Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh

2022-08-22 Thread Qin Wu
Support this draft, with a few comments and suggestions below:

1.   It will be more reasonable to place use section before protocol 
definition section.

2.   Please add reference to RFC defining SRv6 Endpoint Behavior in both 
abstract and introduction section

3.   Please add reference to RFC which allocate 89 Element ID to 
forwardingStatus;

4.   Use case is not clear how these new IPFIX Information Elements work 
together with existing IPFIX Information Elements

Or how these new IPFIX Information Elements work together with SRv6.


-Qin
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Paolo Volpato
发送时间: 2022年8月22日 20:00
收件人: opsawg@ietf.org
主题: Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh

Hi,

I have read the draft and think it is useful in the area of network operations.
Therefore I support its adoption.

BR
Paolo

From: OPSAWG mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org>> On 
Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 10:14 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh

Hello, WG.  We’d like to begin a two week call for adoption of this work.  Even 
as an individual draft it has already received some reviews and has iterated 
quite a bit.  Based on IETF 114 there does seem to be interest in adopting this 
in opsawg, but we need a formal adoption poll.

Please review and provide your adoption thoughts no later than September 1, 
2022.

Thanks.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg


Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh

2022-08-22 Thread Paolo Volpato
Hi,

I have read the draft and think it is useful in the area of network operations.
Therefore I support its adoption.

BR
Paolo


From: OPSAWG mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org>> On 
Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 10:14 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh

Hello, WG.  We’d like to begin a two week call for adoption of this work.  Even 
as an individual draft it has already received some reviews and has iterated 
quite a bit.  Based on IETF 114 there does seem to be interest in adopting this 
in opsawg, but we need a formal adoption poll.

Please review and provide your adoption thoughts no later than September 1, 
2022.

Thanks.

Joe
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg


Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh

2022-08-22 Thread Alex Huang Feng
Hi,

I have read this draft and support the WG adoption. I think it is very valuable 
work and believe it improves network visibility in SRv6 networks.

Regards,

Alex

> On 18 Aug 2022, at 22:14, Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hello, WG.  We’d like to begin a two week call for adoption of this work.  
> Even as an individual draft it has already received some reviews and has 
> iterated quite a bit.  Based on IETF 114 there does seem to be interest in 
> adopting this in opsawg, but we need a formal adoption poll.
>  
> Please review and provide your adoption thoughts no later than September 1, 
> 2022.
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> Joe
> ___
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg 
> 
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg