Re: Warning Message
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 01:18:37PM +0200, Khaled Moussa wrote: > Thanks for advise, > I opened port 9001 at 127.0.0.1 through windows firewall but still > receiving the same warning in tor log? That is the wrong interface. 127.0.0.1 is the local interface that allows your computer to talk to itself. You have to open the port on the external interface. Find an interface with an IP other than 127.0.0.1.
Re: RemoteControl dev trouble (510 Unrecognized command)
Many thanks! The correct CRLS in the authentication made all the
difference for subsequent cmds.
~Jon
coderman wrote:
On Jan 12, 2008 10:44 PM, Jon McLachlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
I have been having some trouble with a python based Tor controller.
...
cx.sendall("authenticate " + pw + "\n\r")
try carriage return, then linefeed: "\r\n".
best regards,
Re: tornode lefkada
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | Every minute there is a log message: | | [Notice] We're missing a certificate from authority lefkada with signing key : launching request. | | I put lefkada in my excludenode list, no change. Nobody can remove this node from the list of nodes? There have been several reports of this problem and several answers. Here is one: http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Jan-2008/msg00186.html - --Karsten -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHig/e0M+WPffBEmURAoOrAJ9ShvWIVKWb6ZmXPefVOcsjsNO0FQCgohF0 MvrGHvDvF9yxldm7B8cvQtg= =M6WB -END PGP SIGNATURE-
100% CPU - again
Hello, When I launch Tor and then a few times later whn Tor is running, Tor uses 100% CPU. I found some tickets in Vidalia about this. Why isn't it possible to fix this problem, as it didn't happen in earlier releases of Tor/Vidalia? Every time it happens, the computer is just unable to do anything during a few minutes! Thanks!
Re: Pidgin and Gajim are both DNS-leaking, what IM-tool for Jabber are you using?
I tested pidgin 2.2.1 on linux and the DNS-Leaking is related to the plugins of the different protocols and not pidgin itself. So ICQ e.g. is not leaking the dns but Jabber is! On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:40:04 -0800 Kyle Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > kazaam wrote: > > Hi, > > I tested today Pidgin and Gajim for DNS-leaking and found that both are > > doing it. In Both you can't circumvent it. Even when using a http-proxy > > they still resolve the dns by themselves not using the proxy. What is your > > preferred IM-application for jabber? > > > > greets > > I'm using Pidgin 2.3.1 in Windows XP connected to Tor via Socks5 and > have not seen any DNS request leave my machine when observing traffic > with Wireshark. > > - Kyle -- kazaam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
