Re:RE: Object relational features and performance

2002-12-20 Thread Stephane Paquette
I've not been to that place but one colleague (ex-job)
describe it this way :
The developpers only know the objects, they're not
aware of the tables. All the locking and relation
between the objects is done at the application server
level. The application server generates the sql to
read/write the tables. So for them a database or a a
file, they do not care.


I have to start reading about objects, j2ee, xml, uml,
java, ... and I thought I would have time to go
snowboarding during the Christmas time  ;-)

 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :  Just because the
development tools are object
 orientated does not mean that the
 database has to be as well.
 
 Dick Goulet
 
 Reply
 Separator
 Subject:RE: Object relational features and
 performance
 Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Stephane=20Paquette?=
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:   12/20/2002 9:04 AM
 
 Is this the future ???
 
 I know one big bank where the development is object
 oriented and the database (DB2 UDB in this case) is
 used as a big flat file. The development is using
 java, j2ee, bea weblogic. 
 
 
  --- DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
 écrit
 :  Stefan - I believe the general consensus had
 emerged
  that usually object
  features aren't worth the effort. Often there are
  few benefits, and if you
  don't do it correctly you may see bad performance.
  Two questions:
 1. Are your developers/management enamored with
  the concept of object, or
  is this just your own curiosity?
 2. Is there something about your application
 that
  leads you to believe
  that it might derive significant benefit from the
  object features?
  For general business applications it is hard to
 beat
  the flexibility of the
  good old traditional relational data modeling.
 The lack of discussion may provide part of the
  answer to your question.
  
  Dennis Williams
  DBA, 40%OCP
  Lifetouch, Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
  -Original Message-
  Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:35 AM
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
  
  
  Hi everybody
  
  I'm not quite sure wether this has been discussed
 in
  deep before, but I
  couldn't find anything satisfieing (hope the
  spelling is correct ;)) things
  in the archive.
  Anyway: Due to my lack of experience with any real
  life scenarios with
  Oracle's object relational features, I never tried
  to recommend the usage of
  these and always kept to a normal relational
  approach. Does anybody have
  any experience with Types / Nested Tables and the
  like in a (preferrably
  big) production system of any kind ? What's
  recommendable, where are the
  pitfalls ?
  
  Any input deeply appreciated,
  TIA, Stefan
  
  
  
   
  -- 
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
  http://www.orafaq.net
  -- 
  Author: Stefan Jahnke
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051
  http://www.fatcity.com
  San Diego, California-- Mailing list and
 web
  hosting services
 

-
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
  E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
  'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
  ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be
 removed
  from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information
  (like subscribing).
  -- 
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
  http://www.orafaq.net
  -- 
  Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051
  http://www.fatcity.com
  San Diego, California-- Mailing list and
 web
  hosting services
 

-
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
  E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
  'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
  ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be
 removed
  from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information
  (like subscribing).
   
 
 =
 Stéphane Paquette
 DBA Oracle et DB2, consultant entrepôt de données
 Oracle and DB2 DBA, datawarehouse consultant
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

__
 Lèche-vitrine ou lèche-écran ?
 magasinage.yahoo.ca
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
 http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Stephane=20Paquette?=
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051
 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web
 hosting services

-
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
 E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
 ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
 from).  

Re:RE: Object relational features and performance

2002-12-20 Thread dgoulet
Just because the development tools are object orientated does not mean that the
database has to be as well.

Dick Goulet

Reply Separator
Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Stephane=20Paquette?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   12/20/2002 9:04 AM

Is this the future ???

I know one big bank where the development is object
oriented and the database (DB2 UDB in this case) is
used as a big flat file. The development is using
java, j2ee, bea weblogic. 


 --- DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit
:  Stefan - I believe the general consensus had
emerged
 that usually object
 features aren't worth the effort. Often there are
 few benefits, and if you
 don't do it correctly you may see bad performance.
 Two questions:
1. Are your developers/management enamored with
 the concept of object, or
 is this just your own curiosity?
2. Is there something about your application that
 leads you to believe
 that it might derive significant benefit from the
 object features?
 For general business applications it is hard to beat
 the flexibility of the
 good old traditional relational data modeling.
The lack of discussion may provide part of the
 answer to your question.
 
 Dennis Williams
 DBA, 40%OCP
 Lifetouch, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:35 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Hi everybody
 
 I'm not quite sure wether this has been discussed in
 deep before, but I
 couldn't find anything satisfieing (hope the
 spelling is correct ;)) things
 in the archive.
 Anyway: Due to my lack of experience with any real
 life scenarios with
 Oracle's object relational features, I never tried
 to recommend the usage of
 these and always kept to a normal relational
 approach. Does anybody have
 any experience with Types / Nested Tables and the
 like in a (preferrably
 big) production system of any kind ? What's
 recommendable, where are the
 pitfalls ?
 
 Any input deeply appreciated,
 TIA, Stefan
 
 
 
  
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
 http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Stefan Jahnke
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051
 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web
 hosting services

-
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
 E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
 ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
 from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information
 (like subscribing).
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
 http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051
 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web
 hosting services

-
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
 E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
 ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
 from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information
 (like subscribing).
  

=
Stéphane Paquette
DBA Oracle et DB2, consultant entrepôt de données
Oracle and DB2 DBA, datawarehouse consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Lèche-vitrine ou lèche-écran ?
magasinage.yahoo.ca
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Stephane=20Paquette?=
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).