.10.2014 10:57]: Could you clarify the state of the future support this router or SoC i have some (~50) and the german Telekom uses the platform in the trains, so i bet somebody will take core of it 8-) and it's FOSS and ath9k based, so you will not totally loose the control. bye, bastian ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] mpcC85xx
On 22/10/14 11:33, Klaus Maus wrote: Hi, I am about to buy a TP-Link WDR4900 because of its powerful NAT throughput (https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=244167#p244167) Some say that this router with his rather uncommon platform mpcC85xx has been abandoned. I'm not sure about this. I built Barrier Breaker, r42961 for mine and with NAT it peaks at 415 Mbit/s WAN - LAN with PPPoE. Could you clarify the state of the future support this router or SoC will have from your team? I won't buy it if it doesn't participate in further development of OpenWrt. Thank you in advance. Klaus ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] mpcC85xx
Seems this target does not get as much attention as for example ar71xx. Until now there is this nasty mac address bug that every wdr4900 has the same mac address [1] (if you don't manually set it in /etc/config/network). Regards Nico [1] https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/14714 Am 22.10.2014 um 10:33 schrieb Klaus Maus: Hi, I am about to buy a TP-Link WDR4900 because of its powerful NAT throughput (https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=244167#p244167) Some say that this router with his rather uncommon platform mpcC85xx has been abandoned. I'm not sure about this. Could you clarify the state of the future support this router or SoC will have from your team? I won't buy it if it doesn't participate in further development of OpenWrt. Thank you in advance. Klaus ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
