http://www.securityinfowatch.com/online/Detection-Systems/Experts--Planes-Vu
lnerable-to-Bombs-Built-on-Board/8942SIW481
 
August 10th, 2006 10:10 AM EDT



Experts: Planes Vulnerable to Bombs Built on Board




Liquids, gels and aerosols are now banned on U.S. flights
AP Photo/Kevin Wolf
Liquids and gels are now banned from U.S. flights for fear that they may
hide the materials for engineering explosives. 


By SHAWN POGATCHNIK
Associated Press Writer
The next terrorist attacks on civilian aircraft could be carried out by
passengers who hide their bomb ingredients in innocent-looking containers
for talcum powder, baby formula or medicine bottles and assemble their
weapon behind a locked restroom door, security experts warn.
The announcement Thursday of a foiled terror plot aiming to blow up flights
from London to the United States using explosives hidden in hand luggage
pointed to a potential new chapter in the battle against airline terrorism:
a world of hours-long security checks, visual inspections of prescription
drugs, and bans on bringing liquids or laptops on board.
Several bomb-disposal experts and troubleshooters for airline security
interviewed by The Associated Press said mobile phones, computers, wrist
watches or anything else with a battery should be prohibited from flights.
Perhaps most chillingly, they warn that security staff at airports are not
looking for the right things anymore - and the change in tactics required is
likely to overwhelm current security standards.
"That theater we see, of people taking off shoes, is not going to stop a
suicide bomber. The terrorists have already sniffed out the weak spots and
are adopting new tactics," said Irish security analyst Tom Clonan, who noted
that security measures usually adapt to the last attack, not the next
threat.
He said that a terrorist group will almost certainly try to blow up a plane
with a bomb assembled on board unless security measures improved
fundamentally.
Anti-terrorist authorities in Britain and the United States declined to
describe the bomb design used by terrorists in the foiled plot - whether
they were primarily liquid or, more likely, contained liquids in a more
complex ingredient list.
Whatever the case, experts predicted passengers may soon have to change
their travel habits radically.
"Every businessman needs to have his laptop on a long-haul flight, and now
you won't be able to. Even a battery-operated watch would provide enough
power for a detonator. All you need is one shock," said Alan Hatcher,
managing director of the International School for Security and Explosives
Education in Salisbury, England.
Airlines have toyed with the idea of banning innocuous personal-care items
from carry-on luggage following previous security scares, only to have the
focus switch elsewhere because of the mammoth difficulty of enforcing
tougher rules. Thursday's announcement dramatically raises the likelihood
that security will come first no matter what the logistical hurdles.
The technology for the kind of liquid or crystallized explosives possibly
involved in the thwarted terror plot is not new.
The threat first appeared in January 1995 in the Philippines, when police
stumbled upon a suspected al-Qaida plot to target U.S.-bound, long-haul
planes with bombs based on nitroglycerine carried on board in containers for
contact-lens solution.
At that time, aviation authorities announced plans to ban aerosols, bottled
gels and containers of liquids holding more than 30 milliliters on U.S.
airliners departing Manila, an idea never properly enforced.
Even then, baby formula was excluded from the limits - even though, in its
powdered form, it could provide a good vehicle for masking crystallized
explosives.
A decade later in Belfast, Northern Ireland, an Algerian man was convicted
of possessing 25 computer disk drives detailing how to bring down an
aircraft using, among other things, crystallized explosives hidden in a
container of talcum powder.
During that trial an FBI explosives expert, Donald Sachtleben, testified he
had built and successfully detonated three bombs based on the instructions
found in the Algerian's home.
Despite this decade-old knowledge, security officials in Dublin and across
Europe still permit passengers to carry on a wide range of receptacles
without any visual inspection.
And the increasing probability that terrorists will try to strike with
explosive components hidden in hand-luggage has been accompanied by a trend
among discount airlines to encourage passengers to bring more carry-on
baggage. In recent months Europe's market-leading airline, Irish budget
carrier Ryanair, has imposed a mandatory charge on all check-in luggage; an
Irish competitor, Aer Lingus, has announced plans to follow suit.
"I'm really surprised the Irish aviation authority hasn't stepped in to
moderate this rush to hand luggage by airlines," said aviation expert Gerry
Byrne. "All our airport security has been geared towards baggage going into
the hold. ... It will overwhelm security if the emphasis is suddenly
switched to hand baggage."
A British security expert, Steve Park, said the likely scenario would
involve a two- or three-member terror team boarding the same flight, each
carrying a different part of the bomb to be made. "They could combine
resources on the plane. That would be perfectly possible on a busy flight,"
he said.
Critical to conventional bombs is a power source to trigger a detonator.
Clonan said cell phones could provide an ideal power-timer unit for a bomb.
"In midflight you could go into the toilet, attach the mobile phone to the
explosives and, as the plane makes a final approach over a densely populated
urban area, you detonate it," he said. To puncture an aircraft's fuselage
would require an explosive charge "half the size of a cigarette packet," he
said.
Hatcher said "liquid bombs" were not the most likely explosive. He said it
was far more likely that a terrorist cell would try to smuggle on board
explosives in crystalline or powder form and to combine it with an
acid-based compound.
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff warned Thursday of precisely
that threat: "benign" materials smuggled on board and mixed to create bomb.
He said authorities were analyzing to see how to protect against such a
threat.
Hatcher said terrorists might also construct an on-board incendiary bomb
based on paraffin or petrol, which if ignited in the mid-Atlantic could
destroy an aircraft before it could land.
None of these items, he noted, could be detected by a typical US$5 million
(euro4 million) X-ray. Hands-on inspection was the only way to tell if a
dark-plastic medicine vial really contains what it says on the label.
"You'll have to carry your prescription and prove to security that the
medicine really is what it is. But for 20 million people a year going
through Heathrow? How do you do that?" Hatcher said, foreseeing a future
airport arrivals hall with five-hour security checks.
And that scenario, he said, points to a future likely target for terrorists
- detonating bombs in an airport terminal, not on a plane.
"You can carry a bag into the center of an airport with thousands of people
around you before you are ever screened. That, too, must change," he said.
Related Stories
 
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to