Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
Support its publication as Co-author. Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 2:39 PM To: opsawg Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-...@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT] Sorry for attaching a wrong link to the draft. Please see as follows. Hi WG, This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf/ Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are welcome. The WG LC will end on 9st Oct 2020. Thanks, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
Hi, Tianran: I am not aware of any IPR for this draft. Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 2:43 PM To: opsawg Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-...@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT] Sorry for attaching a wrong link to the draft. Please see as follows. Hi Authors, Accompany with the WG LC, this mail starts the IPR poll. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04? If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04, please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email in OPSAWG mailing list regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor but are on OPSAWG mailing list, then please explicitly respond if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thanks, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
[OPSAWG] 答复: WG adoption call for draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-07
Support the adoption. This draft give the overall view for the different layers of Yang modules that defined within IETF(also applicable for Yang defined by other STD). What I wondering is the that necessaries of the network layer model. More layers means more conversions between different layers, increased complex for the service automation management system and the relationship management between these models. Is there any way or mechanism to manage these interleaved modules in more automatic manners? Can the above concerns be described in the updated version after its adoption? Best Regards. Aijun Wang China Telecom -邮件原件- 发件人: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou 发送时间: 2019年10月29日 9:44 收件人: opsawg@ietf.org 抄送: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization.auth...@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org 主题: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-07 Hi WG, This email starts a 2 weeks working group adoption call for draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-07. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualiza tion/ This document provides a framework that describes and discusses an architecture for service and network management automation that takes advantage of YANG modeling technologies. If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be willing to review and help the draft. If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work on this topic, please say why. This poll will run until Nov 11. Thanks, Tianran and Joe ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
[OPSAWG] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-song-opsawg-ntf
Support for the adoption. Based on this framework, we can easily judge, compare and select the emerging telemetry technologies in various scenarios. It also gives the common ground for future discussion. Best Regards. Aijun Wang Network R and Operation Support Department China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China. -邮件原件- 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou 发送时间: 2019年3月11日 10:40 收件人: opsawg@ietf.org 抄送: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org 主题: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-song-opsawg-ntf Hi WG, As you may have seen, the authors have posted an update to draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03 to address discussions in Bangkok and after. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ntf/ https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/g338UPfVAtOhVhdDzhJcR2nS76E In Bangkok there seemed to some interest in working on this topic and the chairs believe it is in scope for this working group. This email starts a poll for adoption. If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be willing to review and help the draft. If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work on this topic, please say why. This poll will run until 9am in Prague on Monday 25th March. Regards, Tianran, OPSAWG Co-Chair ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
[OPSAWG] 答复: IPR poll on draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03
I'm not aware of any IPR for this draft. Thanks! -邮件原件- 发件人: Tianran Zhou [mailto:zhoutian...@huawei.com] 发送时间: 2019年3月11日 10:55 收件人: opsawg@ietf.org 抄送: draft-song-opsawg-...@ietf.org 主题: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03 Hi WG, Accompany with the adoption poll, this mail starts the IPR poll. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03? If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03, please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email in OPSAWG mailing list regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor but are on OPSAWG mailing list, then please explicitly respond if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you for kind support. Regards, Tianran, OPSAWG co-chair ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
[OPSAWG] 答复: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06
Hi, Joel: Can we consider this draft from other viewpoints? If the router can report and correlate the traffic with its associated community, the usage of the community to differentiate the customer, the service category that be accessed and the geographical region etc. will be flourished. And currently, China Telecom has some internal usage regulation for community to differentiate some important customers and the related services. Best Regards. Aijun Wang Network R and Operation Support Department China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China. From: Joel Halpern <mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com> Date: 2018-04-13 22:44 To: rtg-...@ietf.org CC: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.org Subject: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Not Ready This is both a gen-art re-review and a routing directorate requested review. The revisions from draft-04 to -06 show some improvement. However, I still have serious problems with this work. The primary problem is that this seems to violate the designed work distribution in the IPFIX architecture. The draft itself notes that the correlation requested could be done in the collector. Which is where correlation is designed to be done. Instead, it puts a significant new processing load on the router that is delivering the IPFIX information. For example, if one delivers IPFIX from the router data plane, one either has to modify the router architecture to include additional complex computed information in the data plane architecture (a bad place to add complexity) or one has to give up and move all the information through the control plane. And even the control plane likely has to add complexity to its RIB logic, as it has to move additional information from BGP to the common structures. The secondary problem is that this additional work is justified for the router by the claim that the unusual usage of applying community tags for geographical location of customers is a common practice. It is a legal practice. And I presume it is done somewhere or the authors would not be asking for it. But it is not common. In short, since even the draft admits that this is not needed, I recommend against publishing this document as an RFC. ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community
Yes/Support I think this document can enhance the flexibility of network traffic management for the operator. Sorry to reply so late. Aijun Wang From China Telecom > From: Tianran Zhou > Date: 2018-01-18 11:06 > To: opsawg@ietf.org > CC: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community > Hi WG, > > The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community have posted the latest > drafts to the mailing list, and believe that the document is ready for LC. > > This starts a 2 week WG LC on > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04 > > Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections to > this mailing list. > All supports and concerns are welcome and helpful for the authors. > > We are also looking for a document shepherd, best with operator background, > to help the following procedures. > > The WG LC will close on Feb 1, 2018. > Authors please indicate whether you are aware of any IPR for the draft. > > Thanks, > Tianran, as OPSAWG co-chair > > ___ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping-00.txt
Hi, Hao: I think this draft is useful for the service provider to deploy virtual network related VAS within DC and can be extended beyond to cover WAN domain further. After standardizing the fabric services model, the complex of the VAS application development and the network management can be relieved largely. It is also coincide with the efforts of various Yang model definitions that are undergoing in several IETF WG. >From the viewpoint of service provider, the VN2PN mapping architecture is one >example of network model deployment scenario. if we can clarify and make >consensus on this use case, then we can move forward further, define the >related Yang model and accelerate the deployment of VAS services for tenant. NVO3 WG and L3SM WG are now working on the similar topics, you can also contact them for more deeper discussion. Best Regards. Aijun Wang China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute Intelligent Network Product Line From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chenhao (philips) Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 5:13 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping-00.txt Dear all, This is a new draft for opsawg. It mainly analysis the issues existed in deploying the virtual network to the underneath physical network in DataCenter network . The basic idea is to abstract the underneath physical network as several fabrics, which can provide the fabric services to the upper-layer application/network administrator, to facilitate the whole configuration procedure. We would like to hear your comments, thanks. Best regards, Hao -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 5:21 PM To: Liyizhou; Chenhao (philips); Xingjun Chu; Yapeng Wu; Yapeng Wu; Liyizhou; Chenhao (philips); Xingjun Chu Subject: New Version Notification for draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Hao Chen and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping Revision: 00 Title: Virtual Network to Physical Network Mapping in DataCenter Network Document date: 2015-10-18 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 12 URL: <https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping-00.txt> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping-00.txt Status: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping/ Htmlized: <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping-00> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-opsawg-dcn-vn2pn-mapping-00 Abstract: Cloud tenant needs virtual network to interconnect their VMs on server. In order to effectively and efficiently map virtual network to physical network, certain mechanism should be employed. This memo analysis the existing VN2PN mapping technique employed in DataCenter and point out the potential shortcomings lie in it. This memo also try to provide a generic mechanism to facilitate the VN2PN mapping in DataCenter network. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
