Re: Firefox woes with .onion and proxies

2010-02-06 Thread andrew
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 02:20:50PM -0500, thec...@gmail.com wrote 2.7K bytes in 
69 lines about:
: Either way, same result. Firefox is 3.5.7 on Ubuntu

Do you have the ubufox package installed?  I think it relies on the
system proxy setting.  Although, you configuring firefox should override the
system proxy config.

: I have since uninstalled torbutton, but, have the same problems.

It sounds like you need to create a new profile and see if it has the
same isues, or simply purge the firefox installed and install it again.

-- 
Andrew Lewman
The Tor Project
pgp 0x31B0974B

Website: https://torproject.org/
Blog: https://blog.torproject.org/
Identi.ca: torproject
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Firefox configurations

2010-02-06 Thread zzzjethro666

 Hello.
I'm trying this again. Not really sure if it showed up the first time. Haven't 
had a response on any of it.
I was wondering if I listed a number of Firefox configuration changes Ihave 
made, would those much more qualified than I peruse them and letme know if they 
are sound (for better anonymity) or not (risk myanonymity)?

I am using the Vidalia/Tor bundle for Mac OS 10.5.2, I guess on a Unix platform 
(ppc).

There's a lot of them so maybe I could start with a few or break it into three 
groups. 
Let me paste some here and see what happens.

network.protocol-handler.warn-external-defaulttrue
Next 4 are the sub-settings for the above line:
network.protocol-handler.warn-external.mailto true
network.protocol-handler.warn-external.news  true
network.protocol-handler.warn-external.nntp   true
network.protocol-handler.warn-external.snewstrue

browser.safebrowsing.enabled  false  This feels 
to me as though it should be true.

browser.sessionstore.privacy_level   2new FF is 
1 what do these numbers mean or represent?

extensions.blocklist.url   delete value 
  SHOULD I?
network.hosts.pop_serverdeletevalue  I 
tried this. Is it good?   (value was mail) should I?

Tha'ts all I'll post for today.
Thanks ahead if any one can help steer me in the right direction and I can 
learn more.
 




RE: Firefox configurations

2010-02-06 Thread downie -



 Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:16:33 +0100
 From: davidlust...@goatse.be
 To: or-talk@freehaven.net
 Subject: Re: Firefox configurations
 
 On 02/06/2010 07:11 PM, downie - wrote:
  
  browser.safebrowsing.enabled  false  This 
  feels to me as though it should be true.

  
  extensions.blocklist.url   delete 
  value   SHOULD I?
  
  This
  is about checking every URL your browser loads against a blacklist 
  (phish,malware etc)
  stored on Mozilla/Google's server. Even if that check goes via Tor, do
  you want that information sent? If not, leave as disabled.
  
  GD

  _
  Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
  http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469227/direct/01/
 
 That's not true, it downloads a list of blacklisted extentions/plugins
 from a Mozilla server. This is how Mozilla disabled the .Net extention
 when Microsoft didn't release a patch for the Firefox extention.

I assume you are just correcting me on extensions.blocklist.url ? I was 
thinking of
browser.safebrowsing.provider.0.lookupURL so I was wrong in that respect.
GD
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/