Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

[Christopher Price]

Ok, interesting no-one mentioned that on the last meeting.  

 

Can we discuss it as a group on Friday before changing what was agreed 5 days 
ago?  

(Note: releng did create it’s own channel but no longer uses it, rather they 
work on community channels as separate channels are at times not very useful 
for collaborative activities.)

 

/ Chris

 

 

From: Tianhongbo 
Date: Wednesday 10 August 2016 at 13:53
To: Christopher Price , Christopher Price 
, Dave Neary , TECH-DISCUSS 
OPNFV 
Subject: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail 
for the dovetail meeting

 

Hi Chris:

 

Yes, we agreed to use the opnfv-meeting.

But now, there is a requirements that all people like to talk in the IRC all 
time for dovetail like done in the releng or yardstick.

If we use opnfv-meeting, we cannot do that.

That is the problem.

 

Best Regards

 

hongbo

 

发件人: Christopher Price [mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com] 
发送时间: 2016年8月10日 18:34
收件人: Tianhongbo; Christopher Price; Dave Neary; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for 
the dovetail meeting

 

Hi Hongbo,

 

If I recall, there were comments on the last meeting that people preferred to 
use opnfv-meeting.  I had not heard anyone speak to the desire to create 
another IRC channel for this meeting series.

 

My only thought is that it seems unnecessary to create another channel, our 
committers indicated a desire to stay on opnfv-meeting and it is unclear why 
this has come up again.

 

/ Chris

 

From:  on behalf of Tianhongbo 

Date: Wednesday 10 August 2016 at 03:02
To: Christopher Price , Dave Neary 
, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for 
the dovetail meeting

 

Hi all:

 

With the development of dovetail, there are more people involved in. 

we used the opnfv-meeting before.

In order to help people to discuss whenever and wherever, I suggest to use the 
#opnfv-dovetail for dovetail discussion.

If we have dovetail own IRC, it can avoid the conflict.

We tested it, it works.

 

Any comments?

 

Best Regards

 

hongbo

___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss 

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

[Tianhongbo]

Hi Chris:

Yes, we agreed to use the opnfv-meeting.
But now, there is a requirements that all people like to talk in the IRC all 
time for dovetail like done in the releng or yardstick.
If we use opnfv-meeting, we cannot do that.
That is the problem.

Best Regards

hongbo

发件人: Christopher Price [mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2016年8月10日 18:34
收件人: Tianhongbo; Christopher Price; Dave Neary; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for 
the dovetail meeting

Hi Hongbo,

If I recall, there were comments on the last meeting that people preferred to 
use opnfv-meeting.  I had not heard anyone speak to the desire to create 
another IRC channel for this meeting series.

My only thought is that it seems unnecessary to create another channel, our 
committers indicated a desire to stay on opnfv-meeting and it is unclear why 
this has come up again.

/ Chris

From: 
>
 on behalf of Tianhongbo 
>
Date: Wednesday 10 August 2016 at 03:02
To: Christopher Price 
>, Dave 
Neary >, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for 
the dovetail meeting

Hi all:

With the development of dovetail, there are more people involved in.
we used the opnfv-meeting before.
In order to help people to discuss whenever and wherever, I suggest to use the 
#opnfv-dovetail for dovetail discussion.
If we have dovetail own IRC, it can avoid the conflict.
We tested it, it works.

Any comments?

Best Regards

hongbo
___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss