blutmagie quad core upgrade
hello, blutmagie exit node has replaced its former socket 775 core2 duo E8600 cpu by a socket 775 core2 quad Q9650. Furthermore memory is upgraded from 4 to 8 GB. Instead of one heavily loaded core which probably has been bad for latency there are now four moderately loaded tor processes running. Blutmagie, blutmagie2, blutmagie3, and blutmagie4 are announced as one family and each core runs safely below 100% cpu load which is hopefully good for latency ;-) BandwidthRate each process is set to 6000 KB. regards Olaf *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Using tor as proxy for the command line
Scott Bennett wrote: I think using nmap in the context of tor is really barking up the wrong tree. Perhaps, the goal was more general than Tor - it's specifically a set of patches for SOCKS5. Would you post your specifications for it, please? Specifications? There's an nmap branch with some basic SOCKS proxy support here: svn co svn://svn.insecure.org/nmap-exp/ioerror/ All the best, Jacob signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: blutmagie quad core upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello I've been wondering this for a long time. How do you keep your exit node running without interference from ISP / local police etc.? Especially when it's the largest exit node. I've had two exit-nodes which both we're closed, first by KRP (National Criminal Police, finnish) and had all my hardware taken by cops (2008) and second one was closed by ISP (2010) even I had informed them about Tor-exit and asked if it was okay to run exit node. It was until they got first abuse-notices, then they shut the node down. I was able to run it about six days. I was able to get off the contract because ISP broke their promises. M Olaf Selke wrote: hello, blutmagie exit node has replaced its former socket 775 core2 duo E8600 cpu by a socket 775 core2 quad Q9650. Furthermore memory is upgraded from 4 to 8 GB. Instead of one heavily loaded core which probably has been bad for latency there are now four moderately loaded tor processes running. Blutmagie, blutmagie2, blutmagie3, and blutmagie4 are announced as one family and each core runs safely below 100% cpu load which is hopefully good for latency ;-) BandwidthRate each process is set to 6000 KB. regards Olaf *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvkIgQACgkQeaKwdrf2V0oi5gCfbeUXjbeE99OPK3uupBEtp74Y 4hgAn2TLWhfsqKpWjXTjqxfOEu62ntPl =gQY0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: blutmagie quad core upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 M wrote: Hello I've been wondering this for a long time. How do you keep your exit node running without interference from ISP / local police etc.? Especially when it's the largest exit node. Do a 'whois' for Olaf's IP range... ;) Timo I've had two exit-nodes which both we're closed, first by KRP (National Criminal Police, finnish) and had all my hardware taken by cops (2008) and second one was closed by ISP (2010) even I had informed them about Tor-exit and asked if it was okay to run exit node. It was until they got first abuse-notices, then they shut the node down. I was able to run it about six days. I was able to get off the contract because ISP broke their promises. M Olaf Selke wrote: hello, blutmagie exit node has replaced its former socket 775 core2 duo E8600 cpu by a socket 775 core2 quad Q9650. Furthermore memory is upgraded from 4 to 8 GB. Instead of one heavily loaded core which probably has been bad for latency there are now four moderately loaded tor processes running. Blutmagie, blutmagie2, blutmagie3, and blutmagie4 are announced as one family and each core runs safely below 100% cpu load which is hopefully good for latency ;-) BandwidthRate each process is set to 6000 KB. regards Olaf -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFL5Cd4O/2mgkVVV7kRAiFzAJ4jUICQydVFgDKQMrMqY91+o/sAGACfTQW5 VqiCt7z29m13TDMttfJubDM= =7+Ua -END PGP SIGNATURE- *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
