Re: Google becomes usefull for us again
Hi ! Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote: Hmm why not just use http://www.scroogle.org That's what I use... the power of google but without all it's badness :) Unfortunately they seem to block some Tor exit nodes too. When I go to Scroogle via anonymizer.ccc.de I receive a 403 Forbidden error :-(
Re: feedback about 0.2.0.6-alpha (r11277), traffic pattern and memory consumption
Hi ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We do need to solve the high bandwidth node problems. I wonder if the other top 10 nodes are seeing the same behavior? I've only a 10 MBit connection but I do see this behaviour too (Tor 0.1.2.17 at the moment): http://aquatorius.spemaus.net/munin/spemaus.net/aquatorius.spemaus.net.html#Network I usually restart Tor every 5 days when network utilization decreases due to heavy swapping, see memory usage graph. But this strange traffic pattern repeats almost daily.
Re: Tor takes too much RAM
Hi ! Roger Dingledine wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:35:56AM +0200, Olaf Selke wrote: Yes, my directory authorities are using way too much ram too. It appears that we introduced something bad in 0.1.2.x that wasn't present in 0.1.1.x. today I noticed that according the FAQ tor needs 768 MB ram each 10 Mbps bandwidth :-) No, this is not true. At least, it wasn't true for 0.1.1.x. Some kind soul appears to have modified the FAQ to report the current situation, rather than bugging anybody about the problems. :) Oh, that was me :-) I'm quite new to Tor and never ran a 0.1.1.x version. So I didn't know that the current memory consumption is too high. Sorry for that. You might try downgrading to 0.1.1.26 briefly, and see how it compares to the current situation. I'll try.
