Re: Active Attacks - Already in Progress?

[Theodore Bagwell]

On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:54 -0800, "Mike Perry" 
wrote:
> Rather than cripple the network by forcing more clients to use slower
> nodes more often, we have opted to try to document the process of
> running a high capacity Tor exit node:
> http://archives.seul.org/tor/relays/Aug-2010/msg00034.html

In my research (posted earlier to this list), I did not find an issue
with exit relays. The relays which were reliably chosen as part of my
circuit were often the first or second relay in my circuit - not the
exit relay.

> Please help us to create the network we *wish* we had.

I'm running a relay of my own, no worries.

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software
  or over the web

***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

Very low performance in CriptolabTORRelays*

[Daniel Franganillo]

Hi,
I'm the admin of CriptoLabTorRelays[1][2][3][4]
As you can see at [1][2][3][4] our relays are having almost no transfer 
rate (3KB or so)
It started on Monday 14 of November and after some testing we came to a 
conclusion... Our Univeristy (our workplace) somehow filtered Tor 
without us noticing.
I need your help to get some proofs of the filter being applied so we 
can make a statement and ask for permission.


Looking at the logs I see a frequently

[debug] TLS error: unexpected close while reading (SSL_ST_OK)

Tor:
0.2.2.18-alpha-2
SSL:
0.9.8o-3

Thanks.

PD: We even tried using bridges (as in https://bridges.torproject.org/) 
with no luck.


[1] 
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=b0ebd113c29fa546596dae34e88b8ad82ffdaa3d
[2] 
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=a65f3cbe32d8b52afcd2b09f0258d5cef1b12f48
[3] 
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=1d6a27aed313662e35f550b212335d4797dccdf6
[4] 
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=3e628de58df60a228c38fa83d000439d129d00cc


--
---
   Daniel Franganillo Corrales
---
e-mail: dani...@dilmun.ls.fi.upm.es
---
CriptoLab. Despacho 6305.
Facultad de Informática.
Campus de Montegancedo S/N
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Boadilla del Monte. Madrid (Spain)
Teléfono - 91 336 (3673)
---



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: glibc Errors for TBB 1.0.17

[cgp3cg]

>> Just upgraded from Tor Browser Bundle 1.0.14 to 1.0.17 for Linux i686,
>> running on Debian lenny/5.0.6. Getting glibc errors:
>>
>> Launching Tor Browser Bundle for Linux in /path/to/tor-browser_en-US
>> ./App/vidalia: /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.9' not found
>> (required by /path/to/tor-browser_en-US/Lib/libQtGui.so.4)
>> ./App/vidalia: /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found
>> (required by /path/to/tor-browser_en-US/Lib/libQtNetwork.so.4)
>> ./App/vidalia: /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.9' not found
>> (required by /path/to/tor-browser_en-US/Lib/libQtCore.so.4)
>>
>> Current installed version of glibc is 2.7 (standard Debian version). I
>> guess this reflects a change in the build environment for TBB?
> 
> Yes, and it looks like a bug to me.  Added to Trac as #2225
> ().

Thanks Robert.

>> I run Tor from a USB drive, so the portable all-in-one Tor/Vidalia/FF
>> bundle is excellent. Happy to build the TBB from source/components ...
>> are there instructions for the process? Or some other way around the
>> problem?
> 
> See  for the build
> scripts, but we would prefer to fix this bug.

Will certainly have a look around. Happy to help if there's anything I
can do.

Thanks
-C
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/