RE: Notes on ath79 RouterBoard 493G image

2020-08-01 Thread mail
Hi,

> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of W. Michael Petullo
> Sent: Samstag, 1. August 2020 06:57
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Notes on ath79 RouterBoard 493G image
> 
> I have some feedback about the ATH79 RouterBoard 493G image built from
> master, as documented at:
> 
>   https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3026
> 
> First, I was unable to update to the sysupgrade image at:
> 
>   https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/targets/ath79/mikrotik/o
> penwrt-ath79-mikrotik-mikrotik_routerboard-493g-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
> 
> while running 19.07.2, although the initial comments on the pull request
> above indicate this is possible. I fixed this by untarring the sysupgrade 
> image,
> renaming its top-level directory from sysupgrade-mikrotik_routerboard-
> rb493g/ to sysupgrade-routerboard/, and retarring the sysupgrade image.

This has been "fixed" for ar71xx @19.07 here:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/6ffd4d8a4de2a7c35a841a21c4b4116dfe54b754

This is in 19.07.3, but not in 19.07.2. So, if you had updated to 19.07.3 
before going for master, it would have worked.
The problem is that ar71xx hardcoded a certain name here, and that code is 
taken from the "old" device.

I cannot comment on your second issue.

Best

Adrian 


openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Notes on ath79 RouterBoard 493G image

2020-07-31 Thread W. Michael Petullo
I have some feedback about the ATH79 RouterBoard 493G image built from
master, as documented at:

https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3026

First, I was unable to update to the sysupgrade image at:


https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/targets/ath79/mikrotik/openwrt-ath79-mikrotik-mikrotik_routerboard-493g-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin

while running 19.07.2, although the initial comments on the
pull request above indicate this is possible. I fixed this by
untarring the sysupgrade image, renaming its top-level directory from
sysupgrade-mikrotik_routerboard-rb493g/ to sysupgrade-routerboard/,
and retarring the sysupgrade image.

I suspect something changed between the time of the intial pull request
comment and the eventual merge. Is there a better way of doing
this? DHCP/TFTP booting the ATH79 image directly fails; I suspect this
is due to the size of the image (see the related comments throught the
merge request referenced above).

Second, the boot process fails as follows after performing the sysupgrade:

[2.117395] UBI: auto-attach mtd2
[2.120802] ubi0: attaching mtd2
[3.260133] ubi0: scanning is finished
[3.326963] ubi0 error: ubi_read_volume_table: not enough PEBs, required 
970, available 958
[3.335627] ubi0 error: ubi_attach_mtd_dev: failed to attach mtd2, error -28
[3.342742] UBI error: cannot attach mtd2
[3.347369] /dev/root: Can't open blockdev
[3.351531] VFS: Cannot open root device "(null)" or unknown-block(0,0): 
error -6
[3.358996] Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the 
available partitions:
[3.367344] 1f00 256 mtdblock0
[3.367347]  (driver?)
[3.373884] 1f018192 mtdblock1
[3.373886]  (driver?)
[3.380420] 1f02  122624 mtdblock2
[3.380422]  (driver?)
[3.386951] 1f03  64 mtdblock3
[3.386953]  (driver?)
[3.393486] 1f04  44 mtdblock4
[3.393488]  (driver?)
[3.400024] 1f05   4 mtdblock5
[3.400026]  (driver?)
[3.406554] 1f06   4 mtdblock6
[3.406557]  (driver?)
[3.413089] 1f07   8 mtdblock7
[3.413091]  (driver?)
[3.419620] 1f08   4 mtdblock8
[3.419623]  (driver?)
[3.426155] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 
unknown-block(0,0)
[3.434403] Rebooting in 1 seconds..

I am not sure what causes this.

-- 
Mike

:wq

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel