Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [KVM] Nomination of Committer promotion for Sundar Nadathur

[yunhong jiang]

+1

Thanks
-jyh

On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 23:14:03 +
"Reddy, Raghuveer"  wrote:

> I would like to nominate Sundar Nadathur as committer to kvmfornfv
> project
> 
> The motivation for nominating Sundar to committer on the NFV
> Hypervisors-kvm project is due to his commitment of providing value
> to the project through consistent high quality and valuable
> contributions. His active participation through patch submissions and
> code reviews for the KVM4NFV project has been invaluable to the
> project.
> 
> Please provide a +1/-1 vote before the end of next week, Sept. 1st.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Raghu Reddy

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] KVM4NFV project survey

[yunhong jiang]

Hi, to all OPNFV technical personnel,

We are conducting a survey to evaluate our future plan for the “KVM4NFV
” project.

Please reply to me (yunhong.ji...@intel.com) or directly to this
email thread and let me know:

1. If you are using our patches or our ideas contributed to the community
in the last few years, and

2. If you would like to see us continuing our participation with regarding
to the KVM optimization work.

Look forward to your feedback and response.

Thanks
--jyh
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] REMINDER: One Week Left to Submit to OPNFV Summit CFP

[yunhong jiang]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:55:25 -0700
Brandon Wick <bw...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hello Jiang,
> 
> Thanks for your question. Please send any future questions to
> eve...@opnfv.org.
> 
> The Design Summit takes place June 12-13 and is where the OPNFV
> technical community will convene to continue working on the E-Release
> and have plenary sessions and project breakouts. It is very focused
> on the OPNFV platform. The Summit Conference takes place Jun 14-15
> and is for the wider NFV ecosystem, featuring keynotes, breakout
> sessions, a technology showcase, networking opportunities, etc. This
> is where the the breakouts will be structured into the six tracks.
> Panels consist of 4 or more speakers in a single session. When in
> doubt, we recommend you submit for the Summit conference as a
> breakout session. From there, our track chairs will be able to make
> further recommendations as needed.

Hi, Brandon,
Thanks for the reply and it's clear now.

--jyh

> 
> Best,
> 
> 
> Brandon Wick
> OPNFV Head of Marketing, The Linux Foundation
> Mobile: +1.917.282.0960  Skype: wick.brandon
> Email / Google Talk: bw...@linuxfoundation.org
> 
> *The OPNFV Summit CFP Closes 3/27!
> <http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/opnfv-summit/program/cfp-details>*
> 
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:31 PM, yunhong jiang <
> yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi, Brandon,
> > When I try to submit the CFP, I noticed there are two types of
> > the session. One is for Design Summit session and one is for OPNFV
> > Summit session. Are there any key differences of these two? I
> > attended the Openstack summit before and they are quite
> > different there.
> >
> > Also on the Design Summit session, there are two formats called
> > break out session and panel discussion. What's the difference of
> > them? How should I decide which format should my session be?
> >
> > Hope your guide on this, thanks!
> >
> > -jyh
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 07:24:43 -0700
> > Brandon Wick <bw...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > OPNFV Technical Community:
> > >
> > > This is a reminder that the CFP for the OPNFV Summit
> > > <http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/opnfv-summit>, June
> > > 12-15, Beijing, China, closes *Monday, March 27*. We encourage
> > > you to prepare and submit a proposal by the deadline. The six
> > > primary tracks are the following:
> > >
> > >- NFV Applications and Orchestration
> > >- Testing, Infrastructure, and DevOps
> > >- NFV Strategy and End User Stories
> > >- NFV Platform Requirements
> > >- Community and Upstream
> > >- Futures and Research
> > >
> > > *Access the CFP Here
> > > <http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/opnfv-summit/program/cfp-
> > details>*
> > >
> > > We look forward to your submissions. If you have any questions,
> > > please email eve...@opnfv.org.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Brandon Wick
> > > OPNFV Head of Marketing, The Linux Foundation
> > > Mobile: +1.917.282.0960  Skype: wick.brandon
> > > Email / Google Talk: bw...@linuxfoundation.org
> >
> >

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] REMINDER: One Week Left to Submit to OPNFV Summit CFP

[yunhong jiang]

Hi, Brandon,
When I try to submit the CFP, I noticed there are two types of the
session. One is for Design Summit session and one is for OPNFV
Summit session. Are there any key differences of these two? I
attended the Openstack summit before and they are quite different
there.

Also on the Design Summit session, there are two formats called
break out session and panel discussion. What's the difference of
them? How should I decide which format should my session be?

Hope your guide on this, thanks!

-jyh

On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 07:24:43 -0700
Brandon Wick  wrote:

> OPNFV Technical Community:
> 
> This is a reminder that the CFP for the OPNFV Summit
> , June 12-15,
> Beijing, China, closes *Monday, March 27*. We encourage you to
> prepare and submit a proposal by the deadline. The six primary tracks
> are the following:
> 
>- NFV Applications and Orchestration
>- Testing, Infrastructure, and DevOps
>- NFV Strategy and End User Stories
>- NFV Platform Requirements
>- Community and Upstream
>- Futures and Research
> 
> *Access the CFP Here
> *
> 
> We look forward to your submissions. If you have any questions, please
> email eve...@opnfv.org.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Brandon Wick
> OPNFV Head of Marketing, The Linux Foundation
> Mobile: +1.917.282.0960  Skype: wick.brandon
> Email / Google Talk: bw...@linuxfoundation.org

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Latency debugging effort on the Plugfest

[yunhong jiang]

Hi,
Jiming and I are from KVM4NFV project and we are considering to
join the Plugfest on April. As our project's focus has been on low
latency and fast live migration, we are considering if we can
have some efforts on the plutfest for these two sides.

Specifically, I'm wondering if there will be some VNF 
applications that have specific latency requirements, and we can
try to launch them with the KVM4NFV environment and analysis/debug the
latency gap, and to discuss how to push such VNFs to the test framework
in E release. Also if anyone have interests on the fast live
migration, that we can try the fast live migration scenario on the
plugfest with specific VNF applications.

We can discuss these proposals on tomorrow's plugfest
bi-weekyly meeting.

Thanks
--jyh
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] [octopus] Are verification jobs for multiple patches serialized on releng?

[yunhong jiang]

Hi, Fatih and Releng team,

Can anyone give me some idea that if I upload a several changes
with one 'git review' command, will the verification jobs for these
patches be serialized?  Asking because I updated a patchset with 25
patches (it's a backporting from upstream patch), and I noticed two
verification jobs,
https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/kvmfornfv-verify-master/406/ and
https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/kvmfornfv-verify-master/405/ are
invoked mostly at the same time, which is a surprise to me.

Also I noticed that although this patchset is submitted with one
command, some patches seems are not submitted together according to
gerrit. For example, the patches for these two building jobs,
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/24265/ and
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/24263/ are the same topic, but
seems the "Submitted Together" number is different, one is 11, and
another one is 12.

Can anyone give me some hints? Any suggestion is welcome.

Thanks
--jyh
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [KVM] Test plan for KVM enhancements for NFV

[yunhong jiang]

Hi, Tapio
The KVM4NFV project is discussing what's should be done on D
release. 

Considering your role changes, do you still have plan to
push this test, or you will postpone this effort?

Thanks
--jyh

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:57:10 +0300
Tapio Tallgren <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com> wrote:

> On 22.09.2016 00:55, yunhong jiang wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:00:07 +0300
> > Tapio Tallgren <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have just put some code to github.com that might be interesting
> >> for your testing: https://github.com/nokia/clocktick_jumps.
> >> It is meant to measure latencies at a very low level, without any
> >> guest operating system involvement.
> >> Ideally, this code would become part of some OPNFV testing project.
> > Hi, Tapio
> >
> >  We have (mostly) integrated the cyclictest into the KVM4NFV
> > project CI. Now it's executed on the patch verification and the
> > daily test. We are also working with yardstick team (
> > https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/21255/1) so that the daily test
> > result can be published on the yardstick dashboard
> > (http://testresults.opnfv.org/grafana/dashboard/db/yardstick-main).
> >
> >  Not sure if you have plan to add your clocktick_jumps to the
> > yardstick, and then we can integrate it into the project CI also?
> 
> Yes, that is my plan. I need to get more familiar with Yardstick
> first, so it might take a while.
> 
> -Tapio

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Weekly Call

[yunhong jiang]

Hi, Trevor
I plan to join the vsperf meeting this week and wonder what's the
time for the meeting.

On your mail, it's stated on Tueday on the begining and also
"Weekly meeting Every Wednesday". Also according to
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Vsperf , the meeting is Wednesday. Can
you please confirm which day is the vsperf meeting? Or you mean we
temply change this meeting to Tuesday this week?

Thanks
--jyh

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:11:58 +
"Cooper, Trevor"  wrote:

> VSPERF Weekly Tuesday 3pm (Dublin), 8am (Pacific)
> *   Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or
> smartphone.
> 
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/761901733
> *   You can also dial in using your phone.
> 
> Ireland +353 (0) 19 030 050
> Access Code: 761-901-733
> 
> More phone numbers
> United States (Long distance): +1 (646) 749-3117
> Canada (Long distance): +1 (647) 497-9371
> Sweden (Long distance): +46 (0) 853 527 817
> United Kingdom (Long distance): +44 (0) 20 3713 5010
> 
> *   Weekly Meeting Every Wednesday 09:00 PT
> (1500)
> UTC
> *   GoToMeeting: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/761901733
> *   IRC:
> *   freenode https://freenode.net/
> *   IRC channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf
> http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf
> *   MeetBot:
> http://meetbot.opnfv.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2015/
> 
> 
> 

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [KVM] Nomination of Committer promotion for David Chou

[yunhong jiang]

+1.

Thanks for David's great effort on the KVM4NFV Fuel plugin.

--jyh

On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 20:31:50 +
"Reddy, Raghuveer"  wrote:

> I would like to nominate David Chou as committer to kvmfornfv project
> 
> The motivation for nominating David to committer on the NFV
> Hypervisors-kvm project is due to his commitment of providing value
> to the project through consistent high quality and valuable
> contributions. His active participation through patch submissions and
> code reviews for fuel-plugin has been invaluable to the project.
> 
> Please provide a +1/-1 vote before the end of next week, Oct. 14.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Raghu Reddy

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][new scenario][hugepage]Fuel configure hugepage with CI.

[yunhong jiang]

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:22:07 +0800
wu.zhih...@zte.com.cn wrote:

> Hi fuel team，
> 
> I notice that fuel@opnfv support hugepage configuration. ZTE-POD1
> want to configure hugepage with CI. 

Hi, Zhihui
Thanks for sharing this information. To achieve good performance
and low latency with openstack, a lot of configuration is required,
like hugue page, CPU reservation, NUMA node (I gave a presentation
on openstack summit on this). 

How can I check the fuel's support to these configuration? It will
be perfect if we can add such support to the scenario tests. 

Thanks
--jyh
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [KVM] Change the test plan wiki page

[yunhong jiang]

On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:57:38 +0800
"renrong...@chinamobile.com" <renrong...@chinamobile.com> wrote:

> Hi yunhong，
> 
> I agree with these points. I have one question about the b). The

I have updated the wiki page. Now all the test related pages are under one
entry page at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/kvm/KVM4NFV+Test , which includes
test spec, test plan, test environment and test result (the test result page is
not done yet). And the KVM4NFV main page
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/kvm/Nfv-kvm) includes the link to this test
entry page.

This chagne should make everything clearer.
> resource only means the software resouces, like the CPU and memory ,
> or it also include the hardware resoure?

I'd take the resource as hardware resource. As we have Intel PoD1 assigned, so
I assume it will be that PoD. But we may need specify the setup on that PoD,
like BIOS changes etc.


> 
> I have tested one scenario which is the baremetal one. The hardware
> we  use Intel E5V4 core ,the kernel version we use the KVM4NFV
> project released(2015-12-21 downloaded). Have you done  this test
> before? Do you have some test results? Or I could check my

Can you try latest version kernel?

Thanks
--jyh

> environment.
> 
> Thanks
> -Ren Rongwei
> 
> 
> renrong...@chinamobile.com
>  
> From: yunhong jiang
> Date: 2016-07-21 08:44
> To: Reddy, Raghuveer
> CC: renrong...@chinamobile.com; jiming.sun;
> 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' Subject: [KVM] Change the test
> plan wiki page Hi, Raghu, Rongwei and the team
>  
> I'm considering some changes to the test plan wiki
> (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/kvm/KVM4NFV+Latency+Test+Plan ),
> and want to get some input:
>  
> a) I will change that wiki page from "test plan" to
> "test spec" because it define what will be tested.
>  
> b) I will create another page talking the test plan, which will
> include the resource allocation status, the pass/fail critiral for
> each release, the tests priority and what should be done on each
> release,
>  
> c) The test plan will include the progress (or another
> wiki page for the progress)?
>  
> d) I will also add the scenario test information in the test plan,
> since I was told that we should take care of the scenarios that
> are owned by the KVM4NFV project.
>  
>Your idea?
>  
> Thanks
> --jyh
>  

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss