Unsubscribe

2007-10-01 Thread Brad Freeman

Unsubscribe


Re: Ultimate solution

2007-03-25 Thread Brad Freeman


On 25 mar 2007, at 21.16, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:


The whole Because some aspect of Flash can kill you, all of flash
must be junked approach won't work. That's like saying, Because Java
could contain an unsafe program, no Java can be used.


Or like saying Because SOME people are using Tor for bad things, we  
need to get rid of Tor.


Brad


Re: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)

2007-03-25 Thread Brad Freeman


On 25 mar 2007, at 22.48, H D Moore wrote:

This is a stupid argument to start with -- ignoring the license,  
TorPark
should be recommended based on the quality of the code and the  
features
of the software. If TorPark LLC does something evil at a later  
date, stop

recommending them.

-HD


Amen, Preach it Brother HD!

Brad


Re: Building tracking system to nab Tor pedophiles

2007-03-07 Thread Brad Freeman
 
On Wednesday, March 07, 2007, at 07:42AM, Roger Dingledine [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:56:22AM -0500, James Muir wrote:
  http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=114
 
 The approaches suggested won't work if you use Firefox with NoScript set 
 to disable JavaScript, Java, Flash and any other plugins.

You still have to be careful though -- if you enable them for some
domains that you trust (say, foo.com), then you can still get nailed
when you visit foo.com from an evil exit node, it inserts some malicious
applets, and your noscript says well yeah, but the user typed in foo.com,
therefore this applet is from foo.com, so I trust it.

So the moral of the story appears to be turn the plugins off, period.
The broader moral is: don't run code from strangers on your computer. The
even broader moral would be to lament that we're still not using SSL on
most Internet interactions. And maybe the fourth is that we (somebody
here) should work on easy instructions for locking down common OS network
interfaces so only Tor communications can get through. Or Tor LiveCDs
that have that already done. Or VM images that can be run as routers
between your computer and the Internet.

--Roger


Actually the moral of the story would be to surf using Lynx w/SSL from a Linux 
or BSD Tor enabled LiveCD.  Unfortunately you won't see any pictures or movies 
so that will eliminate most users who use Tor for private surfing.  ;-)

Or you could get REALLY secure and just unplug the computers from the net and 
go outside for some fresh air and get a life!

IMHO,

Brad




Re: Tor appliance

2006-09-16 Thread Brad Freeman


How about tor on a WRTG54 wireless router? That would be cheap, and I
would guess it's possible given the linux OS firmware. I can't make
this happen since I'm not a programmer, but the idea has occurred to
me before. I like the HyperWRT project, Thibor version.
(http://www.thibor.co.uk/). Maybe start a thread in the forums to see
what the response is.

-P


I've considered this option also on my WRT54GL flashed with DD-WRT if  
it would work and be able to process the encryption fast enough  
without overclocking the router.


I've also considered setting up a linux box as a firewall with either  
IPCop, Astaro, or Smoothwall. Does anyone have experience with these  
or another OS as a firewall appliance? My primary goal is not only  
security but to control/monitor QoS and total amount of bandwidth  
used. Even though I have a 24Mbit/s connection with high bandwidth  
allowance, I need to use some of it also!


Thanks,

Brad