subject:"Re\: \[opnfv\-tech\-discuss\] \[Orchestra\] new project proposal"

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-01 Thread Kunzmann, Gerald

Hi Guiseppe,

Thanks for your proposal.
I assume you meant “present it during the next tech discuss call” on Thursday, 
right?   ☺

Best regards,
Gerald

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Carella, 
Giuseppe
Sent: Montag, 1. August 2016 23:09
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Michael Pauls 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call.

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-01 Thread Carella, Giuseppe

Hi Gerald,

yes, my mistake ;-)

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 01 Aug 2016, at 23:43, Kunzmann, Gerald 
mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>> wrote:

Hi Guiseppe,

Thanks for your proposal.
I assume you meant “present it during the next tech discuss call” on Thursday, 
right?   ☺

Best regards,
Gerald

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Carella, 
Giuseppe
Sent: Montag, 1. August 2016 23:09
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Michael Pauls 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call.

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-02 Thread Liu Yuan

Hi Giuseppe,

I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to 
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open 
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you 
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open 
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better.

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

From: Carella, Giuseppe
Date: 2016-08-02 05:08
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
CC: Michael Pauls
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi all,

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call.

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-02 Thread Carella, Giuseppe

Hi Yuan,

I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, 
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If 
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a 
proposal...

We can discuss about it during the next conference call.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan 
mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Giuseppe,

I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to 
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open 
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you 
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open 
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better.

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

From: Carella, Giuseppe
Date: 2016-08-02 05:08
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
CC: Michael Pauls
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi all,

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call.

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-02 Thread Liu Yuan

Hi Giuseppe,

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:00
To: Liu Yuan<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Yuan,

I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, 
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If 
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a 
proposal...

We can discuss about it during the next conference call.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan 
mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Giuseppe,

I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to 
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open 
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you 
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open 
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better.

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: 2016-08-02 05:08
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
CC: Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi all,

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call.

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-02 Thread HU, BIN

I put it on the agenda of technical community discussion at 6am Pacific Time 
this Thursday 8/4.

Thank you
Bin

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Carella, 
Giuseppe
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 10:30 PM
To: Kunzmann, Gerald 
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Michael Pauls 

Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi Gerald,

yes, my mistake ;-)

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 01 Aug 2016, at 23:43, Kunzmann, Gerald 
mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>> wrote:

Hi Guiseppe,

Thanks for your proposal.
I assume you meant “present it during the next tech discuss call” on Thursday, 
right?   ☺

Best regards,
Gerald

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Carella, 
Giuseppe
Sent: Montag, 1. August 2016 23:09
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: Michael Pauls 
mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call.

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-03 Thread Dave Neary

Hi Yuan,

Hasn't OPNFV-OPEN-O changed its name to Opera in its proposal? I'm not
ure why there needs to be a link to a specific project name.

I do have other feedback, though - I would love to know what
relationship, if any, Orchestra intends to have with MANO related
projects which are already in existence: Models, Parser, VES, Copper,
Domino. I have the same questions/concerns about Opera, for that matter.
I see a lot of words present in both architecture diagrams (Message
queue, NS engine/policy engine, analytics engine, generic VNFM) and some
common requirements that are not states (the need for an NSD, VNFFGD,
VNFD) which suggest to me that there is room for creating common
building blocks for these.

Thanks,
Dave.

On 08/02/2016 05:44 AM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> Hi Giuseppe,
> 
> I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to
> integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO /
> Orcheatrator open source projects, and there is a MANO group in the
> OPNFV. I don't think you could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to
> the Open Baton, maybe named Open Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better. 
> 
> Regards,
> Yuan
> 
> Liu Yuan
> liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com
> 
>  
> *From:* Carella, Giuseppe 
> *Date:* 2016-08-02 05:08
> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> 
> *CC:* Michael Pauls 
> *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
> Hi all, 
> 
> please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra,
> having as main objective the integration between Open Baton and
> OPNFV. We’ll be available to present it during the next TSC call. 
> 
> Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved. 
> 
> [1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra
> 
> Cheers,
> Giuseppe
> 
> Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in
> Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> 

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-04 Thread Liu Yuan

Hi Dave,

In the proposal, the project name is OPNFV OPEN-O Requirement for Integration. 
And the repository name is Opera.

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

From: Dave Neary<mailto:dne...@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-08-04 04:43
To: Liu Yuan<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>; Carella, 
Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
CC: Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Yuan,

Hasn't OPNFV-OPEN-O changed its name to Opera in its proposal? I'm not
ure why there needs to be a link to a specific project name.

I do have other feedback, though - I would love to know what
relationship, if any, Orchestra intends to have with MANO related
projects which are already in existence: Models, Parser, VES, Copper,
Domino. I have the same questions/concerns about Opera, for that matter.
I see a lot of words present in both architecture diagrams (Message
queue, NS engine/policy engine, analytics engine, generic VNFM) and some
common requirements that are not states (the need for an NSD, VNFFGD,
VNFD) which suggest to me that there is room for creating common
building blocks for these.

Thanks,
Dave.

On 08/02/2016 05:44 AM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> Hi Giuseppe,
>
> I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to
> integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO /
> Orcheatrator open source projects, and there is a MANO group in the
> OPNFV. I don't think you could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to
> the Open Baton, maybe named Open Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better.
>
> Regards,
> Yuan
> 
> Liu Yuan
> liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com
>
>
> *From:* Carella, Giuseppe <mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> *Date:* 2016-08-02 05:08
> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *CC:* Michael Pauls <mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
> *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
> Hi all,
>
> please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra,
> having as main objective the integration between Open Baton and
> OPNFV. We’ll be available to present it during the next TSC call.
>
> Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.
>
> [1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra
>
> Cheers,
> Giuseppe
>
> Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in
> Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)
>
>
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>

--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-05 Thread Liu Yuan

Hi,

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

Regards,
Yuan


Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

From: liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:23
To: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Giuseppe,

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:00
To: Liu Yuan<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Yuan,

I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, 
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If 
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a 
proposal...

We can discuss about it during the next conference call.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan 
mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Giuseppe,

I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to 
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open 
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you 
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open 
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better.

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: 2016-08-02 05:08
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
CC: Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi all,

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call.

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-05 Thread Bob Monkman

Yuan,
I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.

I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

One opinion,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi,

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

Regards,
Yuan


Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:23
To: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Giuseppe,

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:00
To: Liu Yuan<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Yuan,

I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, 
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If 
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a 
proposal...

We can discuss about it during the next conference call.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan 
mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Giuseppe,

I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to 
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open 
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you 
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open 
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better.

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: 2016-08-02 05:08
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
CC: Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi all,

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call.

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-05 Thread Christopher Price

Hi Bob,

 

I tend to agree with you, but personally don’t put that much stock into a name. 
 

In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so we did 
ask that the team consider revising the name.  If a project was to propose the 
name OPNFV “orchestration” I would similarly ask them to reconsider.

 

Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO space 
and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an entertaining 
theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might choose something 
similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate.  

 

I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are 
concerns with it let’s discuss it openly every opinion counts here.

 

/ Chris

 

 

From:  on behalf of Bob Monkman 

Date: Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59
To: Liu Yuan , BIN , "Carella, 
Giuseppe" 
Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

 

Yuan,

I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.

 

I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

 

One opinion,

Bob  

 

Robert (Bob) Monkman

Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager

150 Rose Orchard Way

San Jose, Ca 95134

M: +1.510.676.5490

 

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

 

Hi,

 

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

 

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

 

Regards,

Yuan

 

Liu Yuan

liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

 

From: liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

Date: 2016-08-02 18:23

To: Carella, Giuseppe

CC: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Michael Pauls

Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi Giuseppe,

 

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

 

Regards,

Yuan

Liu Yuan

liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

 

From: Carella, Giuseppe

Date: 2016-08-02 18:00

To: Liu Yuan

CC: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Michael Pauls

Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi Yuan, 

 

I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, 
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If 
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a 
proposal...

 

We can discuss about it during the next conference call. 

 

Cheers,
Giuseppe

 

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

 

On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan  wrote:

 

Hi Giuseppe,

 

I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to 
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open 
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you 
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open 
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better. 

 

Regards,

Yuan

Liu Yuan

liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

 

From: Carella, Giuseppe

Date: 2016-08-02 05:08

To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org

CC: Michael Pauls

Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,  

 

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call. 

 

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved. 

 

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

 

Cheers,
Giuseppe

 

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not discl

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-05 Thread Carella, Giuseppe

Hi all,

indeed that was our intention, to have a funny name…considering our open 
“baton" we thought it would make sense to build an orchestra using the OPNFV 
instruments (projects) :-)

of course, I agree that if there are major concerns we’ll have to reconsider it.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 05 Aug 2016, at 17:26, Christopher Price 
mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Bob,

I tend to agree with you, but personally don’t put that much stock into a name.
In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so we did 
ask that the team consider revising the name.  If a project was to propose the 
name OPNFV “orchestration” I would similarly ask them to reconsider.

Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO space 
and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an entertaining 
theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might choose something 
similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate.

I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are 
concerns with it let’s discuss it openly every opinion counts here.

/ Chris


From: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Bob Monkman mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>>
Date: Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59
To: Liu Yuan mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>>, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, "Carella, Giuseppe" 
mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>>
Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Yuan,
I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.

I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

One opinion,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi,

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

Regards,
Yuan


Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:23
To: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Giuseppe,

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:00
To: Liu Yuan<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Yuan,

I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, 
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If 
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a 
proposal...

We can discuss about it during the next conference call.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan 
mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com&

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-05 Thread Pasi Vaananen

So, to make it clear, should we attempt to name the single upstream 
community/project specific projects based on their upstream name, like we have  
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/OPNFV-OPEN-O (and to some extent “ONOS 
Framework” and “OpenContral Virtual Networking for NFV”) this could be e.g. 
OPNFV-OpenBaton ?

 

Regards,

 

Pasi

 

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Bob Monkman
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 11:00 AM
To: Liu Yuan; BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

 

Yuan,

I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.

 

I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

 

One opinion,

Bob  

 

Robert (Bob) Monkman

Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager

150 Rose Orchard Way

San Jose, Ca 95134

M: +1.510.676.5490

 

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

 

Hi,

 

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

 

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

 

Regards,

Yuan

 

  _  

Liu Yuan

liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

 

From: liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

Date: 2016-08-02 18:23

To: Carella, Giuseppe <mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> 

CC: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Michael Pauls 
<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de> 

Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi Giuseppe,

 

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

 

Regards,

Yuan


  _  


Liu Yuan

liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

 

From: Carella, Giuseppe <mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> 

Date: 2016-08-02 18:00

To: Liu Yuan <mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com> 

CC: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Michael Pauls 
<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de> 

Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi Yuan, 

 

I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, 
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If 
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a 
proposal...

 

We can discuss about it during the next conference call. 

 

Cheers,
Giuseppe

 

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

 

On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan  wrote:

 

Hi Giuseppe,

 

I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to 
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open 
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you 
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open 
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better. 

 

Regards,

Yuan


  _  


Liu Yuan

liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

 

From: Carella, Giuseppe <mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> 

Date: 2016-08-02 05:08

To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org

CC: Michael Pauls <mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de> 

Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,  

 

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call. 

 

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved. 

 

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

 

Cheers,
Giuseppe

 

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-05 Thread Bob Monkman

Guiseppe, Chris,
Good comments and I like fun names. I see both sides on this 
one. I thought it was worth a look, since Yuan brought it up and I could see 
how it could _possibly_ be misconstrued. As was said, if a critical mass were 
to think it an issue, the Open Baton team- else I do not feel strong enough to 
push on it. Good luck with the project Giuseppe and team.
Regards,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: Carella, Giuseppe [mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 4:32 PM
To: Christopher Price
Cc: Bob Monkman; Liu Yuan; BIN; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,

indeed that was our intention, to have a funny name…considering our open 
“baton" we thought it would make sense to build an orchestra using the OPNFV 
instruments (projects) :-)

of course, I agree that if there are major concerns we’ll have to reconsider it.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 05 Aug 2016, at 17:26, Christopher Price 
mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Bob,

I tend to agree with you, but personally don’t put that much stock into a name.
In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so we did 
ask that the team consider revising the name.  If a project was to propose the 
name OPNFV “orchestration” I would similarly ask them to reconsider.

Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO space 
and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an entertaining 
theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might choose something 
similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate.

I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are 
concerns with it let’s discuss it openly every opinion counts here.

/ Chris


From: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Bob Monkman mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>>
Date: Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59
To: Liu Yuan mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>>, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, "Carella, Giuseppe" 
mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>>
Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Yuan,
I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.

I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

One opinion,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi,

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

Regards,
Yuan


Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:23
To: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Giuseppe,

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-08 Thread Liu Yuan

Hi Pasi,

I like your idea. It makes more clear.

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com

From: Pasi Vaananen<mailto:opnfv.pasiv...@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-08-05 23:51
To: 'Bob Monkman'<mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>; 'Liu 
Yuan'<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>; 'BIN'<mailto:bh5...@att.com>; 'Carella, 
Giuseppe'<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
So, to make it clear, should we attempt to name the single upstream 
community/project specific projects based on their upstream name, like we have  
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/OPNFV-OPEN-O (and to some extent “ONOS 
Framework” and “OpenContral Virtual Networking for NFV”) this could be e.g. 
OPNFV-OpenBaton ?

Regards,

Pasi

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Bob Monkman
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 11:00 AM
To: Liu Yuan; BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Yuan,
I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.

I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

One opinion,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi,

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

Regards,
Yuan


Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:23
To: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Giuseppe,

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

Regards,
Yuan

Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:00
To: Liu Yuan<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Yuan,

I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, 
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If 
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a 
proposal...

We can discuss about it during the next conference call.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan 
mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Giuseppe,

I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to 
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open 
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you 
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open 
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better.

Regards,
Yuan
_

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-10 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

How about Bat-Mano?

On Aug 5, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Bob Monkman 
mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>> wrote:

Guiseppe, Chris,
Good comments and I like fun names. I see both sides on this 
one. I thought it was worth a look, since Yuan brought it up and I could see 
how it could _possibly_ be misconstrued. As was said, if a critical mass were 
to think it an issue, the Open Baton team- else I do not feel strong enough to 
push on it. Good luck with the project Giuseppe and team.
Regards,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: Carella, Giuseppe [mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 4:32 PM
To: Christopher Price
Cc: Bob Monkman; Liu Yuan; BIN; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,

indeed that was our intention, to have a funny name…considering our open 
“baton" we thought it would make sense to build an orchestra using the OPNFV 
instruments (projects) :-)

of course, I agree that if there are major concerns we’ll have to reconsider it.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 05 Aug 2016, at 17:26, Christopher Price 
mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Bob,

I tend to agree with you, but personally don’t put that much stock into a name.
In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so we did 
ask that the team consider revising the name.  If a project was to propose the 
name OPNFV “orchestration” I would similarly ask them to reconsider.

Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO space 
and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an entertaining 
theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might choose something 
similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate.

I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are 
concerns with it let’s discuss it openly every opinion counts here.

/ Chris


From: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Bob Monkman mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>>
Date: Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59
To: Liu Yuan mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>>, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, "Carella, Giuseppe" 
mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>>
Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Yuan,
I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.

I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

One opinion,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi,

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

Regards,
Yuan


Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>

From: liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com<mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:23
To: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
CC: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Giuseppe,

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

Regards,
Yuan

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-10 Thread Heather Kirksey

Maybe it's my strange mind, but I can't help thinking bat guano on that
one, Bryan.  :)

I like the musical theme myself -- it's a bit whimsical but obviously yield
to the community.

HRK

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 4:21 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L  wrote:

> How about Bat-Mano?
>
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Bob Monkman  wrote:
>
> Guiseppe, Chris,
>
> Good comments and I like fun names. I see both sides on
> this one. I thought it was worth a look, since Yuan brought it up and I
> could see how it could _*possibly*_ be misconstrued. As was said, if a
> critical mass were to think it an issue, the Open Baton team- else I do not
> feel strong enough to push on it. Good luck with the project Giuseppe and
> team.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> Robert (Bob) Monkman
>
> Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
>
> 150 Rose Orchard Way
>
> San Jose, Ca 95134
>
> M: +1.510.676.5490
>
>
>
> *From:* Carella, Giuseppe [mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
> ]
> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2016 4:32 PM
> *To:* Christopher Price
> *Cc:* Bob Monkman; Liu Yuan; BIN; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> indeed that was our intention, to have a funny name…considering our open
> “baton" we thought it would make sense to build an orchestra using the
> OPNFV instruments (projects) :-)
>
>
>
> of course, I agree that if there are major concerns we’ll have to
> reconsider it.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Giuseppe
>
>
>
> Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.
> berlin5gweek.org/)
>
>
>
> On 05 Aug 2016, at 17:26, Christopher Price 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Bob,
>
>
>
> I tend to agree with you, but personally don’t put that much stock into a
> name.
>
> In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so
> we did ask that the team consider revising the name.  If a project was to
> propose the name OPNFV “orchestration” I would similarly ask them to
> reconsider.
>
>
>
> Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO
> space and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an
> entertaining theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might
> choose something similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate.
>
>
>
> I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are
> concerns with it let’s discuss it openly every opinion counts here.
>
>
>
> / Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Bob
> Monkman 
> *Date: *Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59
> *To: *Liu Yuan , BIN ,
> "Carella, Giuseppe" 
> *Cc: *TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
> *Subject: *Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
>
>
>
> Yuan,
>
> I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names
> that come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _*the*_
> solution for some category of function, unless the project is an umbrella
> for multiple options. I am not judging that this was the intent with
> Orchestra, but one could argue such a name “grabs” the function for one
> option.
>
>
>
> I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no
> one else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a
> broad function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be
> sent back to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.
>
>
>
> One opinion,
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> Robert (Bob) Monkman
>
> Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
>
> 150 Rose Orchard Way
>
> San Jose, Ca 95134
>
> M: +1.510.676.5490
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailt
> o:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Liu Yuan
> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
> *To:* BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the
> beginning. And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too
> broad, and needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.
>
>
>
> About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The
> meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why
> there is a difference between these two projects.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Yuan
>
>
> --
>
&g

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-11 Thread Odini, Marie-Paule (CMS ww)

Cool name indeed ! and the logo :)

[cid:image002.png@01D1F3CF.64B92490]

Marie-Paule Odini
Distinguished Technologist
HPE Corporate CT Office - CMS/CSB
Phone: +33 672992772
Email: marie-paule.od...@hpe.com<mailto:marie-paule.od...@hpe.com>
[cid:image001.png@01D10CEA.16CEFEC0]





From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 1:21 AM
To: Bob Monkman 
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

How about Bat-Mano?

On Aug 5, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Bob Monkman 
mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>> wrote:
Guiseppe, Chris,
Good comments and I like fun names. I see both sides on this 
one. I thought it was worth a look, since Yuan brought it up and I could see 
how it could _possibly_ be misconstrued. As was said, if a critical mass were 
to think it an issue, the Open Baton team- else I do not feel strong enough to 
push on it. Good luck with the project Giuseppe and team.
Regards,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: Carella, Giuseppe [mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 4:32 PM
To: Christopher Price
Cc: Bob Monkman; Liu Yuan; BIN; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,

indeed that was our intention, to have a funny name...considering our open 
"baton" we thought it would make sense to build an orchestra using the OPNFV 
instruments (projects) :-)

of course, I agree that if there are major concerns we'll have to reconsider it.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 05 Aug 2016, at 17:26, Christopher Price 
mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Bob,

I tend to agree with you, but personally don't put that much stock into a name.
In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so we did 
ask that the team consider revising the name.  If a project was to propose the 
name OPNFV "orchestration" I would similarly ask them to reconsider.

Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO space 
and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an entertaining 
theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might choose something 
similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate.

I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are 
concerns with it let's discuss it openly every opinion counts here.

/ Chris


From: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Bob Monkman mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>>
Date: Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59
To: Liu Yuan mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>>, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, "Carella, Giuseppe" 
mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>>
Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Yuan,
I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name "grabs" the function for one option.

I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

One opinion,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi,

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

Regards,
Yuan


Liu Yuan
liuyuan_c...@hotmail.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

2016-08-12 Thread Carella, Giuseppe

This is becoming quite interesting now :-) cool suggestions indeed :-D

Let us think about it and and discuss during the next week call..

Cheers,
Giuseppe


On 11 Aug 2016, at 12:54, Odini, Marie-Paule (CMS ww) 
mailto:marie-paule.od...@hpe.com>> wrote:

Cool name indeed ! and the logo :)



Marie-Paule Odini
Distinguished Technologist
HPE Corporate CT Office – CMS/CSB
Phone: +33 672992772
Email: marie-paule.od...@hpe.com<mailto:marie-paule.od...@hpe.com>






From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 1:21 AM
To: Bob Monkman mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

How about Bat-Mano?

On Aug 5, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Bob Monkman 
mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>> wrote:
Guiseppe, Chris,
Good comments and I like fun names. I see both sides on this 
one. I thought it was worth a look, since Yuan brought it up and I could see 
how it could _possibly_ be misconstrued. As was said, if a critical mass were 
to think it an issue, the Open Baton team- else I do not feel strong enough to 
push on it. Good luck with the project Giuseppe and team.
Regards,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: Carella, Giuseppe [mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 4:32 PM
To: Christopher Price
Cc: Bob Monkman; Liu Yuan; BIN; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,

indeed that was our intention, to have a funny name…considering our open 
“baton" we thought it would make sense to build an orchestra using the OPNFV 
instruments (projects) :-)

of course, I agree that if there are major concerns we’ll have to reconsider it.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 05 Aug 2016, at 17:26, Christopher Price 
mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Bob,

I tend to agree with you, but personally don’t put that much stock into a name.
In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so we did 
ask that the team consider revising the name.  If a project was to propose the 
name OPNFV “orchestration” I would similarly ask them to reconsider.

Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO space 
and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an entertaining 
theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might choose something 
similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate.

I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are 
concerns with it let’s discuss it openly every opinion counts here.

/ Chris


From: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Bob Monkman mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>>
Date: Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59
To: Liu Yuan mailto:liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com>>, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, "Carella, Giuseppe" 
mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>>
Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Yuan,
I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.

I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

One opinion,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi,

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal and MANO WG support for projects

2016-08-03 Thread Prakash Ramchandran

Dave,
We have started addressing few of your well founded concerns.

Trying to get MANO WG (workgroup) formed tying to identify MANO Stack issues 
for both NB /SB users wrt OPNFV VIM

1. cross-project relations (existing OPNFV Models, Parser, VES, Copper, Domino)
2. upstream NVFVO (Generic)  integration common minimum like Interface/APIs/Use 
cases to test and verify - OPEN-O, Open Baton, OSM etc.
3. Relation between VNFM (generic) - like Tacker, Juju etc.
4. Cross layer commonality for generic modules for compliance
5. Catalog bindings for  Local and Global serving of VNFs (and VSFs as some 
call) their on-boarding etc.
6. Your question on Templates which are both TOSA, YANG, Hybrid and standards 
as they evolve will also be subject of MANO WG.

I am planning to demonstrate next week MANO meeting some  Catalog and 
On-boarding possibilities to help arrive at some integration aspects that need 
to be fleshed out for OPNFV Eco system to provide Vendors the opportunity to 
build on top of generic capabilities.

Thus I believe the concerns will not run away soon, until Markets prefer what 
we do in OPNFV, we should be open to all upstream as well to internal projects 
that can build & deploy  missing pieces in the eco system.

Monday morning 8 AM PDT (15 UTC MANO WG) 
Monday morning 9 AM PDT ( 16 UTC) Models)- Cross Project co-ordination with 
Model

Wednesday afternoon 1.30 PM PDT (8.30 UTC) 
Wednesday evening  5 PM PDT ( 0 UTC Thursday) for cross project co-ordination 
other than Mode

Thanks
Prakash

Prakash Ramchandran
 R&D USA
FutureWei Technologies, Inc
Email: prakash.ramchand...@huawei.com
Work:  +1 (408) 330-5489
Mobile: +1 (408) 406-5810
2330 Central Expy, Santa Clara, CA 95050, USA

-Original Message-
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 1:44 PM
To: Liu Yuan; Carella, Giuseppe; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi Yuan,

Hasn't OPNFV-OPEN-O changed its name to Opera in its proposal? I'm not
ure why there needs to be a link to a specific project name.

I do have other feedback, though - I would love to know what
relationship, if any, Orchestra intends to have with MANO related
projects which are already in existence: Models, Parser, VES, Copper,
Domino. I have the same questions/concerns about Opera, for that matter.
I see a lot of words present in both architecture diagrams (Message
queue, NS engine/policy engine, analytics engine, generic VNFM) and some
common requirements that are not states (the need for an NSD, VNFFGD,
VNFD) which suggest to me that there is room for creating common
building blocks for these.

Thanks,
Dave.

On 08/02/2016 05:44 AM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> Hi Giuseppe,
> 
> I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to
> integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO /
> Orcheatrator open source projects, and there is a MANO group in the
> OPNFV. I don't think you could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to
> the Open Baton, maybe named Open Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better. 
> 
> Regards,
> Yuan
> 
> Liu Yuan
> liuyuan_c...@hotmail.com
> 
>  
> *From:* Carella, Giuseppe <mailto:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> *Date:* 2016-08-02 05:08
> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *CC:* Michael Pauls <mailto:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de>
> *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
> Hi all, 
> 
> please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra,
> having as main objective the integration between Open Baton and
> OPNFV. We'll be available to present it during the next TSC call. 
> 
> Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved. 
> 
> [1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra
> 
> Cheers,
> Giuseppe
> 
> Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in
> Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> 

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal and MANO WG support for projects

20 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information