Re: Partitioning Tables

2001-11-16 Thread Sunny Verghese

Eric,

In my prev. assignment I had to deal with partitions quite a bit.
Thankfully, on the tables I had to deal with, the parent and child records 
were on partitions corresponding to the same month.
Your's is a tricky situation. I have an idea but I am not sure it is 
feasible for you. But here it is anyway. Good luck my friend

Assumptions :
I am assuming that there is a foreign key based on sesion_id from C -- A, 
and also from B -- A.
Also assuming that data is partitioned by month. So if we need at least 90 
days worth of days,  say we have partitions for Jan, Feb, Mar, and April (3 
full months + the current month. At the end of the current month we will 
actually have 120 days worth of data). On the last day of April, we will 
drop the partition for Jan and create one for May.
Also assuming that if  the child is less than 90 days old, but the parent is 
older than 90,  the complete set (parent and child) need to be retained (and 
not deleted).
Also assuming that you have a little window of down time when you will be 
doing this.

Using the above example, Partition maintenance would involve.

step 1. Drop the Jan partition from B
step 2. Drop Jan partition from C
Now the tricky part. J
step 4. Any session_ids in the Jan partition of A that exists in the 
Feb, MAR or Apr partitions of B OR C, CANNOT be deleted 'cose they 
have children that are not old enough ( ?). Identify these records.
(NOTE : It’s been a while since I’ve worked on this, and I don’t remember if 
we can update the partition key  (i.e, date).. something tells me that it is 
not possible, but I could be wrong , if it is possible,  as an easier 
option we can update the date so that these records get moved to the Feb 
partition (on A), drop the Jan partition, and then reset them back to their 
old dates, and skip the remaining steps other than 8. )
Step 5. Temporarily Disable the foreign constraints from B -- A and from C 
-- A.
Step 6. Exchange the oldest partition from A.
ALTER TABLE A EXCHANGE PARTITION jan WITH TABLE exchange_table WITHOUT 
VALIDATION;
Step 7. Drop the oldest partition.
Step 8. Create a partition for May.
Step 9. Copy records identified in step 4 from the exchange table back into 
A (this will now be in the Feb partition)
Step 10. Re-enable the foreign keys from B-- A and from C-- A.

You are disabling the constraints for a small window and that too during 
down time (I assume). I don’t like having to disable constraints too, but 
this may be faster than delete cascades, involving Non indexed B and C.

Sunny



From: Erik Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Partitioning Tables
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:00:54 -0800

I have a set of three tables that I am having trouble deleting from. The
issues are caused by the size of the tables and the foreign keys. There are
no indexes on B and C due to insertion speed requirements. The last time I
emailed the group about this, partitioning was a popular response. I am now
concidering and testing partitioning. I need to keep 90 days of data 
online,
so partiioning by date seemed like the logical solution. So, I created a
test environment and range partitioned by the date attributes. This worked
great for tables B and C. I was able to export the oldest partitions and
then drop them quickly. The problem was with the A table. I could not drop
partitions becuase of the FK constraints. I would have to disable the
constraints and this is not a great solution. I then thought about hash
partitioning by session_id. Then when I deleted from A with ON DELETE
CASCADE, scans (no indexes on B and C) would be limited to the size of the
partitions. This also seems to be suboptimal, as the deletes are taking a
very long time in my test environment.

Does anyone have any experience on this sort of design that can provide 
some
guidance? I am at a loss and hope that someone has done this sort of thing
sucessfully and can point me in the right direction.

Erik


Table A - Session
   session_id (primary key)
   start_dtm (date)

Table B - Session Event
   session_event (primary key)
   session_id (FK to session table)
   event_datetime (date)

Table C - Session Quote
   session_quote (primary key)
   session_id (FK to session table)
   quote_datetime (date)




--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Erik Williams
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other

Partitioning Tables

2001-11-15 Thread Erik Williams

I have a set of three tables that I am having trouble deleting from. The
issues are caused by the size of the tables and the foreign keys. There are
no indexes on B and C due to insertion speed requirements. The last time I
emailed the group about this, partitioning was a popular response. I am now
concidering and testing partitioning. I need to keep 90 days of data online,
so partiioning by date seemed like the logical solution. So, I created a
test environment and range partitioned by the date attributes. This worked
great for tables B and C. I was able to export the oldest partitions and
then drop them quickly. The problem was with the A table. I could not drop
partitions becuase of the FK constraints. I would have to disable the
constraints and this is not a great solution. I then thought about hash
partitioning by session_id. Then when I deleted from A with ON DELETE
CASCADE, scans (no indexes on B and C) would be limited to the size of the
partitions. This also seems to be suboptimal, as the deletes are taking a
very long time in my test environment. 

Does anyone have any experience on this sort of design that can provide some
guidance? I am at a loss and hope that someone has done this sort of thing
sucessfully and can point me in the right direction.

Erik  


Table A - Session 
session_id (primary key)
start_dtm (date)

Table B - Session Event
session_event (primary key)
session_id (FK to session table)
event_datetime (date)

Table C - Session Quote
session_quote (primary key)
session_id (FK to session table)
quote_datetime (date)
 



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Erik Williams
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Partitioning Tables Indexes

2001-08-08 Thread Koti Reddy


Hi,

Oracle 8.1.7 EE 
OS: all


I am trying to implement Partitioning of Tables  Indexes on a database
which has non-partitioned tables  indexes. I am looking for suggestions
 gotchas from people who implemented. Couple of specific questions I
have are

1. Once I create a table with partitioning, Do I need to use special
techniques to import from old non-partitioned table ??

2. Can I add new partitions from PL/SQL using DBMS_SQL or EXECUTE
IMMEDIATE ??

3. Any other specific things I need to be aware of ??

Thanks in advance..

--koti
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Koti Reddy
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).