Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage
This looks very cool. Can anybody with some experience go into how exactly this works? Based on the site, it doesn't look like running it over tor would add any extra security. On Jan 19, 2008 7:38 PM, Michael Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi please have a look at the http://offsystem.sf.net > If you want to distribute a file anonymously, upload it into the Offsystem > and send the OFF-Link over Tor. > That allows Tor to do anonymous Filesharing without any Bandwidth for the > system. > Offsystem is a kind of uncensorable Online Storage Hard Disk. > > Mike >
Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage
On Sunday 20 January 2008 00:38:35 Michael Schmidt wrote: > Hi please have a look at the http://offsystem.sf.net > If you want to distribute a file anonymously, upload it into the Offsystem > and send the OFF-Link over Tor. > That allows Tor to do anonymous Filesharing without any Bandwidth for the > system. > Offsystem is a kind of uncensorable Online Storage Hard Disk. > > Mike There don't appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs repository only the project members could possibly know how to put the many modules together. There don't appear to be any revision tags either. And there's no build documentation in plain sight. That is seriously shoddy for an open source project. I'm sure offsystem is almost all that it says it is but the lack of all of the above make it as near a black box as your average closed source application. Annoying. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage
Hi Robert, source is here: http://offsystem.cvs.sourceforge.net/offsystem/?sortdir=down On Jan 20, 2008 7:05 PM, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There don't appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs > repository > only the project members could possibly know how to put the many modules > together.
Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage
On Sunday 20 January 2008 18:19:30 Michael Schmidt wrote: > Hi Robert, > > source is here: > http://offsystem.cvs.sourceforge.net/offsystem/?sortdir=down > > On Jan 20, 2008 7:05 PM, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There don't appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs > > repository > > only the project members could possibly know how to put the many modules > > together. Yes, that's the cvs repository I was referring to above - there are no tags there and no source tarballs anywhere else. This means that there is no source distribution for any of their releases. That's annoying. I'm guessing that off_network is the main module there but why should I bother reverse-engineering their build process just to install a possibly broken cvs version? I want the latest release. It's their funeral at the end of the day but an open-source project that doesn't release source tarballs is just being silly. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage
Hi Robert, see the update with source and (first) makefile-description here: http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/download.html On Jan 20, 2008 8:05 PM, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 20 January 2008 18:19:30 Michael Schmidt wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > source is here: > > http://offsystem.cvs.sourceforge.net/offsystem/?sortdir=down > > > > On Jan 20, 2008 7:05 PM, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There don't appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs > > > repository > > > only the project members could possibly know how to put the many > modules > > > together. > > Yes, that's the cvs repository I was referring to above - there are no > tags > there and no source tarballs anywhere else. This means that there is no > source distribution for any of their releases. That's annoying. > > I'm guessing that off_network is the main module there but why should I > bother > reverse-engineering their build process just to install a possibly broken > cvs > version? I want the latest release. It's their funeral at the end of the > day > but an open-source project that doesn't release source tarballs is just > being > silly. >