Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] K8S-OVN4NFV plugin
Hi, If you have any questions, you can reach out to me. Based on questions, I can connect you to right people. Thanks Srini From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org On Behalf Of Mohamed Hamed El-Gamal Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 9:47 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] K8S-OVN4NFV plugin Hello. I would like to ask you regarding K8S-OVN4NFV plugin status and how I can reach further to the OVN group ? Thanks a lot Best regards -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#24044): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/24044 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/72586261/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OVN for SFC
Hi Trinath, I think some of the PODs are not used in intel OPNFV lab. You may want to request for one POD for SFC testing by generating JIRA story. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 26, 2019, at 10:48 PM, Trinath Somanchi mailto:trinaths@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Srini- Currently We are lacking to Pods to test this Scenario with OVN:MASTER. We will look into other possibilities to test the same. Thanks & Regards, Trinath Somanchi. -- IRC(trinaths) | LinkedIn<https://linkedin.com/in/trinaths> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 5:55 AM Addepalli, Srinivasa R mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi Trinath, Any plans in doing test with latest OVN? With respect to SFC with K8S (across CNFs and VNFs), we are internally discussing and will get back with plans. But, it would be great if the OVN4NFV community checks the latest OVN with Openstack SFC. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 20, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Trinath Somanchi mailto:trinaths@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Srini- We haven't tested OVN:MAIN for SFC after that commit. SFC with CNF and VNFs is a TODO in OVN4NFV project. Thanks & Regards, Trinath Somanchi. -- IRC(trinaths) | LinkedIn<https://linkedin.com/in/trinaths> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:57 PM Addepalli, Srinivasa R mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> wrote: Thanks Trinath. Now that SFC changes are merged in OVN (as per your email), is it possible to use main OVN for this and ensure that SFC continues to work by OVN4NFV team? We are looking for that confirmation. BTW, we are intending to see whether OVN SFC can be leveraged for SFC chains involving CNFs and VNFs orchestrated by site orchestrator K8S and Service orchestrator, ONAP. Hence, looking for the confirmation before we start to propose and work on architecture around that. Hi Ritu, Are you using OVN (in OVN4K8SNFV) version that has SFC patches? Thanks Srini From: Trinath Somanchi [mailto:trinaths@gmail.com<mailto:trinaths@gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 9:14 AM To: Addepalli, Srinivasa R mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OVN for SFC Hi Srini- We have done this as a PoC to test SFC with OVN. We have seen certain issues with OVN:MAIN while working with SFC (no NSH). So with reference to [1] and [2] We used OVN:FORK to successfully do SFC with OVN. The need for using OVN:FORK is to have updates to new flows to handle service insertion. At the time when we started this work, FORK was not merged. Now I guess we have these changes merged [3]. Hope this helps. [1] http://www.openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2016/7/1400-fourie.pdf [2] https://files.meetup.com/2997392/sfc_using%20ovn.pdf [3] https://github.com/doonhammer/ovs/commit/5cf1a186b602025a5e765fd5536d429f66ea2b8a Thanks & Regards, Trinath Somanchi. ------ IRC(trinaths) On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:21 PM Srini mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi, I see that OVN4NFV project tried SFC via OVN as per this document: https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/opnfv-ovn4nfv/latest/opnfv-ovn4nfv.pdf I also see that it is not using OVN main code base. It seems to be using a fork: https://github.com/doonhammer/ovs/tree/sfc.v30/ovn Few questions: 1. What kind of issues you faced when you try OVN main code base? 2. Is this work under CI/CD – Is it being continuously tested? If so, which lab? And which PoD? Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22950): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22950 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/30523638/1198335 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss%2bow...@lists.opnfv.org> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [trinaths@gmail.com<mailto:trinaths@gmail.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22986): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22986 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/30523638/675801 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com<mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22992): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22992 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/30523638/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OVN for SFC
Thanks Trinath. Now that SFC changes are merged in OVN (as per your email), is it possible to use main OVN for this and ensure that SFC continues to work by OVN4NFV team? We are looking for that confirmation. BTW, we are intending to see whether OVN SFC can be leveraged for SFC chains involving CNFs and VNFs orchestrated by site orchestrator K8S and Service orchestrator, ONAP. Hence, looking for the confirmation before we start to propose and work on architecture around that. Hi Ritu, Are you using OVN (in OVN4K8SNFV) version that has SFC patches? Thanks Srini From: Trinath Somanchi [mailto:trinaths@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 9:14 AM To: Addepalli, Srinivasa R Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OVN for SFC Hi Srini- We have done this as a PoC to test SFC with OVN. We have seen certain issues with OVN:MAIN while working with SFC (no NSH). So with reference to [1] and [2] We used OVN:FORK to successfully do SFC with OVN. The need for using OVN:FORK is to have updates to new flows to handle service insertion. At the time when we started this work, FORK was not merged. Now I guess we have these changes merged [3]. Hope this helps. [1] http://www.openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2016/7/1400-fourie.pdf [2] https://files.meetup.com/2997392/sfc_using%20ovn.pdf [3] https://github.com/doonhammer/ovs/commit/5cf1a186b602025a5e765fd5536d429f66ea2b8a Thanks & Regards, Trinath Somanchi. -- IRC(trinaths) On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:21 PM Srini mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi, I see that OVN4NFV project tried SFC via OVN as per this document: https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/opnfv-ovn4nfv/latest/opnfv-ovn4nfv.pdf I also see that it is not using OVN main code base. It seems to be using a fork: https://github.com/doonhammer/ovs/tree/sfc.v30/ovn Few questions: 1. What kind of issues you faced when you try OVN main code base? 2. Is this work under CI/CD – Is it being continuously tested? If so, which lab? And which PoD? Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22950): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22950 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/30523638/1198335 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss%2bow...@lists.opnfv.org> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [trinaths@gmail.com<mailto:trinaths@gmail.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22952): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22952 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/30523638/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[opnfv-tech-discuss] OVN for SFC
Hi, I see that OVN4NFV project tried SFC via OVN as per this document: https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/opnfv-ovn4nfv/latest/opnfv-ovn4nfv.pdf I also see that it is not using OVN main code base. It seems to be using a fork: https://github.com/doonhammer/ovs/tree/sfc.v30/ovn Few questions: 1. What kind of issues you faced when you try OVN main code base? 2. Is this work under CI/CD - Is it being continuously tested? If so, which lab? And which PoD? Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22950): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/22950 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/30523638/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Discussion of OPNFV Strategic Plan
Hi Bin, My 2 cents from strategy perspective. I see that Cloud native and micro services mentioned in your presentation. But I did not see any Kubernetes term used anywhere. Hence, I thought I would bring this up. So far, majority of the OPNFV focus seems to be supporting openstack based sites. Many edge deployments are talking about using K8S. That leads to supporting VNFs and CNFs using K8S. I feel that OPNFV community can lead this effort on "K8S for NFV" - from CNI requirements perspective, supporting various workloads (VM, container and Functions) and installation perspective. In summary, strategy perspective, "K8S for NFV" need to be considered, in my view. Some details: On CNI: OVN4NFV project started to develop OVN4NFV to work in K8S environment. But, there may be other CNIs that OPNFV community may be interested in such Nokia DANM and NSM (Network Service Mesh). Hence, I feel it is important for OPNFV community to list down requirements on CNIs for Network functions. On workloads: Docker is well known for bringing up containers. For VMs, there are multiple options - Virtlet and Kubevirt for example. It is good if OPNFV community discusses on how these can be supported. On software provisioning/installations: There are many installation in K8S world - Kubespray and others. I feel that it is important to study and consider new installers that are popular in K8S world and enhance them to use for NFV. Thanks Srini -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of HU, BIN Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 7:40 AM To: Tim Irnich ; AshYoung ; Georg Kunz ; Manuel Buil Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Discussion of OPNFV Strategic Plan Tim, Thank you for jumping in and offering your opinion. That's very helpful and valuable. If I understand correctly, Point #1 and #3 are actually the same question, i.e. what will we do in the next step? - As I clarified in the email https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tsc/message/4844 and earlier in this thread https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tsc/message/4845, this is our 1st milestone or Step #1 to have a strategic plan. This milestone triggers the action of Step #2 and other following steps. Those steps (or actions) are outlined on slide #16. - Once we agree on the strategic plan, the action is the Step #2, i.e. to define the details of the portfolio of what we can offer. The example of details was illustrated in https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tsc/message/4845. - You can see the example of portfolio in https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tsc/message/4845 is getting the balance of equal importance of tools and reference stacks, and maximizes the value of what we can offer. - I changed the wording of 1st bullet point on slide #16 to reflect your point of #1 and #3. This is the Step #2, the immediate action point triggered by the strategic plan. - I also changed wording on other bullets on slide #16 to reflect some more details in my prior messages. - See attached deck v0.7. Regarding your point #4, it is actually one of the following actions, i.e. to develop a marketing message to reflect our strategy. This is captured on the last bullet point on slide #16. Certainly, this is another action point we need to take after we agree on the strategy. Regarding your point #2, yes, we need all TSC members to contribute to those actions, including: - defining the portfolio - defining the implementation and roadmap - working with MWG to define marketing message. I also would expect that yourself will be able to help drive one of those actions, for example, working with MWG on marketing message to make sure that it gets known externally. With those changes on slide #16 (in attached v0.7), hopefully it gets the level of clarity you expected, and we can move forward. I am looking forward to your further contribution in executing this strategy, especially e.g. in working with MWG for our marketing message to get it known externally. Thank you again Bin -Original Message- From: Tim Irnich Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 6:37 AM To: HU, BIN ; AshYoung ; Georg Kunz ; Manuel Buil Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tsc] Discussion of OPNFV Strategic Plan Hi all, having read the entire thread again this morning, I'd like to offer the following thoughts to hopefully help us make progress: - We need to make sure the decision we take triggers action and change (since I think we all agree that we need to change something in OPNFV). To achieve this, we need to more clarity on the choices that are in front of us and their consequences. The current material does not do this clearly enough. It sort of says "we keep doing everything we already do and add a few things." IMHO it would be bet
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes
Hi, I indicated to Bin that I would be able to present on coming Thursday. Thanks Srini From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 4:05 PM To: Bin Hu Cc: Addepalli, Srinivasa R ; Trinath Somanchi ; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV ; Trevor Bramwell ; tim.irn...@ericsson.com Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes Hi Trinath and Srini, Have you decided on a date for the presentation? Thanks. David On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:17 AM HU, BIN mailto:bh5...@att.com>> wrote: Next Thursday is fine. Based on discussion in release meeting today, Trinath will send a proposal to the mailing list, along with a suggested date to discuss in the tech-discuss meeting on Thursdays. We will go from there. Thanks Bin From: Addepalli, Srinivasa R mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 8:53 AM To: HU, BIN mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; David McBride mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; Trinath Somanchi mailto:trinath.soman...@nxp.com>> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>; Trevor Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; tim.irn...@ericsson.com<mailto:tim.irn...@ericsson.com> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes I saw this email just now. I am travelling to Akraino meeting and hence will not be available this Thursday. How about next Thursday? Thanks Srini From: HU, BIN [mailto:bh5...@att.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 4:23 PM To: David McBride mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; Addepalli, Srinivasa R mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>>; Trinath Somanchi mailto:trinath.soman...@nxp.com>> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>; Trevor Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; tim.irn...@ericsson.com<mailto:tim.irn...@ericsson.com> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes David, If they are not available for the release meeting tomorrow, we can take it on Thursday. Thanks Bin From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> On Behalf Of David McBride Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 4:17 PM To: srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com<mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>; Trinath Somanchi mailto:trinath.soman...@nxp.com>> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>; Trevor Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; tim.irn...@ericsson.com<mailto:tim.irn...@ericsson.com>; HU, BIN mailto:bh5...@att.com>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes This would be a good topic for the release meeting<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_Release-2BPlanning=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw=N7Im0Vrt1YhdKq8fSKylAm06K21MT2fF6ppoIAkQMsw=2vugTddTwaqMesdnnvTyuk1tz-CIWym_WN0hZQVwT5w=> tomorrow. Are both of you available? Alternatively, we could discuss it in the weekly technical discussion on Thursday. Bin - would this fit your agenda this week if they're not available for the release meeting? David On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:58 AM Srini mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi, I understand that OVN4NFV group is trying to make sure that OVN is viable option for NFV deployments and Container4NFV group is working on using containers for NFV. In ONAP community, we are trying to create a reference deployment for edges based on Kubernetes and provide service orchestration via ONAP. For data plane network containers, multiple virtual interfaces and multi-homing is a typical requirement. Currently, OVN (even with Multus) does not have a way to provide this support. We, at Intel, working on this to fix the issues in OVN. Since the changes are only relevant for NFV, I am not sure how fast the OVN community would accept those changes. Is OVN4NFV or container4NFV groups the right place to work on these? If you agree, what is the right place (repositories) to make these changes? I tried to search whether there is any fork of OVN in OVN4NFV project. I did not see any. Any suggestions? Thanks Srini -- David McBride Release Manager, OPNFV Mobile: +1.805.276.8018 Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> Skype: davidjmcbride1 IRC: dmcbride -- David McBride Release Manager, OPNFV Mobile: +1.805.276.8018 Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> Skype: davidjmcbride1 IRC: dmcbride -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21857): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21857 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes
I saw this email just now. I am travelling to Akraino meeting and hence will not be available this Thursday. How about next Thursday? Thanks Srini From: HU, BIN [mailto:bh5...@att.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 4:23 PM To: David McBride ; Addepalli, Srinivasa R ; Trinath Somanchi Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV ; Trevor Bramwell ; tim.irn...@ericsson.com Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes David, If they are not available for the release meeting tomorrow, we can take it on Thursday. Thanks Bin From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> On Behalf Of David McBride Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 4:17 PM To: srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com<mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>; Trinath Somanchi mailto:trinath.soman...@nxp.com>> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>; Trevor Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; tim.irn...@ericsson.com<mailto:tim.irn...@ericsson.com>; HU, BIN mailto:bh5...@att.com>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes This would be a good topic for the release meeting<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_Release-2BPlanning=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw=N7Im0Vrt1YhdKq8fSKylAm06K21MT2fF6ppoIAkQMsw=2vugTddTwaqMesdnnvTyuk1tz-CIWym_WN0hZQVwT5w=> tomorrow. Are both of you available? Alternatively, we could discuss it in the weekly technical discussion on Thursday. Bin - would this fit your agenda this week if they're not available for the release meeting? David On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:58 AM Srini mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi, I understand that OVN4NFV group is trying to make sure that OVN is viable option for NFV deployments and Container4NFV group is working on using containers for NFV. In ONAP community, we are trying to create a reference deployment for edges based on Kubernetes and provide service orchestration via ONAP. For data plane network containers, multiple virtual interfaces and multi-homing is a typical requirement. Currently, OVN (even with Multus) does not have a way to provide this support. We, at Intel, working on this to fix the issues in OVN. Since the changes are only relevant for NFV, I am not sure how fast the OVN community would accept those changes. Is OVN4NFV or container4NFV groups the right place to work on these? If you agree, what is the right place (repositories) to make these changes? I tried to search whether there is any fork of OVN in OVN4NFV project. I did not see any. Any suggestions? Thanks Srini -- David McBride Release Manager, OPNFV Mobile: +1.805.276.8018 Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> Skype: davidjmcbride1 IRC: dmcbride -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21822): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21822 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23861762/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[opnfv-tech-discuss] OVN4NFV - Discuss about OVN for networking workloads and logistics to create OVN repository
Hi Trinath, Ritu and I will join tomorrow meeting to discuss logistics to create OVN repository. As part of that, we will present the requirements and what we did in OVN to realize assigning multiple interfaces to containers. I hope we will get chance for ½ hour. Also, can you share details on how to join the meeting? Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21717): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21717 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/24217788/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes
Hi Trinath, Thank you for offering to host the modified OVN in OVN4NFV. I see two links to the repository - One in github and another in git of OPNFV. When do you use one over another? We like to start the work rightaway. Let us know the next steps. Thanks Srini From: Trinath Somanchi [mailto:trinath.soman...@nxp.com] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 9:41 PM To: Addepalli, Srinivasa R ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes Hi Srini- >From OVN4NFV project front, the git repo [1] currently holds the installer >support scripts and relevant documentation. Since we are not currently working on updates to actual OVN/OVS source code, we haven't forked the OVS repo to the project repo. With our current work on OVN SFC, we are using John's OVN SFC 3.0 repo [2] which is forked from OVS and maintained separately in github. Please share you views/ideas on how you are planning to land the fixes. We can either have directory in ovn4nfv repo with relevant tags/branch or the ovs repo forked into external git. Also, it would of be great help for our project if you can give suggestions incorporating those upcoming changes to our next milestones on OVN-CN-VM hybrid scenarios. Hope this helps. Let me know if you need more info/help. /Trinath [1] https://github.com/opnfv/ovn4nfv or https://git.opnfv.org/ovn4nfv/ [2] https://github.com/doonhammer/ovs/tree/sfc.v30 From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Srini Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 10:29 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes Hi, I understand that OVN4NFV group is trying to make sure that OVN is viable option for NFV deployments and Container4NFV group is working on using containers for NFV. In ONAP community, we are trying to create a reference deployment for edges based on Kubernetes and provide service orchestration via ONAP. For data plane network containers, multiple virtual interfaces and multi-homing is a typical requirement. Currently, OVN (even with Multus) does not have a way to provide this support. We, at Intel, working on this to fix the issues in OVN. Since the changes are only relevant for NFV, I am not sure how fast the OVN community would accept those changes. Is OVN4NFV or container4NFV groups the right place to work on these? If you agree, what is the right place (repositories) to make these changes? I tried to search whether there is any fork of OVN in OVN4NFV project. I did not see any. Any suggestions? Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21662): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21662 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23861762/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] [Container4NFV] OVN Changes
Hi, I understand that OVN4NFV group is trying to make sure that OVN is viable option for NFV deployments and Container4NFV group is working on using containers for NFV. In ONAP community, we are trying to create a reference deployment for edges based on Kubernetes and provide service orchestration via ONAP. For data plane network containers, multiple virtual interfaces and multi-homing is a typical requirement. Currently, OVN (even with Multus) does not have a way to provide this support. We, at Intel, working on this to fix the issues in OVN. Since the changes are only relevant for NFV, I am not sure how fast the OVN community would accept those changes. Is OVN4NFV or container4NFV groups the right place to work on these? If you agree, what is the right place (repositories) to make these changes? I tried to search whether there is any fork of OVN in OVN4NFV project. I did not see any. Any suggestions? Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21646): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21646 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23861762/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
