[osint] Rural Muslims Draw New, Unwanted Attention - more info on al Faqr and Muslims of Americas

[Bruce Tefft]

 

http://www.rickross.com/reference/islamic/islamic48.html


Rural Muslims Draw New, Unwanted Attention New York Times/January 3, 2002 By
Jo Thomas with Ralph Blumenthal Red House, Va. -- To federal prosecutors,
the collection of mobile homes on a field near this tiny southern Virginia
town is a "compound" linked to a violent Muslim sect. To the neighbors, it
is a mysterious place where outsiders do not seem welcome. But to Abdul
Jabbar, 26, a chemist who grew up on the bleak streets of South
Philadelphia, it is a place he can live in peace, pray and teach school. 

In the last seven years, Mr. Jabbar and dozens of other Muslims, most of
them African-Americans, have left poor urban homes to resettle in this
corner of Charlotte County, so rural that it has not a single stoplight in
its 500 square miles. 

Their community is one of a handful of isolated Islamic settlements
established across the country by followers of the Muslims of the Americas,
a group that promotes advanced studies in Islam and encourages its members
to live in small villages, "free from the decadence of a godless society." 

Here they attracted little attention, even in a hamlet where all the other
churches are Christian and all are Baptist. Neighbors said they had
peaceful, if distant, relations with them. 

But after the Sept. 11 attacks, federal officials arrested three Muslims on
gun charges, and prosecutors linked them to an obscure organization they
identified as Al Fuqra, which they say has committed firebombings and
murders in the past two decades. The Red House community, they said, was
part of that organization. 

"We are concerned," said John Brownlee, the United States attorney for the
Western District of Virginia. 

"First of all there is a history of violence," Mr. Brownlee said, referring
to suspicions of Al Fuqra's involvement in a bombing in Portland, Ore., a
killing in Tucson, and the recent shooting of a deputy sheriff in
California. "That history, coupled with an Al Fuqra compound 85 miles from
Roanoke and the arrest of three members on charges of possessing firearms is
cause for concern." 

The Muslims of Red House deny any connection with Al Fuqra. They maintain
that Al Fuqra does not exist, except as a slander by the authorities. They
say they are law-abiding citizens and followers of Sheik Mubarik Ali Shah
Gilani, a cleric in Pakistan who uses the Koran to treat illness and who
founded Muslims of the Americas in 1980. 

The sheik, who over the years has told his followers that "Zionist plotters"
plan to rule the world, also told them to take their children and flee the
nation's cities. 

For the last two decades, they have done just that, creating rural enclaves
across the United States and Canada, including the group's headquarters in
Hancock, N.Y., in the western Catskills. 

Those who came to Red House said they did it to escape crime, not commit it.
"I grew up in South Philadelphia," Mr. Jabbar said. "A friend of mine was
shot four times over a basketball game and died. It could have been me." 

Local law enforcement officials say they have had peaceful relations with
the Muslims, with the only offenses an occasional traffic ticket. 

Yet well before Sept. 11, agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms were investigating in Red House undercover, negotiating to sell
machine guns to several Muslims. The investigation had already led to the
arrest of a man who jumped bail in Colorado after being convicted of
conspiracy to murder. 

After the terror attacks, Mr. Brownlee ended the investigation, saying he
was following the Justice Department's mandate to "prevent first and
prosecute second." 

"We looked at these in the context of other Al Fuqra activities and decided
we wanted them off the street," Mr. Brownlee said. 

Vincente Pierre, 44, identified in court as one of those trying to buy a
machine gun, and his wife, Traci Elaine Upshur, 37, were arrested instead on
charges of conspiring in 1998 and 1999 to buy two semiautomatic pistols for
Mr. Pierre, a felon who is not allowed to own a gun. They were convicted on
Nov. 30. 

Although terrorism was not mentioned at the trial, Thomas P. Gallagher, the
A.T.F. agent in charge of the case, testified at a pretrial hearing that Mr.
Pierre belonged to Al Fuqra, which Mr. Gallagher said was "suspected in at
least 17 bombings and assassinations and 12 murders." Prosecutors say they
do not believe there was a connection to Sept. 11. 

Members of the Muslims of the Americas regard those accusations as the
latest manifestations of a Zionist conspiracy to target Muslims. 

"We are what you see," Suhir A. Ahmad, the national spokeswoman for the
group, said in an interview at the Red House village in December. Dr. Ahmad,
who lives in Northern Virginia, has a Ph.D. in Islamic political science
from Quranic Open University, established by Sheik Gilani in Fresno, Calif. 

Dr. Ahmad has described her doctoral thesis, later published as "Target
Islam," as an exposé of "

[osint] Remember that kid that went to Iraq for "School reasons"??? He's tied to Iran!!!

[Bruce Tefft]

 

 
http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/site/modules/news/article.php?storyid=38
 
*UPDATED 23 January 2006: Read more about Farris HASSAN'S adventure as
reported by   Cinnamon Stillwell on
January 10 and by   Tom Blumer on January
21, 2006. Both write for NewsBusters.org - click on their names to read
their accounts.

18 January 2006: Farris HASSAN, the 16-year-old Pine Crest student from Fort
Lauderdale who left the comforts of his $4 million family home on December
11 for Iraq, claimed that he made the trip to put his lessons of his
"immersion journalism" class into practice, and selected Iraq out of
humanitarian concerns for the Iraqi people. His story quickly caught the
attention of the media, who portrayed this young man as adventurous but
naive, and his worried parents clueless to his intentions until they
received an e-mail from him when he was in Kuwait. Upon his return home, he
would certainly face the consequences from his concerned parents, despite
his ostensibly altruistic intentions.

With all of the reporters covering the story, however, it appears that no
one did any research into the background of the Hassan family, or made any
attempts to verify the young man's story. If they had, they might have been
compelled to ask some very basic - but extremely important questions.


Even the most basic research found that Farris Hassan was NOT enrolled in
any journalism class at Pine Crest, which should automatically cast doubt on
the true nature of his journey. Lourdes Cowgill, president of the Pine Crest
School, said that Hassan was never given an "immersion journalism"
assignment. Also, the school confirmed that the boy's father, Dr. Redha
Hassan not only knew of his son's intended travels, but authorized his
absence, which is inconsistent with his initial public statements.

Further, investigation found a number of other inconsistencies in the public
statements made by Dr. Redha Hassan. Although it was initially reported that
neither parent knew of the young boy's intended travels, it was ultimately
revealed that Dr. Hassan actually assisted his son. He admitted that he
arranged for his son's flight into Baghdad through his political
connections, even though he knew the grave risks to "foreigners" wandering
the streets of Baghdad. [According to a January 2, 2005 CNN news story,
Hassan's father said that he had helped his son get a visa into Iraq from
Beirut. The elder Hassan said he was leaving Iraq himself when the teen
called, unable to get into the country from Kuwait. He told him to go to
Lebanon and said he spoke with him almost daily].

Perhaps most importantly, research and investigation into Dr. Redha Hassan
found that he was arrested by the FBI in 1985 for forging 2000 Iraqi
passports and military I.D. cards and seeking to forge 2,000 more. Dr.
Hassan asked his next-door-neighbor and print store owner Joel Feinstein to
make the passports and IDs. According to Feinstein, Dr. Hassan claimed the
documents were for his family in Iraq. Feinstein reported the request to the
FBI, and became an operational asset for the federal government, leading to
Hassan's arrest. Also arrested were two of Farris's uncles and a
"pro-Khomeini" activist identified as Salah Jawad Shubber. Interestingly,
Dr. Hassan, who also went by the name Redha K. Alsawaf, was also the
President of the now defunct Florida non-profit organization World Orphanage
& Refugee Relief Foundation at the time of his arrest. Authorities dropped
the charges against Hassan, and Shubber ultimately pled guilty to conspiracy
charges.

Farris Hassan's initial stop was Amsterdam, Netherlands, where he claims
that he bought a ticket on KLM Airlines. From Amsterdam, Hassan headed to
Kuwait City, where he alleges that he tried to cross the Kuwait-Iraq border
twice by taxi, but was turned away due to Iraqi elections. At that point, it
appears that Hassan sought assistance from his father, who told Farris to
travel to Beirut and stay with family friends. Obligingly, Farris spent ten
days in Beirut, and while there, met with a media relations officer of the
terrorist group Hezbollah at their Central Press Office. This meeting was
arranged through the assistance of his hosts - the family's friends.

Hezbollah is a Shiite Muslim organization based in Lebanon and tied to Iran.
They have a significant presence in Iraq, and an army that is resolved to
drive the Americans out of Iraq. Given the family history, the
inconsistencies and the public contradictions, could it be that Hassan was
going to Iraq to join Hezbollah to fight against the "American occupation?"
Perhaps those are the questions that need to be asked.


 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post m

[osint] Mohammed cartoons in school books

[Bruce Tefft]

 

Mohammed cartoons in school books


From: Agence France-Presse 

>From correspondents in Copenhagen


February 13, 2006 

 

THE 12 cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed published by a Danish newspaper
which have caused outrage in the Muslim world are to be used as a teaching
aid in schools, an educational publisher said in an interview published
today.

They may also be displayed in a museum. 

"What is happening at the moment has so great a significance that you cannot
brush them under the carpet," Peter Mollerup, head of the academic section
of the Danish publisher Gyldendal, told the newspaper Politiken. 

"It is essential that future generations know about these drawings," he
said. 

He said it was not Gyldendal's intention to provoke Muslims, and the
cartoons would be displayed in the context of a painstaking study of the
whole affair. 

Sofie Lene Back of the Royal Library told Politiken that the caricatures
were essential for history and "it would be bad historical practice to
censure them". 

Ervin Nielse, head of the Mediemuseum (media museum) in Odense in the centre
of the country said he "did not rule out" one day displaying "these drawings
that sparked it all off". 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[osint] al Fuqra -- fingers in every violent pie

[Bruce Tefft]

 
 
 
It certainly looks like these folks, al Fuqra aka Muslims of America(s) have
their fingers in most of the major Islamic-based violent events in the US --
links to providing arms, bombs, you name it.
 
Where is the ongoing focus on these folks? It looks like after 911, the LE
went back to being response oriented in relation to them, as opposed to
being pre-emptive.
 
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/782257/posts?page=15
 
  Free Republic
  Home .
 Browse .
 Search
 News/Activism
  Topics .
 Post Article  
  _  


  Skip
to comments. 


  Al Fuqra: Holy
Warriors of Terrorism
 

Anti-Defamation League (pdf) ^ | 1993



Posted on 11/04/2002 4:16:25 PM PST by
 Sabertooth




Al-Fuqra



Holy Warriors of Terrorism


Introduction 



For over ten years, a secretive Black Muslim sect in the United States and
Canada has sought to carry out a self-declared policy of "jihad," or holy
war, by taking violent action against its perceived enemies, generally other
minorities or other Muslims with whom they disagree. The sect, known as
Al-Fuqra, has been linked by law enforcement officials to terrorist violence
in Colorado, Arizona, Pennsylvania, the Pacific-northwest and Canada. 



Most recently, attention has been focused on the group in connection with a
plot to bomb public sites in New York, including the United Nations, FBI
offices at 26 Federal Plaza, and the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels. One of the
fourteen men facing trial for this alleged conspiracy, which also included
the World Trade Center bombing, is reportedly a member of Al-Fuqra, who is
charged with training gang members and supplying them with weapons and
explosives. 



The bomb plot, described in a federal indictment as a plan "to levy a war of
urban terrorism against the United States," also included the targeting of
Jewish leaders and individuals. 



Threats of terrorist violence by shadowy groups of fanatical religious
extremists pose a serious challenge to public order and safety - as
exemplified by the World Trade Center bombing which killed six people and
injured hundreds more. This report is an effort to meet the need for
increased public awareness about one such group in the hope that exposure
can help prevent further violence of this nature. 



Al-Fuqra 



Al-Fuqra is the name of a violent Muslim extremist sect which has come under
law enforcement scrutiny in the February 1993 bombing of the World Trade
Center in New York. Headed by Sheikh Mubarak Ali Jilani Hashemi (also Hasmi)
in Pakistan, the majority of its members are of African-American descent.
The sect is an offshoot of orthodox African-American Muslims and has no
connection to the Nation of Islam led by Louis Farrakhan. 



The name of the organization is taken from the Arabic term "al- fuqara,"
meaning "the impoverished." The sect was formed in Brooklyn in 1980, after
Sheikh Jilani visited the United States for the first time. During his stay,
Jilani, who is known as a mystic and as a charismatic speaker, acquired
followers by preaching at a local African-American mosque described as what
was then the "most influential black American mosque" in the area. He has
visited the United States several times since then. Adherents of Al- Fuqra
have also been active in Canada. 



Over the past thirteen years, followers of the sect have visited Pakistan to
receive religious indoctrination from Sheikh Jilani. Additionally, Al-Fuqra
members have sent funds to Jilani regularly at his base in Lahore, Pakistan.
Press reports indicate that members of the sect in the United States number
between 1,000 and 3,000. 



The Two Faces of Al-Fuqra 



Members of the Muslim community have described the Al-Fuqra sect as an
organization which espouses the Islamic concept of self-help, undertaking
civic works such as fighting drug dealers, cleaning and patrolling the
streets and apartment project corridors and courtyards. Other adherents of
the group who lived in a remote compound at Trout Creek Pass near Buena
Vista, Colorado described themselves as shepherds fleeing the difficulties
of urban life who owned guns in order to protect themselves from the evils
of society. 



Yet the contents of a Colorado Springs storage locker owned by members of
the sect which was confiscated by police in 1989 revealed a hoard of
explosives, military manuals, bomb-making instructions and detailed plans of
the sect's intended targets. The materiel found at the site included 

[osint] Iran is prepared to retaliate, experts warn

[David Bier]

"Iran is prepared to launch attacks using long-range missiles, secret
commando units, and terrorist allies planted around the globe in
retaliation for any strike on the country's nuclear facilities,
according to new US intelligence assessments and military specialists."

http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2006/02/12/iran_is_prepared_to_retaliate_experts_warn/

Iran is prepared to retaliate, experts warn

By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff  |  February 12, 2006

WASHINGTON -- Iran is prepared to launch attacks using long-range
missiles, secret commando units, and terrorist allies planted around
the globe in retaliation for any strike on the country's nuclear
facilities, according to new US intelligence assessments and military
specialists.

US and Israeli officials have not ruled out military action against
Iran if diplomacy fails to thwart its nuclear ambitions. Among the
options are airstrikes on suspected nuclear installations or covert
action to sabotage the Iranian program.

But military and intelligence analysts warn that Iran -- which a
recent US intelligence report described as ''more confident and
assertive" than it has been since the early days of the 1979 Islamic
revolution -- could unleash reprisals across the region, and perhaps
even inside the United States, if the hard-line regime came under attack.

''When the Americans or Israelis are thinking about [military force],
I hope they will sit down and think about everything the ayatollahs
could do to make our lives miserable and what we will do to discourage
them," said John Pike, director of the think tank GlobalSecurity.org,
referring to Iran's religious leaders.

''There could be a cycle of escalation."

President Bush has said military force should be the last resort in
international efforts to deter Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb. Yet
Bush has stated unequivocally that the United States would not
tolerate an Iranian nuclear arsenal, which the CIA estimates could be
in place in three to 10 years. Iran maintains its nuclear program is
solely aimed at producing electricity, not weapons.

Israel, which Iran's new president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has
threatened to annihilate, asserts that Tehran is much closer to going
nuclear and has been far more direct with its counter-threats.

The Israel Defense Forces, which destroyed Iraq's nuclear reactor in
1981, has said it is perfecting ways to launch a preventative strike
against Iranian nuclear sites, including outfitting its Air Force with
American-made, bunker-busting munitions.

US intelligence officials have said that Iran, which fought a war with
Iraq from 1980-1988 that cost one million lives, still has the most
threatening armed forces in the immediate region. Its combined ground
forces are estimated at about 800,000 personnel. The CIA has concluded
that Iran is steadily enhancing its ability to project its military
power, including by threatening international shipping.

But it is Iran's unconventional weapons and tactics -- rather than its
conventional military -- that would pose the greatest threat,
according to the intelligence officials.

Bush's new intelligence chief, John D. Negroponte, outlining the
conclusions reached by a variety of US spy agencies, warned in his
first overall annual threat assessment this month to Congress that
Iran is capable of sparking a much wider conflict it comes under threat.

A major worry: newly acquired long-range missiles. Obtained with the
assistance of North Korea, the Shahab 3 could strike Israel and
perhaps even hit the periphery of Europe, according to a recent report
by the Pentagon's National Air and Space Intelligence Center.

The missiles could also be tipped with chemical warheads and threaten
US military bases in the region.

Iran is believed to have at least 20 launchers that are frequently
moved around the country to avoid detection.

''Iran has an extensive missile-development program and has received
support from entities in Russia, China, and North Korea," the Pentagon
report said, estimating their range to be at least 800 miles.

New missile designs under development could travel 400 miles farther,
it said, while Iran purchased at least a dozen X-55 cruise missiles
from Ukraine in 2001 that are capable of carrying a nuclear warhead as
far as Italy.

Meanwhile, Iranian agents and members of the Revolutionary Guard
Corps, widely believed to have a large presence in Iraq, could attempt
to foment an uprising by the their fellow Shi'ite majority in Iraq or
join insurgents in directly attacking US troops there, Negroponte warned.

He reported that Tehran has ''constrained" itself in Iraq because it
is generally satisfied with the political trends in favor of the
Shi'ite majority and to avoid giving the United States another excuse
to attack Iran. But that could change if Iran were targeted militarily.

A leading Shi'ite cleric in Iraq, Moqtada al-Sadr, whose militia has
clashed with US troops and rival Shi'ite groups, vowed in a

[osint] First Photo of Bush and Abramoff

[David Bier]

"Abramoff has told friends, "I was standing right next to the window
and after the picture was taken, the President came over and shook
hands with me, and we chatted and joked."
"White House had initially said there was no record of disgraced
lobbyist at 2001 meeting"

Abramoff did lobbying work for CICBush43 when he was the governor of
Texas so it would be surprising if he did not know Abramoff.  A photo
gallery including the subject photo is available at the Time orginal
story URL for those wishing to view the photo.

David Bier

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1158908,00.html

Saturday, Feb. 11, 2006 

First Photo of Bush and Abramoff 

White House had initially said there was no record of disgraced
lobbyist at 2001 meeting

By ADAM ZAGORIN AND MATTHEW COOPER/WASHINGTON

Just how close was the relationship between the White House and
disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff? The Bush Administration again faced
questions about those ties after an e-mail Abramoff sent a journalist
friend surfaced last week in which Abramoff wrote that he had met
President Bush almost a dozen times over the past five years, and even
received an invitation to the President's Crawford, Texas ranch along
with other large political donors. Bush "has one of the best memories
of any politician I have ever met," Abramoff mused in the e-mail last
month, adding that, He "saw me in almost a dozen settings, and joked
with me about a bunch of things, including details of my kids." The
White House, however, has continued to assert that the President had
no recollection of ever meeting Abramoff. When TIME reported in
January that it had viewed unpublished photographs of Abramoff with
Bush, aides responded that the pictures meant nothing since the
President is photographed with thousands of supporters and White House
visitors every year.

Now, finally, the first such photo has come to light. It shows a
bearded Abramoff in the background as Bush greets an Abramoff client,
Raul Garza, who was then the chairman of the Kickapoo Traditional
Tribe of Texas; Bush senior advisor Karl Rove looks on. The photograph
was provided to TIME by Mr. Garza. The meeting took place in the
Eisenhower Executive Office Building adjacent to the White House on
May 9, 2001. Told about the photograph in January, the White House
said it had no record that Abramoff was present at the meeting. Shown
the photograph today, White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said
the White House had still found no record of Abramoff's presence but
confirmed that it is Abramoff in the picture. McClellan told TIME:
"The president has taken countless, tens of thousands of pictures at
home and abroad over the last five years. As we've said previously a
photo like this has no relevance to the Justice Department's
investigation (of Abramoff)."

This meeting, however, was a relatively small gathering attended by
some two dozen people, including Garza and another Indian tribal
leader who was Abramoff's client. At least two tribes, the Coushatta
of Louisiana and the Mississippi Band of Choctaw, contributed $25,000
each to the anti-tax group Americans for Tax Reform, which is headed
by Grover Norquist, a well-known conservative ally of the White House.
Garza, who is also known by his Indian name, Makateonenodua.com,
meaning "black buffalo," is under federal indictment for allegedly
embezzling more than $300,000 from his tribe.

Talking about the photo, Abramoff has told friends, "I was standing
right next to the window and after the picture was taken, the
President came over and shook hands with me, and we chatted and
joked." A photograph of that scene as described by Abramoff was shown
to TIME two weeks ago. Abramoff's lawyers have said that their client
has long had photographs of himself with Bush, but that he has no
intention of releasing any of them. Abramoff would not comment on the
matter.

Benigno Fitial, the governor of the Northern Mariana Islands, told
TIME he attended the 2001 meeting as well. Then an Abramoff client,
the governor recalled asking the President a question about tax policy
as part of a discussion among the small group after Bush had given a
short speech on the subject. Fitial was seeking low-tax and relaxed
labor regulations for the Northern Marianas at the time. Fitial said
he used a photograph of himself with President Bush taken at the
meeting in his campaign for governor.

Fitial recalled that the President was "very gracious" at the session.
"He knew quite a few of the people in the room; I know that because he
called them by their first name. The responses showed that the
President was no stranger to these people, he said. "And the response
was very warm on both sides." 





--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[osint] Revealed: the terror prison US is helping build in Morocco

[David Bier]

"The construction of the new compound, run by the Direction de la
Securité du Territoire (DST), the Moroccan secret police, adds to a
substantial body of evidence that Morocco is one of America's
principal partners in the secret "rendition" programme in which the
CIA flies prisoners to third countries for interrogation."
"A recent inquiry into rendition by the Council of Europe, led by Dick
Marty, the Swiss MP, highlighted a pattern of flights between
Washington, Guantanamo Bay and Rabat's military airport at Sale.
French intelligence and diplomatic sources said the most recent such
flight was in the first week in December, when four suspects were seen
being led blindfolded and handcuffed from a Boeing 737 at Sale and
transferred into a fleet of American vehicles."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2036185,00.html

The Sunday TimesFebruary 12, 2006

Revealed: the terror prison US is helping build in Morocco

Tom Walker Rabat and Sarah Baxter

THE United States is helping Morocco to build a new interrogation and
detention facility for Al-Qaeda suspects near its capital, Rabat,
according to western intelligence sources.

The sources confirmed last week that building was under way at Ain
Aouda, above a wooded gorge south of Rabat's diplomatic district.
Locals said they had often seen American vehicles with diplomatic
plates in the area.

The construction of the new compound, run by the Direction de la
Securité du Territoire (DST), the Moroccan secret police, adds to a
substantial body of evidence that Morocco is one of America's
principal partners in the secret "rendition" programme in which the
CIA flies prisoners to third countries for interrogation.

Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and other groups critical of
the policy have compiled dossiers detailing the detention and apparent
torture of radical Islamists at the DST's current headquarters, at
Temara, near Rabat.

A recent inquiry into rendition by the Council of Europe, led by Dick
Marty, the Swiss MP, highlighted a pattern of flights between
Washington, Guantanamo Bay and Rabat's military airport at Sale.

French intelligence and diplomatic sources said the most recent such
flight was in the first week in December, when four suspects were seen
being led blindfolded and handcuffed from a Boeing 737 at Sale and
transferred into a fleet of American vehicles.

Morocco's membership of a so-called "coalition of the willing" has led
to tension within the kingdom, where Mohammed VI, 42, is trying to
suppress a wave of Islamic fundamentalism, most powerfully expressed
in the Casablanca bombings of May 2003, in which 12 suicide bombers —
all of them Moroccan — killed more than 40 people.

More than 3,000 suspected radical Islamists have been arrested since,
but some of the country's higher-profile Al-Qaeda sympathisers have
been released, including Abdallah Tabarak, a former bodyguard of Osama
Bin Laden.

While much of the media is said to have been infiltrated by the DST, a
few publications that dare to question official policy have accused
the government of allowing Morocco to become "the CIA's dustbin".

Donald Rumsfeld, the American defence secretary — who described
Morocco and Tunisia yesterday as "long-standing friends and
constructive partners" in the fight against terrorism — is due to
visit today. Among the topics expected to be discussed with officials
is the opening of a new FBI office in Morocco.

Last Friday the country witnessed its first protests against the
Danish cartoons of the prophet Muhammad. They were highly organised
and controlled but created a sense of apprehension in the capital
before Rumsfeld's talks.

Morocco has an estimated 30,000 policemen for a population of 30m and
many people seem scared of speaking to strangers. A Sunday Times
reporter was photographed by men with mobile phone cameras at least
three times last week but was never directly challenged.

"It's like a web — they let you spin away and like that they believe
they get more information," said the French intelligence source.

The presence of minders made asking questions around Ain Aouda almost
impossible, but at a restaurant adjoining a newly built mosque nearby,
elderly men supping mint tea while they watched the African Nations
Cup were clearly angry about the project.

"We've seen nothing but Americans for five months," complained one
wizened figure before being told by his friends to be quiet.





--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
Ya

[osint] CIA chief sacked for opposing torture

[David Bier]

"...he opposed detaining Al-Qaeda suspects in secret prisons abroad,
sending them to other countries for interrogation and using forms of
torture such as "water boarding", intelligence sources have claimed."
"Since the appointment of Goss, the CIA has lost almost all its
high-level directors amid considerable turmoil."
"AB "Buzzy" Krongard, a former executive director of the CIA who
resigned shortly after Goss's arrival, said the leaks were unlikely to
stop soon, despite proposals to subject officers to more lie detector
tests."
"History will judge how good an idea it was to destroy the teams and
the programmes that were in place."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2036182,00.html

The Sunday TimesFebruary 12, 2006

CIA chief sacked for opposing torture

Sarah Baxter and Michael Smith, Washington

The CIA's top counter-terrorism official was fired last week because
he opposed detaining Al-Qaeda suspects in secret prisons abroad,
sending them to other countries for interrogation and using forms of
torture such as "water boarding", intelligence sources have claimed.

Robert Grenier, head of the CIA counter-terrorism centre, was relieved
of his post after a year in the job. One intelligence official said he
was "not quite as aggressive as he might have been" in pursuing
Al-Qaeda leaders and networks.

Vincent Cannistraro, a former head of counter-terrorism at the agency,
said: "It is not that Grenier wasn't aggressive enough, it is that he
wasn't `with the programme'. He expressed misgivings about the secret
prisons in Europe and the rendition of terrorists."

Grenier also opposed "excessive" interrogation, such as strapping
suspects to boards and dunking them in water, according to Cannistraro.

Porter Goss, who was appointed head of the CIA in August 2004 with a
mission to "clean house", has been angered by a series of leaks from
CIA insiders, including revelations about "black sites" in Europe
where top Al-Qaeda detainees were said to have been held.

In last Friday's New York Times, Goss wrote that leakers within the
CIA were damaging the agency's ability to fight terrorism and causing
foreign intelligence organisations to lose confidence. "Too many of my
counterparts from other countries have told me, `You Americans can't
keep a secret'."

Goss is believed to have blamed Grenier for allowing leaks to occur on
his watch.

Since the appointment of Goss, the CIA has lost almost all its
high-level directors amid considerable turmoil.

AB "Buzzy" Krongard, a former executive director of the CIA who
resigned shortly after Goss's arrival, said the leaks were unlikely to
stop soon, despite proposals to subject officers to more lie detector
tests.

Krongard said it was up to President George Bush to stop the rot. "The
agency has only one client: the president of the United States," he
said. "The reorganisation is the way this president wanted it. If he
is unwilling to reform it, the agency will go on as it is."

"History will judge how good an idea it was to destroy the teams and
the programmes that were in place."





--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[osint] US prepares military blitz against Iran's nuclear sites

[Michael Kerjman]

US prepares military blitz against Iran's nuclear sites
By Philip Sherwell in Washington
(Filed: 12/02/2006)

Strategists at the Pentagon are drawing up plans for devastating bombing
raids backed by submarine-launched ballistic missile attacks against
Iran's nuclear sites as a "last resort" to block Teheran's efforts to
develop an atomic bomb.

Central Command and Strategic Command planners are identifying targets,
assessing weapon-loads and working on logistics for an operation, the
Sunday Telegraph has learnt.

 [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2006/02/12/wiran12a.jpg] 
Click to enlarge


They are reporting to the office of Donald Rumsfeld, the defence
secretary, as America updates plans for action if the diplomatic
offensive fails to thwart the Islamic republic's nuclear bomb ambitions.
Teheran claims that it is developing only a civilian energy
programme





http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/12/wiran12.\
xml&sSheet=/news/2006/02/12/ixnewstop.html




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[osint] Cartoon brouhaha heats up in D.C., too: "Civilized people do not lose control at such an insult."

[Bruce Tefft]

Muslims?  civilized? Now that is an oxymoron, proved by their own
behavior...from the assault on the US Embassy in 1979 to the "cartoon jihad"
and all of the way back to mohammed's murderous behavior...
 
Bruce
 
 
http://news.bostonherald.com/opinion/view.bg?articleid=125616
 
Cartoon brouhaha heats up in D.C., too
By Boston Herald editorial staff
Sunday, February 12, 2006 

Back to those Danish cartoons of Mohammed and the riots of protest against
Westerners they're supposed to have spawned: We had occasion to note
recently that the "Islamofascist Street is easy pickin's for any autocrat
willing to exploit it." 


Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has been more specific. "I have no
doubt that Iran and Syria have gone out of their way to inflame sentiments
and have used this for their own purposes," she said. "The world ought to
call them on it." 


President Bush backed her up with a comment in the presence of the king
of Jordan: "We reject violence as a way to express discontent with what may
be printed in a free press." 


The State Department already had called the Danish newspaper cartoons
"not acceptable," and the fact that Bush and Rice did not repeat such
criticism drew unfavorable comment in Washington. It shouldn't. There's no
need to put on sackcloth and ashes. That will just encourage the
Islamofascists. 


What was the nature of the offense? Insulting a key figure of someone
else's religion. That's an offense against taste. It's regrettable but not a
hanging matter. Civilized people do not lose control at such an insult. 


The king of Jordan didn't like the president's omission. The king and
other Middle Eastern leaders have been silent for decades about a steady
diet of anti-Semitic cartoons, articles and broadcast programs in the
government-controlled media of the region. 


Fundamentalist Islamic clerics and their new government friends have no
standing to claim injury, especially because, contrary to Islamist claims,
it is not forbidden in Islam to depict the prophet. (One scholar, Amir
Taheri, has listed in The Wall Street Journal eight famous images of
Mohammed by Muslim artists in museums around the world, along with examples
of mockery of religion in the literature of Islam.) 


Syria would like to distract attention with its rent-a-mob strategy from
its complicity in assassinations in Lebanon and its aid to the Iraqi
insurgents. Iran would like to distract attention from its drive to produce
nuclear weapons and its aid to Shiite militias in Iraq. It's good to see the
secretary of state calling spades spades for a change, something her
department can usefully do more of. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[osint] Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy non-muslim countries

[Bruce Tefft]

 


Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries

  Author: Dr. Walid
  Publication: Bharatiya Pragna
  Date: June 2000
  URL: http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news109.htm

This article by Dr.  Walid, a top scholar at the Islamic University, exposes
our so-called secular Indian Muslims.  By the doctrine of Al-Taqiyah,
Muslims dominate crime syndicates, increase population by massive
Bangladeshi infiltration and make temporary alliances with Dalits,
Christians, etc.

In the early years of the Islamic conquest of the Arabian peninsula and in
the Fatah (Arab-Islamic invasion and conquest of the upper Middle East and
the outside world), a Muslim concept was devised to achieve success against
the enemy (non Muslims), Al-Taqiyah.  Al-Taqiyah, from the verb Ittaqu,
means linguistically dodge the threat.  Politically it means simulate
whatever status you need in order to win the war against the enemy ...

According to Al-Taqiyah, Muslims were granted the Shar'iyee right
(legitimacy) to infiltrate the Dar el-Harb (war zone), infiltrate the
enemy's cities and forums and plant the seeds of discord and sedition.
These agents were acting on behalf of the Muslim authority at war, and
therefore were not considered as lying against or denouncing the tenants of
Islam.

They were "legitimate" mujahedeen, whose mission was to undermine the
enemy's resistance and level of mobilization.  One of their major objectives
was to cause a split among the enemy's camp while downplaying the issues
related to Islam ("Oh, I am not religious." "Oh, that is not Islam, you are
mistaken, there is so much misinformation." "Oh, it is in the
interpretation." "Brother, Islam is all about peace and love and music just
like in the 60s.") In many instances, they convinced their targeted
audiences that Jihad is not aimed at them, that indigenous people are not
targeted.  Meanwhile the (allegedly) "un Islamic" Muslims continued their
attacks on the target's property and life (e.g.
Lashkar-e Toyiba, Mujahideen and Osama Bin Laden's declaration of war
against innocent American civilians).

They convinced many Jews that they will be protected from Christians, and
they convinced many Christians that Jews were the mortal enemies, because
they killed Issa (Jesus).  They convinced the Aramaics, Copts, and Hebrews
that the enemy is Greece, and signed peace agreements with the Bysantines
Greeks at the expense of Maronite Aramaics, etc.

They convinced the knitted diversity of India to degrade into civil war by
introduction of a variant Buddhist / mystical Islam (Sufism which is decried
as "deviant Islam" used to ease the transition of new recruits from local
communities) creating divisions (based on Muslim - Non
Muslim) eventually fomenting unrest and chaos in the land to prepare it for
waves of armed Invasion (Mohammad bin Qasim, Mahmud Ghaznavi, etc.).

Even today, India is bitterly divided and getting slowly Islamised as battle
lines form between hordes of overzealous Muslims (armed and trained in
madrasahs) and the more pacifist civilians of urban dwellings.

This Jihadic agency of subversion was one of the most fascinating and
efficient arms of the conquest.  In less than four decades, the Middle East
fell to the Arab-Islamic rule [since Arab society was divided again between
pagan and Muslim resulting in nephews and sons killing their uncles and
fathers in cold blood] followed by North Africa and Central Asia [this was
the era of hordes like tribal conquests where barbaric savages invaded
pacifist civilians in towns of major civilizations; the same scenario
replayed itself against the Arab-Islamic world with the Invasion of the
Mongolian hordes].

Al-Taqiyah was a formidable weapon, used by the first dynasties and
strategists.  Today, scholars may identify it as deception.  But the Jihadic
deception was and still is more powerful than the James Bondian methods of
Western classical intelligence tactics, for the simple reason that it has a
civilizational, global dimension versus the narrow State interest of the
regular Western subversive methods.

Al-Taqiyah is still in use today (and is widely practised and acknowledged
by the Shi'ite sect) but not necessarily State- organized.
Arab-Islamic missionaries are slowly converting the disillusioned criminal
classes of the Western world by feeding them a Western "moderate" version of
Islam (at the same time denouncing the actions of Muslims in the rest of the
world as Un Islamic e.g.  Taliban, GIA & FIA [Armed Islamic Front] of
Algeria, Hamas, Lashkar -e Toyiba, Bin Laden and company, etc.)

It is done to prevent the new converts from seeing the real face of Islam;
at least until their faith or mental conditioning is strong enough to make
them turn against their own country and people.

A good example is the growing influence of Islamists in the Americas.
On the one hand, American embassies, trade facilities, soldiers and
intelligence infrastructures are under at

[osint] What gives with imams in the military?

[Bruce Tefft]

 

What gives with imams in the military?

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_20_55/ai_108892926

 

The Chaplain Problem: What gives with imams in the military? - and others
Kate O'Beirne
Abdurahman Alamoudi presented the first imam in the United States Armed
Forces with the military's newest insignia, a silver crescent moon, at Army
captain Abdul Muhammad's commissioning service in 1993. The American Muslim
Foundation-established by Alamoudi-had created the American Muslim Armed
Forces and Veterans Affairs Council in 1991 to "certify Muslim chaplains
hired by the military," and the Pentagon recently confirmed that until 1998,
he served in a non-salaried position, nominating and screening candidates to
be Muslim chaplains in the Army, Navy, and Air Force.
Alamoudi could afford to donate his services to the military. Long suspected
of having terrorist ties, Alamoudi, a native of Eritrea who became a
naturalized U.S. citizen in 1996, was arrested at Dulles airport on
September 28 and charged with illegally accepting money from Libya-six weeks
after British authorities caught him trying to smuggle $340,000 into Syria.
While Alamoudi was on his most recent travels- using his Yemeni passport-to
Great Britain, Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, and Libya, Captain James "Yousef" Yee,
one of the Muslim chaplains his council recommended to the Army, was
detained on suspicion that he engaged in espionage at Guantanamo Bay.
While the military tracks down terrorists halfway around the world, little
attention has been paid to the suspects in its own ranks who should have
raised red flags. There are twelve Muslim chaplains on active duty,
ministering to about 4,200 Muslims in the armed services. Despite the recent
arrest, the Pentagon defends its hiring practices by officially stating that
it is not conducting any review of its chaplaincy-appointment policy as a
result of Captain Yee's detention. A Pentagon spokesman confirms that there
is a review in progress, undertaken a year ago, designed to assess the
requirements for all 2,800 chaplains-priests, rabbis, etc.-on active duty in
order to "simplify administrative procedures." In the case of Islam, the
Pentagon empowers two institutions to certify chaplains: the Islamic Society
of North America and the council founded by Alamoudi. Both groups receive
funding from Saudi Arabia, and federal officials believe both have terrorist
ties, now apparently confirmed in the case of Alamoudi's outfit.
As chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology,
and Homeland Security, Republican senator Jon Kyl of Arizona has held
hearings on Saudi financing of the efforts of the radical Wahhabi sect to
recruit terrorists in the United States. "It is remarkable that people who
have known connections to terrorism are the only people to approve these
chaplains," he says, calling the Pentagon's review of all its chaplains "the
height of politically correct stupidity." On October 14, he plans to hold
hearings to try to learn what the Pentagon appears uninterested in knowing.
"We need to find out if there are systematic efforts by Wahhabists allied
with al- Qaeda to dominate the cleric-selection process of not only the U.S.
military, but also the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, preaching jihad to
disaffected Americans. [This issue] requires thorough examination."
Captain Yee, who has not been charged, was allegedly found with a laptop
containing diagrams of the facilities at the detention base, along with
lists of prisoners' names and the names of CIA, FBI, and military personnel
conducting interrogations. Yee is a 1990 West Point graduate who rejoined
the Army as a chaplain after converting to Islam and spending four years
studying in Syria. In addition to Captain Yee, two others who were assisting
with the interrogation of 660 enemy detainees at Guantanamo Bay have been
arrested.
One is Senior Airman Ahmad I. al-Halabi, a native of Syria who came to the
U.S. as a teenager and served as a translator at Guantanamo Bay for nine
months; he has been charged with espionage for attempting to pass military
secrets to Syria. The information he is alleged to have attempted to share
includes flight information on military personnel, as well as the names and
cellblock numbers of prisoners and operations orders for their transfer.
Al-Halabi was reportedly under investigation by the Air Force Office of
Special Investigations while a supply clerk in California, before being
assigned to Guantanamo.
For the third arrest, the Customs Service gets the credit. Ahmed Fathy
Mehalba, a civilian under contract as an Arabic translator at Guantanamo,
was free of any suspicion when he was routinely searched at Logan airport
after arriving on a flight from Cairo late last month. He was arrested when
officials found a compact disc containing classified documents about the
detention camp in his bags. Mehalba joined the Army in 2000 but washed out
of a training course for military interrogators. While h

[osint] Australia:Most pupils see Muslims as terrorists

[Bruce Tefft]

Most pupils must be smarter than their teachers and parents.
 
Bruce
 



 

Most pupils see Muslims as terrorists


By Chee Chee Leung
February 6, 2006
The AGE

MOST Victorian schoolchildren view Muslims as terrorists, and two out of
five students agree that "Muslims are unclean".

Just over 50 per cent believe "Muslims behave strangely", and 45 per cent
say Australians do not have "positive feelings about Muslims".

These are some of the preliminary findings from a statewide survey of
student attitudes towards the Muslim community.

The research - conducted in the second half of last year - is based on
responses from 551 year 10 and 11 students across public and private
schools.

Almost half said they had learned "a little" about Muslims and Islam at
school, but more than a third said they had learned nothing on these
subjects. When asked if schools should teach more about Muslims, 29 per cent
said no and 34 per cent said they did not care.

Researcher Abe Ata, of the Australian Catholic University, said the findings
showed a need for educators to develop new ways of promoting
multiculturalism among children.

"There are very strong signals that there is a chasm between mainstream
students and Muslim students," said Dr Ata, a senior fellow at the
university's Institute for the Advancement of Research.

"Educationalists and policymakers in education should take proactive steps :
to help create more racial harmony in the classroom and outside it."

In the survey's other findings:

62 per cent agreed Christians were smart, while 36 per cent agreed Muslims
were smart.

38 per cent agreed or strongly agreed Muslims were the most negatively
stereotyped of all minorities, including Aborigines.

34 per cent agreed most Australians were racist, while 46 per cent
disagreed.

Islamic Council of Victoria board member Waleed Aly said the results were
troubling.

"What it demonstrates is that Muslims are being viewed in a way that is
really subhuman," he said. "The only way you can combat this kind of
prejudice is on a personal level : it's much harder to hate people when you
actually know someone in that social group."

The chairman of the Ethnic Communities Council of Victoria, Phong Nguyen,
described the findings as "a wake-up call".

"We cannot assume that our children who grow up in a multicultural setting
will automatically be accepting of each other," he said.

"Adults need to do things to make sure that our impressionable young
children have a growing, mature understanding of the world and other
people."

Mr Nguyen said learning about other faiths and cultures was just as
important to a child's education as studying subjects like maths or physics.

The State Government's draft education laws explicitly permit teaching
comparative religion in public schools and enshrine "openness and
tolerance".

According to the Australian Education Union, some Victorian schools discuss
issues involving Muslims in the curriculum, but others may be hesitant to do
so.

"Sometimes schools do shy away from such controversial issues because of the
sensitivities," Victorian president Mary Bluett said. "There's always the
thought that you might fall foul of politicians or parents."

But Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals president Andrew
Blair said schools had a social responsibility to discuss these sensitive
issues with students. "Just because it's tough, you shouldn't turn your back
on it," he said.

Mr Blair also said the task of helping young people learn about other
cultures lay not only with schools but also with parents and families.

"If this is accurate, it's an indictment of what's actually taking place in
schools, but also probably an indictment of conversations within families in
Victoria," he said.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must o

[osint] Islamic prayers could be illegal under new laws

[Bruce Tefft]

Good move!
 
Bruce
 



 

Islamic prayers could be illegal under new laws


By Barney Zwartz
February 6, 2006

The AGE

 

STANDARD Islamic prayers in mosques may be illegal under new anti-terror
laws, international law specialist Ben Saul told a conference in Melbourne.

Dr Saul said yesterday it could be against the law to pray in Australian
mosques for victory for the mujahideen in Iraq.

The conference also discussed the legality of showing training videos
recruiting Muslims to fight in Chechnya.

The sedition laws applied only where Australia was at war with a country or
group - so training videos for al-Qaeda, the Taliban or Iraq would be
illegal. But if the Australian Government had proscribed some Chechen
organisations, recruiting for them would be illegal.

Dr Saul, of the University of NSW, said the new sedition law criminalised
some things said in a religious context, such as the standard prayer "may
God grant victory to the mujahideen in Iraq".

"The legislation is very ambiguous. You don't necessarily have to encourage
someone to fight Australian troops - even contributing blankets to
mujahideen could be criminal."

Dr Saul told The Age the anti-terrorism laws were an excessive and
unjustified over-reaction to the threat Australia faced, and some provisions
breached human rights under international law.

"The risk to the US and UK is undoubtedly far greater than the risk to
Australia, but we've adopted far more invasive orders. And unlike those
countries, we don't have the protection of a bill of rights," he said.
People could be subjected to house detention for the 10 years the
legislation lasts without ever being charged.

"If one person in a mosque says something outrageous in support of
terrorism, these laws allow the government to close down the entire mosque -
an extremely disproportionate reaction which collectively punishes every
worshipper," Dr Saul said.

He said there was confusion and uncertainty among Muslims about the new
laws. Muslim leaders did not know what they could say until they saw how the
laws were used.

Precise information about the terrorist threat to Australia had not been
made public, so justification for the laws was hard to judge, Dr Saul said.

"Australians are deprived of information and asked to trust political
judgements when we know they have been manipulated in the past," he said.

About 70 Muslim leaders and others attended the Darebin conference, which
was funded by the Federal Government's Living in Harmony program.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[osint] Women activists intimidated by clerics

[Bruce Tefft]

 

Women activists intimidated by clerics
Syria, Politics, 2/9/2006 

ArabicNews.com

United Press International reported that Syrian women seeking to improve the
rights of women faced intimidation from Muslim religious clerics, after
these women tried to distribute a questionnaire survey into views about laws
considered unfair to women.

United Press International reported on activist woman saying "'The head of
our group, Nada al-Ali, was even threatened with death which forced us to
stop the questionnaire,' she added. 'She said the questionnaires sought the
opinion of both males and females on several issues regarding women, notably
a law that gives right to the man to divorce his wife without her knowledge
or approval, women's right for financial compensation after divorce based on
what the couple earned during the time of their marriage, her right to
divorce her husband without his prior approval and the unfair clause in the
civic status laws that grants the man the right to take a second wife
without informing his first spouse. The questionnaire also included queries
about equality between men and women in inheritance, honor crimes in which
only men go unpunished and the right of Syrian women married to foreigners
to grant their children Syrian citizenship.'"

The United Press International report said "Syria's Grand Mufti Sheikh Ahmed
Hassoun, the country's highest religious authority, showed moderation in his
response, saying he received the women's rights activists and answered their
questionnaire in writing. 'Some clerics did not understand or grasp such
matters and considered them as violations (of the religious laws). So they
were suspicious,' Hassoun told United Press International. 'I wish those
clerics did not take such a stance and engaged in dialogue with the
activists instead, because Islam stands by women and gave them distinctive
rights, but these rights need to be reformulated,' Hassoun said."

United Press International reported that "School teacher and women's rights
activist Riad Salem stresses that her licensed group, the Association of
Social and Civilian Initiative, 'is seeking to eliminate injustices against
women which are away from the spirit of Islam, justice or human rights.'..
'For instance, because of a law that bars women from getting married without
a male custodian, a 60-year-old woman had to entrust that mission to her
18-year-old son to be able to marry for a second time.'"

United Press International reported that Rania Tlass, president of the
National Association for Promoting Women's Role, said "our aim is to develop
and support the role of women in the economy and boost their intellectual
abilities in order to pave the way for their contribution in decision-making
on an equal footing with men." ... She said Law 548 on honor crimes is
unfair to women because it gives men the right to kill female relatives if
they suspect them of adultery, while women have no right to object or do the
same. Our Association is demanding that criminal law be applied in such
cases away from emotions and blind anger," Tlass told UPI. She cited a study
into the manipulation of Law 548 by a female lawyer, which found a number of
cases where the law was used for personal gain, including one case where a
brother killed his sister under the pretext of saving the family honor when
he really sought her part of their inheritance."

United Press International reported "All the women who were imprisoned for
belonging to the Communist Action Party and the Muslim Brotherhood
Organization in the mid 1980s have been released. But they were subjected to
physical torture with the same harshness inflicted on male political
prisoners," activist Anwar Bunni told UPI. A female rights activist who
requested anonymity said "women were deeply harmed in prisons, but they
cannot disclose these facts due to the sensitive situation of women in this
country. They were obliged to keep silent."

United Press International reported "'She said she was personally targeted
and intimidated at all levels, including smearing her reputation in order to
destroy her career and social status. She said she was subject to close
surveillance and 'my privacy was violated in a terrifying way but I could do
nothing about it due to the emergency law in force in Syria which gives
security agencies great powers and prerogatives.' The emergency law has been
applied since 1963 in view of the persisting state of war with Israel.
Syrian President Bashar Assad said recently that the law might be canceled
and a new law for political parties enacted."

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. T

[osint] Muslim terrorists present in the US

[Bruce Tefft]

 
 

Excerpt from article below:

 

Prosecuting agencies have indicated that the amount had been laundered
through Professional Security International (PSI), a JF security firm, and
Muslims of the Americas. A portion of the funds was tracked through PSI to
JF couriers who traveled to Pakistan. The PSI reportedly enabled JF cadres
to obtain federal licenses to buy weapons. The Fuqra is also suspected of
having two more security firms located in New York. 

 

http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/pakistan/terroristoutfits/jamaat-ul-
fuqra.htm

Jamaat ul-Fuqra
 Formation
Jamaat ul-Fuqra (JF) or "community of the impoverished", a terrorist outfit
operating in Pakistan and North America, was formed by a Pakistani cleric,
Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani, in New York in 1980, on his first visit to the
US. Mubarak Gilani's intention in forming the outfit was to 'purify' Islam
through violence.

 

Ideology, Leadership and Structure
The JF, in its early phase, sought to counter what is perceived as excessive
Western influence on Islam. It also concluded that violence was a
significant aspect in its quest to purify Islam. In its ideological
moorings, the Fuqra regards as enemies of Islam all those who do not follow
the tenets of Islam as laid out in the Koran, including those Muslims who
they consider as heretics as well as non-Muslims. One of Gilani's works
published by the Quranic Open University in the US and seized in a
1991-investigation instructed his cadres that their foremost duty was to
wage Jehad against the 'oppressors of Muslims'. Members of the group are
described as Islamist extremists with much hatred toward their 'enemies'.

 

The JF is loosely structured with certain elements working openly through
social service organisations to recruit members, raise money, organise
activities and carry out propaganda. Individuals selected to live on JF
premises agree to abide by the law and discipline of the Jamaat ul-Fuqra.
Investigations by the Colorado Attorney General's Office in the 1980s
indicated that the JF was composed of approximately 30 different 'Jamaats'
or communities, more or less mobile in nature. Most of these 'Jamaats' are
reportedly existent even today along with what investigators discerned to be
several covert paramilitary training compounds, one of which had been
located in a mountainous area near Buena Vista, Colorado prior to the
Colorado prosecutions in the mid-1990s. 

 

Within 10 years of its formation, Fuqra's communes in the US attracted many
Muslim converts-including some of those recruited in prisons. The JF is said
to comprise of some 1,000 to 3,000 members in the US. Secrecy is the
hallmark of the outfit and cadres are reportedly well versed in the use of
aliases. The Fuqra's structure is well concealed behind front outfits and
consists of a network of safe houses and cells. Furthermore, the JF founder
as well as cadres consistently maintain that it does not exist. JF members
occasionally travel abroad for 'paramilitary and survivalist training' under
Gilani's supervision.

 

Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani, who also calls himself the sixth Sultan Ul Faqr,
is the chief of JF. 

Jamaat ul-Fuqra is headquartered in Hancock, New York. 

 

Areas of Activity and Influence
Although Gilani, the reclusive chief of Fuqra resides in Lahore, Pakistan,
most JF cells are located in North America. Fuqra members have purchased
isolated rural properties in North America to live as a community, practice
their faith, and insulate themselves from Western culture. The group has set
up and funded rural communes that the US authorities allege are linked to
murder, bombings and other felonies throughout the US and Canada. Currently,
there are half a dozen Fuqra residential compounds in rural hamlets across
the US sheltering hundreds of cadres, some of who have reportedly trained in
the use of weapons and explosives in Pakistan. 

 

Muslims of the Americas, a tax-exempt group established in the US in 1980 by
Gilani, operates communes of primarily black, American-born Muslims in many
states  in the US, including in Binghamton in New York, Badger in
California, York in South California and Red House in Virginia. JF is
reportedly linked through court documents to the Muslims of Americas. There
is also a road in the name of Sheikh Gilani in the vicinity of Virginia. The
cult houses between 100 and 200 people, many of them women and children in
about 20 huge trailers. There is also a Virginia newspaper, the Islamic
Post, founded by Sheikh Gilani.

 

Linkages and Incidents


Jamaat al-Fuqra, also described as a cult, is currently the focus of a probe
by US authorities for charges ranging from links with terrorist groups to
laundering money into Pakistan.

In the 1980s, they carried out various terrorist acts, including numerous
fire-bombings across the United States. JF's early targets in North America
were ethnic Indians and targets linked to various Indian sects. In July
1983, Stephen Paul Paster, a front rank

[osint] Putin's Gamble With Hamas

[Bruce Tefft]

Troublemaking Soviets...never change.
 
Bruce
 
 
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2006/02/13/003.html
 
  

Monday, February 13, 2006. Page 1. 

   Print   |
  Close  
Text size: Aa   Aa
  Aa


Putin's Gamble With Hamas

By Oksana Yablokova   
Staff Writer 

By inviting Hamas leaders for talks, President Vladimir Putin is taking a
risky diplomatic gamble that could significantly boost Russia's global
influence but has already opened the door to accusations of double standards
on terrorism -- accusations that the Kremlin itself has repeatedly directed
at Western countries. 

Hamas leaders confirmed this weekend that they would travel to Moscow in the
second half of February and said that they did not expect conditions for the
talks, despite U.S. pressure for Russia to urge Hamas to renounce violence
and recognize Israeli statehood.

Putin announced the invitation to Hamas -- which has carried out nearly 60
suicide bombings in Israel since 2000 -- during a visit to Spain on
Thursday. The invitation, which follows Hamas' victory in Palestinian
elections on Jan. 25, won support from France on Friday but has enraged
Israel, which fears Russia is lending legitimacy to a group that the United
States and Europe consider a terrorist organization.

"[Putin], I believe, would feel very bad if Israel were to invite the
Chechen terror organizations into Israel and give them legitimacy," Israeli
Education Minister Meir Sheetrit said Friday on Israel Radio.

Israeli television broadcast images Friday night of Hamas posters praising
Chechen rebels, The Associated Press reported. The posters showed images of
Hamas leaders and Chechen rebel warlord Shamil Basayev, who has claimed
responsibility for Russia's most horrific terrorist attacks, including
numerous suicide bombings and the 2004 Beslan school hostage-taking that
left 331 people dead, most of them children. It was unclear when the
televised pictures had been taken.

Putin has refused to negotiate with Chechen rebels, whom he has branded
terrorists. He and other senior Russian officials have criticized the United
States and European countries for refusing to extradite rebels, accusing
them of applying double standards in the global struggle against terrorism.

The Russian Foreign Ministry defended Putin's initiative, saying a dialogue
with Hamas must be started right away to get the peace process back on track
in the Middle East. It said Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov had discussed the
issue with Russia's partners in the so-called Quartet of Middle East peace
negotiators -- the United States, the European Union and the United Nations.

Defense Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov also defended the
plan, saying the West would eventually have to accept the necessity of
talks. "Hamas is in power, this is a fact, and secondly, it came to power as
a result of free democratic elections," Ivanov told reporters at a
NATO-Russia meeting in Italy on Friday.

Moscow has not recognized Hamas as a terrorist organization -- a fact that
Putin stressed during his recent annual news conference in the Kremlin.

Israeli interim Prime Minister Ehud Olmert took a softer line than many of
his colleagues Sunday. "I think the Russian position is mistaken, as I have
stated. But from what they said to us during the weekend, they will demand
Hamas recognize Israel and give up terror," he told a weekly Cabinet
meeting, Reuters reported.

If Russia can find some way out of the international impasse over a Hamas
government, its role as an international player promises to be greatly
enhanced. Putin has been seeking to boost Russia's profile while it holds
the presidency of the Group of Eight leading industrial nations this year.
Putin raised the Hamas talks during a meeting of G8 finance ministers in
Moscow over the weekend.

Putin did the right thing by extending the invitation to Hamas, but he has
taken a serious risk, said Alexei Malashenko, a political analyst with the
Carnegie Moscow Center. "Everything depends on Hamas now," Malashenko said.
"While their leaders are negotiating in Moscow, some of their militants
might be preparing and carrying out a terrorist attack against Israel, and
Putin would have to face the tough question from the West and Israel of who
are you receiving and negotiating with in the Kremlin?"

Russia's envoy to the Middle East, Alexander Kalugin, said Sunday that
Moscow would try to persuade Hamas leaders to abandon their hard-line stance
and embrace peace efforts. He met on Sunday with Palestinian President
Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah.

Should Russia's diplomatic efforts fail, its prestige will suffer a stinging
blow, Malashenko said. He added that Russia should have consulted with
Israel and the other members of the Quartet before announcing the Hamas
talks.

Putin appears to be counting on Hamas to adopt a more moderate stance after
its election win, said Mikhail Roshchin, chief researcher of Islamic studies
at the Insti

[osint] A troubling Western attitude: Paternalism toward Muslims

[Bruce Tefft]

Paternalism is natural, towards the weak, helpless, sick, mentally deranged,
etc.
 
Bruce
 
 
 
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/editorial/13848995.htm
 
  
Posted on Sun, Feb. 12, 2006

    



A troubling Western attitude: Paternalism toward Muslims





The Danish cartoon incident flitted from tragedy to farce last week, when
the editor of an Iranian newspaper solicited cartoons about Jews and the
Holocaust. As a retort to the Danes, this was a bit of a non sequitur. As if
to clarify matters, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei of Iran explained that the entire
affair was a "conspiracy by Zionists who were angry because of the victory
of Hamas." Never mind that the cartoons first appeared in September and that
Hamas won its glorious democratic victory last month. You know how it is
with those people. When you control the banks and Hollywood, you can do
anything.

Such was the state of affairs that it was no surprise when it turned out
that one of the offending cartoons circulated by Danish imams turned out to
be not a caricature of the prophet Muhammad as a pig-man, but a doctored
photo of a contestant at the 2005 French Pig-Squealing Championships. You
can't make this stuff up.

But as we move beyond parody, there's something distinctly unfunny about the
whole business: The West's continued paternalism toward Muslims.

It is worth recounting some of the indiscriminate violence exhibited by
Muslims: In Syria, mobs set fire to the Danish and Norwegian Embassies. In
Gaza City, mobs threw stones at a European Commission building and trashed a
German cultural center. Not satisfied with this, Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar
lamented that "we should have killed all those who offend the prophet, and
instead here we are, protesting peacefully." In Turkey, a Catholic priest
was murdered by a youth shouting "Allahu Akhbar!" Prime Minister Tayyip
Erdogan casually linked the crime to the Danish cartoons. In Afghanistan, a
mob armed with guns and grenades opened fire on a NATO compound. In
Pakistan, the Jamaat-e-Islami party offered a bounty on the offending
cartoonists. And in Århus, Denmark, a Muslim cleric said that Fleming Rose,
the cultural editor at the Danish paper where the whole scene began, should
remember "what happened" to Theo van Gogh. "What happened," of course, was
that van Gogh was shot eight times before having his throat slit with a
butcher's knife. A letter explaining that this was retribution for van Gogh
having offended Islam was pinned to his chest with a knife.

The response of many Western officials to these spasms of violence and
intimidation has been curious. The Vatican blamed the newspapers for
printing the cartoons in the first place, calling it an act of "unacceptable
provocation." A court in South Africa forbade its country's newspapers from
running the cartoons. The British secretary of state for foreign and
commonwealth affairs, Jack Straw, called it "wrong" for European papers to
publish them.

American officials agreed. James P. Cain, U.S. ambassador to Denmark,
likened the printing of the cartoons to terrorism and asked that Muslims not
hold all Westerners accountable for the actions of a few: "That would be
like the U.S.A. blaming all Muslims for the terror attack on Sept. 11," he
said. Kurtis Cooper, a U.S. State Department spokesman, said that printing
the cartoons was "unacceptable."

The message Western governments are sending is unmistakable: Publishing the
cartoons was irresponsible because Muslims cannot be expected to behave in a
civilized manner. Since the cartoon incident first erupted, the Bush
administration has changed its tone. But it is deeply worrying nonetheless
that the administration's first reaction was to make excuses for Muslim
violence.

We've seen this paternalism before in American policy. Recall the period in
May 2004, when President Bush rushed around the Arab media apologizing for
Abu Ghraib - not just to Iraqis, who were the actual victims of Abu Ghraib,
but also to the entire Muslim diaspora.

"People who have been seeing those pictures," the President told Jordan's
King Abdullah II, "didn't understand the true nature and heart of America."

It was assumed that when Westerners saw pictures of the murdered Theo van
Gogh - or, for that matter, Daniel Pearl or Nicholas Berg, or pictures of
the Twin Towers - they would not impute such evil to all Muslims. When
Muslims see Abu Ghraib, however, American policymakers assumed them
incapable of making similar distinctions.

Is American paternalism toward the Middle East warranted? Assume it isn't.
Assume that Arab Muslims are capable of making the sort of minimal moral
distinctions that we expect of non-Muslims. Doesn't the soft bigotry of our
low expectations undermine precisely those Muslims we should be supporting?
The Muslim Council of Britain condemned the violence, as did Afghanistan's
Ulama Council. So did

[osint] How to End the War on Terror in One Simple Step

[Bruce Tefft]

 
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:16:33 -0800 (PST), Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  By Scott Kauzlarich
  Professor of Social Science at Ellsworth College in Iowa Falls, IA.
   
  Why are we spending billions to fight the War on Terror? Why are we
gambling our economy and civil liberties when a simple, cheap, and effective
solution is right under our nose? In one fell swoop, we can end the War on
Terror; it requires only one small act.
   
  The United States must convert to Islam.
   
  That's it--just pass a law declaring Islam the official religion of
America. A few kneels to the east, a televised pilgrimage or two, and that's
that. The whole messy thing is over. No more crashing planes, no more
plastic-wrapped houses, no more anxiety.
   
  Although this move is both brilliant and easy, it will be met, initially,
with a small amount of controversy. The really good ideas always are. To
help those who will carry the solution forth, I've outlined how to deal with
the three big questions that will inevitably come up...
   
  http://www.nothingfornobody.com/how_to_end_the_war_on_terror_in.htm

How to End the War on Terror in One Simple Step

By Scott Kauzlarich

Professor of Social Science at Ellsworth College in Iowa Falls, IA.

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Why are we spending billions to fight the War on Terror? Why are we gambling
our economy and civil liberties when a simple, cheap, and effective solution
is right under our nose? In one fell swoop, we can end the War on Terror; it
requires only one small act.

The United States must convert to Islam.

That's it--just pass a law declaring Islam the official religion of America.
A few kneels to the east, a televised pilgrimage or two, and that's that.
The whole messy thing is over. No more crashing planes, no more
plastic-wrapped houses, no more anxiety.

Although this move is both brilliant and easy, it will be met, initially,
with a small amount of controversy. The really good ideas always are. To
help those who will carry the solution forth, I've outlined how to deal with
the three big questions that will inevitably come up.

 

What About Christianity?

 

Christians will resist the conversion to Islam at first and they will be the
toughest crowd to convince as a whole. But given the government's perfect
track-record of turning everything it touches into crap, it won't take long
before Christian leaders see the obvious benefits of making Islam our
official religion. In no time, Islam will be mortally wounded and Pat
Robertson will be singing our praises.

Returning Christianity to a minority status is probably the best thing that
could happen to the religion right now. It might be the one thing that truly
saves it--imagine Bible-beaters getting the kind of protected status and
privileges that other groups get.

Instead of swimming upstream against "separation of church and state"
Christians can utilize the methods of other suppressed sects. In the name of
diversity, Nativity scenes and the Ten Commandments will make a comeback;
Christianity might even get that rebel "cool" it lost 2,000 years ago. With
a national conversion to Islam, the Christian Right stands a fighting chance
of beating back the rising tide of secular humanism it fears so much.

 

Is Converting to Islam Legal?

 

Some people will worry about the U.S. Constitution; they'll say we can't
convert the country to Islam without a Constitutional amendment. To this I
say: "What in Allah are you talking about?" The document has been contorted
and abused for the better part of a century. Why stop now?

The idea that we must respect the Constitution is a sentimental position
that no longer has any relevance to the real world--most Americans have
given up the quaint notion that the Constitution must be followed closely.
In fact, if you want to get technical about it, almost everything the
Federal Government does is prohibited by the Constitution. What is one more
thing going to hurt?

In truth, we can't really damage the Constitution any more than it already
is. As far as I can tell the document is a dead letter--little more than a
scrap of paper cherished by almost no one. If eliminating the enumerated
powers doctrine and the Tenth Amendment didn't cause alarm, surely a little
thing like the establishment clause won't be missed.

 

Will Muslim Terrorists Believe Us?

 

What if terrorists like Osama bin Laden don't take our conversion seriously?
Well, so what? It's not a matter of convincing bin Laden; it's a matter of
convincing his supporters. Osama won't get behind the wheel of a truck bomb,
so if he thinks our conversion is a trick, who cares? When the Great Satan
becomes the Great Islam, bin Laden's pool of fanatics will dry up and blow
away. Our conversion to Islam will land a crushing blow to al Qaeda--one can
hardly strike a blow for jihad by blowing up stuff in a Muslim country.

This isn't to say that terrorists like bin Laden won't still be around. But
now their fire will be directed somew

[osint] Toon-deaf Europe is taking the wrong stand

[Bruce Tefft]

 

"The issue is not "freedom of speech" or "the responsibilities of the press"
or "sensitivity to certain cultures." The issue, as it has been in all these
loony tune controversies going back to the Salman Rushdie fatwa, is the
point at which a free society musters the will to stand up to thugs. British
Muslims march through the streets waving placards reading "BEHEAD THE
ENEMIES OF ISLAM." If they mean that, bring it on. 
As my columnar confrere John O'Sullivan argued, *we might as well fight in
the first ditch as the last."**
*


http://www.suntimes.com/output/steyn/cst-edt-steyn12.html


Toon-deaf Europe is taking the wrong stand

/February 12, 2006/

*BY MARK STEYN SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST *

>From Europe's biggest-selling newspaper, the Sun: ''Furious Muslims have
blasted adult shop [i.e., sex shop] Ann Summers for selling a blowup male
doll called Mustafa Shag."

Not literally "blasted" in the Danish Embassy sense, or at least not yet.
Quite how Britain's Muslim Association found out about Mustafa Shag in order
to be offended by him is not clear. It may be that there was some confusion:
given that "blowup males" are one of Islam's leading exports, perhaps some
believers went along expecting to find Ahmed and Walid modeling the new line
of Semtex belts. Instead, they were confronted by just another filthy
infidel sex gag. The Muslim Association's complaint, needless to say, is
that the sex toy "insults the Prophet Muhammad -- who also has the title
al-Mustapha.''

In a world in which Danish cartoons insult the prophet and Disney Piglet
mugs insult the prophet and Burger King chocolate ice-cream swirl designs
insult the prophet, maybe it would just be easier to make a list of things
that don't insult him. Nonetheless, the Muslim Association wrote to the Ann
Summers sex-shop chain, "We are asking you to have our Most Revered
Prophet's name 'Mustafa' and the afflicted word 'shag' 
removed."

If I were a Muslim, I'd be "hurt" and "humiliated" that the revered
prophet's name is given not to latex blowup males but to so many real blowup
males: The leader of the 9/11 plotters? Mohammed Atta. The British Muslim
who self-detonated in a Tel Aviv bar? Asif Mohammed Hanif. The gunman who
shot up the El Al counter at LAX? Heshamed Mohamed Hedayet. The former U.S.
Army sergeant who masterminded the slaughter at the embassy bombings in
Kenya and Tanzania? Ali Mohamed. The murderer of Dutch filmmaker Theo van
Gogh? Mohammed Bouyeri. The notorious Sydney gang rapist? Mohammed Skaf. The
Washington sniper? John Allen Muhammed. 
If I were a Muslim, I would be deeply offended that the prophet's name is
the preferred appellation of so many killers and suicide bombers on every
corner of the earth.

But apparently that's not as big a deal as Mustafa Shag. When Samuel
Huntington formulated his famous "clash of civilizations" thesis, I'm sure
he hoped it would play out as something nobler than shaggers vs. 
nutters. But in a sense that's the core British value these days. If it's
inherent in Muslim culture to take umbrage at everything, it's inherent in
English culture to turn everything into a lame sex gag. The "Mustafa"
template is one of the most revered in the English music-hall
tradition: "I've been reading the latest scholarly monograph -- 'Sexual
Practices of the Middle East by Mustapha Camel.'" If they wanted to appease
the surging Muslim demographic, the British could conceivably withdraw from
Iraq and Afghanistan but it's hard to imagine they could withdraw from
vulgar sex jokes and still be recognizably British. They are, in the Muslim
Association's choice of words, "afflicted" with shag fever.

In theory, this should have been the perfect moment for Albert Brooks to
release his new film ''Looking for Comedy in the Muslim World.'' 
Instead, life is effortlessly outpacing art. Brooks had an excellent premise
and, somewhere between studio equivocation and his sense of
self-preservation, it all got watered down, beginning with the decision to
focus the plot on a trip to India. Which is a, er, mostly Hindu country. But
the Arab world refused to let Brooks film there, and, even if they had, he'd
have been lucky to get out alive. Needless to say, the movie doesn't mention
that. So a film whose title flaunts a bold disdain for political correctness
is, in the end, merely another concession to it.

You can't blame Brooks, not in a world of surreal headlines like "Cartoon
Death Toll Up to Nine" (the Sunday Times of Australia). Instead of ''Looking
for Comedy in the Muslim World,'' the Muslim world's come looking for comedy
in the West and doesn't like what it's found. If memory serves, it was NBC
who back in the '70s used to have every sitcom joke about homosexuality
vetted by a gay dentist in New Jersey. Apprised of this at a conference on
censorship, the producer of "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" remarked, "You mean
there really is a tooth fairy?" Alas, the Islamist Advisory Commission on
Quran-Compatible Humor will be made of st

[osint] Amir Taheri on Iran: The second clock is ticking.

[Bruce Tefft]

 
http://www.americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=4435

Amir Taheri on Iran: The second clock is ticking.

Amir Taheri just wrote a column in Asharq Al Awrsat pointing out that Iran's
rush to nukes will be shaped by its domestic politics - specifically, an
ongoing battle between the most dangerous faction led by Ahmadinejad, and a
more risk-averse group of Mullahs, including former President Rafsanjani.
April is the critical month. That is when a new Supreme Guide, with supreme
power over the President, may be elected by the Mullahs' "Assembly of
Experts."  If the fanatics gains control over the top job, there will be
nothing to stop them from controlling Iran and its bombs.

Taheri also confirms that Ahmadinejad truly has an Apocalyptic vision about
the return of the Mahdi, the Hidden Imam  of the Shia sect. Ahmadinejad
"puts the Mahdi ahead of all prophets and claims that he has " a private
personal channel" to the "Hidden Imam.""

Another important point is that Ahmadinejad's ideological guide, Ayatollah
Yazdi, utterly rejects the usual warrant for double-talk:

"He is totally against both taqiyah (obfuscation) and kitman (dissimulation)
which have been perfected into veritable arts by the mullahs over the
centuries. Thus he often says aloud what most mullahs think in silence."

In sum:

1. Ahmadinejad has repeatedly said that he wants Israel wiped off the map.

2. For twenty years, Iran has been moving toward nuclear weapons and
long-range missiles. They are now near the point of no return, where they
can no longer be halted without a massive military attack.

3. Ahmadinejad, according to multiple sources, is a fanatic who wants to
bring about an Islamic Apocalypse, a total world war that would bring back
the messiah of Shia Islam.

4. Ahmadinejad rejects the policy of lying followed by previous Mullahs, so
that we should take him at his word.

5. On the other side, Israel is said to have some 200 nuclear weapons,
including a second-strike capacity, able to destroy Tehran if Jerusalem or
Tel Aviv are hit by surprise.

6. France, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and others within the 2,000 km range
of Iranian missiles cannot possibly believe that a massive nuclear exchange
next door will leave them untouched.

It follows that all powers-- European and Islamic-- in and near the region
must want Iran's radicals out, and nuclear development brought to a halt. It
was France that secretly gave Israel the plans for Saddam's nuclear reactor
in 1981, making it possible for the Israeli Air Force to destroy it in a
single bombing raid. The French built the reactor, took Hussein's money, and
then ensured that it was blown up.

If the past is prologue, it would seem that Russia, France, and even the
Arab countries will secretly cooperate with a US-Israeli effort to destroy
Tehran's nuclear capacity, simply to ensure their own survival. If that does
not happen, we will be back to the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, or much
worse.





--
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[osint] Muslims and the imperceptibility of the West

[Bruce Tefft]

 

http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/MohammadAsghar60212.htm

Muslims and the imperceptibility of the West 

---

By Mohammad Asghar
2006/02/12   

SOME political cartoons published by a Danish newspaper are behind the
Muslims' rage, which they have been displaying for some days by resorting to
all kinds of violence in the part of the world they call their own. They
have attacked foreign embassies; they have burned the national flags of even
those nations, which have nothing to do with the publication of the
cartoons. Their agitation is also responsible for the death of some people.


Muslims' violent reaction against the cartoons has generated huge debate
among those people whose voice and discourses demand our attention. Some of
the renowned debaters believe that the publication of the cartoons was not
appropriate because, they maintain, Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, was not
a political figure. They also tell us that, since depiction of his features
in any form or shape is offensive to the Muslims, all the non-Muslims of the
world should respect their religious sensitivity by being sensitive to the
Muslims' Islamic beliefs.   

In my judgment, most of the non-Muslim debaters are wrong. All of them, who
hold the above views, are misinformed. They are not aware of the True
Islamic History, nor are they aware of the Islamic agendas that drive each
Muslim's life on earth.   

Apart from being a religious dictator, Muhammad was also a brute and
ruthless political leader. While forcing Islam on the Pagans, Jews and
Christians of the Arabian Peninsula, he also established the first Islamic
State, with its capital in Medina. It was this action of his that had led
his successors to establish the Islamic Empire over one-third of our earth,
and to rule over it for over 1,100 years.   

Since Muhammad was both a religious as well as a political dictator,
non-Muslims have every right to publish, and see his cartoons in their
newspapers. Any action taken by the Muslims to prevent them from expressing
themselves and their views tantamount to interfering in their internal
affairs as well as to denying them the right of _expression their political
systems have granted them through their constitutions.   

No self-respecting and freedom-loving people should cave in to the Muslims'
demands, no matter how violently they want to impose them on others. They
should stand up, and face the madness of the Muslims, with all available
means at their disposal. Failure to do so would eventually prove disastrous
for the West.   

One day, it would find itself in the same position in which, the Philippines
finds itself today. Embolden by its soft attitude towards its fast growing
Muslim population, it is now fighting for its own existence. Had the
authorities in the Philippines adopted a hard posture towards the Muslims
before they could become a threat for its existence, it would have saved
itself all the trouble, and the bloodbath, it is now struggling to prevent
in the wake of a war of secession they have been fighting on its soil.   

The Quran tells the Muslims that the earth and all that that it contains
belong to Allah (3:109). It also tells them that the only Religion that is
acceptable to Him is Islam, which He made perfect (cf. 5:3), while Muhammad
was still alive.   

As the followers of the perfect religion of Allah, Muslims are His
Representatives on earth. This position of theirs makes them the owner of
the whole earth as well as of everything that it contains.

According to the above doctrine of Islam, non-Muslims are the illegal
occupiers of the lands they are now living on. Since their religions are not
acceptable to Allah, all of them must either be evicted from their homes, or
be killed for refusing to submit themselves to Islam.   

Most Muslims' mind is heavily influenced by the above doctrine of their
religion. It makes them dream for the day when they would become the owner
of the entire earth by evicting or killing its non-Muslim inhabitants. They
have been working secretly on their mission for a long time, but the
publication of the cartoons by the Danish Newspaper has exposed their
secret. It has also enabled the whole world to know how infuriated Muslims
can become, if one dares to publish some cartoons of their Prophet.  

By their violent actions, Muslims are telling all the non-Muslims of the
world that they cannot express their views even in their own backyard, as it
hurts or is likely to hurt their religious sentiments. They are also telling
them that they would be beheaded, if they dared to offend them by doing
anything that is prohibited in their religion.   

Instead of realizing the grave threat that the Muslims pose to the
non-Muslim world, many Christian debaters and commentators have chosen to
take their side by claiming that since Muslims do not insult the revered
personalities of other religions, non-Muslims should reciprocate their
so-called noble gesture by not insulti