[opnfv-tech-discuss] stepping down as JOID PTL
Hi All, I have moved to different role within Canonical and I am stepping down as JOID PTL. I am trying to find a new member but could not get the confirmation on resources. I am looking for volunteers from community who can be PTL for JOID. Please send me message or email in case any of you are interested? Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net] +1.281.736.5150narindergupta2007[skype] Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #49376] [linuxfoundation.org #49376] Re: Testing kubernetes for Telco use case
If you uses joid deployment we run the microbot services in the kubernetes to test including replicas. juju run-action kubernetes-worker/0 microbot replicas=3 Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net] +1.281.736.5150narindergupta2007[skype] Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:58 AM, David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org > wrote: > +Narinder, Ross, Cedric, Jose > > The JOID project is currently deploying Kubernetes and running tests on > Kubernetes using Yardstick. We are also expecting to have support for > testing Kubernetes in Functest during the current release cycle. > > David > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Arif Mohammad Khan <a...@voereir.com> > wrote: > >> HI Team , >> >> >> I have started looking into kubernetes for NFV . What test case engine do >> we have in OPNFV for its testing . I am looking on baremetal and docker >> with Kubernetes . It will be helpful if some can guide for functional >> testing project for Kubernetes like Rally and tempest of Openstack . >> Looking forward for your help . >> >> >> Regards >> Arif Khan >> +919582212061 >> ___ >> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list >> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org >> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss >> > > > > -- > *David McBride* > Release Manager, OPNFV > Mobile: +1.805.276.8018 > Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org > Skype: davidjmcbride1 > IRC: dmcbride > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Testing kubernetes for Telco use case
If you uses joid deployment we run the microbot services in the kubernetes to test including replicas. juju run-action kubernetes-worker/0 microbot replicas=3 Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net] +1.281.736.5150narindergupta2007[skype] Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:58 AM, David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org > wrote: > +Narinder, Ross, Cedric, Jose > > The JOID project is currently deploying Kubernetes and running tests on > Kubernetes using Yardstick. We are also expecting to have support for > testing Kubernetes in Functest during the current release cycle. > > David > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Arif Mohammad Khan <a...@voereir.com> > wrote: > >> HI Team , >> >> >> I have started looking into kubernetes for NFV . What test case engine do >> we have in OPNFV for its testing . I am looking on baremetal and docker >> with Kubernetes . It will be helpful if some can guide for functional >> testing project for Kubernetes like Rally and tempest of Openstack . >> Looking forward for your help . >> >> >> Regards >> Arif Khan >> +919582212061 >> ___ >> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list >> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org >> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss >> > > > > -- > *David McBride* > Release Manager, OPNFV > Mobile: +1.805.276.8018 > Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org > Skype: davidjmcbride1 > IRC: dmcbride > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos
done for joid. Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net] +1.281.736.5150narindergupta2007[skype] Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:51 PM, David McBride < dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > IMPORTANT!! - PLEASE READ THE TAGGING INSTRUCTIONS > <https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Git+Tagging+Instructions+for+Euphrates> > CAREFULLY, BEFORE YOU TAG YOUR REPO, SINCE THE VERSION NAMING FORMAT HAS > CHANGED SINCE THE LAST DANUBE RELEASE. > > Team, > > If you haven't already done so, t's time to tag your repos for the > Euphrates 5.0.0 release. The deadline is 12 p.m. noon, Pacific Time. See > the link for the tagging instructions, above. > > Let me know if you have any questions. > > David > > -- > *David McBride* > Release Manager, OPNFV > Mobile: +1.805.276.8018 > Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org > Skype: davidjmcbride1 > IRC: dmcbride > > ___ > opnfv-project-leads mailing list > opnfv-project-le...@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-project-leads > > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][openretriever] OpenRetriever wants to know how k8s e2e test integrated with functest
Thanks Jose for including me in the email chain. Yes as part of joid deployment we do run the simple test of creating pod on top of deployment nothing beyond that. And we are ready to work with functest team once we have resource identified. Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net] +1.281.736.5150narindergupta2007[skype] Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > We haven’t thought about test cases yet, that is the task that the intern > should be looking at. > > > > + Morgan (Functest) and Nadinder (Joid). > > > > Regards, > > Jose > > > > > > > > *From:* 贾玄 [mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, July 27, 2017 08:08 AM > *To:* Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com> > *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; ruijing@intel.com; 'Bin Lu' > <bin...@arm.com> > *Subject:* 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss][functest][openretriever] > OpenRetriever wants to know how k8s e2e test integrated with functest > > > > Thanks Jose. > > > > That will be great if functest can offer a bunch of simple test case. > OpenRetriever is not using Magnum and Zun now as these projects are not > stable and convenient now. We collaborate with JOID to deply k8s on bare > metal machine. > > > > Could you kindly provide one simple test case , then we can process this > task? > > > > Thanks > > > > Xuan Jia > > Project Manager > > Big Data & IT Technology Research Center China Mobile Research Institute > > 32 Xuanwumen West Street, Xicheng Distirct, Beijing 100032, China > > Mobile: (+86) 13811000575 <+86%20138%201100%200575> > > E-mail: jiax...@chinamobile.com > > > > *发件人**:* Jose Lausuch [mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com > <jose.laus...@ericsson.com>] > *发送时间:* 2017年7月26日 21:17 > *收件人:* 贾玄 <jiax...@chinamobile.com> > *抄送:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > *主题:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][functest][openretriever] OpenRetriever > wants to know how k8s e2e test integrated with functest > > > > Hi, > > > > We are not covering K8 deployments in Functest yet. Basically because we > have no resources to work on that. Therefore we opened an intern project > proposal to find someone that can help us with that task. > > https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Intern+Project%3A+Functional+tests+for+ > Kubernetes+deployments > > > > We would like to offer a bunch of simple test cases that make sense only > for container based deployments without openstack (e.g. k8 deployments in > JOID). If possible, we could also integrate upstream suites from Kubernetes > as we are doing today with Tempest/Rally. This is of course our wish, but > the topic is still open. > > > > I think there is a python module for kubernetes, so the idea would be to > start writing tests in python using Functest framework using that client. > > > > Thanks, > > Jose > > > > > > > > *From:* 贾玄 [mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com <jiax...@chinamobile.com>] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 25, 2017 13:52 PM > *To:* Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com> > *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss][functest][openretriever] OpenRetriever > wants to know how k8s e2e test integrated with functest > > > > Hi Jose: > >OpenRetriever (Container integrated for NFV ) is a project to > provide container environment for NFV in Edge Node or Core-network Node. > We have collaborated with yardstick team to write the test cases for > container <->container and container <->virtual machine. > >We have another requirement for functest. How can we make > kubernetes e2e test integrated with functest? I can pick a volunteer with > your project to finish this task . But I don’t know how many gap between > k8s e2e and functest for integration. Have you investigated before ? > > > >Thanks > > > > Xuan Jia > > Project Manager > > Big Data & IT Technology Research Center China Mobile Research Institute > > 32 Xuanwumen West Street, Xicheng Distirct, Beijing 100032, China > > Mobile: (+86) 13811000575 <+86%20138%201100%200575> > > E-mail: jiax...@chinamobile.com > > > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] intel pod21 accessing issue
DAvid, Yes I worked on it today and now Intel pod21 is reconnected to CI but it might be a day or two once all scenario run once though. Thanks and Regards, Narinder > On Jul 1, 2017, at 6:10 PM, David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> > wrote: > > Narinder & Ross, > > What's the status? Is Joid connected to CI? If not, what's the estimate for > when it will be connected? Thanks. > > David > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:59 AM Brattain, Ross B <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com > <mailto:ross.b.bratt...@intel.com>> wrote: > Yes, we just rebooted. > > > > <>From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org > <mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>] > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 9:55 AM > To: Beierl, Mark <mark.bei...@dell.com <mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>> > Cc: Brattain, Ross B <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com > <mailto:ross.b.bratt...@intel.com>>; Narinder Gupta > <narinder.gu...@canonical.com <mailto:narinder.gu...@canonical.com>>; > TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>; Cooper, Trevor > <trevor.coo...@intel.com <mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>> > Subject: Re: intel pod21 accessing issue > > > > +Trevor, tech-discuss > > > > Team, > > > > There seems to be a systemic issue with Intel PODs, beyond the issue > originally reported by Narinder. See Mark's comments in the thread below. > > > > Ross / Trevor - could you please look into this ASAP? Thanks. > > > > David > > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Beierl, Mark <mark.bei...@dell.com > <mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > It would appear that not just pod 21 is affected. Pod 24 is in the same > situation where the VPN is failing to pass any traffic. From Jenkins [1] I > can see that nearly every Intel pod is offline. This means no daily jobs can > run. > > > > Ross, is there someone at Intel that should be contacted, or are you the > virtual Jack while he's off? > > > > David, a broadcast to the opnfv-test-discuss list is probably a good idea so > that everyone is aware of this outage. > > > > [1] https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/ > <https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/> > > > Regards, > > Mark > > > > Mark Beierl > > SW System Sr Principal Engineer > > Dell EMC | Office of the CTO > > mobile +1 613 314 8106 > mark.bei...@dell.com <mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com> > > > On Jun 28, 2017, at 08:40, Beierl, Mark <mark.bei...@emc.com > <mailto:mark.bei...@emc.com>> wrote: > > > > It appears to be the same problem for me. Once connected to the VPN, I > cannot route any traffic: > > > > Wed Jun 28 08:37:13 2017 us=943655 /sbin/ip link set dev tun0 up mtu 1500 > > Wed Jun 28 08:37:13 2017 us=946972 /sbin/ip addr add dev tun0 local > 10.10.210.205 peer 10.10.210.206 > > Wed Jun 28 08:37:13 2017 us=953666 /sbin/ip route add 10.10.210.0/24 > <http://10.10.210.0/24> via 10.10.210.206 > > > > ping 10.10.210.206 > > PING 10.10.210.206 (10.10.210.206) 56(84) bytes of data. > > --- 10.10.210.206 ping statistics --- > > 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2030ms > > > > ping 10.10.210.1 > > PING 10.10.210.1 (10.10.210.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > > --- 10.10.210.1 ping statistics --- > > 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2029ms > > > > Looks like something is wrong with the VPN server. > > > > Regards, > > Mark > > > > Mark Beierl > > SW System Sr Principal Engineer > > Dell EMC | Office of the CTO > > mobile +1 613 314 8106 > mark.bei...@dell.com <mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com> > > > On Jun 27, 2017, at 22:41, David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org > <mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: > > > > +Mark > > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Narinder Gupta <narinder.gu...@canonical.com > <mailto:narinder.gu...@canonical.com>> wrote: > > Ross, > > It was working but suddenly it stopped responding now and this time seems to > be access from vpn as i can not access even IPMI now. > > > > Thanks and Regards, > Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com > <mailto:narinder.gu...@canonical.com> > Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Intel Lab
Can't we avoid until opnfv summit ? Thanks and regards, Narinder Gupta 1-2817365150 On May 31, 2017 18:48, "Jack Morgan" <jack.mor...@intel.com> wrote: > All, > > I'm very sorry for the short notice as I was trying to avoid having to > make this change. The uplink in our HF2 lab is going away Thursday so I > need to move all 6 POD below to our JF3 lab. I will be sending out new VPN > profiles for those who have them already. The IP allocation will change for > each POD as well. In fact, each POD will have its own /24 and be isolated > from other POD. Otherwise, nothing else will change in your POD. I will > contact each POD once its back online. Let me know if you have any > questions. > > > Resource > Project(s) > Project lead > Intel POD 2 <https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+Pod2> CPerf > <https://wiki.opnfv.org/cperf> Jamo Luhrsen > Intel POD 4 <https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+Pod4> CI > Standalone Fatih Degirmenci > Intel POD 5 <https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+Pod5> JOID > <https://wiki.opnfv.org/joid> Narinder Gupta > Intel POD 7 <https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+Pod7> Apex > <https://wiki.opnfv.org/apex> Tim Rozet > Intel POD 8 <https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+Pod8> Compass4nfv > <https://wiki.opnfv.org/compass4nfv> Meimei > Intel POD 9 <https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+Pod9> StorPerf > <https://wiki.opnfv.org/storperf> Mark Beierl > > > Thanks, > > -- > Jack Morgan > OPNFV Pharos Intel Lab > > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] [Danube] joid status
Fatih, I am still working on huawei pod12 to setup so that i can start the deployment. Also I was expecting pod5 will be up and running with master though. But my VPN connection is not working. Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net] +1.281.736.5150narindergupta2007[skype] Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Fatih Degirmenci < fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Narinder, > > > > Uli had an AP to reach out to you regarding moving Joid from intel-pod6 to > huawei-pod12 to prevent this type of situation and this AP was completed > during the Infra WG meeting on 2016-12-14. > > > > When I look at the Wiki, I see that huawei-pod12 corresponds to > huawei-pod6 on Jenkins. We can get this POD assigned to Joid in 5 minutes > on Jenkins and give a try to see if things work fine or not. > > > > https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Huawei+Xi%27an+Lab > > https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/huawei-pod6/ > > > > /Fatih > > > > *From: *"narinder.gu...@canonical.com" <narinder.gu...@canonical.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, 3 January 2017 at 15:52 > *To: *Morgan Richomme <morgan.richo...@orange.com> > *Cc: *"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists. > opnfv.org>, BLAISONNEAU RD-CORE-LAN <david.blaisonn...@orange.com>, Fatih > Degirmenci <fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com>, Artur Tyloch < > artur.tyl...@canonical.com> > *Subject: *Re: [OPNFV] [Danube] joid status > > > > Morgan, > > You are correct all our pods are with Intel and currently intel pods are > down. > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com > > Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net] > > +1.281.736.5150 <(281)%20736-5150> > narindergupta2007[skype] > > > > Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com > > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:32 AM, <morgan.richo...@orange.com> wrote: > > Hi Narinder > > during our weekly meeting this morning I took the point to sync with you > on joid for Danube. > > As far we can see in Jenkins, there were no joid deployment on bare > metal since 1 week (but I assume Intel Infra is not available at the > moment and all the joid deployments were done on Intel) and we did not > see any virtual deployment on Danube (no ressources or Intel ressources > as well?). > > Do you have any view when joid deployment will be available? Any status > update on joid in Danube? > > I saw that Artur added kubernetes based scenario, do you know the status? > > Are all your infra resources Intel based? If so would it make sense to > find a second sources to avoid CI blackout > > /Morgan > > NB: As far as I know Orange community pod (POD2) is installed in > Colorado no-HA. I do not know if we could move to Danube (we would like > to have something relatively stable) and reconnect the CI. My ideal > scenario would be POD2 (Colorado HA) and POD1 (Danube HA). I will sync > with David. > > > _ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] [Danube] joid status
Morgan, You are correct all our pods are with Intel and currently intel pods are down. Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net] +1.281.736.5150narindergupta2007[skype] Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:32 AM, <morgan.richo...@orange.com> wrote: > Hi Narinder > > during our weekly meeting this morning I took the point to sync with you > on joid for Danube. > > As far we can see in Jenkins, there were no joid deployment on bare > metal since 1 week (but I assume Intel Infra is not available at the > moment and all the joid deployments were done on Intel) and we did not > see any virtual deployment on Danube (no ressources or Intel ressources > as well?). > > Do you have any view when joid deployment will be available? Any status > update on joid in Danube? > > I saw that Artur added kubernetes based scenario, do you know the status? > > Are all your infra resources Intel based? If so would it make sense to > find a second sources to avoid CI blackout > > /Morgan > > NB: As far as I know Orange community pod (POD2) is installed in > Colorado no-HA. I do not know if we could move to Danube (we would like > to have something relatively stable) and reconnect the CI. My ideal > scenario would be POD2 (Colorado HA) and POD1 (Danube HA). I will sync > with David. > > > _ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] API mismatch between Open-O and Compass
Yingjun, By default Juju will deploy to version 2 but we can switch to v3 in case other installers and applications are ready. As if today charm support both v2 and v3 but JOID is enabling v2. Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.freenode.net] +1.281.736.5150narindergupta2007[skype] Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Yingjun Li <yingjun...@huawei.com> wrote: > Gildas > > > > Could you help answering Harry’s question? OPEN-O 2 release will support > OpenStack Newton, which means to support OS API v3. I guess the major parts > involved in OpenStack API is NFVO and Common service. What is the OPEN-O > plan to support the Newton API? > > > > Narinder, can you confirm that Juju supports OpenStack Newton? > > > > Thanks > > Yingjun > > > > *From:* huangxiangyu > *Sent:* Monday, December 19, 2016 11:46 PM > *To:* Yingjun Li; zhao.huab...@zte.com.cn; Thajudheen Rajak; Gaoweitao > (Victor, MANO) > *Cc:* openo-disc...@lists.open-o.org; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; > Chigang (Justin) > *Subject:* API mismatch between Open-O and Compass > > > > Hi Yingjun > > > > Currently , OpenStack Newton deployed by Compass use keystone API V3 > instead of V2 . I assume there may be API mismatch when Open-O talk to > OpenStack. Please check with Open-O developers if Open-O only support > keystone V2. And if so, modification should be made in Open-O in order to > integrate with Compass. BTW, does this issue also exist in JuJu ? maybe > victor can answer this question ? > > > > Regards > > Harry Huang > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
