Re: [osg-users] [3rdparty] osgCuda: Using CUDA in osg - Problem with Threading

[Mick]

Hi Robert,


Robert Osfield wrote:
 With this in mind - osgCompute?  osgComputation?


well this sounds good. I guess we would prefer osgCompute (it's a bit shorter).
I think we will change the namespaces by the beginning of next week.

Best regards,
Mick

-- 
SVT Group

--
Read this topic online here:
http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=8434#8434





___
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Re: [osg-users] [3rdparty] osgCuda: Using CUDA in osg - Problem with Threading

[Robert Osfield]

Hi Mick,

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Mick mick@googlemail.com wrote:
 Oh, we did not know... We chose the name pipe because the part which
 runs on the GPU based on CUDA, for example, is organized more in a
 pipeline structure than in a graph-structure.

 Right now seems to be a good time to change the name to something else
 since we didn't release it to the public so far.

 What would you prefer? We suggest: osgGPP (general purpose processing)
 It could also be the base for OpenCL. What do you think?

I'm inclined towards being longer more informative in names, so
osgAudio rather than osgAL, osgAnimation rather than osgAnimtk etc.
osgGPP is rather cryptic.  As OpenCL is becoming the standard then
perhaps it's label  of Open Computing Language might be a guide.
With this in mind - osgCompute?  osgComputation?

Thoughts for the community??

 Done - I already posted it to the osg-submissions list.

Thanks will be doing another osg-submissions review right after having
a tea break!

Robert.
___
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org