Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage

2008-01-19 Thread Ringo Kamens
This looks very cool. Can anybody with some experience go into how exactly
this works? Based on the site, it doesn't look like running it over tor
would add any extra security.

On Jan 19, 2008 7:38 PM, Michael Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi please have a look at the http://offsystem.sf.net
> If you want to distribute a file anonymously, upload it into the Offsystem
> and send the OFF-Link over Tor.
> That allows Tor to do anonymous Filesharing without any Bandwidth for the
> system.
> Offsystem is a kind of uncensorable Online Storage Hard Disk.
>
> Mike
>


Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage

2008-01-20 Thread Robert Hogan
On Sunday 20 January 2008 00:38:35 Michael Schmidt wrote:
> Hi please have a look at the http://offsystem.sf.net
> If you want to distribute a file anonymously, upload it into the Offsystem
> and send the OFF-Link over Tor.
> That allows Tor to do anonymous Filesharing without any Bandwidth for the
> system.
> Offsystem is a kind of uncensorable Online Storage Hard Disk.
>
> Mike

There don't appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs repository 
only the project members could possibly know how to put the many modules 
together. There don't appear to be any revision tags either. And there's no 
build documentation in plain sight.

That is seriously shoddy for an open source project. I'm sure offsystem is 
almost all that it says it is but the lack of all of the above make it as 
near a black box as your average closed source application. Annoying.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage

2008-01-20 Thread Michael Schmidt
Hi Robert,

source is here:
http://offsystem.cvs.sourceforge.net/offsystem/?sortdir=down

On Jan 20, 2008 7:05 PM, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> There don't appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs
> repository
> only the project members could possibly know how to put the many modules
> together.


Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage

2008-01-20 Thread Robert Hogan
On Sunday 20 January 2008 18:19:30 Michael Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> source is here:
> http://offsystem.cvs.sourceforge.net/offsystem/?sortdir=down
>
> On Jan 20, 2008 7:05 PM, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There don't appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs
> > repository
> > only the project members could possibly know how to put the many modules
> > together.

Yes, that's the cvs repository I was referring to above - there are no tags 
there and no source tarballs anywhere else. This means that there is no 
source distribution for any of their releases. That's annoying.

I'm guessing that off_network is the main module there but why should I bother 
reverse-engineering their build process just to install a possibly broken cvs 
version? I want the latest release. It's their funeral at the end of the day 
but an open-source project that doesn't release source tarballs is just being 
silly. 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage

2008-01-21 Thread Michael Schmidt
Hi Robert, see the update with source and (first) makefile-description here:
http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/download.html

On Jan 20, 2008 8:05 PM, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sunday 20 January 2008 18:19:30 Michael Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > source is here:
> > http://offsystem.cvs.sourceforge.net/offsystem/?sortdir=down
> >
> > On Jan 20, 2008 7:05 PM, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There don't appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs
> > > repository
> > > only the project members could possibly know how to put the many
> modules
> > > together.
>
> Yes, that's the cvs repository I was referring to above - there are no
> tags
> there and no source tarballs anywhere else. This means that there is no
> source distribution for any of their releases. That's annoying.
>
> I'm guessing that off_network is the main module there but why should I
> bother
> reverse-engineering their build process just to install a possibly broken
> cvs
> version? I want the latest release. It's their funeral at the end of the
> day
> but an open-source project that doesn't release source tarballs is just
> being
> silly.
>