Of course it is...both the blind sheik Abdel Rahman (bin Laden's mentor) and
Abdul Azzam his erstwhile partner,were Muslim Brotherhood members, as well
as Hassan Turabi who brought together bin Laden, Mugniyah, the Iranians,
Egyptian Islamic Jihad, and other members of al-Qaeda in Khartoum in 1995.

Bruce



French Commentary: Muslim Brotherhood Plays Key Role in International
Terrorism Paris Le Figaro (Internet Version-WWW) in French 29 Jul 05

[Commentary by Radio France Internationale editorialist Richard Labeviere: 
"Muslim Brotherhood Behind Al-Qa'ida"]

   The Al-Qa'ida bubble has deflated considerably since the Madrid attacks
(11 March 2004.)  The first explosions in London (7 July 2005) dealt it a
decisive blow.  Last, those in Sharm Al-Shaykh (23 July 2005) have refocused

the inquiries pursued during the past several decades into the historical
background of contemporary jihadism, namely, the Muslim Brotherhood.

   Rather than attributing this series of attacks, which do not represent an

operational continuum, to some hypothetical "European pillar" of Al-Qa'ida,
or to an "Iraqi pillar" that is no more relevant, investigators have been
concentrating for several years, but particularly since Madrid, on the
international structure, or the international apparatus, of this Egyptian
brotherhood, which emerged in the late 1920s.  Developed on the basis of
organizations representing the peasantry of Upper Egypt, this movement,
based on a strict interpretation of the founding texts of Sunni Islam, was
also much influenced by the corporatist ideology that was also behind
Mussolini's Fascism.  It is partly for this reason that the brotherhood
initially organized on the basis of the sectors of economic activity in the
hands of a small bourgeoisie opposed to the "free officers" that overthrew
King Faruq, including Jamal Abd-al Nasir, who was to become the embodiment
of a secular and keenly Marxist-type Arab nationalism.

   This historical background, encouraged and financed from the outset by
Saudi Arabia's King Faysal would by the end of the 1970s produce more
radical groups of students advocating recourse to armed struggle --Jemah
Islamiyah and the Jihad, authors of President Anwar al-Sadat's assassination

6 October 1981.  Apart from the death sentencing issued to five leading
activists in 1982, the approximately 200 other Muslim brothers indicted --
who constantly proclaimed their Islamist convictions throughout the trial --

were eventually released without further process.  Following this amnesty,
as hasty as it was uncontrolled, most of these activists left Egypt for
Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Horn of
Africa, the Africa of the Sahel, and the Maghreb.  It was this dispersal of
the veteran jihadists that lay behind the formation of Bin Ladin's nebula
until the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1989, and the lasting
establishment of jihadist hotbeds in Central Asia, Southeast Asia, Africa,
and Europe.

   Apart from the historical background of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood
and its reconfiguration, and apart from the Saudi financial epicenter,
investigators now favor a third lead in Pakistan, along three axes -- the
cross-border tribal areas of Afghanistan; the Kashmiri focus of conflict
with India; and last, the port metropolis of Karachi, uncontrolled and
uncontrollable, harboring some 250 madrasas (Koranic schools) daily teaching

religious hatred to "students" aged 4-70.

   Following the bombardments in Kosovo and Serbia, following all the
interventions decided on by the UN Security Council, following the
US-British "coalition" in spite of the United Nations, how is it possible to

justify the marginalization of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the
innumerable civilian victims of the second Iraq war?  The jihad factories
find their symbolic legitimization in the imbalance, or iniquity, of the
political and diplomatic handling of numerous international crises, among
which the Israeli-Palestinian confrontation is in the forefront.  Since 1948

this conflict has generated over 400 UN Security Council, General Assembly,
and Human Rights Commission resolutions, without any of these texts being
implemented in the very least.  The second Iraqi war and the lasting
establishment in the country of Western troops, including 140,000 US
soldiers, as well as increasing numbers of military bases throughout the
region, as far as Central Asia, constitute the second symbolic reference
point for the new jihadists.  Last, the Chechen conflict completes this
triptych, the foundation of the civilizational split and the pretext for all

kinds of crusades.  From this viewpoint, these aspects of the Muslim
Brotherhood's ideology present disturbing analogies with the deadly
projections of the US neoconservatives.

   Without ever setting themselves within the historical perspective of
national and post-colonial crises, the Muslim Brotherhood's preachers active

in Europe exploit them as they please, in order to pursue the erection of a
wall of incomprehension between immigrant Muslim communities and the rest of

the populations, described as a jumble of hostile infidels working to
annihilate the faithful.  So it is hardly surprising to see these same
preachers now flocking to London, demanding that their fellows in religion
abide by the laws of their host countries, while continuing privately to
issue orders for them not to integrate, as so many roads to salvation.

   Far from representing the majority of the Muslim communities, the
brotherhood still functions in a sectarian fashion, whereby knowledge is
mixed inextricably with a power to influence and do damage.  Its community
objectives are reminiscent of the great waves of sorcery and possession,
such as that which invaded Europe at the end of the 16th and beginning of
the 17th centuries.  And antiterrorist investigators now would do well to
examine Michel de Certeau's "The Possession at Loudun," deciphering the
arguments according to which sectarianism, on the way to becoming a social
movement, reveals the symptoms of a society worried about its own
foundations and goals.  "Linked to a moment," Michel de Certeau concludes,
"that is, to the transition from religious criteria to political criteria
(...), the possession at Loudun thus also connects (...) to the question
that arises with the emergence, different from the devilry of the past but
just as worrying, of the new social expressions of the other."

   Now that the Al-Qa'ida smokescreen is starting to fade, can we perhaps at

last start thinking about and responding to the ideological and practical
strategies of the Muslim Brotherhood? 

 





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h6bu6jb/M=362329.6886306.7839369.3040540/D=groups/S=1705323667:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1122992287/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992
">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to