Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

2017-01-31 Thread Paraskevopoulos Georgios 
Hi all,



I’ve come up with a quick & dirty fix



https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427194/



The implementation is a bit ad hoc so reviews are welcome.



BR,

George



From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:24 AM
To: Veena Lingadahalli <vlingadaha...@mvista.com>; Serg Melikyan 
<smelik...@mirantis.com>; Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Priya Kanaujia <pkanau...@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 
deployment



PS2: I run a test modifying service_provider -> ‘systemd’. It gives the 
following error:



(/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]/ensure) change from stopped to 
running failed: Could not start Service[tacker]: Execution of '/bin/systemctl 
start tacker-server' returned 5: Failed to start tacker-server.service: Unit 
tacker-server.service not found.



So we need to change the way the symlink to the service is created



BR,

George



From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>  
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:19 AM
To: Veena Lingadahalli <vlingadaha...@mvista.com 
<mailto:vlingadaha...@mvista.com> >; Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com 
<mailto:smelik...@mirantis.com> >; Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com 
<mailto:tro...@redhat.com> >
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> ; Priya Kanaujia 
<pkanau...@mvista.com <mailto:pkanau...@mvista.com> >
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 
deployment



Hi all,



I have no problem helping with that. How can we proceed?

Romanos found that service_provider is hard coded here as “upstart”:

https://github.com/trozet/puppet-tacker/blob/master/manifests/params.pp#L19



So change this and modify the upstart job?

https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/fuel-plugin-tacker.git;a=blob;f=tacker_package/tacker-server;h=e8d5e23efc2e01a981e7d1f8877adbaf92b9a75d;hb=refs/heads/master



PS: Sorry Serg I must have missed that mail. I encountered the problem now that 
I’m trying to install fuel 10.



BR,

George



From: Veena Lingadahalli [mailto:vlingadaha...@mvista.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 6:44 AM
To: Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com <mailto:smelik...@mirantis.com> >; 
Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com <mailto:tro...@redhat.com> >
Cc: Paraskevopoulos Georgios <geo...@intracom-telecom.com 
<mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com> >; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> ; Priya Kanaujia 
<pkanau...@mvista.com <mailto:pkanau...@mvista.com> >; Aimee Ukasick 
<aimeeu.opensou...@gmail.com <mailto:aimeeu.opensou...@gmail.com> >
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 
deployment



Hi Tim,

Tacker fuel-plugin used in Colorado release is based on your repo [1]. I see 
that there are some code changes in tacker newton as part of the implementation 
of bp tacker-vnffg [2]. So do you have any plans to rebase the SFC_colorado 
changes to newton? How should we proceed about adding tacker-plugin in Fuel 10.?



[1] https://github.com/trozet/tacker/tree/SFC_colorado
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/tacker-vnffg


Thanks,
-Veena

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com 
<mailto:smelik...@mirantis.com> > wrote:

Hi Georgios,

Aimee was asking same question couple of weeks ago, and I had added
you in the thread as person originally enabled Tacker in Colorado
release.

> Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd 
> instead of 14.04 with upstart?
Seems like so.

>Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
It's pretty late in the cycle, so the only way Tacker might be added
to Fuel is through feature freeze exception and fixing it quickly. Do
you want to work on that?


On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Paraskevopoulos Georgios
<geo...@intracom-telecom.com <mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com> > wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to deploy Fuel 10 with Tacker plugin enabled and I’m getting the
> following error:
>
> (/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]) Provider upstart is not
> functional on this host
>
>
>
> Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd
> instead of 14.04 with upstart?
>
> Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> George
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> George Paraskevopoulos
>

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

2017-01-31 Thread Paraskevopoulos Georgios 
PS2: I run a test modifying service_provider -> ‘systemd’. It gives the 
following error:



(/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]/ensure) change from stopped to 
running failed: Could not start Service[tacker]: Execution of '/bin/systemctl 
start tacker-server' returned 5: Failed to start tacker-server.service: Unit 
tacker-server.service not found.



So we need to change the way the symlink to the service is created



BR,

George



From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:19 AM
To: Veena Lingadahalli <vlingadaha...@mvista.com>; Serg Melikyan 
<smelik...@mirantis.com>; Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Priya Kanaujia <pkanau...@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 
deployment



Hi all,



I have no problem helping with that. How can we proceed?

Romanos found that service_provider is hard coded here as “upstart”:

https://github.com/trozet/puppet-tacker/blob/master/manifests/params.pp#L19



So change this and modify the upstart job?

https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/fuel-plugin-tacker.git;a=blob;f=tacker_package/tacker-server;h=e8d5e23efc2e01a981e7d1f8877adbaf92b9a75d;hb=refs/heads/master



PS: Sorry Serg I must have missed that mail. I encountered the problem now that 
I’m trying to install fuel 10.



BR,

George



From: Veena Lingadahalli [mailto:vlingadaha...@mvista.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 6:44 AM
To: Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com <mailto:smelik...@mirantis.com> >; 
Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com <mailto:tro...@redhat.com> >
Cc: Paraskevopoulos Georgios <geo...@intracom-telecom.com 
<mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com> >; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> ; Priya Kanaujia 
<pkanau...@mvista.com <mailto:pkanau...@mvista.com> >; Aimee Ukasick 
<aimeeu.opensou...@gmail.com <mailto:aimeeu.opensou...@gmail.com> >
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 
deployment



Hi Tim,

Tacker fuel-plugin used in Colorado release is based on your repo [1]. I see 
that there are some code changes in tacker newton as part of the implementation 
of bp tacker-vnffg [2]. So do you have any plans to rebase the SFC_colorado 
changes to newton? How should we proceed about adding tacker-plugin in Fuel 10.?



[1] https://github.com/trozet/tacker/tree/SFC_colorado
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/tacker-vnffg


Thanks,
-Veena

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com 
<mailto:smelik...@mirantis.com> > wrote:

Hi Georgios,

Aimee was asking same question couple of weeks ago, and I had added
you in the thread as person originally enabled Tacker in Colorado
release.

> Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd 
> instead of 14.04 with upstart?
Seems like so.

>Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
It's pretty late in the cycle, so the only way Tacker might be added
to Fuel is through feature freeze exception and fixing it quickly. Do
you want to work on that?


On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Paraskevopoulos Georgios
<geo...@intracom-telecom.com <mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com> > wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to deploy Fuel 10 with Tacker plugin enabled and I’m getting the
> following error:
>
> (/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]) Provider upstart is not
> functional on this host
>
>
>
> Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd
> instead of 14.04 with upstart?
>
> Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> George
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> George Paraskevopoulos
>
> Software Engineer (SDN/NFV), INTRACOM-TELECOM
>
>  + 30 210 667 7689
>
>  geo...@intracom-telecom.com <mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com>
>
>  19.7 km Markopoulou Ave 19002 Peania, Athens, Greece
>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail message and any attachments are intended only
> for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be
> confidential. If you have received this transmission in error, and you are
> not an intended recipient, be aware that any copying, disclosure,
> distribution or use of this transmission or its contents is prohibited.
> INTRACOM TELECOM and the sender accept no liability for any loss, disruption
> or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data
> contained in, or transmitted with, this email. Views or opinions expressed
> in this message may be those of the author and may not necessarily represent
>

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

2017-01-31 Thread Paraskevopoulos Georgios 
Hi all,



I have no problem helping with that. How can we proceed?

Romanos found that service_provider is hard coded here as “upstart”:

https://github.com/trozet/puppet-tacker/blob/master/manifests/params.pp#L19



So change this and modify the upstart job?

https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/fuel-plugin-tacker.git;a=blob;f=tacker_package/tacker-server;h=e8d5e23efc2e01a981e7d1f8877adbaf92b9a75d;hb=refs/heads/master



PS: Sorry Serg I must have missed that mail. I encountered the problem now that 
I’m trying to install fuel 10.



BR,

George



From: Veena Lingadahalli [mailto:vlingadaha...@mvista.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 6:44 AM
To: Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com>; Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com>
Cc: Paraskevopoulos Georgios <geo...@intracom-telecom.com>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Priya Kanaujia <pkanau...@mvista.com>; 
Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensou...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 
deployment



Hi Tim,

Tacker fuel-plugin used in Colorado release is based on your repo [1]. I see 
that there are some code changes in tacker newton as part of the implementation 
of bp tacker-vnffg [2]. So do you have any plans to rebase the SFC_colorado 
changes to newton? How should we proceed about adding tacker-plugin in Fuel 10.?



[1] https://github.com/trozet/tacker/tree/SFC_colorado
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/tacker-vnffg


Thanks,
-Veena



On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com 
<mailto:smelik...@mirantis.com> > wrote:

Hi Georgios,

Aimee was asking same question couple of weeks ago, and I had added
you in the thread as person originally enabled Tacker in Colorado
release.

> Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd 
> instead of 14.04 with upstart?
Seems like so.

>Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
It's pretty late in the cycle, so the only way Tacker might be added
to Fuel is through feature freeze exception and fixing it quickly. Do
you want to work on that?


On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Paraskevopoulos Georgios
<geo...@intracom-telecom.com <mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com> > wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to deploy Fuel 10 with Tacker plugin enabled and I’m getting the
> following error:
>
> (/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]) Provider upstart is not
> functional on this host
>
>
>
> Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd
> instead of 14.04 with upstart?
>
> Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> George
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> George Paraskevopoulos
>
> Software Engineer (SDN/NFV), INTRACOM-TELECOM
>
>  + 30 210 667 7689
>
>  geo...@intracom-telecom.com <mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com>
>
>  19.7 km Markopoulou Ave 19002 Peania, Athens, Greece
>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail message and any attachments are intended only
> for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be
> confidential. If you have received this transmission in error, and you are
> not an intended recipient, be aware that any copying, disclosure,
> distribution or use of this transmission or its contents is prohibited.
> INTRACOM TELECOM and the sender accept no liability for any loss, disruption
> or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data
> contained in, or transmitted with, this email. Views or opinions expressed
> in this message may be those of the author and may not necessarily represent
> those of INTRACOM TELECOM.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>



--
Serg Melikyan, Development Manager at Mirantis, Inc.
http://mirantis.com | smelik...@mirantis.com <mailto:smelik...@mirantis.com>  | 
+1 (650) 440-8979





___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

2017-01-30 Thread Veena Lingadahalli 
Hi Tim,

Tacker fuel-plugin used in Colorado release is based on your repo [1]. I
see that there are some code changes in tacker newton as part of the
implementation of bp tacker-vnffg [2]. So do you have any plans to rebase
the SFC_colorado changes to newton? How should we proceed about adding
tacker-plugin in Fuel 10.?


[1] https://github.com/trozet/tacker/tree/SFC_colorado
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/tacker-vnffg

Thanks,
-Veena


On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Serg Melikyan 
wrote:

> Hi Georgios,
>
> Aimee was asking same question couple of weeks ago, and I had added
> you in the thread as person originally enabled Tacker in Colorado
> release.
>
> > Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with
> systemd instead of 14.04 with upstart?
> Seems like so.
>
> >Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
> It's pretty late in the cycle, so the only way Tacker might be added
> to Fuel is through feature freeze exception and fixing it quickly. Do
> you want to work on that?
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Paraskevopoulos Georgios
>  wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I’m trying to deploy Fuel 10 with Tacker plugin enabled and I’m getting
> the
> > following error:
> >
> > (/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]) Provider upstart is not
> > functional on this host
> >
> >
> >
> > Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with
> systemd
> > instead of 14.04 with upstart?
> >
> > Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > George
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > George Paraskevopoulos
> >
> > Software Engineer (SDN/NFV), INTRACOM-TELECOM
> >
> >  + 30 210 667 7689
> >
> >  geo...@intracom-telecom.com
> >
> >  19.7 km Markopoulou Ave 19002 Peania, Athens, Greece
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail message and any attachments are intended
> only
> > for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be
> > confidential. If you have received this transmission in error, and you
> are
> > not an intended recipient, be aware that any copying, disclosure,
> > distribution or use of this transmission or its contents is prohibited.
> > INTRACOM TELECOM and the sender accept no liability for any loss,
> disruption
> > or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data
> > contained in, or transmitted with, this email. Views or opinions
> expressed
> > in this message may be those of the author and may not necessarily
> represent
> > those of INTRACOM TELECOM.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Serg Melikyan, Development Manager at Mirantis, Inc.
> http://mirantis.com | smelik...@mirantis.com | +1 (650) 440-8979
>
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

2017-01-30 Thread Serg Melikyan 
Hi Georgios,

Aimee was asking same question couple of weeks ago, and I had added
you in the thread as person originally enabled Tacker in Colorado
release.

> Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd 
> instead of 14.04 with upstart?
Seems like so.

>Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
It's pretty late in the cycle, so the only way Tacker might be added
to Fuel is through feature freeze exception and fixing it quickly. Do
you want to work on that?


On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Paraskevopoulos Georgios
 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to deploy Fuel 10 with Tacker plugin enabled and I’m getting the
> following error:
>
> (/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]) Provider upstart is not
> functional on this host
>
>
>
> Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd
> instead of 14.04 with upstart?
>
> Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> George
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> George Paraskevopoulos
>
> Software Engineer (SDN/NFV), INTRACOM-TELECOM
>
>  + 30 210 667 7689
>
>  geo...@intracom-telecom.com
>
>  19.7 km Markopoulou Ave 19002 Peania, Athens, Greece
>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail message and any attachments are intended only
> for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be
> confidential. If you have received this transmission in error, and you are
> not an intended recipient, be aware that any copying, disclosure,
> distribution or use of this transmission or its contents is prohibited.
> INTRACOM TELECOM and the sender accept no liability for any loss, disruption
> or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data
> contained in, or transmitted with, this email. Views or opinions expressed
> in this message may be those of the author and may not necessarily represent
> those of INTRACOM TELECOM.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>



-- 
Serg Melikyan, Development Manager at Mirantis, Inc.
http://mirantis.com | smelik...@mirantis.com | +1 (650) 440-8979
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

2017-01-30 Thread Paraskevopoulos Georgios 
Hi all,



I'm trying to deploy Fuel 10 with Tacker plugin enabled and I'm getting the 
following error:

(/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]) Provider upstart is not 
functional on this host



Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd 
instead of 14.04 with upstart?

Will fuel-plugin-tacker be updated for Fuel 10?



Thanks,

George








George Paraskevopoulos

Software Engineer (SDN/NFV), INTRACOM-TELECOM


 + 30 210 667 7689

   geo...@intracom-telecom.com


 19.7 km Markopoulou Ave 19002 Peania, Athens, Greece





The information in this e-mail message and any attachments are intended only 
for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential. 
If you have received this transmission in error, and you are not an intended 
recipient, be aware that any copying, disclosure, distribution or use of this 
transmission or its contents is prohibited.  INTRACOM TELECOM and the sender 
accept no liability for any loss, disruption or damage to your data or computer 
system that may occur while using data contained in, or transmitted with, this 
email. Views or opinions expressed in this message may be those of the author 
and may not necessarily represent those of INTRACOM TELECOM.





___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss