Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 05 Dec 2018 (ww86)
Will be late to meeting as I have a conflict. Will try to join late. - Original Message - From: "Sridhar K. N. Rao" To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: "ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'" , "Trevor Cooper" , "Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)" , "Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com)" , "Bill Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com)" , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "eddie arrage" , "Jose Angel Lausuch" , "Julien Meunier" , "thomas faivre" , "martin klozik" , "richard elias" , "Bob Fubel" Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 10:20:48 PM Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 05 Dec 2018 (ww86) Agenda: 1. Development Update 2. IEEE NFVSDN – summary. 3. Containerizing VSPERF - Review .proto 4. Results Container. 5. Acumos-VSPERF : Model Contribution. Meeting minutes * WW85: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-11-21-16.04.html * WW84: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-11-14-15.58.html * WW83: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-10-31-15.03.html Time: Wednesday PT 8h00 UTC 16h00 . IRC: freenode https://freenode.net/ channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf; http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf Audio: https://zoom.us/j/2362828999 Or iPhone one-tap : US: +16699006833,,2362828999# or +16465588656,,2362828999# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 880 1246 (Toll Free) Meeting ID: 236 282 8999 International numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=Xn-Kas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n Cheers, Sridhar -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22507): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22507 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/28607465/1217144 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [ctrau...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22510): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22510 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/28607465/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] CANCELLED - VSPERF weekly meeting - 17 OCT 2018.
Hi All, I will not be able to make the meeting tomorrow due to a sales demo I am giving. I plan on working on the ubuntu image performance drop investigation starting Thursday this week so I'll have updates next weeks meeting. Bob will still be on for any updates that need RedHats attention. Thanks! -Christian, - Original Message - From: "Sridhar K. N. Rao" To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: "ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'" , "Trevor Cooper" , "Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)" , "Cian Ferriter" , "Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com)" , "Bill Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com)" , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "eddie arrage" , "Jose Angel Lausuch" , "Julien Meunier" , "thomas faivre" , "martin klozik" , "richard elias" , "Emma Finn" , "Bob Fubel" , "Akanksha Srivastava" Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 10:40:24 PM Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] CANCELLED - VSPERF weekly meeting - 17 OCT 2018. Hi all, I’m Sorry, I’ll have to cancel this week’s meeting. I’ll be travelling and AL will be chairing a meeting in Germany around same time. We will meet on 24 th October. My Apologies. Regards Sridhar -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22171): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22171 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/27376455/1217144 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [ctrau...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22207): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22207 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/27376455/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Vote for new VSPERF PTL
+1 - Original Message - From: "ALFRED C MORTON (AL)" To: "Trevor Cooper" , opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: "MartinX Klozik" , "Bill Michalowski" , "Christian Trautman" , "Sridhar Rao" , "Maryam Tahhan" Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 8:48:29 AM Subject: RE: [VSPERF] Vote for new VSPERF PTL +1, thanks for stepping-up, Sridhar! Al From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 7:11 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Klozik, MartinX; 'Bill Michalowski'; 'Christian Trautman'; Rao, Sridhar; Tahhan, Maryam; Cooper, Trevor Subject: [VSPERF] Vote for new VSPERF PTL Importance: High VSPERF committers … There have been no further nominations for the VSPERF PTL position … therefore Sridhar Rao from Spirent is the sole candidate. To provide a record of this and acknowledgement from VSPERF committers please respond here indicating your approval/disapproval (+1, -1) for Sridhar to take over as PTL effective from the Euphrates release. Thanks! Trevor From: Cooper, Trevor Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 8:59 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org ; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) < acmor...@att.com >; Klozik, MartinX < martinx.klo...@intel.com >; 'Bill Michalowski' < bmich...@redhat.com >; 'Christian Trautman' < ctrau...@redhat.com >; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' < mars.toktonal...@nokia.com >; Raymond Paik < rp...@linuxfoundation.org >; dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org ; 'Rao, Sridhar' < sridhar@spirent.com > Subject: [VSPERF] New PTL for VSPERF after E release I will be stepping down as PTL for VSPERF effective from the E release. Thank you VSPERF team … I am very grateful for the opportunity to lead the project through Danube and Euphrates. I have learned a lot from all of you and have enjoyed your company immensely. I would like to nominate Sridhar Rao (Spirent) as the next VSPERF PTL. If there are any further nominations please notify by 6 th October. /Trevor ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] E Release DPDK/OVS/VPP/QEMU versions
Thank you for the update Martin I will keep my document patch for the tunings staged for now locally until we can get past this and have you verify the tunings on the CI pod. -Christian, - Original Message - From: "MartinX Klozik" To: "Christian Trautman" Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 3:00:54 AM Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] E Release DPDK/OVS/VPP/QEMU versions Hi Christian, unfortunately I was not able to run CI runs with updated version of vsperf’s toolset. The reason is, that all PODs hosted by Intel are not reachable from Jenkins running at build.opnfv.org. This situation is caused by update of firewall at Intel side and it is not solved yet. Thus we won’t be able to properly verify possible update of toolset before the fork of stable branch. I suggest to update toolset versions in unfrozen master branch after the fork and if vsperf proves itself stable enough, we can discuss a possibility to merge these changes to the stable/Euphrates branch afterwards. Broken CI is also preventing us to evaluate an impact of your CI tuning tips, because CI is not running since 31 st of August. I followed your tips provided in Jira to tune CI node (pod12-node3) at Friday 1 st of September and manual TC execution looked promising. At first I thought, that broken connection between node3 and Jenkins was caused by node configuration changes and reboot, but finally I’ve found that it is a generic issue. So for proper evaluation of results and fine tuning of vpserf configuration, we have to wait until CI will be up again. Let’s hope, that Intel will be able to open accidently forbidden port in firewall soon. Best Regards, Martin From: Christian Trautman [mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 4:49 PM To: Klozik, MartinX Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] E Release DPDK/OVS/VPP/QEMU versions Hi Martin, I've tested QEMU 2.9 on some internal tests as well and saw no issues. I think moving OVS to 2.7 is a good idea. 2.8.0 is still too new. DPDK 17.05 should work fine. I've used it inside guests for some time now without issues. I haven't checked it against OVS 2.7 though. I think running some tests with the agreed newer versions and giving the green light would be a good approach. We should move up a bit for E release if possible. -Christian, - Original Message - From: "MartinX Klozik" < martinx.klo...@intel.com > To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 7:41:15 AM Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] E Release DPDK/OVS/VPP/QEMU versions Hi vsperf community, as of now, vsperf uses following versions of DPDK/OVS/VPP respectively: DPDK_TAG ?= v17.02 OVS_TAG ?= cc3a32f3b6891168cee98812e8f5e3d8a5a52c98 (in general compatible with DPDK v17.02, so about 6 months old) VPP_TAG ?= v17.04 QEMU_TAG ?= v2.5.0 Do we want to keep it as it is for E release? In general vsperf is able to run with: 1) DPDK v17.05 & compatible OVS (cca 2-3 months old where support for 17.05 was merged) - which is known to have issues with MULTIQUEUES in the GUESTs, so v17.05.1 have to be enforced; However this tag can be installed by standard vsperf build scripts, as it is not present in DPDK git repository – in a nutshell I would rather avoid this buggy version 2) DPDK v17.08 & OVS (current master works just fine) – if we would like to upgrade – this would be the proper candidate 3) VPP v17.07 4) QEMU 2.8.0 (I’ve tested it some time ago) and probably also QEMU 2.9.0 (can be easily tested) In case there will be an interest to include newer DPDK/OVS/VPP/DPDK versions in E release, I can run a several CI runs with selected versions to verify its performance and stability and we can take a decision next week, if newer set of tools should be used or not. Overall, it is just a matter of modification of src/package-list.mk In case we will keep current DPDK/OVS/VPP/QEMU versions for E release. Then I suggest to switch to recent versions in master branch after the fork of Euphrates stable branch. Please advise, Martin -- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] E Release DPDK/OVS/VPP/QEMU versions
Hi Martin, I've tested QEMU 2.9 on some internal tests as well and saw no issues. I think moving OVS to 2.7 is a good idea. 2.8.0 is still too new. DPDK 17.05 should work fine. I've used it inside guests for some time now without issues. I haven't checked it against OVS 2.7 though. I think running some tests with the agreed newer versions and giving the green light would be a good approach. We should move up a bit for E release if possible. -Christian, - Original Message - From: "MartinX Klozik" To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 7:41:15 AM Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] E Release DPDK/OVS/VPP/QEMU versions Hi vsperf community, as of now, vsperf uses following versions of DPDK/OVS/VPP respectively: DPDK_TAG ?= v17.02 OVS_TAG ?= cc3a32f3b6891168cee98812e8f5e3d8a5a52c98 (in general compatible with DPDK v17.02, so about 6 months old) VPP_TAG ?= v17.04 QEMU_TAG ?= v2.5.0 Do we want to keep it as it is for E release? In general vsperf is able to run with: 1) DPDK v17.05 & compatible OVS (cca 2-3 months old where support for 17.05 was merged) - which is known to have issues with MULTIQUEUES in the GUESTs, so v17.05.1 have to be enforced; However this tag can be installed by standard vsperf build scripts, as it is not present in DPDK git repository – in a nutshell I would rather avoid this buggy version 2) DPDK v17.08 & OVS (current master works just fine) – if we would like to upgrade – this would be the proper candidate 3) VPP v17.07 4) QEMU 2.8.0 (I’ve tested it some time ago) and probably also QEMU 2.9.0 (can be easily tested) In case there will be an interest to include newer DPDK/OVS/VPP/DPDK versions in E release, I can run a several CI runs with selected versions to verify its performance and stability and we can take a decision next week, if newer set of tools should be used or not. Overall, it is just a matter of modification of src/package-list.mk In case we will keep current DPDK/OVS/VPP/QEMU versions for E release. Then I suggest to switch to recent versions in master branch after the fork of Euphrates stable branch. Please advise, Martin -- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
[opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Meeting notes for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017
Meeting notes for today. Minutes: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-30-15.03.html Minutes (text): http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-30-15.03.txt Log: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-30-15.03.log.html Talk to you all next week. -Christian, - Original Message - From: "Christian Trautman" To: "ALFRED C MORTON (AL)" Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:17:30 AM Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017 I'll see if I can do take the meeting notes. Just need to find a quick how to before the meeting. -Christian, - Original Message - From: "ALFRED C MORTON (AL)" To: "Trevor Cooper" , opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: "Sridhar Rao" , "MartinX Klozik" , "Bill Michalowski" , "Christian Trautman" , "Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)" Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 8:31:08 AM Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017 Thanks for letting us know, Trevor. I will use the organizer credentials to start the meeting at 1100 EDT. I’m in the office today, and despite filling an exception with IT, my IRC access is blocked. So, I could use some help with IRC minutes. see others at the meeting, Al From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:39 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Sridhar Rao; Klozik, MartinX; Bill Michalowski; Christian Trautman; Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving) Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017 I am unable to attend the vsperf weekly meeting tomorrow … some suggestions for agenda topics are … - TREX integration / testing https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/34561/ (Latency statistics are affecting Trex performance so they are disabled by default, Sridhar configuration files in Jira, …) - Test API patch … was merged https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/40005/ - CI POD tuning (tests and documentation) Previous Minutes - Ww34 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-23-14.59.html - ww33 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-16-14.57.html - ww32 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-09-14.45.html - ww31 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-02-14.55.html - ww30 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-07-26-15.03.html Time: Wednesday UTC 15h00, Ireland (UTC/GMT +1) 16h00, PDT 8h00 (UTC/GMT -7) … Currently observing daylight saving IRC: freenode https://freenode.net/ channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf Audio: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/391235029 You can also dial in using your phone. United States: +1 (571) 317-3116 Access Code: 391-235-029 Phone numbers from other countries are here … https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings /Trevor ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017
I'll see if I can do take the meeting notes. Just need to find a quick how to before the meeting. -Christian, - Original Message - From: "ALFRED C MORTON (AL)" To: "Trevor Cooper" , opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: "Sridhar Rao" , "MartinX Klozik" , "Bill Michalowski" , "Christian Trautman" , "Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)" Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 8:31:08 AM Subject: RE: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017 Thanks for letting us know, Trevor. I will use the organizer credentials to start the meeting at 1100 EDT. I’m in the office today, and despite filling an exception with IT, my IRC access is blocked. So, I could use some help with IRC minutes. see others at the meeting, Al From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:39 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Sridhar Rao; Klozik, MartinX; Bill Michalowski; Christian Trautman; Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving) Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 30 Aug 2017 I am unable to attend the vsperf weekly meeting tomorrow … some suggestions for agenda topics are … - TREX integration / testing https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/34561/ (Latency statistics are affecting Trex performance so they are disabled by default, Sridhar configuration files in Jira, …) - Test API patch … was merged https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/40005/ - CI POD tuning (tests and documentation) Previous Minutes - Ww34 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-23-14.59.html - ww33 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-16-14.57.html - ww32 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-09-14.45.html - ww31 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-02-14.55.html - ww30 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-07-26-15.03.html Time: Wednesday UTC 15h00, Ireland (UTC/GMT +1) 16h00, PDT 8h00 (UTC/GMT -7) … Currently observing daylight saving IRC: freenode https://freenode.net/ channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf Audio: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/391235029 You can also dial in using your phone. United States: +1 (571) 317-3116 Access Code: 391-235-029 Phone numbers from other countries are here … https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings /Trevor ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VOTE on generating VSPERF Stable branch for Danube
Late to the party but yes +1 - Original Message - From: "ALFRED C MORTON (AL)" To: "Bill Michalowski" , "Trevor Cooper" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 8:30:33 PM Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VOTE on generating VSPERF Stable branch for Danube +1, nice work folks! From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Bill Michalowski Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 3:46 PM To: Trevor Cooper Cc: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VOTE on generating VSPERF Stable branch for Danube +1 - Original Message - From: Trevor Cooper < trevor.coo...@intel.com > To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' < opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > Sent: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:30:51 -0500 (EST) Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VOTE on generating VSPERF Stable branch for Danube VSPERF committers and contributors … The deadline for creating the stable branch of VSPERF for Danube is 10 th March There are currently are no outstanding patches waiting for review or commit PLEASE RESPOND WITH +1, 0, -1 to indicated your agreement/disagreement with generating the stable branch. We will check on the consensus at our weekly meeting this week (Wednesday) before the final decision to proceed. Thanks Trevor (VSPERF PTL) ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Poll for the OPNFV D-release naming
Just curious if the scale is a rank 10 being highest or a rank 1 being highest? I didn't see this noted anywhere. Thanks, -Christian, - Original Message - From: "Raymond Paik" To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Sent: Monday, September 5, 2016 12:01:22 AM Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Poll for the OPNFV D-release naming Everyone: Here's the link to the D-release naming poll: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/6639ZCC The poll will close at 5pm Pacific Time on September 9th (Friday). Thanks, Ray ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test?
Hi Binghan, Moongen does support collection of latency stats so it just needs to be added to VSPerf. We will add this as a JIRA ticket and advise you when its available. Thanks. -Christian, - Original Message - From: "Christian Trautman" To: "Binghan" Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:14:40 PM Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test? Hi Binghan, Moongen in VSPerf does not currently collect latency stats. I will inquire with the developers if this is planned in the near future and get back to you. -Christian, - Original Message - From: "Binghan" To: "MartinX Klozik" Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:04:15 AM Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test? Hi Martin, I am using Moongen, I cannot find latency result from Moongen log, I consider that VSperf parse Moongen log to get the test result. And about the configuration, I did not use the custom.conf, everything is by default. Sure, traffic generator part has been reconfigured, but nothing else. I attached pvp test log file and test report. Thanks a lot. BRs, Binghan On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Klozik, MartinX < martinx.klo...@intel.com > wrote: Hi Binghan, Could you please sent us following info? * what traffic generator you use * your vsperf configuration * full test output In general these values are reported by traffic generator and the level of implementation might be different among supported traffic generators. It would be good to check if these latencies are visible in traffic generator itself. Thank you, Martin From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org ] On Behalf Of Binghan Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 3:02 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test? Hi VSPERF experts, I am trying to use VSPERF to benchmark OVS performance. I use default configuration, but no matter I run PVP test or P2P test, the latency result is always 0. Do I need to configure anything special to enable latency test? BRs, Binghan [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: throughput_rx_fps, Value: 19123026.00 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: throughput_rx_mbps, Value: 9950.989 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: throughput_rx_percent, Value: 64.253 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: tx_rate_fps, Value: 19123026.00 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: tx_rate_mbps, Value: 12850.673 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: tx_rate_percent, Value: 64.253 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: min_latency_ns, Value: 0.000 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: max_latency_ns, Value: 0.000 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: avg_latency_ns, Value: 0.000 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: type, Value: rfc2544 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: packet_size, Value: 64 -- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test?
Hi Binghan, Moongen in VSPerf does not currently collect latency stats. I will inquire with the developers if this is planned in the near future and get back to you. -Christian, - Original Message - From: "Binghan" To: "MartinX Klozik" Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:04:15 AM Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test? Hi Martin, I am using Moongen, I cannot find latency result from Moongen log, I consider that VSperf parse Moongen log to get the test result. And about the configuration, I did not use the custom.conf, everything is by default. Sure, traffic generator part has been reconfigured, but nothing else. I attached pvp test log file and test report. Thanks a lot. BRs, Binghan On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Klozik, MartinX < martinx.klo...@intel.com > wrote: Hi Binghan, Could you please sent us following info? * what traffic generator you use * your vsperf configuration * full test output In general these values are reported by traffic generator and the level of implementation might be different among supported traffic generators. It would be good to check if these latencies are visible in traffic generator itself. Thank you, Martin From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org ] On Behalf Of Binghan Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 3:02 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] How to enable latency test? Hi VSPERF experts, I am trying to use VSPERF to benchmark OVS performance. I use default configuration, but no matter I run PVP test or P2P test, the latency result is always 0. Do I need to configure anything special to enable latency test? BRs, Binghan [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: throughput_rx_fps, Value: 19123026.00 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: throughput_rx_mbps, Value: 9950.989 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: throughput_rx_percent, Value: 64.253 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: tx_rate_fps, Value: 19123026.00 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root) - Key: tx_rate_mbps, Value: 12850.673 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: tx_rate_percent, Value: 64.253 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: min_latency_ns, Value: 0.000 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: max_latency_ns, Value: 0.000 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: avg_latency_ns, Value: 0.000 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: type, Value: rfc2544 [INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,728 : (root) - Key: packet_size, Value: 64 -- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] support CLI for all configuration parameters
+1
This would be extremely helpful for our CI scripts.
-Christian,
- Original Message -
From: "MartinX Klozik"
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 9:18:07 AM
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] support CLI for all configuration
parameters
Hi Folks,
Currently VSPERF uses a lot of configuration options spread among several
configuration files, but only a few of them are configurable “on the fly” by
CLI option –test-params. During the past, there were several requirements to
allow a CLI modification of various configuration options. So in these days
some of them can be modified, but it is hard to find, which one (one have to
consult documentation related to the specific feature).
What about a change which will allow to modify any option by CLI (and
“Parameters” option of testcase definition)? It means, that for any
configuration option (by default UPPER case name) its lower case form can be
used to redefine the value through –test-params argument.
In a nutshell following patch will do the trick:
diff --git a/conf/__init__.py b/conf/__init__.py
index 4622823..d4332ac 100644
--- a/conf/__init__.py
+++ b/conf/__init__.py
@@ -34,7 +34,11 @@ class Settings(object):
"""Return a settings item value
"""
if attr in self.__dict__:
- return getattr(self, attr)
+ if attr == 'TEST_PARAMS':
+ return getattr(self, attr)
+ else:
+ # Check if parameter value was overridden by CLI option
+ return get_test_param(attr.lower(), getattr(self, attr))
else:
raise AttributeError("%r object has no attribute %r" %
(self.__class__, attr))
Let me know what do you think (e.g. reply with +1).
If you’ll find it useful, I’ll create a ticket for that and prepare a patch.
The final patch have to take into the account currently supported CLI
parameters (i.e. code cleanup & type conversion/checking & testing).
Best Regards,
Martin
--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
