AW: Q: How can i turn the automatic reload of the config files off?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 to answer my own question: edit orion/autoupdate.properties removed config works. jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel. +49-163-4803237 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Jan Heise Gesendet: Montag, 1. April 2002 17:42 An: Orion-Interest Betreff: WG: Q: How can i turn the automatic reload of the config files off? - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, i'd like to turn of the automatic reload of the following config files: - - - config/server.xml - - - config/application.xml I'm using orion 1.5.2 under debian-linux and every time i reconfigure/add webapps in one of the above files, orion tries to reconfigure itself, fails and instead goes down. and this in a very nasty way (i have to use kill -9 and be quite fast to find out a proc id of one of the java processes. otherwise the vm eats up all resources on the machine. i used the following vm's: blackdown, ibm and sun 1.3 interestingly, this is not a problem using win2k. orion reconfigures properly. I'd like to turn automatic reconfiguration off so i can edit the config files and afterwards run my own /etc/init.d/orion restart script. tia, jan - - -- Jan Heise / Tel. +49-163-4803237 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPKh/yp/YNqVvLvLkEQIGgwCeOoorJcv0FBj4a7HgAXuAYRgVYE0AoI7h XGKg6G7alvKvCQH5FuXkn2U+ =2nF7 - -END PGP SIGNATURE- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPKrph5/YNqVvLvLkEQKMuACfcauWXWnQ86N7JdsXQi+LaC3//xIAn1Az clegFYJi6YWMmjs57l9rzFRM =0m6u -END PGP SIGNATURE-
WG: Q: How can i turn the automatic reload of the config files off?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, i'd like to turn of the automatic reload of the following config files: - - config/server.xml - - config/application.xml I'm using orion 1.5.2 under debian-linux and every time i reconfigure/add webapps in one of the above files, orion tries to reconfigure itself, fails and instead goes down. and this in a very nasty way (i have to use kill -9 and be quite fast to find out a proc id of one of the java processes. otherwise the vm eats up all resources on the machine. i used the following vm's: blackdown, ibm and sun 1.3 interestingly, this is not a problem using win2k. orion reconfigures properly. I'd like to turn automatic reconfiguration off so i can edit the config files and afterwards run my own /etc/init.d/orion restart script. tia, jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel. +49-163-4803237 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPKh/yp/YNqVvLvLkEQIGgwCeOoorJcv0FBj4a7HgAXuAYRgVYE0AoI7h XGKg6G7alvKvCQH5FuXkn2U+ =2nF7 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
AW: ClassCastException with struts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, this sounds definitely like having some jars in the wrong place. you should check for jars and configs in orion/lib that should not be there but should be local to each webapp. (WEB-INF/lib) the struts jar has to be local to each webapp too. there is no common config area for struts. hth, jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel. +49-163-4803237 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Lucas Persona Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2002 14:41 An: Orion-Interest Betreff: ClassCastException with struts Greetings, I've been trying Orion and I'm having some problems using multiple applications (or copy's from the same application). What I have is one application, used (and modified) by some guys. So, each one has his own web-app and application and a source / library directory. The problem seems to be with struts, that always throws a ClassCastException when the second application trys to run. Without using Struts, everything seems to work fine and each application runs separatly. I think that Struts uses some 'common area configuration' that can only be created and used by one instance of a struts. Does anyone had the same problem or knows something to help on that? Thanks in advance and sorry for my English :) Lucas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPH9Nd5/YNqVvLvLkEQJrEACgrqc+SNyN9+TlkTiOTZbF6FMHdFoAn3mT Sh7hFPe5mL9z6uQOvZuXHfud =2TZa -END PGP SIGNATURE-
AW: Orion+Linux under heavy load
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, they changed a lot of the threading/vm stuff with the release of kernel 2.4. i don't remember exactly the kernel-version for redhat 6.2 but i'm sure it is a 2.2 at maximum. but i would also be interested in a comparision linux - freebsd. jdk 1.3 is now officially supported under freebsd too. someone's got any numbers here? jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel. +49-163-4803237 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von josete Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2002 20:58 An: Orion-Interest Betreff: Re: Orion+Linux under heavy load Wich problem do you say they've fixed? threads under linux? i've done some tests with a redhat 6.2.(sorry i can't remember exactly the kernel version) and jboss, and only at start time it was about three times slower than the same jboss in a windows 2000. If with the new kernel versions it runs more efficiently, it would be great because i'm a linux fan that has been forced to use windows by this problem... XD - - Original Message - From: Jorge Jimenez C [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: Re: Orion+Linux under heavy load Don't worry. That problem is already fixed in the latest linux kernel releases. I don't remember exactly release number but you can easily find it. I've made some tests with JBoss and it runs very well. JJ - Original Message - From: Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:57 AM Subject: Orion+Linux under heavy load When browsing through JBoss's documentation I found this remark: http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/ch11s02.html --snip-- Be aware however that JBoss performance is very dependant on the underlying configuration. For example, informal tests show that on the same PC box, it can run twice as fast under Windows 2000 / Sun JVM than under Linux 2.2 / Sun JVM. Linux users probably already know that linux does not support real threads. Under heavy load, JBoss will for example crash with 200 concurrent users under linux, whereas it can handle 1000 of them on the same box with Windows 2000. Of course, if you use Apache or Jetty in front of JBoss to handle the thread pooling, this will not be a problem. --/snip-- How about Orion, has anyone compared Win2k and Linux regarding speed? The last paragraph is really alarming -- is it really so that Linux is not a wise choice as a production platform? Is this why UNIX is so popular in production environments? Or is JBoss just coded poorly? How many users (sessions) can Orion handle, is there a difference in Win2k / Linux / UNIX performance? Cheers, Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPGO5/p/YNqVvLvLkEQKEygCeLV4BM3MvOU9o+ol5jD+KggTfgpIAnRcz 0Z5oI7RviYShM7VBKZoCeTbM =UlCt -END PGP SIGNATURE-
german umlauts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, i have some weird behaviour, perhaps someone knows the solution: when i'm posting a form with german umlauts to the servlet-engine, the umlauts are lost in the processing, when using the blackdown or sun-jdks under linux. with the ibm jdk, this problem does not occur. (but i have some bugs that prevent me from using the ibm jdk) this error does not occur under win2k. it's definitely connected with the jdk and not with the servlet engine (i tried jboss/tomcat also). do i have to localize the jdk or something like that? jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel: +49-163-4803237 / E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPEQhMJ/YNqVvLvLkEQKzuACgyG62e127lvDA/NFfYZcsYNTI1hIAn0kJ k7yaM++WyM5ezR0ZZxgghG6T =xB5j -END PGP SIGNATURE-
AW: string mappings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, i remember, that i just altered the column from varchar to text after the first deployment. but perhaps there is a better solution. jan - -- Jan Heise / Tel: +49-163-4803237 / E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Morten Wilken Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2002 11:50 An: Orion-Interest Betreff: string mappings hi all, i have a situation where i need to make an entitybean with a subject line and a body text in the class both these are implemented as Strings, but i need to map the subject to a short varchar (ie 50 chars) and the body text to a larger one (but not so large that i need to map it to a blob).. how do i differentiate between the 2 in the db schema? sincerely Morten Wilken -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPDxM0Z/YNqVvLvLkEQIx9gCffhBbxjLFonxcwCMFaWInTtY81lIAoLkZ /AWF3VMJGrxW0cWBrwPHAIgT =uEjj -END PGP SIGNATURE-
AW: Form-based login
hi juha, regarding your last paragraph, i think this is the intention of the servlet-spec - and the only real usage. all other types of login should be done differently but not via j_security_check. jan -- Jan Heise / Tel: +49-163-4803237 / E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Juha Paananen Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2001 15:52 An: Orion-Interest Betreff: Form-based login Hi! In WebLogic 6, the j_security_check recognizes a parameter j_target_url. I don't think this is part of the J2EE spec, but a WebLogic feature instead. Do you know if there's an equivalent to this in Orion? At least, this j_target_url doesn't seem to work. I need this in a website where there is always (at least, when user has not logged in) a small login form visible in the left column, and this form should be submitted to j_security_check and then a specific welcome page should be displayed. If I just post the form to j_security_check, I get an error message in the browser You are not authorized to view this page.. The only way I've managed to make the form-based login to work, is by surfing to some page that has a security-constraint. In this case, Orion takes me to the login form and then to the originally requested page, just as it is supposed to do.. Thanks, Juha
ejbdoclet 1.2 orion 1.5.2
hello orion users, i try to use ejbdoclet 1.2 with orion. i successfully used ejbdoclet for my jboss-projects and i tried to port one of them to orion. two questions arouse: i did not find how i can create the full orion-ejb.xml deployment descriptors and orion did not like my ejbs blblaBean must not be declared abstract. any solutions for this or do i have to write the deployment descriptors by hand? tia, jan -- Jan Heise / Tel: +49-163-4803237 / E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]