[OPSAWG] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-13: (with COMMENT)
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/ -- COMMENT: -- Thanks for your work to address my previous DISCUSS and COMMENT. There is a residual comment, which is the question of how srhIPv6Section should be formed if there is no SRH in the packet. In his reply, Thomas said, > In case when the compressed SID container is only used in the IPv6 destination address of the provider data plane and the SRH is not being present at all, it would be a zero lenght array. Perhaps adding some text to that effect might be worthwhile. ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Dear John, My apology. Your assumption is correct. In case when the compressed SID container is only used in the IPv6 destination address of the provider data plane and the SRH is not being present at all, it would be a zero lenght array. Best wishes Thomas > On 24 May 2023, at 17:32, John Scudder wrote: > > Thanks, Thomas. I think this part isn’t answered yet? > >> On May 24, 2023, at 1:03 AM, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote: >> >> And what >> of srhIPv6Section? Would it just be omitted in the case of a bare cSID, would >> it be a zero-length octetArray, ...? > > Regards, > > —John > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thanks, Thomas. I think this part isn’t answered yet? > On May 24, 2023, at 1:03 AM, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote: > > And what > of srhIPv6Section? Would it just be omitted in the case of a bare cSID, would > it be a zero-length octetArray, ...? Regards, —John ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
