http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11770842
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11770842>
17           November 2010 Last updated at 16:51 GMT
New study delves inside a suicide         bomber's mind
By Dave Lee         BBC Science Unit

Researchers         say this study

gives clues         to how suicide attacks could be averted at the last
minute

Suicide bombings         have become the         defining act of
political violence of our time.

>From Afghanistan         to Madrid, London         to Sri Lanka,        
they are an all pervasive presence in our political landscape        
and a crucial         tactic employed in modern day terrorism.

As the inquest into the 7/7 London         bombings tries to piece
together the         events of that day, little research has ever been
done on the         minds of suicide         bombers themselves.

Trying to discover exactly why a         suicide bomber would        
kill themselves to further an apparent cause is, for obvious        
reasons, an         impossible task.

But one study from Tel Aviv University
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546550903409312>  has endeavoured to find
out if         suicide bombers shared any noticeable         personality
traits or characteristics - by interviewing and         analysing
would-be         suicide bombers.

These were men who had attempted         to carry out a         suicide
attack but had failed for a variety of reasons,         including
technical         defects (the bomb did not go off) or capture (either
on the way         to the target         or earlier).

Some of our suicide         bombers actually got to their         target
and pressed the switch"

They discovered a pattern of being         unable to handle        
stressful situations, an inability to see the bigger picture and        
a tendency to         be intimidated by people in positions of
authority.

Meanwhile, the organisers -         responsible for commanding        
and co-ordinating suicide bombings - had bigger egos, were        
better equipped         mentally to handle stress and, for the most
part, were unwilling         to consider a         suicide attack
themselves.

Intimate access

Retired professor and         world-renowned terrorism expert        
Ariel Merari had access to 15 would-be suicide bombers being        
held in jail for attempted         attacks relating to the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Five of the group were sent by         Hamas, five by the        
Palestinian Islamic Jihad and five from Fatah's al-Aqsa Martyrs        
Brigades.

In addition to this, Professor         Merari and his team        
interviewed the organisers of suicide attacks - all from the        
same groups.

Alongside the organisers and         failed bombers were a        
control group - 12 men who had been tried and jailed for various        
political         violence activities from stone-throwing to armed
assaults.

The first challenge for Professor         Merari's team was in        
convincing subjects to speak. The prisoners insisted on getting        
the backing of         higher-ranking members of their organisation.

"I told them why we wanted to         carry out this         project,
this study," explained Professor Merari on Radio 4's All in the Mind
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00vy0g0> .

"There was real lively discussion.         In the end         they
agreed to participate and that was indeed the key to         achieving
the consent         of the other organisers."

In recent         years, global suicide attacks have increased. Between
1981 and         2000, 17         countries had been the victim of
suicide attacks, compared to 32         between         2001-2008.

Suicide attacks are often tied to         a perception of        
religious fanaticism from the perpetrator.

However, this latest research         suggests religious        
significance ranked lower than other factors when the prisoners        
made their         decision to carry out a suicide attack.

"Almost all of them were         religious, but the         suicide guys
were not more religious than the control group         members.

"The depth or intensity of         religious belief was         not
something which distinguished them from other non-suicide        
terrorists."

'Afraid'

Instead, Professor Merari found         that "national        
humiliation" ranked higher as a reason for an attack.

"This was by far the clearest,         strongest         motivation they
expressed.

"It is not a matter of personal         suffering; they         tried to
avenge their communities suffering. They mentioned         events that
they         saw on television, not events that happened to them
personally."

The men interviewed as part of the         organisers group        
were, on average, older, better educated, and, perhaps        
predictably, unlikely to         put themselves forward for suicide
attacks.

"Nine of 14 admitted that they         would not be         willing to
carry out suicide attacks themselves - because they         were        
afraid," said Professor Merari.

"They did not use the term         'afraid', but they use         terms
such as 'not everybody can carry out an act such as this',         'it
takes a special         person' etcetera.

"The remaining five said 'In         principle I would be        
willing to carry it out, but my role as a commander was more        
important and         therefore I did not do it'. They were frank, I
guess, in giving         this         straightforward answer."

The study also noted that the         organisers' portrayal of        
suicide bombers as being "highly determined youngsters" was        
misguided.

"The suicide [bombers] themselves         gave a very         different
picture. Sixty-six per cent of them admitted that they         were
afraid,         they hesitated, and when we looked at larger number of
suicide         cases we found         that 36% of 61 cases of suicide
bombers the candidates just         dropped out."

'Close as possible'

Prof Merari acknowledges that         because his subjects all        
"failed" their mission, the study can not given an exact        
representation of a suicide bomber.

However, his team believes that         their findings are as        
"close as possible".

"Some of our suicide bombers         actually got to         their
target and pressed the switch - just that the bomb they         were
carrying         failed to explode because of mechanical failure.


All in the Mind
    * Exploring            the limits and potential of the human mind
    * It is           broadcast on Tuesday at 2100GMT           and
repeated on Wednesday at 1630GMT

    * Listen again to All in the Mind
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qxx9>
    * Download           as a podcast
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/medmatters>

"Psychologically,         these are         suicide bombers for all
effects and purposes."

His findings conclude that         measures can be taken to        
prevent attacks based on the common personality traits.

"One of the conclusions of this         study was that         any
impediment on the way to the target increases the chance         that
the suicide         bomber would change his mind. This is because those
who hesitate         need some sort         of excuse.

"They have to have some sort of         excuse to keep         their
self-respect.

"Any kind of impediment,         statistically, would         increase
the chance that the would-be suicide bomber changes his         mind on
the         way to the target."


  <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11770842>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to