Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)

[Florian D.]

Ben Wilhelm wrote:
 (snipped cool stuff)
 

thanks a lot for your shrewd and amusing explanations. I would not
mind, if this discussion would go on like that for a while ;)
cheers, florian

Re: A root-server for about 30EUR for an exitnode?

[Florian D.]

Olaf Selke wrote:
 100 Mbit/s SLA mit 1000 GB Traffic (anschliessend 5 Mbit/s, sobald der
 Grenzwert überschritten wurde)
 
 means 1 TB (each month?) is included. Afterwards the server will be
 throttled to 5 MBit/s bandwidth.
 
 Olaf
 
read closer:
ODER
100 Mbit/s ohne SLA mit unbegrenztem Traffic

means that without the 99,9% guarantee, you'll get unlimited traffic

TOR and non-contineous internet connections

[Florian D.]

Hi folks,
I like the TOR project and want to participate. My question: Is it a
good idea to set up a server, which is not connected to the internet
contineously? -- i.e. I turn on my computer, when I come home from
work and turn it off at bedtime, so it runs several hours a day - is
this enough? Each time the server goes down, the session for the
user gets interrupted, right? So, where is the line to draw?

cheers, Florian

Re: TOR and non-contineous internet connections

[Florian D.]

9teen wrote:
 But bridge-relays or non-exit nodes are also fine and and help the TOR
 network as well.
ok, thx for the answers, will do that.