Re: Drop Tor users via bridges by over 2/3 in the beginning of March (was: Tor in China)
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:31:06 -0500, Flamsmark wrote: :At the beginning of March, the great firewall of China blocked all (then) :known tor exits and relays, and a substantial number of bridges - presumably :enumerated over a prior, somewhat extended period. This is our working theory as well. Pending research involves which set of bridges were blocked; website, email, twitter/qq account, or all of them. -- Andrew Lewman The Tor Project pgp 0x31B0974B Website: https://www.torproject.org/ Blog: https://blog.torproject.org/ Identi.ca: torproject *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Drop Tor users via bridges by over 2/3 in the beginning of March (was: Tor in China)
On 10 March 2010 07:42, Paul Menzel wrote: > So my next question is, why did the users count drop that much in the > beginning of March? > At the beginning of March, the great firewall of China blocked all (then) known tor exits and relays, and a substantial number of bridges - presumably enumerated over a prior, somewhat extended period.
Drop Tor users via bridges by over 2/3 in the beginning of March (was: Tor in China)
Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2010, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Karsten Loesing: […] > I figured out the problem. The metrics portal had the bridge user > numbers from 2009-11-30 to 2010-01-05 imported twice. This affected all > countries, but was simply most visible for Chinese bridge users. I > removed those days from the stats and imported the descriptors again. > > The corrected graphs can be found on the graphs page: > > http://metrics.torproject.org/bridge-users-graphs.html#china So my next question is, why did the users count drop that much in the beginning of March? […] Thanks, Paul signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
