Re: order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-12 Thread Jack van Zanen

Hi

I have in the past seen a download for a backported statspack on I believe
OTN. This would work on Oracle 8.0.5
Maybe still there

Jack


   
  
  Baker, Barbara 
  
  bbaker@denvernewspaperTo:   Multiple recipients of 
list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
  agency.comcc:   (bcc: Jack van 
Zanen/nlzanen1/External/MEY/NL)
  Sent by:   Subject:  order by in subquery 
workaround   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
   
  
   
  
  11-07-2002 19:38 
  
  Please respond to
  
  ORACLE-L 
  
   
  
   
  



 Solaris 2.6
 Oracle RDBMS v8.0.5.2.1

List:
I'm trying to run a retrofit of statspack on an 8.0.5 database.  (ya, I
know.  upgrading would actually be easier)
The statspack stuff came from an 8.1.7 install I have on the same box.

The spreport.sql report encounters errors in the order by clause.  The
problem is that you can't do an order by on a subquery before version
8.1.something-or-other

I know there's some kind of work around for this.  I had something to do
with a hint.  Even after 3 cups of coffee, I can't remember what it is.

Can anyone help?
Thanks!
Barb

here are the errors:

Shared Pool StatisticsBegin   End
   --  --
 Memory Usage %:   75.99   70.05
% SQL with executions1:   21.95   48.60
  % Memory for SQL w/exec1:   11.28   21.84
   order by time desc, waits desc
   *
ERROR at line 24:
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis




pmon timer  1,184  1,177 355,304   3001
0.2
  -
  order by (e.buffer_gets - nvl(b.buffer_gets,0)) desc, e.hash_value,
st.piece
  *
ERROR at line 41:
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Baker, Barbara
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



===
De informatie verzonden in dit e-mailbericht is vertrouwelijk en is
uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Openbaarmaking,
vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan
derden is, behoudens voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van Ernst 
Young, niet toegestaan. Ernst  Young staat niet in voor de juiste en
volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van een verzonden e-mailbericht, noch
voor tijdige ontvangst daarvan. Ernst  Young kan niet garanderen dat een
verzonden e-mailbericht vrij is van virussen, noch dat e-mailberichten
worden overgebracht zonder inbreuk of tussenkomst van onbevoegde derden.

Indien bovenstaand e-mailbericht niet aan u is gericht, verzoeken wij u
vriendelijk doch dringend het e-mailbericht te retourneren aan de verzender
en het origineel en eventuele kopieën te verwijderen en te vernietigen.

Ernst  Young hanteert bij de uitoefening van haar werkzaamheden algemene
voorwaarden, waarin een beperking van aansprakelijkheid is opgenomen. De
algemene voorwaarden worden u op verzoek

Re: order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-12 Thread Robert Pegram

I downloaded it from metalink a while back.  It was
pretty straight forward to install.  The report name
was something different like statsrep.sql or
statsrep80.sql.  Also, there was a view that had to be
created.  All the information/instructions were in the
tar file that I downloaded.

If you can't find it on metalink, let me know, and I
will round up my old notes and the tar file and send
it to you.

Rob Pegram
Oracle Certified DBA

--- Jack van Zanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi
 
 I have in the past seen a download for a backported
 statspack on I believe
 OTN. This would work on Oracle 8.0.5
 Maybe still there
 
 Jack
 
 
 
 

   Baker, Barbara  
 

   bbaker@denvernewspaper   
 To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
   agency.com   
 cc:   (bcc: Jack van
 Zanen/nlzanen1/External/MEY/NL) 
   
   Sent by:  
 Subject:  order by in subquery workaround   

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 

 
 

 
 

   11-07-2002 19:38  
 

   Please respond to 
 

   ORACLE-L  
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
  Solaris 2.6
  Oracle RDBMS v8.0.5.2.1
 
 List:
 I'm trying to run a retrofit of statspack on an
 8.0.5 database.  (ya, I
 know.  upgrading would actually be easier)
 The statspack stuff came from an 8.1.7 install I
 have on the same box.
 
 The spreport.sql report encounters errors in the
 order by clause.  The
 problem is that you can't do an order by on a
 subquery before version
 8.1.something-or-other
 
 I know there's some kind of work around for this.  I
 had something to do
 with a hint.  Even after 3 cups of coffee, I can't
 remember what it is.
 
 Can anyone help?
 Thanks!
 Barb
 
 here are the errors:
 
 Shared Pool StatisticsBegin   End
--  --
  Memory Usage %:   75.99   70.05
 % SQL with executions1:   21.95   48.60
   % Memory for SQL w/exec1:   11.28   21.84
order by time desc, waits desc
*
 ERROR at line 24:
 ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
 
 
 
 
 pmon timer  1,184  1,177
 355,304   3001
 0.2
  

-
   order by (e.buffer_gets -
 nvl(b.buffer_gets,0)) desc, e.hash_value,
 st.piece
   *
 ERROR at line 41:
 ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
 
 
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
 http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Baker, Barbara
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX:
 (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet
 access / Mailing Lists


 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
 E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
 ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
 from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information
 (like subscribing).
 
 
 

===
 De informatie verzonden in dit e-mailbericht is
 vertrouwelijk en is
 uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde.
 Openbaarmaking,
 vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding en/of verstrekking
 van deze informatie aan
 derden is, behoudens voorafgaande schriftelijke
 toestemming van Ernst 
 Young, niet toegestaan. Ernst  Young staat niet in
 voor de juiste en
 volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van een
 verzonden e-mailbericht, noch
 voor tijdige

RE: order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-12 Thread Baker, Barbara

Rob and Jack:
Found it.  (165420.1)
Thanks for your help.
Barb

 --
 From: Robert Pegram[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:48 AM
 To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject:  Re: order by in subquery workaround
 
 I downloaded it from metalink a while back.  It was
 pretty straight forward to install.  The report name
 was something different like statsrep.sql or
 statsrep80.sql.  Also, there was a view that had to be
 created.  All the information/instructions were in the
 tar file that I downloaded.
 
 If you can't find it on metalink, let me know, and I
 will round up my old notes and the tar file and send
 it to you.
 
 Rob Pegram
 Oracle Certified DBA
 
 --- Jack van Zanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi
  
  I have in the past seen a download for a backported
  statspack on I believe
  OTN. This would work on Oracle 8.0.5
  Maybe still there
  
  Jack
  
  
  
  
 
Baker, Barbara  
  
 
bbaker@denvernewspaper   
  To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
agency.com   
  cc:   (bcc: Jack van
  Zanen/nlzanen1/External/MEY/NL) 

Sent by:  
  Subject:  order by in subquery workaround   
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
11-07-2002 19:38  
  
 
Please respond to 
  
 
ORACLE-L  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
   Solaris 2.6
   Oracle RDBMS v8.0.5.2.1
  
  List:
  I'm trying to run a retrofit of statspack on an
  8.0.5 database.  (ya, I
  know.  upgrading would actually be easier)
  The statspack stuff came from an 8.1.7 install I
  have on the same box.
  
  The spreport.sql report encounters errors in the
  order by clause.  The
  problem is that you can't do an order by on a
  subquery before version
  8.1.something-or-other
  
  I know there's some kind of work around for this.  I
  had something to do
  with a hint.  Even after 3 cups of coffee, I can't
  remember what it is.
  
  Can anyone help?
  Thanks!
  Barb
  
  here are the errors:
  
  Shared Pool StatisticsBegin   End
 --  --
   Memory Usage %:   75.99   70.05
  % SQL with executions1:   21.95   48.60
% Memory for SQL w/exec1:   11.28   21.84
 order by time desc, waits desc
 *
  ERROR at line 24:
  ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
  
  
  
  
  pmon timer  1,184  1,177
  355,304   3001
  0.2
   
 
 -
order by (e.buffer_gets -
  nvl(b.buffer_gets,0)) desc, e.hash_value,
  st.piece
*
  ERROR at line 41:
  ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
  
  
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
  http://www.orafaq.com
  --
  Author: Baker, Barbara
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX:
  (858) 538-5051
  San Diego, California-- Public Internet
  access / Mailing Lists
 
 
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
  E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
  'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
  ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
  from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information
  (like subscribing

Re: order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-12 Thread Babu . Nagarajan


For databases  8i you need to run statsrep80.sql

Babu




Jack van Zanen [EMAIL PROTECTED]@fatcity.com on 07/12/2002 02:53:21 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:



Hi

I have in the past seen a download for a backported statspack on I believe
OTN. This would work on Oracle 8.0.5
Maybe still there

Jack



  Baker, Barbara
  bbaker@denvernewspaperTo:   Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  agency.comcc:   (bcc: Jack
van Zanen/nlzanen1/External/MEY/NL)
  Sent by:   Subject:  order by in
subquery workaround
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  11-07-2002 19:38
  Please respond to
  ORACLE-L





 Solaris 2.6
 Oracle RDBMS v8.0.5.2.1

List:
I'm trying to run a retrofit of statspack on an 8.0.5 database.  (ya, I
know.  upgrading would actually be easier)
The statspack stuff came from an 8.1.7 install I have on the same box.

The spreport.sql report encounters errors in the order by clause.  The
problem is that you can't do an order by on a subquery before version
8.1.something-or-other

I know there's some kind of work around for this.  I had something to do
with a hint.  Even after 3 cups of coffee, I can't remember what it is.

Can anyone help?
Thanks!
Barb

here are the errors:

Shared Pool StatisticsBegin   End
   --  --
 Memory Usage %:   75.99   70.05
% SQL with executions1:   21.95   48.60
  % Memory for SQL w/exec1:   11.28   21.84
   order by time desc, waits desc
   *
ERROR at line 24:
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis




pmon timer  1,184  1,177 355,304   3001
0.2
  -
  order by (e.buffer_gets - nvl(b.buffer_gets,0)) desc, e.hash_value,
st.piece
  *
ERROR at line 41:
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Baker, Barbara
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



===
De informatie verzonden in dit e-mailbericht is vertrouwelijk en is
uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Openbaarmaking,
vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan
derden is, behoudens voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van Ernst 
Young, niet toegestaan. Ernst  Young staat niet in voor de juiste en
volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van een verzonden e-mailbericht, noch
voor tijdige ontvangst daarvan. Ernst  Young kan niet garanderen dat een
verzonden e-mailbericht vrij is van virussen, noch dat e-mailberichten
worden overgebracht zonder inbreuk of tussenkomst van onbevoegde derden.

Indien bovenstaand e-mailbericht niet aan u is gericht, verzoeken wij u
vriendelijk doch dringend het e-mailbericht te retourneren aan de verzender
en het origineel en eventuele kopieën te verwijderen en te vernietigen.

Ernst  Young hanteert bij de uitoefening van haar werkzaamheden algemene
voorwaarden, waarin een beperking van aansprakelijkheid is opgenomen. De
algemene voorwaarden worden u op verzoek kosteloos toegezonden.
=
The information contained in this communication is confidential and is
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. You should not copy, disclose or distribute this communication
without the authority of Ernst  Young. Ernst  Young is neither liable for
the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this
communication nor for any delay in its receipt. Ernst  Young does not
guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor
that the communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference.

If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please return
the communication to the sender and delete and destroy all copies.

In carrying out its engagements, Ernst  Young applies general terms and
conditions, which contain a clause that limits its liability. A copy of
these terms and conditions is available on request free of charge

order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-11 Thread Baker, Barbara

 Solaris 2.6 
 Oracle RDBMS v8.0.5.2.1 
 
List:
I'm trying to run a retrofit of statspack on an 8.0.5 database.  (ya, I
know.  upgrading would actually be easier)
The statspack stuff came from an 8.1.7 install I have on the same box.  

The spreport.sql report encounters errors in the order by clause.  The
problem is that you can't do an order by on a subquery before version
8.1.something-or-other

I know there's some kind of work around for this.  I had something to do
with a hint.  Even after 3 cups of coffee, I can't remember what it is.

Can anyone help?
Thanks!
Barb

here are the errors:

Shared Pool StatisticsBegin   End
   --  --
 Memory Usage %:   75.99   70.05
% SQL with executions1:   21.95   48.60
  % Memory for SQL w/exec1:   11.28   21.84
   order by time desc, waits desc
   *
ERROR at line 24:
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis




pmon timer  1,184  1,177 355,304   3001
0.2
  -
  order by (e.buffer_gets - nvl(b.buffer_gets,0)) desc, e.hash_value,
st.piece
  *
ERROR at line 41:
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Baker, Barbara
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).