Re: Having trouble setting up TOR server Additional info,,
Hello Pei Hanru! Nice to hear from you. I am trying to re-check my RHEL with TOR to make sure I have the correct IP behind the firewall. That easily could be the problem,, Will get back to you as soon as I have news about it or report. Thanks for your interest, will talk later, Algenon Pei Hanru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Algenon On 2007-10-23 18:32 CST, algenon flower wrote: > Hello experienced TOR people,,, > I realize I may have become a little obsessed with getting my TOR > server up, but for me it represents an important step in my education, > and I intend it to be an aid, at least in some small way, to the TOR > project. I think I am almost there, just that I have to configure my > firewall and perhaps other in order for it to work. I have decided to > provide the Linksys config current in html as an aid for anyone who > might have hints on what direction I should go to fix the problem. > Normally I would not post this much info, but am not sure of more options. > Thanks in advance, >Algenon At Linksys_Port_Forwarding.htm (Port range forwarding) page, I noticed you have two similar port forwarding rules, but they have different IP addresses, one is 192.168.1.2, the other is 192.168.1.3, maybe that's where you problem lies. Delete the wrong one, and try again. Thanks for your contribution to the Tor community! Hanru -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHHdYstHG285r2MGoRAitYAJ91Sl8e/fXyiHb1WtwVcvXT+TckzwCeJII5 6ui+vxfngan+UKC94Dcyygk= =m+9q -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
xB Browser 2.0.0.8a push
- New Installer for Windows - Creates Desktop/Start Menu Icons - <10MB including archives - Can Register for free xB account - xB Members can upgrade via their Trans ID - Enhanced Windows Vista compatibility - Firefox 2.0.0.8 - Tor 0.1.2.17 - Addons all updated - New Password Addon - xBBNuker included, returns xB Browser to virgin state. https://update.xerobank.com/beta/xB%20Browser%20Installer.exe https://update.xerobank.com/beta/xB%20Browser%20Installer.exe.sig
Re: Having trouble setting up TOR server Additional info,,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Algenon On 2007-10-23 18:32 CST, algenon flower wrote: > Hello experienced TOR people,,, > I realize I may have become a little obsessed with getting my TOR > server up, but for me it represents an important step in my education, > and I intend it to be an aid, at least in some small way, to the TOR > project. I think I am almost there, just that I have to configure my > firewall and perhaps other in order for it to work. I have decided to > provide the Linksys config current in html as an aid for anyone who > might have hints on what direction I should go to fix the problem. > Normally I would not post this much info, but am not sure of more options. > Thanks in advance, >Algenon At Linksys_Port_Forwarding.htm (Port range forwarding) page, I noticed you have two similar port forwarding rules, but they have different IP addresses, one is 192.168.1.2, the other is 192.168.1.3, maybe that's where you problem lies. Delete the wrong one, and try again. Thanks for your contribution to the Tor community! Hanru -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHHdYstHG285r2MGoRAitYAJ91Sl8e/fXyiHb1WtwVcvXT+TckzwCeJII5 6ui+vxfngan+UKC94Dcyygk= =m+9q -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Having trouble setting up TOR server Additional info,,
Hello experienced TOR people,,, I realize I may have become a little obsessed with getting my TOR server up, but for me it represents an important step in my education, and I intend it to be an aid, at least in some small way, to the TOR project. I think I am almost there, just that I have to configure my firewall and perhaps other in order for it to work. I have decided to provide the Linksys config current in html as an aid for anyone who might have hints on what direction I should go to fix the problem. Normally I would not post this much info, but am not sure of more options. Thanks in advance, Algenon algenon flower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello experienced TOR ppl, I am trying to set up a TOR server on Linux Redhat Enterprise v5,, I am using a Linksys hardware firewall that does have NAT and have modified the system to open ports 9001-9031. I have just installed TOR and Vidalia for Redhat on my system,and, using Vidalia configured TOR ot act as a server. My problem is: (TOR log below) Oct 22 20:45:19.089 [Notice] Tor v0.2.0.7-alpha (r11572). This is experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. (Running on Linux i686) Oct 22 20:45:29.624 [Notice] Tor has successfully opened a circuit. Looks like client functionality is working. Oct 22 20:45:29.769 [Notice] Now checking whether ORPort 24.22.67.176:9001 and DirPort 24.22.67.176:9030 are reachable... (this may take up to 20 minutes -- look for log messages indicating success) Oct 22 20:46:37.127 [Warning] eventdns: All nameservers have failed Oct 22 20:46:37.299 [Notice] eventdns: Nameserver 68.87.69.146 is back up Oct 22 20:47:29.326 [Notice] Freeing linked Socks connection [waiting for circuit] with 65 bytes on inbuf, 0 on outbuf. Oct 22 20:54:35.222 [Notice] Freeing linked Socks connection [waiting for circuit] with 65 bytes on inbuf, 0 on outbuf. Oct 22 21:00:39.050 [Notice] Freeing linked Socks connection [waiting for circuit] with 65 bytes on inbuf, 0 on outbuf. Oct 22 21:05:25.858 [Warning] Your server (24.22.67.176:9001) has not managed to confirm that its ORPort is reachable. Please check your firewalls, ports, address, /etc/hosts file, etc. Oct 22 21:05:25.876 [Warning] Your server (24.22.67.176:9030) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Please check your firewalls, ports, address, /etc/hosts file, etc. *** To simplify things, I have disabled Redhat's software firewall, to make sure it is not causing the problem. I am a little unsure I have configured my firewall to accept traffic on ports 9001 and 9030,, I can supply info from the firewall to whomever is interested in helping. Does anyone have any good ideas about how I can get my TOR server up & what the problem is?? Love to hear,,, Algenon __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Linksys_Errors.tar.gz Description: 2980260711-Linksys_Errors.tar.gz
Re: recent rev. take a very long time to get client working
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:58:47PM +0800, Li-Hui Zhou wrote: > I have no idea why recent svn revs take a very long time to get the > client function working. A lot of > Oct 23 14:50:48.239 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but > not > enough to build a circuit. > Oct 23 14:50:55.840 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but > not > enough to build a circuit. > Oct 23 14:52:06.682 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but > not > enough to build a circuit. > such as informations in the log. It's because recent svn revisions use the new v3 directory protocol, and there are currently only two v3 directory authorities. Both of these authorities upgraded to a new version a few hours ago that had a crash bug, and one of them is still down. It takes a majority to build a networkstatus consensus, and a majority of 2 is 2. Without a consensus, your Tor client refuses to build any circuits. Later, there will be more than two v3 authorities, so this will happen less. We're pondering letting Tor clients start with an obsolete networkstatus consensus (say, if you have one from 12 hours ago). This is good from a "now it works" perspective, but bad because a malicious directory cache can hand you one from 12 hours ago and claim there aren't any newer ones, and now you behave differently from all the other users who weren't tricked. --Roger
Re: Setting up a private tor network
Robert Hogan wrote: I was also setting up my own Tor network based on the instructions in the FAQ, but I've been trying to reproduce it as a virtual network running a number of User Mode Linux based virtual machines on one PC. It is available as a Netkit laboratory; I think it is quite easy to install and run, so if you want to experiment, let me know and I send it to you. I think everyone on the list would be interested. Can you send a link? If it's not *too* big I can mirror it. I have it in our SVN. I just have to verify accessibility, review the install instructions, and I send the link. Csaba
