Re: Cache vs. Oracle

2002-06-09 Thread Don Granaman

Cache = Mumps++ (Yes, it used to be called "Mumps".  Is that an omen? ;-)

I worked almost four years in a shop where one of the two most critical
systems ran on Cache, but I didn't have anything to do with it.  The other
40+ production databases were Oracle - those were mine.

My only opinion of Cache is that even their "technical" people are
completely full of BS.  Once, we had two of them on site for a week on a
consulting engagement (tuning).  During that time, I heard them telling
people how Cache was so much better than Oracle because, among other things,
"With Oracle, design and code have nothing to do with performance.  Only
database tuning by the DBA makes any difference.  With Cache, the developer
has full control over performance.  You don't even need a DBA."  Of course,
this database was a continual performance nightmare - primarily because the
developers "had full control"... and no DBA (they administered it
themselves - as per vendor propaganda).  Whether Cache is actually capable
of decent performance is still a mystery.  There were also some other
significant issues, but I don't have the details.  Be sure that it will
actually do what you need before seriously considering it.

Don Granaman
[OraSaurus]

- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:09 PM


> Cache? What is cache?
>
> -Original Message-
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Okay,  I admit it I am somewhat of an Oracle bigot.  Does anyone have
> objective comparisons between Cache vs. Oracle or any opinions on subject?
>
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Don Granaman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Cache vs. Oracle

2002-06-04 Thread Gogala, Mladen
Title: RE: foreign key what help!!



Cache? 
What is cache? 

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 
  1:44 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
  RE: Cache vs. Oracle
  

  
 
 
Okay,  I admit it I am somewhat of an 
Oracle bigot.  Does anyone have objective comparisons between Cache 
vs. Oracle or any opinions on 
subject?


RE: Cache vs. Oracle

2002-06-04 Thread Paula_Stankus
Title: RE: foreign key what help!!




  

   
   
  Okay,  I admit it I am somewhat of an Oracle 
  bigot.  Does anyone have objective comparisons between Cache vs. 
  Oracle or any opinions on 
subject?