Hi Chris: Sure.
hongbo 发件人: Christopher Price [mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2016年8月10日 20:26 收件人: Tianhongbo; Dave Neary; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 主题: Re: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting Ok, interesting no-one mentioned that on the last meeting. Can we discuss it as a group on Friday before changing what was agreed 5 days ago? (Note: releng did create it’s own channel but no longer uses it, rather they work on community channels as separate channels are at times not very useful for collaborative activities.) / Chris From: Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>> Date: Wednesday 10 August 2016 at 13:53 To: Christopher Price <chrispric...@gmail.com<mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com>>, Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>, Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com<mailto:dne...@redhat.com>>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Subject: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting Hi Chris: Yes, we agreed to use the opnfv-meeting. But now, there is a requirements that all people like to talk in the IRC all time for dovetail like done in the releng or yardstick. If we use opnfv-meeting, we cannot do that. That is the problem. Best Regards hongbo 发件人: Christopher Price [mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2016年8月10日 18:34 收件人: Tianhongbo; Christopher Price; Dave Neary; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting Hi Hongbo, If I recall, there were comments on the last meeting that people preferred to use opnfv-meeting. I had not heard anyone speak to the desire to create another IRC channel for this meeting series. My only thought is that it seems unnecessary to create another channel, our committers indicated a desire to stay on opnfv-meeting and it is unclear why this has come up again. / Chris From: <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>> Date: Wednesday 10 August 2016 at 03:02 To: Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>, Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com<mailto:dne...@redhat.com>>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting Hi all: With the development of dovetail, there are more people involved in. we used the opnfv-meeting before. In order to help people to discuss whenever and wherever, I suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for dovetail discussion. If we have dovetail own IRC, it can avoid the conflict. We tested it, it works. Any comments? Best Regards hongbo _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
