Re: Want a faster Tor? Upgrade, inform others

2007-09-03 Thread Kyle Williams
On 9/1/07, Mike Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For those of you who are not subscribed to or-announce and/or have
> friends who use Tor, the latest Tor stable should provide significant
> performance/capacity increase once most clients upgrade. According to
> my measurements with TorFlow, there should be roughly four times as
> much capacity once the network rebalances.
>
> In addition, many users should experience noticable improvement in
> performance just based on the fact that we are choosing guards
> in proportion to their bandwidth and expiring guards that were
> selected with the buggy uniform algorithm.
>
> Also, once the network is balanced, we can begin to investigate both
> reliability scanning options and Johannes Renner can finish his
> Master's Thesis on performance enhanced path selection. :)
>
> http://archives.seul.org/or/announce/Aug-2007/msg1.html
>
> --
> Mike Perry
> Mad Computer Scientist
> fscked.org evil labs



Thank You Mike for your research and hard work on making Tor faster.  We
appreciate it.

I noticed the performance gain from the very first time I used the new
release, and continue experiencing faster connections.  I was able to
download a 30MB file the other night at a rate of 250KB/sec consistently
throughout the entire download.

We updated Tor in JanusVM and will be releasing a new version soon.



best regards,
Kyle Williams
http://www.janusvm.com


Re: Want a faster Tor? Upgrade, inform others

2007-09-03 Thread Steven Huf
I'm actually having difficuties... Tor says it's control port is
unavaliable, then exits. Please Help :S

On 9/3/07, Joerg Maschtaler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mike Perry wrote on 01.09.2007 15:50:
> > [...]
> > In addition, many users should experience noticable improvement in
> > performance just based on the fact that we are choosing guards
> > in proportion to their bandwidth and expiring guards that were
> > selected with the buggy uniform algorithm.
> > [...]
>
> After upgrading to 0.1.2.17 i can confirm that the performance is much
> much better.
> Well done and thanks for that!
>
> Maybe now it is possible again to persuade friends to use Tor.
>
> Thanks again for your work.
>
> Best regards,
> Joerg
>


Re: [Polipo-users] ANNOUNCE: Polipo-1.0.2

2007-09-03 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> I put together a standard Polipo 1.0.2 universal binary for OSX users.  
> It's located at http://interloper.org/tmp/polipo/.

Excellent.

> The config file has comments for those wishing to use it with Tor.

Could I please see a copy?  I'm rather keen on having the default
installation of Polipo be roughly the same on all platforms.

DJB is annoying, but he often has a point.  Please see

  http://cr.yp.to/compatibility.html

especially the last paragraph.

> Juliusz, feel free to link to it from your polipo page.

Done.

Juliusz


Re: [Polipo-users] ANNOUNCE: Polipo-1.0.2

2007-09-03 Thread phobos
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:08:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 2.2K bytes in 
71 lines about:

I put together a standard Polipo 1.0.2 universal binary for OSX users.  
It's located at http://interloper.org/tmp/polipo/.  The tarball
contains my 'contrib' dir designed to be extracted in the polipo-1.0.2/
dir.  I've personally tested it since the 1.0.2 release and feel it's
ready for general usage.  The config file has comments for those wishing
to use it with Tor.

I've signed it with the same key I use to sign the official Tor
packages.

Juliusz, feel free to link to it from your polipo page.  And yes, I
still used the custom Makefile to make my life easier.

In the future, I hope to have less time between release and dmg
availability.

Feedback and comments welcome.

-- 
Andrew


pgps9lyQ541JT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Want a faster Tor? Upgrade, inform others

2007-09-03 Thread Joerg Maschtaler
Mike Perry wrote on 01.09.2007 15:50:
> [...]
> In addition, many users should experience noticable improvement in
> performance just based on the fact that we are choosing guards 
> in proportion to their bandwidth and expiring guards that were
> selected with the buggy uniform algorithm.
> [...]

After upgrading to 0.1.2.17 i can confirm that the performance is much much 
better.
Well done and thanks for that!

Maybe now it is possible again to persuade friends to use Tor.

Thanks again for your work.

Best regards,
Joerg