Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call on draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03
I have read the draft and I support the adoption. Thanks, Bo -邮件原件- 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Henk Birkholz 发送时间: 2021年1月5日 2:04 收件人: opsawg 主题: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call on draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03 Dear OPSAWG members, this starts a call for Working Group Adoption on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03 ending on Monday, January 25. As a reminder, this I-D describes potential issues and concerns regarding the use of DNS names and IP addressed with RFC8520 Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) in support of device access. Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments you may have. For the OPSAWG co-chairs, Henk ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call on draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00
I have read the draft and I support the adoption. Thanks, Bo -邮件原件- 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Henk Birkholz 发送时间: 2021年1月5日 0:10 收件人: opsawg 主题: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call on draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00 Dear OPSAWG members, this starts a call for Working Group Adoption on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00 ending on Monday, January 25. As a reminder, this I-D describes different ways to acquire Software Bills of Material (SBOM) about distinguishable managed entities. The work was updated by the authors on October 13th and now elaborates on three ways SBOM can be found, including a MUD URI as one of the options. Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments you may have. For the OPSAWG co-chairs, Henk ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
[OPSAWG] 🔔 Final day of three ongoing WG Adoption Calls
Dear OPSAWG members, as a reminder, today is the final day of three ongoing calls for adoption: I-D.lear-opsawg-sbom-access, I-D.richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations, and I-D.richardson-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls. For the OPAWG co-chairs, Henk ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-03.txt
Dear chairs, The authors believe the VPN service performance monitoring YANG draft is ready to be adopted as the WG document. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-03 The new revision has addressed the comments from the WG mailing list: 1.Added text to clarify the “percentile” parameters descriptions 2.Fixed the counters and percentile definition to be alignment with ietf-interface and ietf-stamp The authors would like to request WG adoption of the draft. Thanks, Bo on behalf of all the co-authors -邮件原件- 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2021年1月22日 11:15 收件人: Bin Wen ; Wubo (lana) ; Chang Liu ; Change Liu ; Honglei Xu ; Mohamed Boucadair ; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios ; Oscar de Dios ; Qin Wu ; Qin Wu 主题: New Version Notification for draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-03.txt A new version of I-D, draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Bo Wu and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm Revision: 03 Title: A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring Document date: 2021-01-21 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 31 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-03.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-03 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-03 Abstract: The data model defined in RFC8345 introduces vertical layering relationships between networks that can be augmented to cover network/service topologies. This document defines a YANG model for both Network Performance Monitoring and VPN Service Performance Monitoring that can be used to monitor and manage network performance on the topology at higher layer or the service topology between VPN sites. This document does not define metrics for network performance or mechanisms for measuring network performance. The YANG model defined in this document is designed as an augmentation to the network topology YANG model defined in RFC 8345 and draws on relevant YANG types defined in RFC 6991, RFC 8299, RFC 8345, and RFC 8532. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
