Re: Default Exit Policy

2008-05-26 Thread Nathaniel Dube
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

What about creating a white list/black list for domains in Tor.  That way Tor 
could allow certain domains (such as google.com) to bypass the default 
blocks.  This way you would be maintaining security while adding 
functionality.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIO14fvsn/sQCIOqQRArssAJ0f/oNleTMQUSeEYe3hXvjX9YOayACfc9M4
Ab7ViVtcFKeyLejz+35wu1g=
=Qph5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: GPG Public Keys

2008-05-22 Thread Nathaniel Dube
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 22 May 2008 04:35:55 am Sebastian Hahn wrote:
 I'm still looking for a solution, and might switch to mutt when I have
 the time to set up my mail system properly.
One solution I might recommend is figuring out what you're doing different 
than every one else on the list who sign their email.  I've seen a hand full 
of people so far who sign their email to this list and kmail has no problem 
validating their signed messages.  It just seems to be yours.  I'm not trying 
to point fingers.  I'm just saying.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFINT/fvsn/sQCIOqQRAlexAJ9uuUXw9bLiGtGMxZc3QxhrlR9h+wCeMXkg
f0cs3ReFe3dSnJb7CA9uVn0=
=GxZU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: unsubscribe

2008-05-22 Thread Nathaniel Dube
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 22 May 2008 05:16:15 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 unsubscribe
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body [unsubscribe or-talk]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFINhKrvsn/sQCIOqQRAkNMAJ9lb+W2tMsnEhRSSmM6Rk7Bx0gZsACeOarA
LAmn431UVyDO3mt6t/Tutm4=
=WPSd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Default Exit Policy

2008-05-22 Thread Nathaniel Dube
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I was looking at my server's stats at https://torstatus.kgprog.com and noticed 
that it has an exit policy that I didn't put in my config file.  For 
example...

reject 0.0.0.0/8:*
reject 169.254.0.0/16:*
reject 127.0.0.0/8:*
reject 192.168.0.0/16:*
reject 10.0.0.0/8:*
reject 172.16.0.0/12:*
reject 75.63.1.109:*
reject *:25
reject *:119
reject *:135-139
reject *:445
reject *:465
reject *:563
reject *:587
reject *:1214
reject *:4661-4666
reject *:6346-6429
reject *:6699
reject *:6881-6999
accept *:*

The only part of that I have in my config file is [accept *:*].  Is the rest 
some kind of defaults?  I noticed one of the defaults is [reject *:587] which 
I'm wondering why that would be in the defaults.  That ports is used for 
sending secure email.  Port 25 I can understand but 587?!  I use that port 
for gmail.  I have two gmail accounts.  One is this one which is tied to my 
real name.  The other isn't and I use with Thunderbird and the torbutton 
addon.  I've noticed that sometimes I can't send email and sometimes I can.  
It all depends on the current circuit.  After seeing the defaults exit policy 
I can see why I've been having the issues with my email.

The point of this email?!  I wish to understand the rational of having the 
defaults block ports used for secure encrypted protocoles.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFINk83vsn/sQCIOqQRAn8nAKCHtbwbJgzK5LWyKdVOY7YaxgV1uwCeN78A
WSa9RDSj0/XcXGlqy2KhUnA=
=PtV5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Router Flags

2008-05-22 Thread Nathaniel Dube
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Can someone explain what these router flags mean?  Some of them I have a good 
guess what they mean but I decided to list them all.

Authority
Bad Directory
Bad Exit
Exit
Fast
Guard
Hibernating
Named
Stable
Running
Valid
V2Dir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFINlChvsn/sQCIOqQRAm8uAJwMaMpUU/NopSqCFNPae8JKGr3OUwCZAQn/
aJwpk/meBTGzNeBoglnq/pM=
=ehyp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


GPG Public Keys

2008-05-21 Thread Nathaniel Dube
I noticed some of you have GPG keys.  I tried searching key servers so I can 
add your public keys to my list.  It would seem either I'm not searching the 
right servers or none of you have uploaded them.  So I'm asking that all of 
you respond with your public keys and I'll do the same.


0xC109AB9DD3436B3A12F148AABEC9FFB100883AA4.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: GPG Public Keys

2008-05-21 Thread Nathaniel Dube
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:57:41 pm Sebastian Hahn wrote:
 are you sure this is not just because subkeys.pgp.net ist not
 functional currently and it's the only keyserver you use? This has
 caused some problems for some people...

 I've also uploaded my key, and I was just able to download it.
I ended up deleting everything in ~/.gnupg with the exception of the .gpg 
files and deleted my kgpg config file.  I restarted kgpg and some of the 
issues seemed to have gone away.  Though I'm still getting time out errors 
with a few key servers.  I managed to get your key.  For some reason kmail is 
giving me a [Invalid signature.] warning about your email. :-/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFINMvgvsn/sQCIOqQRAmGEAJ9uw4PXxT0YaDfghYSCSRhk9joVxgCfSraq
PEMCC7L04ppY9d029G5XqAc=
=lNpU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Ports 443 80

2008-05-18 Thread Nathaniel Dube
I just tried something else and I managed to get it working. :-)  The problem 
was I was over thinking the solution.  I set the ports in torrc back to their 
defaults ORPort 9001  DirPort 9030.

Instead, what I did was have the port forwaring on the router level...  
443 -- 9001  80 -- 9030.  Then I had the router forward ports 9001  9030 
to my private IP on the network.  So now I only need open ports 9001  9030 
on my local software firewall.

This solution is the easiest and most efficient way I can see doing it.  I 
hope this helps out every one else.  Here's my entire torrc so every one 
knows what settings I used to get it working.

SocksPort 9050
SocksListenAddress 127.0.0.1
DataDirectory /home/tor/.tor
ControlPort 9051
Nickname [Left Out]
ContactInfo [Left Out]
ORPort 9001
DirPort 9030

It's with this torrc and hardware router settings I managed to get every thing 
working.  Thanks every one for all the help.


Re: Ports 443 80

2008-05-18 Thread Nathaniel Dube
On Sunday 18 May 2008 12:50:27 pm morphium wrote:
 why don't you set ORListenAddress to 0.0.0.0:443 and don't do anything
 with your firewall?
I'm running Linux.  You can only open certain lower ports (such as 80  443) 
in root.  And it's bad to run tor as root.