Re: checking new email on adium
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:46:08AM +, M wrote: When Adium checks for new emails when an acct is routed thru tor.. will the eail checking also be routed thru it, or will it use the global settings? That depends on Adium. I don't have any experience with it, so I guess your best bet is to test it yourself (wireshark helps). Regards, Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 pgpFWgzWJ5cR2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gratuitous change blocks upgrade to 0.2.2.15-alpha :-(
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:29:38AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: I'm still in astonishment, wondering how I can actually exclude the nodes that should be excluded. No angry rants from me at this point. I would recommend a little script which generates the torrc file for you using a template file with your commented nodes on separate lines. Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 pgp7CfU8zi4UB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How does TOR deal with mac addresses
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:03:09PM -0400, Faraaz Damji wrote: Since he in Marco's original post referred to the client's ISP, just to clarify, your ISP can't even see leaked data sent through Tor. It would be encrypted before being sent through the Tor network. Just to clarify, you can leak DNS requests with a faulty setup which _can_ be seen by your ISP. Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 pgpJaJEP0lZdB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How does TOR deal with mac addresses
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:00:44PM +0530, emigrant wrote: On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 19:48 +0100, Marco Predicatori wrote: If you use Tor correctly, he can't figure out what site you are connecting to, and that's the whole point. thanks for the reply, what do you mean by using Tor correctly? If Tor is not correctly used you can still leak information regarding your identity. See this link on the main Tor page: https://www.torproject.org/download.html.en#Warning Hope this helps, Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 pgpuPYcRxxqie.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Tor/Iptables Question
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:34:23AM -0400, Ringo wrote: Ok so I added this one (which seemed like the only one that would open things up) and still no luck: iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT Here's a export of my current rules: # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.1.1 on Thu Aug 20 09:28:22 2009 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [9850:7346270] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [10373:5920044] -A INPUT -p tcp -j DROP -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT You're dropping all incoming TCP traffic! This must be switched. And you should use conntrack (it replaces state). -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -j DROP But I'm not sure if this is necessary at all. You could accept all incoming traffic. -A OUTPUT -o lo -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8118 -m owner --uid-owner torify -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -o lo -p tcp -m tcp --dport 9050 -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -o lo -p tcp -m owner --uid-owner torify -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A OUTPUT -o lo -p tcp -m tcp --dport -j ACCEPT COMMIT [snip] I haven't tested it so I'm not sure it will work. Hope this helps, Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
