Re: Exclude nodes from certain countries

2007-09-16 Thread Scott Bennett
 On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:54:43 -0400 misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:17:14 -0500 (CDT), Scott Bennett wrote:

  Please read the tor documentation.  If you think you've already done
 that, please go back and read it again.  

That brings back the pain of reading it the first time :)

I must admit I gave up after first few pages. I found it was too technical

 Oh, my goodness!  And you've been *using* tor?  That's like walking
across Lake Shore Drive wearing earplugs and blindfolded. :-(  I never even
downloaded the first version I used until I had taken the time to read and
understand most of the documentation at tor.eff.org well enough to convince
myself that I could use it safely and even depend upon it to a satisfactory
degree.

and overwhelming, even though I'm not a computer novice.

 Once you understand the functions
 of the directory authorities and the directory mirrors, take a few minutes
 to browse through the files that tor maintains on your computer.  Note
 especially the contents of the files named cached-routers and
 cached-routers.new, and also the status document files in the cached-status/
 subdirectory.  All should be clear to you after you do those basic things.
  Note that this is a user safety issue:  one should *not* use tor
 without having gained first a minimal understanding of what tor is doing
 and what it is not doing.  Without that understanding, a user is in grave
 danger of assuming his/her anonymmity is being maintained when, in fact,
 it may not be.

Now that you pointed me to specific things to research, it's a bit easier
and it's a place to start.

Is there some sort of in-a-nutshell documentation without excessive
technicalities that you can recommend?

 Sounds like wanting a guide to PGP that doesn't involve the reader
understanding the basics of public-key encryption.  Sigh...
 I'd strongly recommend that you start with the tor overview
document at

https://tor.eff.org/overview

paying special attention to the cartoon describing how circuits are built,
which should begin to straighten you out on some of the other misconceptions
you've indicated regarding tor.  To learn about the process in greater detail,
continue reading at

http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/path-spec.txt

 To understand how tor clients (and servers) know what choices of servers
are available, you need to read the directory protocol document(s) appropriate
to the version of tor you run.  For 0.1.2.1[67], read

http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/dir-spec-v2.txt

 For 0.2.0.6-alpha, read the above and

http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/dir-spec.txt

And for earlier versions, *UPGRADE* to one of the above.
 To my knowledge, there is no _Tor_for_Dummies_ or _The_Complete
_Idiot's_Guide_to_Tor_ .  (Most of us are grateful for the documentation
efforts that Roger Dingledine et al. have made already.)  It's sophisticated,
complex software to provide services that are quite complicated and tricky
to achieve.  Knowing how to use it safely comes from understanding it
anyway, so you have a choice:

a) you can continue to live dangerously and obliviously until you
   get yourself into serious trouble, or

b) you can stop using tor, or

c) you can bite the bullet and study.

 Best wishes with whichever path you choose.


  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet:   bennett at cs.niu.edu  *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army.   *
*-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**


Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik
On 07:41:12 2007-09-16 Martin Senftleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 02:19 schrieb Alexander W. Janssen:
  On 9/16/07, Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   If you set up a paypal account I would be willing to donate on a
   case-by-case basis (in this case, it would be to help with your
   legal fees). I think even if you don't need help with legal fees
   by receiving donations from all across the world it sends the
   message to German authorities that harassing and attacking tor
   node operators is not acceptable. Also, being able to mail in
   money would also be nice ; )
 
  Well. There's an EFF Europe now and it has a coordinator, Erik
  Josefsson, who's in cahrge with it. Maybe we should contact him and
  let all the funds ran over the european EFF?
 
  Erik, you're listening? Is there any possiblity to create a legal
  fund?
 
  (Problem is: At leat german organisations can't accept donations
  tax-free from foreign countries. Also I'd like to see someone
  official in charge rather than some person - like me, who is pretty
  much unkown and not trustworthy when it comes to money.)
 
 I (a German) am particularly reluctant to use PayPal. Recently, c't (a  
 German computer magazine) published a series of incidents which  
 shattered my faith in PayPal completely. Further, PayPal informs the  
 police willingly about movements at their end - also abroad. Even  
 though I have an account with PayPal in Germany, US-police obviously  
 could obtain information from PayPal about me.  
 Besides, small submissions (like 1 US$) swallow high fees, that  
 doesn't make much sense.
 

I avoid paypal myself for a long time... Just heard to many bad things
about it...

There is a british based site:

http://www.moneybookers.co.uk

Their privacy policy seems to be better in general...

 association (eingetragener Verein) would be protected against legal  
 prosecution. The association could act as contract partners with the  
 ISPs, and as that run Tor nodes which are managed by its members.  

Nice...



--
Andraž ruskie Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker

Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.

Key id = F4C1F89C
Key fingerprint = 6FF2 8F20 4C9D DB36 B5B6  F134 884D 72CC F4C1 F89C



Re: Exclude nodes from certain countries

2007-09-16 Thread Robert Hogan
On Friday 14 September 2007 18:27:21 misc wrote:
 I'm using Tor on windows

 I prefer to avoid tor nodes from certain countries. I know that I can
 manually add nodes into ExcludeNodes setting in Tor Config.

 However there are over hundred different Tor nodes in one country I want to
 exclude. And they're constantly changing (news ones pop up, old ones
 disappear, etc). It's impossible to do such a task manually using
 ExcludeNodes setting.

 Didn't anybody find a better way?

TorK allows you to do this (in a rough and ready way using the geoip database 
(maxmind.com) - about 9x% accurate). TorK is available only for Linux/BSD 
unfortunately, but you could you use the Incognito LiveCD which uses TorK as 
the default Tor interface.

http://www.patdouble.com/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=11Itemid=18
http://files1.cjb.net/incognito

-- 

Browse Anonymously Anywhere - http://anonymityanywhere.com
TorK- KDE Anonymity Manager - http://tork.sf.net
KlamAV  - KDE Anti-Virus- http://www.klamav.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Thomas Hluchnik
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 07:41 schrieb Martin Senftleben:

Hello,

can you please give some more info about that? I am just thinkinking about 
becoming member of a association and let my two tor nodes register as from 
that association. I have the luck that my home was not yet searched by any 
technical incompetent police, but who knows...

What about the Humanistische Union? Do they have tor nodes? Is there anybody 
of them in this thread? Would like to hear if the HU is interested of gettimg 
members with tor nodes as entrance gift.

What I definitely NOT like is giving up my help for the tor project. In times 
like these modern inquisition we have to resist, but have to find ways to 
protect ourselves.


 I am currently into registering an association that was founded more 
 than a hundred years ago - that is quite some work, but manageable. 
 I find the thought to found an association quite intriguing, 
 particularly for Germany, where the members of a registered 
 association (eingetragener Verein) would be protected against legal 
 prosecution. The association could act as contract partners with the 
 ISPs, and as that run Tor nodes which are managed by its members. 
 
 BTW, one such node has just been set up which is legally registered 
 with an association in Germany and run by a previous Tor-node admin 
 who has also been harassed by the police. But I don't think they will 
 be setting up more nodes.
 
 Martin


pgpKHmcIlJGzx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Stephen
Greetings!

Because of the terrible threat to civil liberties that currently exists (on 
several levels) in the UK there are some interesting groups and working 
relationships that are beginning to establish themselves. These UK groups are 
also building connections within Europe. Perhaps there is some kind of scope 
here for Tor Operators who have created their own association, to form some 
kind of affiliation with other groups that are already actively involved in 
addressing issues not too disimiliar to those that have affected (and no doubt 
will continue to affect) Tor Operators. Of course, there would need to be a 
clear understanding of the goals/objectives of any such association of Tor 
Operators/Users. 

The point I am trying to make here has already been made, that there should be 
some coordinated effort to promote and protect the legitimacy of Tor as a valid 
and important human rights tool. The shift of emphasis needs to be made, away 
from all of the negative implications of Tor and back onto the benefits that 
Tor has to offer. To my mind, this can only really be achieved through some 
kind of definite, structured, coordinated effort. I would be willing to play my 
part, here in the UK, where I can. 

I've included a link to the Open Rights Group by way of example (not promotion 
per se), to illustrate the point (that has already been made) that many groups 
already exist with whom an association of Tor Operators/Users could affiliate. 
This could be done both on a local (National) level and then also in various 
world regions. EDRI, for example, incorporates the involvement of at least one 
member of the CCC.


http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/09/03/digital-rights-go-continental/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDRI

http://www.edri.org/

--

Open Rights Group:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Rights_Group

http://www.openrightsgroup.org/

--

Any comments and further focus/opinion?

Regards,

Stephen








Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Martin Senftleben
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 12:08 schrieb Thomas Hluchnik:
 Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 07:41 schrieb Martin Senftleben:

 Hello,

 can you please give some more info about that? I am just
 thinkinking about becoming member of a association and let my two
 tor nodes register as from that association. I have the luck that
 my home was not yet searched by any technical incompetent police,
 but who knows...

I am not sure about which association has done that, but I'm in the 
process of finding it out. I wonder if it would be meaningful to 
found a German association that is dedicated to that sole purpose of 
protecting privacy on the Internet - if such an association doesn't 
yet exist in Germany - and provides Tor servers as well as legal 
advice for German Tor admins and others who provide similar 
facilities and are proscuted in Germany.

 What about the Humanistische Union? Do they have tor nodes? Is
 there anybody of them in this thread? Would like to hear if the HU
 is interested of gettimg members with tor nodes as entrance gift.

I'm not sure, I can't imagine they would do it, but I'll ask them.

 What I definitely NOT like is giving up my help for the tor
 project. In times like these modern inquisition we have to resist,
 but have to find ways to protect ourselves.

Martin
-- 
Dr. Martin Senftleben, Ph.D. (S.V.U.)
http://www.drmartinus.de/
http://www.daskirchenjahr.de/



pgp0IRfWljg1j.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Scott Bennett
 On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:08:27 +0200 Thomas Hluchnik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 07:41 schrieb Martin Senftleben:

Hello,

 Please get with the program.  This is getting to be a real drag.  See
below.

can you please give some more info about that? I am just thinkinking about=
=20
becoming member of a association and let my two tor nodes register as from=
=20
that association. I have the luck that my home was not yet searched by any=
=20
technical incompetent police, but who knows...

What about the Humanistische Union? Do they have tor nodes? Is there anyb=
ody=20
of them in this thread? Would like to hear if the HU is interested of getti=
mg=20
members with tor nodes as entrance gift.

What I definitely NOT like is giving up my help for the tor project. In tim=
es=20
like these modern inquisition we have to resist, but have to find ways to=20
protect ourselves.


 I am currently into registering an association that was founded more=20
 than a hundred years ago - that is quite some work, but manageable.=20
 I find the thought to found an association quite intriguing,=20
 particularly for Germany, where the members of a registered=20
 association (eingetragener Verein) would be protected against legal=20
 prosecution. The association could act as contract partners with the=20
 ISPs, and as that run Tor nodes which are managed by its members.=20
=20
 BTW, one such node has just been set up which is legally registered=20
 with an association in Germany and run by a previous Tor-node admin=20
 who has also been harassed by the police. But I don't think they will=20
 be setting up more nodes.

A:  It makes it hard to follow and is thus inconsiderate.
B:  Why not?
A Once again, Do NOT TOP-POST!!!


  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet:   bennett at cs.niu.edu  *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army.   *
*-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**


Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Ringo Kamens
I know they aren't directly related, but it could also help to involve
*the unions* because they have a lot of power. At least in the US.
Unfortunately I just started school and I have very little time on my
hands so I can't directly help with this project much, even though I
was working 10 hours a day with them before, but you should make a
post to Binary Freedom (the discussion list). People there will
certainly help you. They are an advocacy group for binary freedoms
that participate in a lot of direct action and they can certainly help
your cause. We have troops on the ground in the UK, but not sure about
Germany.
Comrade Ringo Kamens

On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:08:27 +0200 Thomas Hluchnik
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 07:41 schrieb Martin Senftleben:
 
 Hello,

  Please get with the program.  This is getting to be a real drag.  See
 below.
 
 can you please give some more info about that? I am just thinkinking about=
 =20
 becoming member of a association and let my two tor nodes register as from=
 =20
 that association. I have the luck that my home was not yet searched by any=
 =20
 technical incompetent police, but who knows...
 
 What about the Humanistische Union? Do they have tor nodes? Is there anyb=
 ody=20
 of them in this thread? Would like to hear if the HU is interested of getti=
 mg=20
 members with tor nodes as entrance gift.
 
 What I definitely NOT like is giving up my help for the tor project. In tim=
 es=20
 like these modern inquisition we have to resist, but have to find ways to=20
 protect ourselves.
 
 
  I am currently into registering an association that was founded more=20
  than a hundred years ago - that is quite some work, but manageable.=20
  I find the thought to found an association quite intriguing,=20
  particularly for Germany, where the members of a registered=20
  association (eingetragener Verein) would be protected against legal=20
  prosecution. The association could act as contract partners with the=20
  ISPs, and as that run Tor nodes which are managed by its members.=20
 =20
  BTW, one such node has just been set up which is legally registered=20
  with an association in Germany and run by a previous Tor-node admin=20
  who has also been harassed by the police. But I don't think they will=20
  be setting up more nodes.

 A:  It makes it hard to follow and is thus inconsiderate.
 B:  Why not?
 A Once again, Do NOT TOP-POST!!!


   Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
 **
 * Internet:   bennett at cs.niu.edu  *
 **
 * A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
 * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
 * -- a standing army.   *
 *-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
 **



Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Scott Bennett
 On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:06:25 -0400 Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
still didn't get it:

I know they aren't directly related, but it could also help to involve
*the unions* because they have a lot of power. At least in the US.
Unfortunately I just started school and I have very little time on my
hands so I can't directly help with this project much, even though I
was working 10 hours a day with them before, but you should make a
post to Binary Freedom (the discussion list). People there will
certainly help you. They are an advocacy group for binary freedoms
that participate in a lot of direct action and they can certainly help
your cause. We have troops on the ground in the UK, but not sure about
Germany.
Comrade Ringo Kamens

On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:08:27 +0200 Thomas Hluchnik
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 07:41 schrieb Martin Senftleben:
 
 Hello,

  Please get with the program.  This is getting to be a real drag.  See
 below.
 
 can you please give some more info about that? I am just thinkinking about=
 =20
 becoming member of a association and let my two tor nodes register as from=
 =20
 that association. I have the luck that my home was not yet searched by any=
 =20
 technical incompetent police, but who knows...
 
 What about the Humanistische Union? Do they have tor nodes? Is there anyb=
 ody=20
 of them in this thread? Would like to hear if the HU is interested of getti=
 mg=20
 members with tor nodes as entrance gift.
 
 What I definitely NOT like is giving up my help for the tor project. In tim=
 es=20
 like these modern inquisition we have to resist, but have to find ways to=20
 protect ourselves.
 
 
  I am currently into registering an association that was founded more=20
  than a hundred years ago - that is quite some work, but manageable.=20
  I find the thought to found an association quite intriguing,=20
  particularly for Germany, where the members of a registered=20
  association (eingetragener Verein) would be protected against legal=20
  prosecution. The association could act as contract partners with the=20
  ISPs, and as that run Tor nodes which are managed by its members.=20
 =20
  BTW, one such node has just been set up which is legally registered=20
  with an association in Germany and run by a previous Tor-node admin=20
  who has also been harassed by the police. But I don't think they will=20
  be setting up more nodes.

 A:  It makes it hard to follow and is thus inconsiderate.
 B:  Why not?
 A Once again, Do NOT TOP-POST!!!

 Attention Comrade Ringo Kamens:  Please read the above!!!


  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet:   bennett at cs.niu.edu  *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army.   *
*-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**


Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Ringo Kamens
I'm using gmail which doesn't give me an option unless I'm using a pop3 client.
Comrade Ringo Kamens

On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:06:25 -0400 Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 still didn't get it:

 I know they aren't directly related, but it could also help to involve
 *the unions* because they have a lot of power. At least in the US.
 Unfortunately I just started school and I have very little time on my
 hands so I can't directly help with this project much, even though I
 was working 10 hours a day with them before, but you should make a
 post to Binary Freedom (the discussion list). People there will
 certainly help you. They are an advocacy group for binary freedoms
 that participate in a lot of direct action and they can certainly help
 your cause. We have troops on the ground in the UK, but not sure about
 Germany.
 Comrade Ringo Kamens
 
 On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:08:27 +0200 Thomas Hluchnik
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 07:41 schrieb Martin Senftleben:
  
  Hello,
 
   Please get with the program.  This is getting to be a real drag.  See
  below.
  
  can you please give some more info about that? I am just thinkinking 
  about=
  =20
  becoming member of a association and let my two tor nodes register as 
  from=
  =20
  that association. I have the luck that my home was not yet searched by 
  any=
  =20
  technical incompetent police, but who knows...
  
  What about the Humanistische Union? Do they have tor nodes? Is there 
  anyb=
  ody=20
  of them in this thread? Would like to hear if the HU is interested of 
  getti=
  mg=20
  members with tor nodes as entrance gift.
  
  What I definitely NOT like is giving up my help for the tor project. In 
  tim=
  es=20
  like these modern inquisition we have to resist, but have to find ways 
  to=20
  protect ourselves.
  
  
   I am currently into registering an association that was founded more=20
   than a hundred years ago - that is quite some work, but manageable.=20
   I find the thought to found an association quite intriguing,=20
   particularly for Germany, where the members of a registered=20
   association (eingetragener Verein) would be protected against legal=20
   prosecution. The association could act as contract partners with the=20
   ISPs, and as that run Tor nodes which are managed by its members.=20
  =20
   BTW, one such node has just been set up which is legally registered=20
   with an association in Germany and run by a previous Tor-node admin=20
   who has also been harassed by the police. But I don't think they will=20
   be setting up more nodes.
 
  A:  It makes it hard to follow and is thus inconsiderate.
  B:  Why not?
  A Once again, Do NOT TOP-POST!!!

  Attention Comrade Ringo Kamens:  Please read the above!!!


   Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
 **
 * Internet:   bennett at cs.niu.edu  *
 **
 * A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
 * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
 * -- a standing army.   *
 *-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
 **



Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Scott Bennett
 On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:44:21 -0400 Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
claimed:

I'm using gmail which doesn't give me an option unless I'm using a pop3 client.
Comrade Ringo Kamens

 See evidence that others manage somehow below.  And couldn't you use a
pop3s client instead?  Encrypted links are the way, you know.

On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:06:25 -0400 Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 still didn't get it:

 I know they aren't directly related, but it could also help to involve
 *the unions* because they have a lot of power. At least in the US.
 Unfortunately I just started school and I have very little time on my
 hands so I can't directly help with this project much, even though I
 was working 10 hours a day with them before, but you should make a
 post to Binary Freedom (the discussion list). People there will
 certainly help you. They are an advocacy group for binary freedoms
 that participate in a lot of direct action and they can certainly help
 your cause. We have troops on the ground in the UK, but not sure about
 Germany.
 Comrade Ringo Kamens
 
 On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:08:27 +0200 Thomas Hluchnik
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 07:41 schrieb Martin Senftleben:
  
  Hello,
 
   Please get with the program.  This is getting to be a real drag.  See
  below.
  
  can you please give some more info about that? I am just thinkinking 
  about=
  =20
  becoming member of a association and let my two tor nodes register as 
  from=
  =20
  that association. I have the luck that my home was not yet searched by 
  any=
  =20
  technical incompetent police, but who knows...
  
  What about the Humanistische Union? Do they have tor nodes? Is there 
  anyb=
  ody=20
  of them in this thread? Would like to hear if the HU is interested of 
  getti=
  mg=20
  members with tor nodes as entrance gift.
  
  What I definitely NOT like is giving up my help for the tor project. In 
  tim=
  es=20
  like these modern inquisition we have to resist, but have to find ways 
  to=20
  protect ourselves.
  
  
   I am currently into registering an association that was founded more=20
   than a hundred years ago - that is quite some work, but manageable.=20
   I find the thought to found an association quite intriguing,=20
   particularly for Germany, where the members of a registered=20
   association (eingetragener Verein) would be protected against legal=20
   prosecution. The association could act as contract partners with the=20
   ISPs, and as that run Tor nodes which are managed by its members.=20
  =20
   BTW, one such node has just been set up which is legally registered=20
   with an association in Germany and run by a previous Tor-node admin=20
   who has also been harassed by the police. But I don't think they 
   will=20
   be setting up more nodes.
 
  A:  It makes it hard to follow and is thus inconsiderate.
  B:  Why not?
  A Once again, Do NOT TOP-POST!!!

  Attention Comrade Ringo Kamens:  Please read the above!!!

 Here's a fairly recent posting to the freebsd-ports list from someone
at a gmail.com account.  I've indented with ']' in this case.

]Message: 3
]Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:21:47 +0800
]From: Jiawei Ye [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]Subject: Re: compat-6x does not work when kernel has NO_KSE
]To: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd ports [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]Message-ID:
]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
]
]On 9/12/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
]
] How does symbol versioning affect this?  Are you saying that libmap no
] longer works with pre-7 libraries?
]
] Kris
]
]This is what happens when I try to run diablo-jdk15 on a
]symbol-versioned -current with NO_KSE kernel.
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15]$
]/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/bin/java -version
]Fatal error 'kse_create() failed
]' at line 444 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_kern.c (errno = 2)
]
]So I added this to /etc/libmap.conf (this will use libthr.so.3)
]
][/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/bin/java]
]libpthread.so.2 libthr.so
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc]$ /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/bin/java -version
]/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libthr.so: version LIBTHREAD_1_0
]required by /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/bin/java not found
]
]I am not sure what is the correct way to fix this.
]
]Jiawei
]
]-- 
]If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck,
]then to the end user it's a duck, and end users have made it pretty
]clear they want a duck; whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or
]coffee is irrelevant.
]
]
]--

 So apparently others with gmail.com accounts manage to post correctly.
Unless there is something unusual about your individual account, please
learn to use your email interface and editor(s).  

Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread BlueStar88
Am Sonntag, den 16.09.2007, 08:59 -0500 schrieb Scott Bennett:
 On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:44:21 -0400 Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 claimed:
 
 I'm using gmail which doesn't give me an option unless I'm using a pop3 
 client.
 Comrade Ringo Kamens
  Here's a fairly recent posting to the freebsd-ports list from someone
 at a gmail.com account.  I've indented with ']' in this case.

[...]

  So apparently others with gmail.com accounts manage to post correctly.
 Unless there is something unusual about your individual account, please
 learn to use your email interface and editor(s).  Up until now, it has
 been a pain to follow any thread to which you have posted a followup.


I can follow his posts with ease. Maybe you should change your mail
reader? ;-)
I've understood him like this: He's using the webinterface at gmail,
*not* a POP3/s client and maybe gmail handles it like this.

Btw: And maybe you should place such things more gently by private mail.



Greets

-- 
BlueStar88 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Mike Cardwell

Ringo Kamens wrote:


I'm using gmail which doesn't give me an option unless I'm using a pop3 client.
Comrade Ringo Kamens


When you hit reply. Your cursor is at the top of the message. There's 
nothing stopping you moving the cursor down.


In fact, a quick google shows that if you're using Firefox, there's a 
Greasemonkey script which does this for you:


http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8041

Mike


Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Kasimir Gabert
On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:44:21 -0400 Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 claimed:

 I'm using gmail which doesn't give me an option unless I'm using a pop3 
 client.
 Comrade Ringo Kamens

  See evidence that others manage somehow below.  And couldn't you use a
 pop3s client instead?  Encrypted links are the way, you know.
 
 On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:06:25 -0400 Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  still didn't get it:
 
  I know they aren't directly related, but it could also help to involve
  *the unions* because they have a lot of power. At least in the US.
  Unfortunately I just started school and I have very little time on my
  hands so I can't directly help with this project much, even though I
  was working 10 hours a day with them before, but you should make a
  post to Binary Freedom (the discussion list). People there will
  certainly help you. They are an advocacy group for binary freedoms
  that participate in a lot of direct action and they can certainly help
  your cause. We have troops on the ground in the UK, but not sure about
  Germany.
  Comrade Ringo Kamens
  

[snipped]

 ]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc]$ /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/bin/java -version
 ]/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libthr.so: version LIBTHREAD_1_0
 ]required by /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/bin/java not found
 ]
 ]I am not sure what is the correct way to fix this.
 ]
 ]Jiawei
 ]
 ]--
 ]If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck,
 ]then to the end user it's a duck, and end users have made it pretty
 ]clear they want a duck; whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or
 ]coffee is irrelevant.
 ]
 ]
 ]--

  So apparently others with gmail.com accounts manage to post correctly.
 Unless there is something unusual about your individual account, please
 learn to use your email interface and editor(s).  Up until now, it has
 been a pain to follow any thread to which you have posted a followup.


   Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
 **
 * Internet:   bennett at cs.niu.edu  *
 **
 * A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
 * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
 * -- a standing army.   *
 *-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
 **


Hello Scott Bennett,

I feel that any public ridiculing should be taken off this list.
There are far more important things to talk about here, such as the
safety of all of the German Tor exit node operators.

Kasimir Gabert


-- 
Kasimir Gabert


Looking for a 'flasher' to support me on a little flash-issue

2007-09-16 Thread BlueStar88
On doing another browser check element at torcheck.xenobite.eu I've
following question:


Is there a 'flasher' out there, who has some time for a quickie?

I need something like this

getURL(calling_base_url?PHPSESSID=current_session_idFlash=1);

in actionscript 1.0, then build as SWF/FLA sticked on the onLoad event
or the like.
Another few lines about the object placement into HTML/JavaScript would
be nice too, but are not necessary, I'll figure it out!

After some tries on google'ing for it I still do not know, how to build
such objects without using a fee'ish Ad_be GUI...

Thanks!



Greets

-- 
BlueStar88 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


List of TorRaids

2007-09-16 Thread Daniel Schroeder
hello list,

i have setup a Wiki page to collect information about tor and law
enforcement...primarily for German Tor servers...
...but feel free to put information about other countries on this site...

https://wiki.leitstelle511.net/TorRaids


cheers,
d




Re: Like to run TOR-Node

2007-09-16 Thread BlueStar88
Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 20:51 +0200 schrieb Eugen Leitl:
 On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:38:33PM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
 
  better way (i hope). Think on professional service providers, they get
  the chance to *cooperate*, not just get cut off. What 'cooperation'
  means in detail, who knows...
 
 The 'professional service providers' bend over backwards to
 accomodate Big Brother's every whim. All they care is about who's going

And law.

There *are* providers saving IP-data only 7 days and less to obey
(current) data protection laws. Their only way not to get legally sued
from any party, the LEAs *and* customers. And therefore the police is
often not able to get the data fast enough, because of loosing time
getting the case on (there are many, thanks to eB_y), getting the clue
of the IP, propose the warrant, letter running time etc.

Until 2008..



Greets

-- 
BlueStar88 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Tor DIRs changed?

2007-09-16 Thread Mr. Blue
These URLs had listed tor nodes:

http://belegost.mit.edu/tor/
http://tor.noreply.org/tor/
http://moria.mit.edu:9031/tor/

Now 1st and third are timing out and second is not
giving list of nodes, but some very short info!

Can you give me a list of URLs, where I can find a
list of tor nodes?


Thanks in advance.


   

Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, 
photos  more. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC


Re: Tor DIRs changed?

2007-09-16 Thread TOR Admin (gpfTOR1)
Hi,
 Can you give me a list of URLs, where I can find a
 list of tor nodes?

https://torstat.xenobite.eu/
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/
http://tns.hermetix.org/

May be, some more are online, but I use the 3 above.

Greeting


Re: Tor DIRs changed?

2007-09-16 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 10:01:19AM -0700, Mr. Blue wrote:
 These URLs had listed tor nodes:
 
 http://belegost.mit.edu/tor/
 http://tor.noreply.org/tor/
 http://moria.mit.edu:9031/tor/
 
 Now 1st and third are timing out and second is not
 giving list of nodes, but some very short info!

There are 5 directory authorities.

The first and third you listed above moved in May:
http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/May-2007/msg00212.html
(Roger needed to relocate the computer.)

The reason that none of these are giving you a list of nodes by
requesting the url Tor is that you're using an obsolete format:,
   http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/May-2007/msg00229.html


yrs,
-- 
Nick Mathewson


pgpgoluOtZc8n.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Tor DIRs changed?

2007-09-16 Thread Mr. Blue

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 10:01:19AM -0700, Mr. Blue
wrote:
 These URLs had listed tor nodes:
 
 http://belegost.mit.edu/tor/
 http://tor.noreply.org/tor/
 http://moria.mit.edu:9031/tor/
 
 Now 1st and third are timing out and second is not
 giving list of nodes, but some very short info!

There are 5 directory authorities.

The first and third you listed above moved in May:
   
http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/May-2007/msg00212.html
(Roger needed to relocate the computer.)

The reason that none of these are giving you a list of
nodes by
requesting the url Tor is that you're using an
obsolete format:,
  
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/May-2007/msg00229.html


yrs,
-- 
Nick Mathewson


--


Ok I see,
I've retreived:
http://128.31.0.34:9031/tor/status/all.z

In PHP, I see just some giberish data.
I've tried to base64_decode it, but nada.

Opening it in Notepad++ gives a clear list of nodes.

What is that format?
So I could see it clearly  in a string in PHP too?


   

Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/


Re: [Fwd: Re: I break the silence: My arrest]

2007-09-16 Thread Smuggler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

We operated the gwdeXmmx nodes and still a few others.

* arrested
No

* confiscated equippment
Yes

* Home or office searched
Yes, twice

* Surveillance
Likely, who knows

* Case against us
Several, yes

Xinwen Fu wrote:
 A question to all Tor-operators:
 I'd like to do a survey about all incidents which happened to
 operators. Stuff like:
 
 * arrested
 * confiscated equippment
 * nastygram
 * surveillance
 * ...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG7YViOMmnRrmEoQkRAqRSAJ0QiMD7ig5yoKtrdwbhEuTaGjZ+WgCeKVj/
O2kwI+ecxpoaSXbu2xFhRvY=
=7CMW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: I break the silence: My arrest

2007-09-16 Thread Smuggler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ricky,

Ricky Fitz wrote:

 I think there is a need to incorporate. If there is for example an
 incorporated society which runs some tor-nodes, police is going to
 confiscate the servers (which is okay), but not going to search houses
 from members of the incorporated society.

I know from personal experience that this is not necessarily true.
We had an IP under investigation. The RIPE entry showed it to be
operated by a corporation. All contracts (uplink, cage, etc.) were made
by the corporation.
That didnt stop the police to search my personal apartment (not the
corporate offices).

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG7YZEOMmnRrmEoQkRAqLNAJwLlBk0Mdhd+PuVgr7fb4aNrlmtYgCgl0iy
ASFH/+8sbBn6epBtvBRi+Mg=
=rOBy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Privoxy config: Use Tor for https:, and normal for http:

2007-09-16 Thread Michael_google gmail_Gersten
So one big thing that has been discussed on the list of late is that
anything sent over http: may transmit authentication cookies in the
clear.

I'd like to configure privoxy to assume that instead of sending all
traffic over tor, or instead of forwarding based on node name, to use
protocol.

What I'm looking at is something like this:
1. Anything specifying https: may be safely sent over tor.
2. Anything specifying http: should not

I'm now starting to track which sites I'm logged in on, by seeing
which send me personal greetings, that do not support https:, and
adding in do not forward these sites over tor to my privoxy config.

I think of this as a start. Even with this in place, is there
anything that I might be overlooking?


Tor consuming much CPU RAM (?)

2007-09-16 Thread morphium
Hi, i sadly have to tell you that I have to limit my server morphium to 
following:

BandwidthRate 1000 KB
BandwidthBurst 1500 KB

But: Its not due to bandwith. If i increase that values, the server load raises 
above 1, from now 0.1 or something.
I have an Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz and 2 gigabytes of ram, so I don't understand 
why tor is so bad for my load.

If this is a Bug, I would be glad to get an update :)

If this is known (because tor needs the time for the crypto things) its okey, 
but i hope you understand that this slows down the network. I think there are 
many older machines, with much bandwith, but if the CPU cant handle the 
requests, tor is loosing bandwith.

Best regards,
morphium


Re: Tor consuming much CPU RAM (?)

2007-09-16 Thread phobos
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 10:02:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.7K bytes in 
14 lines about:
: I have an Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz and 2 gigabytes of ram, so I don't 
understand why tor is so bad for my load.

Onion routing is cryptographically intense.  If you can run an oprofile
on tor on your cpu, we can see what calls are consuming the most cpu.
Most likely, it isn't tor but openssl.  Unfortunately, there isn't much
we can do about this.  

Thanks for running a node, everyone appreciates it.

-- 
Andrew


CN's nodes lookin' uncool, do they?

2007-09-16 Thread BlueStar88
The chinese routers daily raise and fall and their massive proportion of
exit nodes looks like sort of 'work-day-behavior-of-the-exit-spy':

https://tor.xenobite.eu:82/mrtg-torstat/torstat-routers-cn-day.png

GMT+7

In opposite to the other major players:

https://torstat.xenobite.eu/showstatistics.php

(down below that page)



Greets

-- 
BlueStar88 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


A Tor Typo

2007-09-16 Thread Andrew Del Vecchio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Color me an anal-retentive English language nazi, but the phrase Tor
is not an HTTP proxy... that appears when you try to run a web
browser or other program via HTTP should read: Tor is not a HTTP
proxy. Correct English grammar dictates that it's the first LETTER in
a word that matters, not the first SOUND. In HTTP, the article should
thus be a and not an. Other than that, no major problems to
report. The latest alpha seems to work well with no major resource
hogging issues on Ubuntu 7.04 Edgy Eft.

Ciao,
Andrew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG7ZwcgwZR2XMkZmQRAgP9AKC4f0573T6ST+PbWPLpgZKI4x1XqQCgho5T
RlGlhL8TC1JdC4EWgKE1u1c=
=UFPn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: A Tor Typo

2007-09-16 Thread Michael_google gmail_Gersten
 Correct English grammar dictates that it's the first LETTER in
 a word that matters, not the first SOUND.
I suspect that you will find that this is not a 100% true for all
English speaking countries and locations, and that it varies by
dialect, possibly by accent/location.

In any event, I was taught growing up that it is the first sound.

(And I think we are sufficiently off-topic now :-)


Re: Exclude nodes from certain countries

2007-09-16 Thread misc
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:42:32 +0100, Robert Hogan wrote:

 TorK allows you to do this (in a rough and ready way using the geoip database 
 (maxmind.com) - about 9x% accurate). TorK is available only for Linux/BSD 
 unfortunately, but you could you use the Incognito LiveCD which uses TorK as 
 the default Tor interface.
 
 http://www.patdouble.com/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=11Itemid=18
 http://files1.cjb.net/incognito

Thanks, I'll check it out



No-mail mode for this list

2007-09-16 Thread misc
How can I put this list into no-mail mode (so that I do not receive any
e-mails from it)?

I'm accessing it using the newsreader, so I do not need hundreds of e-mails
simultaneously going to my e-mail account.



Re: Exclude nodes from certain countries

2007-09-16 Thread Scott Bennett
 On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:18:49 -0400 misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:25:51 -0500 (CDT), Scott Bennett wrote:

  I'd strongly recommend that you start with the tor overview
 document at
 
  https://tor.eff.org/overview
 
 paying special attention to the cartoon describing how circuits are built,
 which should begin to straighten you out on some of the other misconceptions
 you've indicated regarding tor.  To learn about the process in greater 
 detail,
 continue reading at
 
  http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/path-spec.txt
 
  To understand how tor clients (and servers) know what choices of servers
 are available, you need to read the directory protocol document(s) 
 appropriate
 to the version of tor you run.  For 0.1.2.1[67], read
 
  http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/dir-spec-v2.txt
 
  For 0.2.0.6-alpha, read the above and
 
  http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/dir-spec.txt

Thanks Scott,

I understand now that Tor client downloads network-status documents with
descriptors of available onion routers and then chooses the routers for
building circuits from that list. I understand that tor client connects
directly only to entry nodes, and never makes a direct connection with
middle or exit nodes (unless they're later used as entry nodes for
different circuits).

 Well, almost.  There is a sublety there in that entry node is not
exactly synonymous with entry guard.  An entry node is simply the first
node of a circuit and can be any tor server currently accepting connections
on its ORPort.  If one's torrc contains UseEntryGuards 1 or that value
is allowed to default to 1, then the tor client will limit the choices for
the entry node for a new circuit to tor servers marked Guard in a status
document.   But it sounds like you have the idea now.

I understand that I can use firewall to control the entry nodes used (the
firewall would prevent connecting to bad IPs, certain countries, etc). But

 Yes, that would work, but might be a real pain to live with because of
all the delays you could encounter when tor tries to contact a server
blocked by your firewall and has to wait for the timeout before trying to
reach a different one.  ExcludeNodes would be much faster because tor
would know in advance not to bother connecting to those servers.  The problem
then becomes one of maintaining the list of excluded nodes.
 There is another option, though.  You can specify a list of EntryNodes
to use, as well as a list of ExitNodes in your torrc.  These lists would
be the pools from which servers would be chosen first for those circuit
positions.  If you set StrictEntryNodes 1 and StrictExitNodes 1, then
those will be the only ones that can be chosen.  You could choose a reasonably
sized list of servers that meet your criteria for entry or exit nodes, and
then just live with those, rather than trying to maintain a huge and
dynamic list of nodes to exclude.

I still do NOT see how Tor connections to entry nodes can be controlled
with Squid.

 Can't help you there.  I know nothing about squid.

It would make sense to use Protowall (with a blocklist from bluetack.co.uk)
to prevent connections to bad IP ranges. That way entry nodes run by
various bad organizations will not be used.

 I don't know Protowall either.

But I'm still left with a problem of how to avoid nodes from certain
countries. What especially bothers me is when ALL THREE NODES are chosen
from the same bad country. I would really like to avoid that. 

 You don't really have to worry about the middle nodes.

I hope solution for Windows will come soon.

 Give EntryNodes - StrictEntryNodes and ExitNodes - StrictExitNodes
methods a try.  If you pick, say, 25 - 50 nodes with long uptimes, you should
be okay.


  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet:   bennett at cs.niu.edu  *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army.   *
*-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**


Re: A Tor Typo

2007-09-16 Thread Andrew Del Vecchio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Where did you grow up? I'm from the US. Since we're talking about it,
are there any active localization projects going on? Having the major
Euro languages plus Mandarin Chinese would be good to start with, IMHO.

~Andrew

Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
 Correct English grammar dictates that it's the first LETTER in a
 word that matters, not the first SOUND.
 I suspect that you will find that this is not a 100% true for all
 English speaking countries and locations, and that it varies by
 dialect, possibly by accent/location.

 In any event, I was taught growing up that it is the first sound.

 (And I think we are sufficiently off-topic now :-)




-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG7bUhgwZR2XMkZmQRAuL9AJ971InG9L23thYjRHQ5tNr+caXWrwCgls18
urTrmgVnOKbVrj4hheVZjIs=
=y1a3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: CN's nodes lookin' uncool, do they?

2007-09-16 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:08:12PM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
 The chinese routers daily raise and fall and their massive proportion of
 exit nodes looks like sort of 'work-day-behavior-of-the-exit-spy':
 
 https://tor.xenobite.eu:82/mrtg-torstat/torstat-routers-cn-day.png
 
 GMT+7

Here's an alternative to the conspiracy theory:

Notice that many of the China nodes have the nickname 'Unnamed'. This
is what you'll get if you don't set a Nickname -- for example, if you
click the turn me into a server button in Vidalia. Also, you use the
default exit policy when you click that button in Vidalia.

It's already been established informally through other measurements
that we have tens of thousands of Tor users in China. So the alternative
theory is that a slightly larger (but still quite small) percentage of
Chinese users have chosen to click the button in Vidalia.

 In opposite to the other major players:
 
 https://torstat.xenobite.eu/showstatistics.php
 
 (down below that page)

Nice stats pages!

--Roger



Re: No-mail mode for this list

2007-09-16 Thread Steven Huf
Quote: How can I put this list into no-mail mode (so that I do not
receive any
e-mails from it)?

Same, it's really filling up my inbox unnecessarily...

On 9/17/07, misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 How can I put this list into no-mail mode (so that I do not receive any
 e-mails from it)?

 I'm accessing it using the newsreader, so I do not need hundreds of
 e-mails
 simultaneously going to my e-mail account.